Search

From a game of darts to neurorehabilitation, the ability to explore and fine tune our movements is critical for success. Past work has shown that exploratory motor behaviour in response to reinforcement (reward) feedback is closely linked with the basal ganglia, while movement corrections in response to error feedback is commonly attributed to the cerebellum. While our past work has shown these processes are dissociable during adaptation, it is unknown how they uniquely impact exploratory behaviour. Moreover, converging neuroanatomical evidence shows direct and indirect connections between the basal ganglia and cerebellum, suggesting that there is an interaction between reinforcement-based and error-based neural processes. Here we examine the unique roles and interaction between reinforcement-based and error-based processes on sensorimotor exploration in a neurotypical population. We also recruited individuals with Parkinson's disease to gain mechanistic insight into the role of the basal ganglia and associated reinforcement pathways in sensorimotor exploration. Across three reaching experiments, participants were given either reinforcement feedback, error feedback, or simultaneously both reinforcement & error feedback during a sensorimotor task that encouraged exploration. Our reaching results, a re-analysis of a previous gait experiment, and our model suggests that in isolation, reinforcement-based and error-based processes respectively boost and suppress exploration. When acting in concert, we found that reinforcement-based and error-based processes interact by mutually opposing one another. Finally, we found that those with Parkinson's disease had decreased exploration when receiving reinforcement feedback, supporting the notion that compromised reinforcement-based processes reduces the ability to explore new motor actions. Understanding the unique and interacting roles of reinforcement-based and error-based processes may help to inform neurorehabilitation paradigms where it is important to discover new and successful motor actions. Author summary: Reinforcement-based and error-based processes play a pivotal role in regulating our movements. Converging neuroanatomical evidence show interconnected reinforcement-based and error-based neural circuits. Yet is unclear how reinforcement-based and error-based processes interact to influence sensorimotor behavior. In our past work we showed that reinforcement-based and error-based processes are dissociable. Building on this work, here we show that these process can also interact to influence trial-by-trial sensorimotor behaviour. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

J. A. S. Kelso and J. J. Jeka (1992) demonstrated that symmetry is a useful conceptual tool to distinguish the coordination between components with similar versus different anatomical properties. The present experiments studied human arm-leg patterns to test whether their coordinative asymmetry was changed by manipulating the inertial properties of a single limb. The results showed that (a) consistent with model predictions, adding weight to the arm or the leg minimized or enhanced coordinative asymmetry, respectively and (b) the response to a perturbation slowed as movement frequency increased but in a fashion that reflected the underlying coordinative asymmetry. The observed coordinative effects suggest the influence of neural phase relationships and emphasize that symmetry plays an important role in understanding coordination in systems in which control cannot be traced unequivocally to a single end-effector or a neurophysiological substrate.