Search

For the past 15 years, trials of combination therapy options for visceral leishmaniasis have been conducted with the aim of identifying effective, and safe treatment regimens that were shorter than existing monotherapy regimens and could also prevent or delay the emergence of drug resistance. Although first-line treatment currently relies on combination therapy in east Africa, this is not true in Latin America owing to disappointing trial results, with lower than expected efficacy seen for the combination treatment group. By contrast, several effective combination therapy regimens have been identified through trials on the Indian subcontinent; yet, first-line therapy is still AmBisome monotherapy as the drug is part of a free donation programme and is highly effective in this region. Achieving a short all-oral combination treatment will require new chemical entities, several of which are currently under evaluation. Future studies should systematically include pharmacological substudies to ensure optimal dosing for all patient groups. To achieve maximal impact of new combination treatments, mechanisms to ensure drug availability and access after trials should be established. Enhancing the longevity of current and novel treatments will require effective systems for early detection of emerging drug resistance.

Adequate power to identify an exposure-response relationship in a phase IIa clinical trial for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is important for dose selection and design of follow-up studies. Currently, it is not known what response marker provides the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model more power to identify an exposure-response relationship. We simulated colony-forming units (CFU) and time-to-positivity (TTP) measurements for four hypothetical drugs with different activity profiles for 14 days. The power to identify exposure-response relationships when analyzing CFU, TTP, or combined CFU + TTP data was determined at 60 total participants, or with 25 out of 60 participants in the lowest and highest dosing groups (unbalanced design). For drugs with moderate bactericidal activity, power was low (<59%), irrespective of the data analyzed. Power was 1.9% to 29.4% higher when analyzing TTP data compared to CFU data. Combined analysis of CFU and TTP further improved the power, on average by 4.2%. For a drug with a medium-high activity, the total sample size needed to achieve 80% power was 136 for CFU, 72 for TTP, and 68 for combined CFU + TTP data. The unbalanced design improved the power by 16% over the balanced design. In conclusion, the power to identify an exposure-response relationship is low for TB drugs with moderate bactericidal activity or with a slow onset of activity. TTP provides the PK-PD model with more power to identify exposure-response relationships compared to CFU, and combined analysis or an unbalanced dosing group study design offers modest further improvement.

Nivolumab is an immunotherapeutic monoclonal antibody (mAb) that is used for the treatment of several types of cancer. The evidence on its use during lactation is lacking. Here, we report on a 39-year-old woman with metastasized melanoma who was treated with 480 mg nivolumab every four weeks during lactation. Breast milk samples were collected over the course of 34 days, including two cycles of nivolumab. The highest measured concentration of nivolumab during the first cycle was 503 ng/mL at day 13. The cumulative relative infant dose (RID) over the first cycle (28 days) was 9.8 %. The highest overall measured nivolumab concentration was 519 ng/mL at day 33, five days after administration of the second nivolumab cycle. Nivolumab seems to accumulate in breast milk over two consecutive cycles, hence the RIDs of consecutive cycles are expected to be higher. To draw further conclusions regarding safety of breastfeeding during nivolumab therapy, more information about the oral bioavailability of nivolumab in newborns, the nivolumab steady-state concentrations in breast milk and its pharmacodynamic effects are needed.

Introduction Malaria infection during pregnancy increases the risk of low birth weight and infant mortality and should be prevented and treated. Artemisinin-based combination treatments are generally well tolerated, safe and effective; the most used being artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP). Pyronaridine-artesunate (PA) is a new artemisinin-based combination. The main objective of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of PA versus AL or DP when administered to pregnant women with confirmed Plasmodium falciparum infection in the second or third trimester. The primary hypothesis is the pairwise non-inferiority of PA as compared with either AL or DP. Methods and analysis A phase 3, non-inferiority, randomised, open-label clinical trial to determine the safety and efficacy of AL, DP and PA in pregnant women with malaria in five sub-Saharan, malaria-endemic countries (Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mali, Mozambique and the Gambia). A total of 1875 pregnant women will be randomised to one of the treatment arms. Women will be actively monitored until Day 63 post-treatment, at delivery and 4–6 weeks after delivery, and infants’ health will be checked on their first birthday. The primary endpoint is the PCR-adjusted rate of adequate clinical and parasitological response at Day 42 in the per-protocol population. Ethics and dissemination This protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee for Health Research in Burkina Faso, the National Health Ethics Committee in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology/Faculty of Pharmacy in Mali, the Gambia Government/MRCG Joint Ethics Committee and the National Bioethics Committee for Health in Mozambique. Written informed consent will be obtained from each individual prior to her participation in the study. The results will be published in peer-reviewed open access journals and presented at (inter)national conf

The traditional design of food-effect studies has a high patient burden for toxic drugs with long half-lives (e.g., anticancer agents). Microtracers could be used to assess food-effect in patients without influencing their ongoing treatment. The feasibility of a microtracer food-effect study during steady-state of the therapeutic drug was investigated in an in silico simulation study with alectinib as an example for a relative toxic drug with a long half-life. Microtracer pharmacokinetics were simulated based on a previously published population pharmacokinetic model and used for estimation of a model with and a model without food as a covariate on oral bioavailability of alectinib (assuming a 40% food-effect). Power was defined as the fraction of clinical trials where a significant (p < 0.01) food-effect was identified. The proposed study design of 10 patients on steady-state treatment, 10 blood samples collected within 24 h after administration and an assumed food-effect of 40% had a power of 99.9%. The mean estimated food-effect was 39.8% (80% confidence interval: 31.0%-48.6%). The feasibility of microtracer food-effect studies was demonstrated. The design of the microtracer food-effect study allowed estimation of the food-effect with minimal influence on therapeutic treatment and reducing patient burden compared to the traditional study design for toxic drugs with long half-lives.

Studies to evaluate and optimize [177Lu]Lu-PSMA treatment focus primarily on individual patient data. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) dosimetry model was developed to explore the potential of using imaging data as input for population PK models and to characterize variability in organ and tumor uptake of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with low volume metastatic prostate cancer. Simulations were performed to identify the effect of dose adjustments on absorbed doses in salivary glands and tumors. A six-compartment population PK model was developed, consisting of blood, salivary gland, kidneys, liver, tumor, and a lumped compartment representing other tissue (compartment 1–6, respectively), based on data from 10 patients who received [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (2 cycles, ~ 3 and ~ 6 GBq). Data consisted of radioactivity levels (decay corrected) in blood and tissues (9 blood samples and 5 single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography scans). Observations in all compartments were adequately captured by individual model predictions. Uptake into salivary glands was saturable with an estimated maximum binding capacity (Bmax) of 40.4 MBq (relative standard error 12.3%) with interindividual variability (IIV) of 59.3% (percent coefficient of variation [CV%]). IIV on other PK parameters was relatively minor. Tumor volume was included as a structural effect on the tumor uptake rate constant (k15), where a two-fold increase in tumor volume resulted in a 1.63-fold increase in k15. In addition, interoccasion variability on k15 improved the model fit (43.5% [CV%]). Simulations showed a reduced absorbed dose per unit administered activity for salivary glands after increasing radioactivity dosing from 3 to 6 GBq (0.685 Gy/GBq vs. 0.421 Gy/GBq, respectively). All in all, population PK modeling could help to improve future radioligand therapy research.

Bioanalytical method development and validation for the quantification of antileishmanial drugs are pivotal to support clinical trials and provide the data necessary to conduct pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. This review provides a comprehensive overview of published validated bioanalytical assays for the quantification of antileishmanial drugs amphotericin B, miltefosine, paromomycin, pentamidine, and pentavalent antimonials in human matrices. The applicability of the assays for leishmaniasis clinical trials as well as their relevance to PK studies with emphasis on the choice of matrix, calibration range, sample volume, sample preparation, choice of internal standards, separation, and detection was discussed for each antileishmanial drug. Given that no published bioanalytical methods included multiple antileishmanial drugs in a single assay although antileishmanial shortened combination regimens currently were under investigation, it was recommended to combine various drugs in a single bioanalytical method. Furthermore, bioanalytical method development regarding target site matrix as well as applying microsampling strategies was recommended to optimize future clinical PK studies in leishmaniasis.

Background: Little is known about parameters that have a relevant impact on (dis)similarities in biodistribution between various Ga-68-labeled somatostatin analogues. Additionally, the effect of tumor burden on organ uptake remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe and compare organ and tumor distribution of [Ga-68]Ga-DOTATATE and [Ga-68]Ga-HA-DOTATATE using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and to identify factors that might cause biodistribution and tumor uptake differences between both peptides. In addition, the effect of tumor burden on peptide biodistribution in gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients was assessed. Methods: A PBPK model was developed for [Ga-68]Ga-(HA-)DOTATATE in GEP-NET patients. Three tumor compartments were added, representing primary tumor, liver metastases and other metastases. Furthermore, reactions describing receptor binding, internalization and recycling, renal clearance and intracellular degradation were added to the model. Scan data from GEP-NET patients were used for evaluation of model predictions. Simulations with increasing tumor volumes were performed to assess the tumor sink effect. Results: Data of 39 and 59 patients receiving [Ga-68]Ga-DOTATATE and [Ga-68]Ga-HA-DOTATATE, respectively, were included. Evaluations showed that the model adequately described image-based patient data and that different receptor affinities caused organ uptake dissimilarities between both peptides. Sensitivity analysis indicated that tumor blood flow and blood volume impacted tumor distribution most. Tumor sink predictions showed a decrease in spleen uptake with increasing tumor volume, which seemed clinically relevant for patients with total tumor volumes higher than similar to 550 mL. Conclusion: The developed PBPK model adequately predicted tumor and organ uptake for this GEP-NET population. Relevant organ uptake differences between [Ga-68]Ga-DOTATATE and [Ga-68]Ga-HA-DOTATATE we

Background and Objective As a result of changes in physiology during pregnancy, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs can be altered. It is unclear whether under- or overexposure occurs in pregnant cancer patients and thus also whether adjustments in dosing regimens are required. Given the severity of the malignant disease and the potentially high impact on both the mother and child, there is a high unmet medical need for adequate and tolerable treatment of this patient population. We aimed to develop and evaluate a semi-physiological enriched model that incorporates physiological changes during pregnancy into available population PK models developed from non-pregnant patient data. Methods Gestational changes in plasma protein levels, renal function, hepatic function, plasma volume, extracellular water and total body water were implemented in existing empirical PK models for docetaxel, paclitaxel, epirubicin and doxorubicin. These models were used to predict PK profiles for pregnant patients, which were compared with observed data obtained from pregnant patients. Results The observed PK profiles were well described by the model. For docetaxel, paclitaxel and doxorubicin, an overprediction of the lower concentrations was observed, most likely as a result of a lack of data on the gestational changes in metabolizing enzymes. For paclitaxel, epirubicin and doxorubicin, the semi-physiological enriched model performed better in predicting PK in pregnant patients compared with a model that was not adjusted for pregnancy-induced changes. Conclusion By incorporating gestational changes into existing population pharmacokinetic models, it is possible to adequately predict plasma concentrations of drugs in pregnant patients which may inform dose adjustments in this population.

Pyronaridine-artesunate was recently strongly recommended in the 2022 update of the WHO Guidelines for the Treatment of Malaria, becoming the newest artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for both uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria. Pyronaridine-artesunate, available as a tablet and paediatric granule formulations, is being adopted in regions where malaria treatment outcome is challenged by increasing chloroquine resistance. Pyronaridine is an old antimalarial agent that has been used for more than 50 years as a blood schizonticide, which exerts its antimalarial activity by interfering with the synthesis of the haemozoin pigment within the Plasmodium digestive vacuole. Pyronaridine exhibits a high blood-to-plasma distribution ratio due to its tendency to accumulate in blood cells. This feature is believed to play a crucial role in its pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and pharmacological activity. The PK characteristics of pyronaridine include rapid oral absorption, large volumes of distribution and low total body clearance, resulting in a long terminal apparent half-life. Moreover, differences in PK profiles have been observed between healthy volunteers and malaria-infected patients, indicating a potential disease-related impact on PK properties. Despite a long history, there is only limited knowledge of the clinical PK and pharmacodynamics of pyronaridine, particularly in special populations such as children and pregnant women. We here provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical pharmacology of pyronaridine in the treatment of malaria.