Search

The premise of research in human physiology is to explore a multifaceted system whilst identifying one or a few outcomes of interest. Therefore, the control of potentially confounding variables requires careful thought regarding the extent of control and complexity of standardisation. One common factor to control prior to testing is diet, as food and fluid provision may deviate from participants' habitual diets, yet a self-report and replication method can be flawed by under-reporting. Researchers may also need to consider standardisation of physical activity, whether it be through familiarisation trials, wash-out periods, or guidance on levels of physical activity to be achieved before trials. In terms of pharmacological agents, the ethical implications of standardisation require researchers to carefully consider how medications, caffeine consumption and oral contraceptive prescriptions may affect the study. For research in females, it should be considered whether standardisation between- or within-participants in regards to menstrual cycle phase is most relevant. The timing of measurements relative to various other daily events is relevant to all physiological research and so it can be important to standardise when measurements are made. This review summarises the areas of standardisation which we hope will be considered useful to anyone involved in human physiology research, including when and how one can apply standardisation to various contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The complement system is comprised of the classical, lectin and alternative pathways that result in the formation of: pro-inflammatory anaphylatoxins; opsonins that label cells for phagocytic removal; and, a membrane attack complex that directly lyses target cells. Complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) -- cell lysis triggered by complement protein C1q binding to the Fc region of antibodies bound to target cells -- is another effector function of complement and a key mechanism-of-action of several monoclonal antibody therapies. At present, it is not well established how exercise affects complement system proteins in humans. Methods: A systematic search was conducted to identify studies that included original data and investigated the association between soluble complement proteins in the blood of healthy humans, and: 1) an acute bout of exercise; 2) exercise training interventions; or, 3) measurements of habitual physical activity and fitness. Results: 77 studies were eligible for inclusion in this review, which included a total of 10,236 participants, and 40 complement proteins and constituent fragments. Higher levels of exercise training and cardiorespiratory fitness were commonly associated with reduced C3 in blood. Additionally, muscle strength was negatively associated with C1q. Elevated C3a-des-Arg, C4a-des- Arg and C5a, lower C1-inhibitor, and unchanged C3 and C4 were reported immediately post-laboratory based exercise, compared to baseline. Whereas, ultra-endurance running and resistance training increased markers of the alternative (factor B and H), classical (C1s), and leptin (mannose binding lectin) pathways, as well as C3 and C6 family proteins, up to 72-h following exercise. Heterogeneity among studies may be due to discrepancies in blood sampling/handling procedures, analytical techniques, exercise interventions/measurements and fitness of included populations. Conclusions: Increased anaphylatoxins were observed immediately following an acute bout of exercise in a laboratory setting, whereas field-based exercise interventions of a longer duration (e.g. ultra-endurance running) or designed to elicit muscle damage (e.g. resistance training) increased complement proteins for up to 72-h. C3 in blood was mostly reduced by exercise training and associated with increased cardiorespiratory fitness, whereas C1q appeared to be negatively associated to muscle strength. Thus, both acute bouts of exercise and exercise training appear to modulate complement system proteins. Future research is needed to assess the clinical implications of these changes, for example on the efficacy of monoclonal antibody therapies dependent on CDC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The premise of research in human physiology is to explore a multifaceted system whilst identifying one or a few outcomes of interest. Therefore, the control of potentially confounding variables requires careful thought regarding the extent of control and complexity of standardisation. One common factor to control prior to testing is diet, as food and fluid provision may deviate from participants' habitual diets, yet a self-report and replication method can be flawed by under-reporting. Researchers may also need to consider standardisation of physical activity, whether it be through familiarisation trials, wash-out periods, or guidance on levels of physical activity to be achieved before trials. In terms of pharmacological agents, the ethical implications of standardisation require researchers to carefully consider how medications, caffeine consumption and oral contraceptive prescriptions may affect the study. For research in females, it should be considered whether standardisation between- or within-participants in regards to menstrual cycle phase is most relevant. The timing of measurements relative to various other daily events is relevant to all physiological research and so it can be important to standardise when measurements are made. This review summarises the areas of standardisation which we hope will be considered useful to anyone involved in human physiology research, including when and how one can apply standardisation to various contexts., (© 2024 The Authors. Experimental Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society.)