Search

Factor VIII (FVIII) circulates in a noncovalent complex with von Willebrand Factor (VWF), the latter determining FVIII half-life. The VWF-binding aptamer rondaptivon pegol (BT200) increases plasma levels of VWF/FVIII in healthy volunteers. This trial assessed its safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics in hemophilia A. Nineteen adult patients (ages 20-62 years, 4 women) with hemophilia A (8 mild, 2 moderate, and 9 severe) received subcutaneous injections of rondaptivon pegol. After an initial fixed dose of 3 mg on days 0 and 4, patients received weekly doses of 2 to 9 mg until day 28. Severe hemophilia A patients underwent sparse-sampling population pharmacokinetics individual profiling after the final dose of rondaptivon pegol. Adverse events, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were assessed. FVIII activity and VWF levels were measured. All patients tolerated rondaptivon pegol well. The geometric mean half-life of rondaptivon pegol was 5.4 days and rondaptivon pegol significantly increased VWF levels. In severe hemophilia A, 6 doses of rondaptivon pegol increased the half-lives of 5 different FVIII products from a median of 10.4 hours to 31.1 hours (range, 20.8-56.0 hours). Median FVIII increased from 22% to 48% in mild hemophilia A and from 3% to 7.5% in moderate hemophilia A. Rondaptivon pegol is a first-in-class prohemostatic molecule that extended the half-life of substituted FVIII approximately 3-fold and increased endogenous FVIII levels approximately 2-fold in hemophilia patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04677803.

Type 2B von Willebrand disease (VWD) is characterized by an increased binding affinity of von Willebrand factor (VWF) to platelet glycoprotein Ib. This can lead to clearance of high-molecular-weight (HMW) multimers and thrombocytopenia with a resulting moderate-severe bleeding phenotype. Rondoraptivon pegol (BT200) is a pegylated aptamer binding to the A1 domain of VWF with a novel mechanism of action: it enhances VWF/factor VIII (FVIII) levels by decreasing their clearance. To study the potential benefit of rondoraptivon pegol in patients with type 2B VWD, we conducted a prospective phase 2 trial. Patients with type 2B VWD received 3 mg rondoraptivon pegol subcutaneously on study days 1, 4, and 7, followed by 6 to 9 mg every week until day 28. Five patients (male:female ratio = 3:2) were included. Rondoraptivon pegol rapidly tripled platelet counts from a median of 60 to 179 × 10E9/L (P < .001). Circulating VWF antigen increased from a median of 64% to 143%, which doubled FVIII activity levels from 67% to 134%. In all thrombocytopenic patients, plasma levels of VWF:GPIbM normalized, VWF ristocetin cofactor and VWF collagen-binding activity increased, and HMW multimers appeared. These pronounced improvements reversed during washout of the drug, thus demonstrating causality. The A1 domain binding aptamer directly corrects the underlying defect of type 2B VWD, thus providing a novel potential option for prophylaxis and treatment of patients with this VWD type. These data provide the basis for a phase 2b/3 trial in such patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04677803.

Platelets play a key role in arterial thrombosis and antiplatelet therapy is pivotal in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Current antiplatelet drugs target different pathways of platelet activation and show specific pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics, implicating clinically relevant drug-drug interactions.This article reviews the role of platelets in hemostasis and cardiovascular thrombosis, and discusses the key pharmacodynamics, drug-drug interactions and reversal strategies of clinically used antiplatelet drugs.Antiplatelet therapies target distinct pathways of platelet activation: thromboxane A

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII) circulate in a noncovalent complex in blood and promote primary hemostasis and clotting, respectively. A new VWF A1-domain binding aptamer, BT200, demonstrated good subcutaneous bioavailability and a long half-life in non-human primates. This first-in-human, randomized, placebo-controlled, doubleblind trial tested the hypothesis that BT200 is well tolerated and has favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects in 112 volunteers. Participants received one of the following: a single ascending dose of BT200 (0.18-48 mg) subcutaneously, an intravenous dose, BT200 with concomitant desmopressin or multiple doses. Pharmacokinetics were characterized, and the pharmacodynamic effects were measured by VWF levels, FVIII clotting activity, ristocetin-induced aggregation, platelet function under high shear rates, and thrombin generation. The mean half-lives ranged from 7-12 days and subcutaneous bioavailability increased dose-dependently exceeding 55% for doses of 6-48 mg. By blocking free A1 domains, BT200 dose-dependently decreased ristocetin-induced aggregation, and prolonged collagen-adenosine diphosphate and shear-induced platelet plug formation times. However, BT200 also increased VWF antigen and FVIII levels 4-fold (P

Hemophilia A, characterized by absent or ineffective coagulation factor VIII (FVIII), is a serious bleeding disorder that entails severe and potentially life-threatening bleeding events. Current standard therapy still involves replacement of FVIII, but is often complicated by the occurrence of neutralizing alloantibodies (inhibitors). Management of patients with inhibitors is challenging and necessitates immune tolerance induction for inhibitor eradication and the use of bypassing agents (activated prothrombin complex concentrates or recombinant activated factor VII), which are expensive and not always effective. Emicizumab is the first humanized bispecific monoclonal therapeutic antibody designed to replace the hemostatic function of activated FVIII by bridging activated factor IX and factor X (FX) to activate FX and allow the coagulation cascade to continue. In the majority of hemophilic patients with and without inhibitors, emicizumab reduced the annualized bleeding rate to almost zero in several clinical trials and demonstrated a good safety profile. However, the concurrent use of emicizumab and activated prothrombin complex concentrate imposes a high risk of thrombotic microangiopathy and thromboembolic events on patients and should be avoided. Yet, the management of breakthrough bleeds and surgery remains challenging with only limited evidence-based recommendations being available. This review summarizes published clinical trials and preliminary reports of emicizumab and discusses the clinical implications of emicizumab in treatment of hemophilia A.

Objective Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are an emerging class of glucose lowering drugs, which become increasingly relevant for treatment and prevention of heart failure (HF). Therefore we aimed to investigate various SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with established HF at baseline. Design Extensive search of PubMed and Web of Science until January 2021. Two reviewers independently and in duplicate applied the selection criteria. This meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Data was pooled using a random-effects model. Participants Randomized clinical trials of SGLT2 inhibitors vs comparator in patients with HF reporting clinical outcomes. Main outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of hospitalization for HF (HHF) or cardiovascular (CV) mortality. All-cause mortality, CV mortality and HHF were considered as secondary endpoints. Subgroup analyses involving status of diabetes, type of HF, administered type of SGLT2 inhibitor, sex, age, BMI, eGFR, cause of HF and concomitant medication were performed. Results Seventeen RCTs, comprising a total of 20749 participants, were included (n=10848 treated with SGLT2 inhibitors and n=9901 treated with a comparator). Treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a 27% relative risk reduction (RRR) of HHF or CV-mortality (RR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.68–0.78); 32% RRR of HHF (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.62–074); 18% RRR of CV mortality (RR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.73–0.91) and 17% RRR of all-cause mortality (RR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.75–0.91). The magnitude of the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on the primary endpoint was comparable in patients with diabetes vs those without diabetes (RR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.67–0.78 vs RR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.66–0.87, respectively). Patients with HFmrEF (heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction) seemed to have the greatest benefit of SGLT2 inhibition (RR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.40–0.83), whereas patients with an ejection fraction over 45% profited the least (RR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.55–1.12). The direction of the effects was similar for all SGLT2 inhibitors for each outcome. Therapy with SGLT2 inhibitors was beneficial independently of patients' baseline data, except the concomitant use of ARNIs (angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors). Conclusions In patients with HF, SGLT2 inhibitors are associated with improved CV outcome. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): FWF-Austrian Science Fund Figure 1Figure 2

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a hypercoagulable state. It has been hypothesized that higher-dose anticoagulation, including therapeutic-dose and intermediate-dose anticoagulation, is superior to prophylactic-dose anticoagulation in the treatment of COVID-19. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of higher-dose anticoagulation compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19. Ten randomized controlled open-label trials with a total of 5,753 patients were included. The risk of death and net adverse clinical events (including death, thromboembolic events, and major bleeding) were similar between higher-dose and prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (risk ratio (RR) 0.96, 95% CI, 0.79-1.16, P = 0.66 and RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.73-1.03, P = 0.11, respectively). Higher-dose anticoagulation, compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation, decreased the risk of thromboembolic events (RR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.47-0.84, P = 0.002) but increased the risk of major bleeding (RR 1.76, 95% CI, 1.19-2.62, P = 0.005). The risk of death showed no statistically significant difference between higher-dose anticoagulation and prophylactic-dose anticoagulation in noncritically ill patients (RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.50-1.52, P = 0.62) and in critically ill patients with COVID-19 (RR 1.04, 95% CI, 0.93-1.17, P = 0.5). The risk of death was similar between therapeutic-dose vs. prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69-1.21, P = 0.54) and between intermediate-dose vs. prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.63-1.61, P = 0.98). In patients with markedly increased d-dimer levels, higher-dose anticoagulation was also not associated with a decreased risk of death as compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (RR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.64-1.16, P = 0.34). Without any clear evidence of survival benefit, these findings do not support the routine use of therapeutic-dose or intermediate-dose anticoagulation in critically or noncritically ill patients with COVID-19.

We report the case of a 19-year-old male who complained of myalgia, muscle weakness, and darkened urine two days after receiving his Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States) COVID-19 vaccination. Blood examination revealed an increased creatine kinase (CK) level, and his urinary dipstick tested positive for blood, indicative of acute rhabdomyolysis. Serum creatinine levels were normal. Rhabdomyolysis due to strenuous physical activity was ruled out and further diagnostics excluded an autoimmune cause. Under repeated treatment with intravenous fluid resuscitation (outpatient treatment), his symptoms resolved and peak CK levels of 44,180 U/L returned to almost normal levels within two weeks. Rhabdomyolysis is a rare, potentially fatal vaccine-induced reaction. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying pathomechanism and to investigate whether subcutaneous injection of vaccines may be able to prevent rhabdomyolysis.

Defibrotide is approved for the treatment of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The exact mode of action of defibrotide is unclear and human in vivo data are scarce. In this randomized, double blind, crossover trial we included 20 healthy volunteers. Four were randomized to receive placebo, while 16 received a 2 ng/kg bodyweight bolus of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Infusion of 6.25 mg/kg defibrotide or placebo was started one hour before the injection of the LPS bolus. Plasma levels of prothrombin fragments F1 + 2, thrombin-antithrombin complexes, von Willebrand factor, E-selectin, tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), plasmin-antiplasmin complexes (PAP), tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin 6, and C-reactive protein were measured. Thromboelastometry was performed. Infusion of defibrotide did not reduce the LPS-induced activation of coagulation, the endothelium or the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. However, defibrotide increased t-PA antigen levels by 31% (Quartiles: 2–49%, p = 0.026) and PAP concentrations by 13% (−4–41%, p = 0.039), while PAI-1 levels remained unaffected. Moreover, defibrotide reduced C-reactive protein levels by 13% (0–17%, p = 0.002). A transient increase in the clotting time in thromboelastometry and a decrease in F1 + 2 prothrombin fragments suggests modest anticoagulant properties. In conclusion, defibrotide infusion enhanced fibrinolysis and reduced C-reactive protein levels during experimental endotoxemia.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and subsequent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, particularly ticagrelor, is an emerging treatment strategy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This meta‐analysis was designed to investigate whether short‐term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy is associated with a favorable outcome as compared with standard DAPT (1–3 months of DAPT was termed “short‐term” DAPT, 6–12 months DAPT was termed “standard” DAPT). The primary outcome was the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) comprising myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death. Secondary outcomes included all‐cause mortality and net adverse clinical events (NACE; myocardial infarction, stroke, all‐cause death, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding). The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Three studies comprising 26,143 patients were included. The risk of MACE was similar between the two treatment groups (risk ratio (RR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72–1.02, P = 0.08, I 2 = 22%). Short‐term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy resulted in a 20% relative risk reduction of all‐cause mortality (RR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.65–0.98, P = 0.03, I 2 = 0%) and an 18% relative risk reduction of NACE (RR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.71–0.94, P = 0.005, I 2 = 33%) as compared with standard DAPT. Short‐term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy significantly decreased the risk of major bleeding (RR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.49–0.92, P = 0.01, I 2 = 65%). In patients with acute coronary syndrome, short‐term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy resulted in an unchanged ischemic risk but a significantly lower bleeding risk compared with standard DAPT. Short‐term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy compared with standard DAPT resulted in a favorable safety and efficacy profile. Direct comparisons of aspirin vs. ticagrelor monotherapy following PCI are needed.

Introduction The ideal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still unknown. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare very short-term (1–3 months), short-term (6 months), standard-term (12 months) and long-term (>12 months) DAPT durations for efficacy and safety. Methods Overall DAPT comparisons were classified as “any shorter-term”/”any longer-term” DAPT. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and cardiovascular death). The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Results Twenty-six studies comprising 103.394 patients were included. Compared with standard-term DAPT duration, very short-term DAPT duration with subsequent drop of aspirin (RR 1.06, 95% CI, 0.95–1.18, p = 0.26) or drop of the P2Y12 inhibitor (RR 0.92, 95% CI, 0.72-1.16, p = 0.47) was not associated with a higher risk of MACE. Any longer-term compared with any shorter-term DAPT durations led to a significantly lower risk of MACE (RR 0.88, 95% CI, 0.81–0.96, p = 0.002), but a significantly higher risk of BARC 3-5 major bleeding events (RR 1.63, 95% CI, 1.22–2.17, p = 0.001). In the ACS subgroup receiving prasugrel or ticagrelor but not clopidogrel, any longer-term DAPT duration was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE compared to any shorter-term DAPT duration (RR 0.84, 95% CI, 0.77–0.92, p = 0.0001). Conclusion DAPT may be shortened to 1-3 months in patients with low ischemic but high bleeding risk followed by aspirin or P2Y12 monotherapy. Prasugrel or ticagrelor based DAPT may be extended to >12 months in case of high ischemic and low bleeding risk. PROSPERO registration no CRD42020163719.

Background Late antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a leading cause of transplant failure. Blocking IL-6 has been proposed as a promising therapeutic strategy. Methods We performed a phase 2 randomized pilot trial to evaluate the safety (primary endpoint) and efficacy (secondary endpoint analysis) of the anti-IL-6 antibody clazakizumab in late ABMR. The trial included 20 kidney transplant recipients with donor-specific, antibody-positive ABMR ≥365 days post-transplantation. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 25 mg clazakizumab or placebo (4-weekly subcutaneous injections) for 12 weeks (part A), followed by a 40-week open-label extension (part B), during which time all participants received clazakizumab. Results Five (25%) patients under active treatment developed serious infectious events, and two (10%) developed diverticular disease complications, leading to trial withdrawal. Those receiving clazakizumab displayed significantly decreased donor-specific antibodies and, on prolonged treatment, modulated rejection-related gene-expression patterns. In 18 patients, allograft biopsies after 51 weeks revealed a negative molecular ABMR score in seven (38.9%), disappearance of capillary C4d deposits in five (27.8%), and resolution of morphologic ABMR activity in four (22.2%). Although proteinuria remained stable, the mean eGFR decline during part A was slower with clazakizumab compared with placebo (-0.96; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], -1.96 to 0.03 versus -2.43; 95% CI, -3.40 to -1.46 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per month, respectively, P=0.04). During part B, the slope of eGFR decline for patients who were switched from placebo to clazakizumab improved and no longer differed significantly from patients initially allocated to clazakizumab. Conclusions Although safety data indicate the need for careful patient selection and monitoring, our preliminary efficacy results suggest a potentially beneficial effect of clazakizumab on ABMR activity and progression.

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) plays a major role in arterial thrombosis. Antiplatelet drugs induce only a moderate relative risk reduction after atherothrombosis, and their inhibitory effects are compromised under high shear rates when VWF levels are increased. Therefore, we investigated the ex vivo effects of a third-generation anti-VWF aptamer (BT200) before/after stimulated VWF release. We studied the concentration-effect curves BT200 had on VWF activity, platelet plug formation under high shear rates (PFA), and ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (Multiplate) before and after desmopressin or endotoxin infusions in healthy volunteers. VWF levels increased > 2.5-fold after desmopressin or endotoxin infusion (p 300 s at baseline, whereas 1.35 µg/ml BT200 were needed 2 h after desmopressin infusion. Similarly, twofold higher BT200 concentrations were necessary to inhibit ristocetin induced aggregation after desmopressin infusion compared to baseline (p

Transition from cangrelor to oral P2Y12 inhibitors after PCI carries the risk of platelet function recovery and acute stent thrombosis. Whether the recommended transition regimen is appropriate for hypothermic cardiac arrest survivors is unknown. We assessed the rate of high platelet reactivity (HPR) after transition from cangrelor to ticagrelor in hypothermic cardiac arrest survivors. Adult survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), who were treated for hypothermia (33 °C ± 1) and received intravenous cangrelor during PCI and subsequent oral loading with 180mg ticagrelor were enrolled in this prospective observational cohort study. Platelet function was assessed using whole blood aggregometry. HPR was defined as AUC > 46U. The primary endpoint was the rate of HPR (%) at predefined time points during the first 24 h after cangrelor cessation. Poisson regression was used to estimate the relationship between the overlap time of cangrelor and ticagrelor co-administration and the number of subsequent HPR episodes, expressed as incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Between December 2017 and October 2019 16 patients (81% male, 58 years) were enrolled. On average, ticagrelor was administered 39 min (IQR 5−50) before the end of cangrelor infusion. The rate of HPR was highest 90 min after cangrelor cessation and was present in 44% (7/16) of patients. The number of HPR episodes increased significantly with decreasing overlap time of cangrelor and ticagrelor co-administration (IRR 1.03, 95%CI 1.01−1.05; p = 0.005). In this selected cohort of hypothermic cardiac arrest survivors who received cangrelor during PCI, ticagrelor loading within the recommended time frame before cangrelor cessation resulted in a substantial amount of patients with HPR.

Background: The effect of conventional anti-platelet agents is limited in secondary stroke prevention, and their effects are further blunted under conditions of high shear stress in the presence of increased levels of circulating VWF. VWF mediates platelet adhesion to collagen under high shear stress and is thereby critically involved in thrombus formation at sites of stenotic extracranial intracranial arteries (reviewed by Buchtele et al. 2018). We have created a novel anti-VWF aptamer (BT200) which could be useful for secondary stroke prevention, because the anti-VWF aptamer ARC1779 effectively reduced cerebral embolization after carotid endarterectomy (Markus et al. 2011). Aims: To characterize the effects of BT200 in blood of patients with large artery atherosclerosis stroke. Methods: Blood samples were obtained from 30 patients with acute stroke Inhibition of VWF activity by BT200 was quantified by REAADS ELISA and VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), platelet function under high shear rates with the PFA-100, and ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation in whole blood. Results: The majority of stroke patients had elevated VWF:RCo levels (mean: 198%; range 55-330%). Of 15 patients receiving clopidogrel with or without aspirin, only two had a prolonged collagen adenosine diphosphate closure time (CADP-CT) >123s, and only one patient had a ristocetin induced aggregation of 300s, and decreased aggregation to Conclusions: BT200 effectively inhibits VWF activity and VWF-dependent platelet function in blood from patients with acute stroke. Results from this study proved useful for planning of the ongoing phase I and planned phase II trial.

The protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) is critically involved in the co-activation of coagulation and inflammatory responses. Vorapaxar is a reversible, orally active, low molecular weight, competitive antagonist of PAR-1.We investigated the effects of PAR-1 inhibition by vorapaxar on the inflammatory response, the activation of coagulation, fibrinolysis and endothelium during experimental endotoxemia. In this randomized, double blind, crossover trial, 16 healthy volunteers received a bolus infusion of 2 ng/kg lipopolysaccharide (LPS) ± placebo/vorapaxar with a washout period of 8 weeks. Vorapaxar dosing was guided by thrombin receptor-activating peptide-6-induced whole blood aggregometry. Participants received 10 mg vorapaxar or placebo as an initial dose and, depending on the aggregometry, potentially an additional 10 mg. Goal was > 80% inhibition of aggregation compared with baseline. Vorapaxar significantly reduced the LPS-induced increase in pro-thrombin fragments F1 + 2 by a median of 27% (quartiles: 11–49%), thrombin–anti-thrombin concentrations by 22% (–3 to 46%) and plasmin–anti-plasmin levels by 38% (23–53%). PAR-1 inhibition dampened peak concentrations of tumour necrosis factor -α, interleukin-6 and consequently C-reactive protein by 66% (−11–71%), 50% (15–79%) and 23% (16–38%), respectively. Vorapaxar decreased maximum von Willebrand factor levels by 29% (26–51%) and soluble E-selectin concentrations by 30% (25–38%) after LPS infusion. PAR-1 inhibition did not affect thrombomodulin, soluble P-selectin and platelet factor-4 concentrations.PAR-1 inhibition significantly reduced the activation of coagulation, fibrinolysis, the inflammatory response and endothelial activation during experimental human endotoxemia.

Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) causes predominantly extravascular hemolysis and anemia via complement activation. Sutimlimab is a novel humanized monoclonal antibody directed against classical pathway complement factor C1s. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term maintenance treatment with sutimlimab in patients with CAD. Seven CAD patients treated with sutimlimab as part of a phase 1B study were transitioned to a named patient program. After a loading dose, patients received biweekly (once every 2 weeks) infusions of sutimlimab at various doses. When a patient’s laboratory data showed signs of breakthrough hemolysis, the dose of sutimlimab was increased. Three patients started with a dose of 45 mg/kg, another 3 with 60 mg/kg, and 1 with a fixed dose of 5.5 g every other week. All CAD patients responded to re-treatment, and sutimlimab increased hemoglobin from a median initial level of 7.7 g/dL to a median peak of 12.5 g/dL (P = .016). Patients maintained near normal hemoglobin levels except for a few breakthrough events that were related to underdosing and which resolved after the appropriate dose increase. Four of the patients included were eventually treated with a biweekly 5.5 g fixed-dose regimen of sutimlimab. None of them had any breakthrough hemolysis. All patients remained transfusion free while receiving sutimlimab. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events. Overlapping treatment with erythropoietin, rituximab, or ibrutinib in individual patients was safe and did not cause untoward drug interactions. Long-term maintenance treatment with sutimlimab was safe, effectively inhibited hemolysis, and significantly increased hemoglobin levels in re-exposed, previously transfusion-dependent CAD patients.

Background Platelet inhibition by aspirin reduces ischemic events but increases the risk of bleeding events. Yet, the role of aspirin in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease remains unclear. Purpose To produce a clinically relevant benefit-risk assessment of aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Methods We performed a meta-analysis of aspirin effects in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease comprising 13 randomized-controlled trials in 164.225 patients comparing aspirin versus placebo/control during a mean follow-up period of 6.4 years. Using a random effect model, relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each outcome. Results Aspirin reduced the relative risk of ischemic stroke by 10% (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82–0.99), myocardial infarction by 14% (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77–0.95) and the major adverse cardiovascular events by 9% (RR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.86–0.95) but was associated with a 46% relative risk increase of major bleeding events (RR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.30–1.64). Aspirin did not reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.90–1.08), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.93–1.02) or cancer (RR 1.05; 95% CI, 0.87–1.26). Aspirin use did not translate into a net clinical benefit adjusted for event-associated mortality risk (mean 0.034%; 95% CI: −0.18 to 0.25%). Forest plot of major outcomes. Conclusions Aspirin use in primary prevention is associated with a reduced risk of stroke and myocardial infarction, but at a cost of an increased risk of major bleeding. Acknowledgement/Funding None

A 66-year-old Caucasian male became unconscious 2 weeks after initiation of add-on therapy with empagliflozin for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. The inpatient had recently suffered focal pontine stroke, rendering him bedridden and requiring increased nursing care, including assistance with drinking. The patient had received empagliflozin 10 mg once daily for glycaemic control. Investigations revealed hypernatraemia (164 mmol/l), a urine glucose level of 3935 mg/dl, and a creatinine level of 2.1 mg/dl. The patient was diagnosed with severe hypernatraemic dehydration due to iatrogenic glucosuria and prerenal kidney failure. Empagliflozin was discontinued and the patient received hypotonic fluids (including 5% dextrose and free water). Over the following 4 days, glucosuria subsided, blood sodium levels and kidney function normalized and the patient regained full consciousness. He was discharged for rehabilitation 40 days after admission. A Naranjo assessment score of 6 was obtained, indicating a probable relationship between the patient’s hypernatraemic dehydration and administration of empagliflozin. In this care-dependent inpatient, who lost the ability to replace water loss autonomously because of a stroke, continuous administration of empagliflozin caused persistent glucosuria and contributed to progressive volume depletion. Excessive dehydration resulted from ignorance of both the populations that are susceptible to dehydration under sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor therapy and the drug’s mechanism of action. In patients who depend on support from others in daily tasks, including fluid intake, patients with an impaired sense of thirst and those who have lost the ability to communicate thirst, SGLT2 inhibitor therapy should not be initiated or might be (temporarily) discontinued.