Search

Introduction Nexobrid®, a bromelain-based type of enzymatic debridement, has become more prevalent in recent years. We present the recommendations on enzymatic debridement (Nexobrid®)’s role based on the practice knowledge of expert Italian users. Methods The Italian recommendations, endorsed by SIUST (Italian Society of Burn Surgery), on using enzymatic debridement to remove eschars for burn treatment were defined. The definition followed a process to evaluate the level of agreement (a measure of consensus) among selected experts, representing Italian burn centers, concerning defined clinical aspects of enzymatic debridement. The consensus involved a multi-phase process based on the Delphi method. Results The consensus panel included experts from Italy with a combined experience of 1068 burn patients treated with enzymatic debridement. At the end of round 3 of the Delphi method, the panel reached 100% consensus on 26 out of 27 statements. The panel achieved full, strong consensus (all respondents strongly agreed on the statement) on 24 out of 27 statements. Discussion The statements provided by the Italian consensus panel represent a “ready to use” set of recommendations for enzymatic debridement in burn surgery that both draw from and complete the existing scientific literature on the topic. These recommendations are specific to the Italian experience and are neither static nor definitive. As such, they will be updated periodically as further quality evidence becomes available.

Aim and background A wide range of methodologies for breast reconstruction is now available. For immediate breast reconstruction we prefer to use implants, whereas reconstruction using autologous tissues, such as transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps (TRAMF) and muscular latissimus dorsi flaps, is applied only in selected cases. In contrast, for delayed reconstruction the choice between prostheses and autologous tissue depends on various conditions. The different reconstructive methods can be adopted as a single procedure or as a combination of surgical procedures. Following the issue of legislation defining the new structure of the Italian Health Service, the need to accurately assess the costs incurred for the execution of surgical operations has taken on paramount importance. The aim of the study was to evaluate not only the clinical limits of each surgical technique, but also its cost, in order to optimize the choice of the same procedures, conditions being equal. Methods The study population included 105 patients who underwent breast reconstruction in the period 1st January 1994-30th June 1995. The reconstructive procedures included 48 immediate implants, 7 immediate TRAMF, 17 delayed implants, 30 delayed TRAMF, and 3 delayed latissimus dorsi muscular flaps. Results After data evaluation, we concluded that reconstruction using permanent expandable implants is the most convenient among implant reconstructions for its low global treatment cost. In fact, reconstructive procedures using temporary expanders, which require two surgical operations, have a higher cost than breast reconstruction using permanent expandable implants. Breast reconstruction using TRAMF is the most convenient because it limits the cost of surgical materials and because flap versatility limits the number of modifications on the contralateral breast. In contrast, breast reconstruction using latissimus dorsi flaps has high costs. Conclusions There is no balance between price list and effective cost of the different surgical reconstructive procedures, which may be a point of departure to see whether it is impossible to improve the efficiency of the Health Care System and in any case open a debate between the Regions and hospitals to improve the service, keeping it at a good level.