Search

Your search keyword '"Havens, Joaquim M."' showing total 410 results
Start Over Author "Havens, Joaquim M." Publication Year Range Last 50 years
410 results on '"Havens, Joaquim M."'

1. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Consensus Guidelines for Emergency Laparotomy Part 3: Organizational Aspects and General Considerations for Management of the Emergency Laparotomy Patient

Author

Peden, Carol J., Aggarwal, Geeta, Aitken, Robert J., Anderson, Iain D., Balfour, Angie, Foss, Nicolai Bang, Cooper, Zara, Dhesi, Jugdeep K., French, W. Brenton, Grant, Michael C., Hammarqvist, Folke, Hare, Sarah P., Havens, Joaquim M., Holena, Daniel N., Hübner, Martin, Johnston, Carolyn, Kim, Jeniffer S., Lees, Nicholas P., Ljungqvist, Olle, Lobo, Dileep N., Mohseni, Shahin, Ordoñez, Carlos A., Quiney, Nial, Sharoky, Catherine, Urman, Richard D., Wick, Elizabeth, Wu, Christopher L., Young-Fadok, Tonia, and Scott, Michael J.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Consensus Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations Part 2—Emergency Laparotomy: Intra- and Postoperative Care

Author

Scott, Michael J., Aggarwal, Geeta, Aitken, Robert J., Anderson, Iain D., Balfour, Angie, Foss, Nicolai Bang, Cooper, Zara, Dhesi, Jugdeep K., French, W. Brenton, Grant, Michael C., Hammarqvist, Folke, Hare, Sarah P., Havens, Joaquim M., Holena, Daniel N., Hübner, Martin, Johnston, Carolyn, Kim, Jeniffer S., Lees, Nicholas P., Ljungqvist, Olle, Lobo, Dileep N., Mohseni, Shahin, Ordoñez, Carlos A., Quiney, Nial, Sharoky, Catherine, Urman, Richard D., Wick, Elizabeth, Wu, Christopher L., Young-Fadok, Tonia, and Peden, Carol J.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: Part 1—Preoperative: Diagnosis, Rapid Assessment and Optimization

Author

Peden, Carol J., Aggarwal, Geeta, Aitken, Robert J., Anderson, Iain D., Bang Foss, Nicolai, Cooper, Zara, Dhesi, Jugdeep K., French, W. Brenton, Grant, Michael C., Hammarqvist, Folke, Hare, Sarah P., Havens, Joaquim M., Holena, Daniel N., Hübner, Martin, Kim, Jeniffer S., Lees, Nicholas P., Ljungqvist, Olle, Lobo, Dileep N., Mohseni, Shahin, Ordoñez, Carlos A., Quiney, Nial, Urman, Richard D., Wick, Elizabeth, Wu, Christopher L., Young-Fadok, Tonia, and Scott, Michael

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

17. Trends in Hospital Admission and Surgical Procedures following ED visits for Diverticulitis

Author

Greenwood-Ericksen, Margaret B., Havens, Joaquim M., Ma, Jiemin, Weissman, Joel S., and Schuur, Jeremiah D.

Subjects
Emergency Department, Health Services, Diverticulitis, Admission
Abstract

Introduction: Diverticulitis is a common diagnosis in the emergency department (ED). Outpatient management of diverticulitis is safe in selected patients, yet the rates of admission and surgical procedures following ED visits for diverticulitis are unknown, as are the predictive patient characteristics. Our goal is to describe trends in admission and surgical procedures following ED visits for diverticulitis, and to determine which patient characteristics predict admission.Methods: We performed a cross-sectional descriptive analysis using data on ED visits from 2006-2011 to determine change in admission and surgical patterns over time. The Nationwide Emergency DepartmentSample database, a nationally representative administrative claims dataset, was used to analyze ED visits for diverticulitis. We included patients with a principal diagnosis of diverticulitis (ICD-9 codes562.11, 562.13). We analyzed the rate of admission and surgery in all admitted patients and in low-risk patients, defined as age

Published
2016

24. Defining re-implementation

Author

Moyal-Smith, Rachel, primary, Etheridge, James C., additional, Karlage, Ami, additional, Sonnay, Yves, additional, Yuan, Christina T., additional, Havens, Joaquim M., additional, Brindle, Mary E., additional, and Berry, William, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

31. Consensus Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations Part 2 — Emergency Laparotomy:Intra- and Postoperative Care

Author

Scott, Michael J., Aggarwal, Geeta, Aitken, Robert J., Anderson, Iain D., Balfour, Angie, Foss, Nicolai Bang, Cooper, Zara, Dhesi, Jugdeep K., French, W. Brenton, Grant, Michael C., Hammarqvist, Folke, Hare, Sarah P., Havens, Joaquim M., Holena, Daniel N., Hübner, Martin, Johnston, Carolyn, Kim, Jeniffer S., Lees, Nicholas P., Ljungqvist, Olle, Lobo, Dileep N., Mohseni, Shahin, Ordoñez, Carlos A., Quiney, Nial, Sharoky, Catherine, Urman, Richard D., Wick, Elizabeth, Wu, Christopher L., Young-Fadok, Tonia, Peden, Carol J., Scott, Michael J., Aggarwal, Geeta, Aitken, Robert J., Anderson, Iain D., Balfour, Angie, Foss, Nicolai Bang, Cooper, Zara, Dhesi, Jugdeep K., French, W. Brenton, Grant, Michael C., Hammarqvist, Folke, Hare, Sarah P., Havens, Joaquim M., Holena, Daniel N., Hübner, Martin, Johnston, Carolyn, Kim, Jeniffer S., Lees, Nicholas P., Ljungqvist, Olle, Lobo, Dileep N., Mohseni, Shahin, Ordoñez, Carlos A., Quiney, Nial, Sharoky, Catherine, Urman, Richard D., Wick, Elizabeth, Wu, Christopher L., Young-Fadok, Tonia, and Peden, Carol J.

Abstract

Background: This is Part 2 of the first consensus guidelines for optimal care of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy (EL) using an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) approach. This paper addresses intra- and postoperative aspects of care. Methods: Experts in aspects of management of high-risk and emergency general surgical patients were invited to contribute by the International ERAS® Society. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Medline database searches were performed for ERAS elements and relevant specific topics. Studies on each item were selected with particular attention to randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and large cohort studies and reviewed and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Recommendations were made on the best level of evidence, or extrapolation from studies on elective patients when appropriate. A modified Delphi method was used to validate final recommendations. Some ERAS® components covered in other guideline papers are outlined only briefly, with the bulk of the text focusing on key areas pertaining specifically to EL. Results: Twenty-three components of intraoperative and postoperative care were defined. Consensus was reached after three rounds of a modified Delphi Process. Conclusions: These guidelines are based on best available evidence for an ERAS® approach to patients undergoing EL. These guidelines are not exhaustive but pull together evidence on important components of care for this high-risk patient population. As much of the evidence is extrapolated from elective surgery or emergency general surgery (not specifically laparotomy), many of the components need further evaluation in future studies.

Published
2023

38. Consensus Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations Part 2—Emergency Laparotomy: Intra- and Postoperative Care.

Author

Scott, Michael J., Aggarwal, Geeta, Aitken, Robert J., Anderson, Iain D., Balfour, Angie, Foss, Nicolai Bang, Cooper, Zara, Dhesi, Jugdeep K., French, W. Brenton, Grant, Michael C., Hammarqvist, Folke, Hare, Sarah P., Havens, Joaquim M., Holena, Daniel N., Hübner, Martin, Johnston, Carolyn, Kim, Jeniffer S., Lees, Nicholas P., Ljungqvist, Olle, and Lobo, Dileep N.

Subjects
PERIOPERATIVE care, POSTOPERATIVE care, SURGERY, ENHANCED recovery after surgery protocol, ABDOMINAL surgery, ELECTIVE surgery
Abstract

Background: This is Part 2 of the first consensus guidelines for optimal care of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy (EL) using an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) approach. This paper addresses intra- and postoperative aspects of care. Methods: Experts in aspects of management of high-risk and emergency general surgical patients were invited to contribute by the International ERAS® Society. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Medline database searches were performed for ERAS elements and relevant specific topics. Studies on each item were selected with particular attention to randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and large cohort studies and reviewed and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Recommendations were made on the best level of evidence, or extrapolation from studies on elective patients when appropriate. A modified Delphi method was used to validate final recommendations. Some ERAS® components covered in other guideline papers are outlined only briefly, with the bulk of the text focusing on key areas pertaining specifically to EL. Results: Twenty-three components of intraoperative and postoperative care were defined. Consensus was reached after three rounds of a modified Delphi Process. Conclusions: These guidelines are based on best available evidence for an ERAS® approach to patients undergoing EL. These guidelines are not exhaustive but pull together evidence on important components of care for this high-risk patient population. As much of the evidence is extrapolated from elective surgery or emergency general surgery (not specifically laparotomy), many of the components need further evaluation in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

40. Utility of a Device Briefing Tool to Improve Surgical Safety

Author

Etheridge, James C., primary, Moyal-Smith, Rachel, additional, Lim, Shu Rong, additional, Yong, Tze Tein, additional, Tan, Hiang Khoon, additional, Sonnay, Yves, additional, Brindle, Mary E., additional, Lim, Christine, additional, Rothbard, Sarah, additional, Murray, Eleanor J., additional, and Havens, Joaquim M., additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

48. Creating a high‐performance surgical safety checklist: A multimodal evaluation plan to reinvigorate the checklist.

Author

Moyal‐Smith, Rachel, Etheridge, James C., Lim, Shu Rong, Sonnay, Yves, Tan, Hiang Khoon, Yong, Tze Tein, Havens, Joaquim M., and Brindle, Mary E.

Subjects
TEAMS in the workplace, PILOT projects, MEDICAL quality control, EVALUATION of human services programs, PROFESSIONS, OPERATIVE surgery, HOSPITAL health promotion programs, PEER relations, QUALITY assurance, COMMUNICATION, HEALTH care teams, RESEARCH funding, LEGAL compliance, THEMATIC analysis, PATIENT safety, CORPORATE culture
Abstract

Rationale, Aims, and Objectives: The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist is a communication tool designed to improve surgical safety processes and enhance teamwork. It has been widely adopted since its introduction over ten years ago. As surgical safety needs evolve, organizations should periodically review and update their checklists. A holistic evaluation of the checklist in the context of an organization is the first step to making informed updates. In this article, we describe a comprehensive but feasible strategy for checklist evaluation which we developed and implemented as part of a surgical safety initiative in a high‐performing center. Methods: A three‐part evaluation plan was developed and carried out by a multidisciplinary team. The evaluation included assessment of 1. Quality of care through a review of surgical safety events; 2. Safety culture through a validated survey and informal feedback; and 3. Checklist performance through direct observations and a staff survey. To prepare for re‐implementation the current institutional checklist was critically evaluated and a context assessment survey was administered to surgical staff. Results: The evaluation revealed challenges in communication and teamwork, with surgical staff often perceived to be working in silos. The quality of care assessment indicated room for improvement in safety processes. Deficiencies in the safety culture measures of communication and feedback shed light on an overall lack of engagement with the checklist. Checklist performance demonstrated good adherence to the items on the checklist but limited engagement by the surgical team and minimal communication between subteams. These findings informed our revisions to the checklist and its implementation processes. Conclusions: We developed and implemented a comprehensive, scalable approach to checklist evaluation which directly informed improvements to the checklist that were tailored to the organization's current context. Organizations can apply this framework to breathe new life into their checklist and transform their safety culture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results