9 results on '"Jarvers, Jan-Sven Gilbert"'
Search Results
2. Empfehlungen zur Diagnostik und Therapie oberer Halswirbelsäulenverletzungen: Axisringfrakturen
- Author
-
Scholz, Matti, Schleicher, Philipp, Kandziora, Frank, Badke, Andreas, Dreimann, Marc, Gebhard, Harry, Gercek, Erol, Gonschorek, Oliver, Hartensuer, René, Jarvers, Jan-Sven Gilbert, et al, Kobbe, Philipp, Osterhoff, Georg, University of Zurich, and Scholz, Matti
- Subjects
10021 Department of Trauma Surgery ,2732 Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,610 Medicine & health ,Surgery ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,2746 Surgery - Published
- 2018
3. Halo Fixator and Halo Traction – Value for the Treatment of Spinal Disorders in Childhood
- Author
-
Heyde, Christoph Eckhard, additional, Krause, Matthias, additional, Jarvers, Jan-Sven Gilbert, additional, Spiegl, Ulrich Josef Albert, additional, Völker, Anna, additional, Glasmacher, Stefan, additional, Josten, Christoph, additional, and von der Höh, Nicolas H., additional
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Recommendations for the Diagnostic Testing and Therapy of Atlas Fractures
- Author
-
Schleicher, Philipp, additional, Scholz, Matti, additional, Kandziora, Frank, additional, Badke, Andreas, additional, Dreimann, Marc, additional, Gebhard, Harry W., additional, Gercek, Erol, additional, Gonschorek, Oliver, additional, Hartensuer, René, additional, Jarvers, Jan-Sven Gilbert, additional, Katscher, Sebastian, additional, Kobbe, Philipp, additional, Koepp, Holger, additional, Matschke, Stefan, additional, Mörk, Sven, additional, Müller, Christian W., additional, Osterhoff, Georg, additional, Pécsi, Ferenc, additional, Pishnamaz, Miguel, additional, Reinhold, Maximilian, additional, Schmeiser, Gregor, additional, Schnake, Klaus John, additional, Schneider, Kristian, additional, Spiegl, Ulrich Josef Albert, additional, and Ullrich, Bernhard, additional
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Halo Fixator and Halo Traction – Value for the Treatment of Spinal Disorders in Childhood.
- Author
-
Heyde, Christoph Eckhard, Krause, Matthias, Jarvers, Jan-Sven Gilbert, Spiegl, Ulrich Josef Albert, Völker, Anna, Glasmacher, Stefan, Josten, Christoph, and von der Höh, Nicolas H.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Subaxial Cervical Spine Injuries: Treatment Recommendations of the German Orthopedic and Trauma Society
- Author
-
Schleicher, Philipp, Scholz, Matti, Kandziora, Frank, Badke, Andreas, Brakopp, Florian Hans, Ekkerlein, Helmut Klaus Friedrich, Gercek, Erol, Hartensuer, Rene, Hartung, Philipp, Jarvers, Jan-Sven Gilbert, Kobbe, Philipp, Matschke, Stefan, Morrison, Robert, Mueller, Christian W., Pishnamaz, Miguel, Reinhold, Maximilian, Schnake, Klaus John, Schmeiser, Gregor, Stein, Gregor, Ullrich, Bernhard, Weiss, Thomas, Zimmermann, Volker, Schleicher, Philipp, Scholz, Matti, Kandziora, Frank, Badke, Andreas, Brakopp, Florian Hans, Ekkerlein, Helmut Klaus Friedrich, Gercek, Erol, Hartensuer, Rene, Hartung, Philipp, Jarvers, Jan-Sven Gilbert, Kobbe, Philipp, Matschke, Stefan, Morrison, Robert, Mueller, Christian W., Pishnamaz, Miguel, Reinhold, Maximilian, Schnake, Klaus John, Schmeiser, Gregor, Stein, Gregor, Ullrich, Bernhard, Weiss, Thomas, and Zimmermann, Volker
- Abstract
In a consensus process during four sessions in 2016, the working group lower cervical spine of the German Society for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery (DGOU), formulated Therapeutic Recommendations for the Lower Cervical Spine, taking into consideration the current literature. Therapeutic goals are a permanently stable, painless cervical spine and the protection against secondary neurologic damage while retaining the greatest possible amount of motion and spinal profile. Due to its ease of use and its proven good reliability, the AOSpine classification for subaxial cervical injuries should be used. The Canadian C-Spine Rule is recommended as a clinical decision rule whether to perform imaging or not. If a structural or unstable injury is suspected by patient history or clinical findings, a spiral CT scan of the cervical spine is the favoured diagnosticmodality. Conventional X-ray is reserved for patients in whom there is no dangerous mechanism of injury. MR imaging is recommended in case of unexplained neurologic deficit, prior to closed reduction and open posterior surgery and to exclude disco-ligamentous injuries. Urgency of MR imaging depends on the specific findings. CT angiography is recommended in higher-grade facet joint injuries or in the presence of vertebra-basilar symptoms. Flexion-extension imaging is recommended only as a physician-guided dynamic fluoroscopy, when an unstable lesion is still suspected. The therapeutic strategy is mainly dependent on morphologic criteria, which are described using the AOSpine classification. A0-injuries are treated conservatively. A1- and A2-injuries are treated conservatively in the majority of cases, and in single cases a gross kyphotic deformity might indicate surgical stabilisation. A3-injuries do indicate a surgical therapy in the majority of cases, but certain cases might be treated conservatively. A4-fractures as well as B- and C-type injuries are to be treated surgically. Most injuries can be treated by anterior pla
- Published
- 2017
7. Therapieempfehlungen zur Versorgung von Verletzungen der subaxialen Halswirbelsäule.
- Author
-
Schleicher, Philipp, Scholz, Matti, Kandziora, Frank, Badke, Andreas, Brakopp, Florian Hans, Ekkerlein, Helmut Klaus Friedrich, Gercek, Erol, Hartensuer, Rene, Hartung, Philipp, Jarvers, Jan-Sven Gilbert, Kobbe, Philipp, Matschke, Stefan, Morrison, Robert, Müller, Christian W., Pishnamaz, Miguel, Reinhold, Maximilian, Schnake, Klaus John, Schmeiser, Gregor, Stein, Gregor, and Ullrich, Bernhard
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment of Fractures of the Ring of Axis.
- Author
-
Scholz M, Schleicher P, Kandziora F, Badke A, Dreimann M, Gebhard H, Gercek E, Gonschorek O, Hartensuer R, Jarvers JG, Katscher S, Kobbe P, Koepp H, Korge A, Matschke S, Mörk S, Müller CW, Osterhoff G, Pécsi F, Pishnamaz M, Reinhold M, Schmeiser G, Schnake KJ, Schneider K, Spiegl UJA, and Ullrich B
- Subjects
- Humans, Joint Dislocations diagnostic imaging, Joint Dislocations surgery, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Orthopedic Procedures, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Cervical Vertebrae diagnostic imaging, Cervical Vertebrae surgery, Spinal Fractures diagnostic imaging, Spinal Fractures surgery
- Abstract
In a consensus process with four sessions in 2017, the working group "upper cervical spine" of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU) formulated "Therapeutic Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Upper Cervical Fractures", taking their own experience and the current literature into consideration. The following article describes the recommendations for axis ring fractures (traumatic spondylolysis C2). About 19 to 49% of all cervical spine injuries include the axis vertebra. Traumatic spondylolysis of C2 may include potential discoligamentous instability C2/3. The primary aim of the diagnostic process is to detect the injury and to determine potential disco-ligamentous instability C2/3. For classification purposes, the Josten classification or the modified Effendi classification may be used. The Canadian C-spine rule is recommended for clinical screening for C-spine injuries. CT is the preferred imaging modality and an MRI is needed to determine the integrity of the discoligamentous complex C2/3. Conservative treatment is appropriate in case of stable fractures with intact C2/3 motion segment (Josten type 2 and 2). Patients should be closely monitored, in order to detect secondary dislocation as early as possible. Surgical treatment is recommended in cases of primary severe fracture dislocation or discoligamentous instability C2/3 (Josten 3 and 4) and/or secondary fracture dislocation. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) C2/3 is the treatment of choice. However, in case of facet joint luxation C2/3 with looked facet (Josten 4), a primary posterior approach may be necessary., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. [Subaxial Cervical Spine Injuries: Treatment Recommendations of the German Orthopedic and Trauma Society].
- Author
-
Schleicher P, Scholz M, Kandziora F, Badke A, Brakopp FH, Ekkerlein HKF, Gercek E, Hartensuer R, Hartung P, Jarvers JG, Kobbe P, Matschke S, Morrison R, Müller CW, Pishnamaz M, Reinhold M, Schnake KJ, Schmeiser G, Stein G, Ullrich B, Weiß T, and Zimmermann V
- Subjects
- Bone Plates, Bone Screws, Cervical Vertebrae diagnostic imaging, Cervical Vertebrae surgery, Computed Tomography Angiography, Decision Support Techniques, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuronavigation, Spinal Fusion, Spinal Injuries classification, Spinal Injuries diagnostic imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Cervical Vertebrae injuries, Spinal Injuries surgery
- Abstract
In a consensus process during four sessions in 2016, the working group "lower cervical spine" of the German Society for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery (DGOU), formulated "Therapeutic Recommendations for the Lower Cervical Spine", taking into consideration the current literature. Therapeutic goals are a permanently stable, painless cervical spine and the protection against secondary neurologic damage while retaining the greatest possible amount of motion and spinal profile. Due to its ease of use and its proven good reliability, the AOSpine classification for subaxial cervical injuries should be used. The Canadian C-Spine Rule is recommended as a clinical decision rule whether to perform imaging or not. If a structural or unstable injury is suspected by patient history or clinical findings, a spiral CT scan of the cervical spine is the favoured diagnostic modality. Conventional X-ray is reserved for patients in whom there is no "dangerous mechanism of injury". MR imaging is recommended in case of unexplained neurologic deficit, prior to closed reduction and open posterior surgery and to exclude disco-ligamentous injuries. Urgency of MR imaging depends on the specific findings. CT angiography is recommended in higher-grade facet joint injuries or in the presence of vertebra-basilar symptoms. Flexion-extension imaging is recommended only as a physician-guided dynamic fluoroscopy, when an unstable lesion is still suspected. The therapeutic strategy is mainly dependent on morphologic criteria, which are described using the AOSpine classification. A0-injuries are treated conservatively. A1- and A2-injuries are treated conservatively in the majority of cases, and in single cases a gross kyphotic deformity might indicate surgical stabilisation. A3-injuries do indicate a surgical therapy in the majority of cases, but certain cases might be treated conservatively. A4-fractures as well as B- and C-type injuries are to be treated surgically. Most injuries can be treated by anterior plate stabilisation with interbody support; when a complete burst fracture is present, corpectomy and vertebral body replacement is necessary. In certain cases, an additive posterior or pure posterior instrumentation might be possible or even mandatory. In most of these cases, lateral mass screws are sufficient; when pedicle screws are applied in C3 to C6, a 3D-navigation system is recommended. Injuries in an ankylosing spine (M3-modifier) should be treated preferably from posterior with long-segment instrumentation., Competing Interests: Interessenkonflikt: Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.