Search

Purpose of Review: In this review, we analyzed the different therapy options in patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL)., Recent Findings: The treatment of advanced HL has greatly evolved during the last decade even still based on polychemotherapy. Mature data established that the better strategies require Positron emission tomography (PET)-driven treatments which allow to optimize the balance between disease control and both immediate and late treatment adverse effects, leading to cure most patients while minimizing the risk of toxicity. Indeed, PET-driven deescalated strategies offer the better treatment option. The recent incorporation of targeted therapies, anti-CD30 or anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) in combination with chemotherapy should quickly change the game and be a step forward to still decrease the risk of treatment toxicity and improve the cure rate., Summary: The standard of care for advanced HL remains currently PET-driven chemotherapy and should rapidly evolve with the addition of targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are now used in routine practice for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Severe (grade ≥ 3) cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) are still the most concerning acute toxicities leading to frequent intensive care unit (ICU) admission, prolonging hospitalization, and adding significant cost to treatment. We report on the incidence of CRS and ICANS and the outcomes in a large cohort of 925 patients with LBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) in France based on patient data captured through the DESCAR-T registry. CRS of any grade occurred in 778 patients (84.1%), with 74 patients (8.0%) with grade 3 CRS or higher, while ICANS of any grade occurred in 375 patients (40.5%), with 112 patients (12.1%) with grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Based on the parameters selected by multivariable analyses, two independent prognostic scoring systems (PSS) were derived, one for grade ≥ 3 CRS and one for grade ≥ 3 ICANS. CRS-PSS included bulky disease, a platelet count < 150 G/L, a C-reactive protein (CRP) level > 30 mg/L and no bridging therapy or stable or progressive disease (SD/PD) after bridging. Patients with a CRS-PSS score > 2 had significantly higher risk to develop grade ≥ 3 CRS. ICANS-PSS included female sex, low level of platelets (< 150 G/L), use of axi-cel and no bridging therapy or SD/PD after bridging. Patients with a CRS-PSS score > 2 had significantly higher risk to develop grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Both scores were externally validated in international cohorts of patients treated with tisa-cel or axi-cel., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The IELSG38 trial was conducted to investigate the effects of subcutaneous (SC) rituximab on the complete remission (CR) rate and the benefits of SC rituximab maintenance in patients with extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) who received front-line treatment with chlorambucil plus rituximab. Study treatment was an induction phase with oral chlorambucil 6 mg/m2/day on weeks 1-6, 9-10, 13-14, 17-18, and 21-22, and intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 of weeks 1-4, and 1,400 mg SC on weeks 9, 13, 17, and 21. Then, a maintenance phase followed with rituximab administered at 1,400 mg SC every two months for two years. Of the 112 patients enrolled, 109 were evaluated for efficacy. The CR rates increased from 52% at the end of the induction phase to 70% upon completion of the maintenance phase. With a median follow-up of 5.8 years, the 5-year event-free, progression-free, and overall survival rates were 87% (95% CI: 78-92), 84% (95% CI: 75-89), and 93% (95% CI: 86-96), respectively. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities were neutropenia (33%) and lymphocytopenia (16%). Six patients experienced treatment-related serious adverse events, including fever of unknown origin, sepsis, pneumonia, respiratory failure, severe cerebellar ataxia, and fatal acute myeloid leukemia. The trial showed that SC rituximab did not improve the CR rate at the conclusion of the induction phase, which was the main endpoint. Nevertheless, SC rituximab maintenance might have facilitated long-term disease control, potentially contributing to enhanced event-free and progression-free survival.

Background: Follicular helper T-cell lymphomas (TFHL) harbour frequent alterations in genes that regulate DNA methylation. Preliminary reports suggest that treatment with 5-azacitidine has clinical activity in patients with relapsed or refractory TFHL. We aimed to compare the oral form of azacitidine with investigator's choice standard therapy (ICT; ie, gemcitabine, bendamustine, or romidepsin) in patients with relapsed or refractory TFHL., Methods: Patients older than 18 years with relapsed or refractory TFHL (angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, or nodal T-cell lymphoma with phenotype, ie, positive with two or more markers among CD10, BCL6, CXCL13, PD1, or ICOS) based on the 2017 WHO classification of haematological neoplasms, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-3, were recruited in university hospitals from five European countries and from Japan. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment with either azacitidine given at a dose of 300 mg once a day (200 mg in Japanese patients) for 14 days in a 28-day cycle or gemcitabine, bendamustine, or romidepsin according to the investigator's choice. Random assignment was stratified by the number of previous lines of therapy and by the presence of previous or concomitant myeloid malignancy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, presented in the intention-to-treat population. This Article is the final analysis of this trial, registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Europe NCT03593018 and Japan NCT03703375)., Findings: 86 patients (median age 69 years [IQR 62-76], 50 patients were male, 36 were female) were enrolled between Nov 9, 2018, to Feb 22, 2021; 42 in the azacitidine group and 44 in the ICT group. With a median follow-up of 27·4 months (IQR 20·2-32·9), the median progression-free survival was 5·6 months (95% CI 2·7 -8·1) in the azacitidine group versus 2·8 months (1·9-4·8) in the ICT group (hazard ratio of 0·63 (95% CI 0·38-1·07); 1-sided p=0·042). Grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 32 (76%) of 42 patients in the azacitidine group versus 42 (98%) of 43 patients in the ICT group. The most adverse grade 3 or worse adverse events were haematological (28 [67%] of 42 patients vs 40 [93%] of 43 patients), infection (8 [19%] and 14 [33%]), and gastrointestinal (5 [12%] vs 1 [2%] for azacitidine and ICT, respectively). There were two treatment-related deaths in the azacitidine group (one endocarditis and one candidiasis) and three in the ICT group (one heart failure, one COVID-19, and one cause unknown)., Interpretation: Although the pre-specified primary outcome of the trial was not met, the favourable safety profile suggests that azacitidine could add to the treatment options in these difficult to treat diseases especially in combination with other drugs. Trials with combination are in preparation in a platform trial., Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb., Translation: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests EB reports receiving research funding from Amgen and Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS); honoraria from Kite, Gilead, Novartis, Roche, Incyte, Miltenyi Biotech, Takeda, and Sanofi; and participation on an advisory committee for Roche, Gilead, ADC Therapeutics, Takeda, Novartis, and Incyte. FM reports receiving consultancy fees from Roche, Gilead, and AbbVie and participation on advisory committees for Roche, Gilead, Novartis, BMS, AbbVie, Genmab, Miltenyi, Allogene Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, and Janssen. GC reports receiving honoraria from Gilead, Novartis, Mylteni, Sanofi, AbbVie, Takeda, Roche, Janssen, Roche, Celgene, Novartis and participation on advisory committees for MabQi, Ownards Therapeutics, AbbVie, Roche, and BMS. NF reports receiving consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, HUYA, and Novartis; research funding from Bayer, BMS, Chugai Pharma, Celgene, Genmab, and Incyte; honoraria from AstraZeneca, BMS, Chugai Pharma, Dainippon Sumitomo, Eisai, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Nippon Shinyaku, Novartis, Ono, Sanofi, Symbio, Takeda, and Celgene. R-OC reports receiving honoraria from Roche, Takeda, Merck, BMS, Gilead and Kite, AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, and Incyte; research funding from Takeda and Gilead and Kite; honoraria from Roche, Takeda, Merck, BMS, Gilead and Kite, AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, Incyte and AstraZeneca; and participation on advisory committees for Roche, Takeda, Merck, BMS, Gilead and Kite, ADC Therapeutics, Janssen, and Incyte. CPF reports receiving consultancy fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Atarabio, Celgene and BMS, GenMab, Gilead and Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Morphosys, Ono Pharmaceutical, Roche, and Takeda; research funding from BeiGene; and speaker bureau fees from Celgene and BMS, Gilead and Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Roche, and Takeda; and travel support from Roche. FAd’A reports receiving research funding from Servier and Nordic Nanovector. PBS reports receiving consultancy fees from Amgen, Roche, Janssen, Gilead, Incyte, Morphosys, CTI Biopharma, BMS, Celegene, AbbVie, Takeda, BMS, Beigene, and Lilly; research funding from Roche; and honoraria from Amgen, Roche, Janssen, Gilead, Incyte, Morphosys, CTI Biopharma, BMS, Celegene, AbbVie, Takeda, BMS, Beigene, and Lilly. AG and MN are current employees and stock option holders at BMS. L-MF reports receiving honoraria from Roche, AbbVie, Janssen, and AstraZeneca. M-HD-L reports receiving research funding from Roche and Celgene; honoraria from Gilead and Amgen and travel support from Mundipharma. LdL reports receiving consultancy fees from Lunaphore Technologies and Bayer and honoraria from Novartis. PG reports receiving consultancy fees from Takeda; research funding from Takeda, Innate Pharma, Alderan, and Sanofi; and honoraria from Takeda Gilead. KT reports receiving consultancy fees from Ono Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, Yakuruto, Solasia Pharma, Meiji Seika Pharma, and HUYABIO; research funding from Kyowa-hakko and Kirin, Meiji Seika Pharma, BMS, Byer, Daiich-Sankyo, HUYABIO, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; and honoraria from Chugai Pharma, Eizai, and Meiji Seika Pharma. FL reports receiving honoraria from Kiowa, Miltenyi, and BMS; research funding from Roche and BMS; and travel support from Roche and Gilead. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

The last 3 decades have witnessed a major evolution in the treatment of advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). The most prominent of these developments include the introduction of the international prognostic scoring (IPS) system; therapeutic decision-making based on both IPS and interim PET/CT data; the finding that a negative interim PET/CT result could be safely used for treatment de-escalation; the introduction of intensive combination chemotherapy like escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, oncovin (vincristine), procarbazine, and prednisone); and further modification of this protocol with the incorporation of a conjugated anti-CD30 antibody brentuximab vedotin (BV) into first-line regimens, like BV-AVD (BV+ adriamycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine) and BrECADD (brentuximab vedotin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dacarbazine, and dexamethasone). The accruing data about the toxicity of the escalated BEACOPP protocol have led to decreasing the number of therapeutic cycles, substitution of toxic agents like procarbazine with dacarbazine (e.g., BEACOPDac), and reduction/omission of radiation therapy. Lately, a significant advancement has been made by the integration of checkpoint inhibitors in the first-line treatment, with preliminary results demonstrating the superiority of anti-PD1 combined with chemotherapy (nivolumab-AVD) compared to the BV-AVD regimen. This review aims to analyze recently published studies whose findings could change the treatment practice in advanced-stage HL.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. The primary analysis of the Ro-CHOP phase III randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01796002) established that romidepsin (Ro) plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP) did not yield an increased efficacy compared with CHOP alone as first-line treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. We report the planned final analysis 5 years after the last patient enrolled. With a median follow-up of 6 years, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.0 months compared with 10.2 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.005]; P = .054), while median overall survival was 62.2 months (35.7-86.6 months) and 43.8 months (30.1-70.2 months; HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.14]; P = .324) in the Ro-CHOP and CHOP arms, respectively. In an exploratory analysis, the median PFS in the centrally reviewed follicular helper T-cell lymphoma subgroup was significantly longer in the Ro-CHOP arm (19.5 v 10.6 months, HR, 0.703 [95% CI, 0.502 to 0.985]; P = .039). Second-line treatments were given to 251 patients with a median PFS2 and OS2 after relapse or progression of 3.3 months and 11.5 months, respectively. Within the limits of highly heterogeneous second-line treatments, no specific regimen seemed to provide superior disease control. However, a potential benefit was observed with brentuximab vedotin in association with chemotherapy even after excluding anaplastic large-cell lymphoma subtype or after adjusting for histology and international prognostic index in a multivariate model (HR for PFS, 0.431 [95% CI, 0.238 to 0.779]; P = .005).

The results of the GA in Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (GAINED) study demonstrated the success of an 18 F-FDG PET-driven approach to allow early identification-for intensification therapy-of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients with a high risk of relapse. Besides, some works have reported the prognostic value of baseline PET radiomics features (RFs). This work investigated the added value of such biomarkers on survival of patients involved in the GAINED protocol. Methods: Conventional PET features and RFs were computed from 18 F-FDG PET at baseline and extracted using different volume definitions (patient level, largest lesion, and hottest lesion). Clinical features and the consolidation treatment information were also considered in the model. Two machine-learning pipelines were trained with 80% of patients and tested on the remaining 20%. The training was repeated 100 times to highlight the test set variability. For the 2-y progression-free survival (PFS) outcome, the pipeline included a data augmentation and an elastic net logistic regression model. Results for different feature groups were compared using the mean area under the curve (AUC). For the survival outcome, the pipeline included a Cox univariate model to select the features. Then, the model included a split between high- and low-risk patients using the median of a regression score based on the coefficients of a penalized Cox multivariate approach. The log-rank test P values over the 100 loops were compared with a Wilcoxon signed-ranked test. Results: In total, 545 patients were included for the 2-y PFS classification and 561 for survival analysis. Clinical features alone, consolidation features alone, conventional PET features, and RFs extracted at patient level achieved an AUC of, respectively, 0.65 ± 0.07, 0.64 ± 0.06, 0.60 ± 0.07, and 0.62 ± 0.07 (0.62 ± 0.07 for the largest lesion and 0.54 ± 0.07 for the hottest). Combining clinical features with the consolidation features led to the best AUC (0.72 ± 0.06). Adding conventional PET features or RFs did not improve the results. For survival, the log-rank P values of the model involving clinical and consolidation features together were significantly smaller than all combined-feature groups ( P < 0.007). Conclusion: The results showed that a concatenation of multimodal features coupled with a simple machine-learning model does not seem to improve the results in terms of 2-y PFS classification and PFS prediction for patient treated according to the GAINED protocol., (© 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells can induce prolonged remissions and potentially cure a significant proportion of patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas. However, some patients may die of causes unrelated to lymphoma after CAR T-cell therapy. To date, little is known about the nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after CAR T-cell therapy. Using the French DESCAR-T registry, we analyzed the incidence and causes of NRM and identified risk factors of NRM. We report on 957 patients who received standard-of-care axicabtagene ciloleucel (n = 598) or tisagenlecleucel (n = 359) between July 2018 and April 2022, in 27 French centers. With a median follow-up of 12.4 months, overall NRM occurred in 48 patients (5.0% of all patients): early (before day 28 after infusion) in 9 patients (0.9% of all patients and 19% of overall NRM), and late (on/after day 28 after infusion) in 39 patients (4.1% of all patients and 81% of overall NRM). Causes of overall NRM were distributed as follows: 56% infections (29% with non-COVID-19 and 27% with COVID-19), 10% cytokine release syndromes, 6% stroke, 6% cerebral hemorrhage, 6% second malignancies, 4% immune effector cell associated neurotoxicities, and 10% deaths from other causes. We report risk factors of early NRM and overall NRM. In multivariate analysis, both diabetes and elevated ferritin level at lymphodepletion were associated with an increased risk of overall NRM. Our results may help physicians in patient selection and management in order to reduce the NRM after CAR T-cell therapy., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

The GAINED phase 3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01659099) evaluated a PET-driven consolidative strategy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. In this post hoc analysis, we aimed to compare the prognostic value of the per-protocol PET interpretation criteria (Menton 2011 consensus) with the change in the SUV max (ΔSUV max ) alone. Methods: Real-time central review of 18 F-FDG PET/CT was performed in 581 patients after 2 cycles (PET2) and 4 cycles (PET4) of immunochemotherapy using the Menton 2011 criteria, combining the ΔSUV max (cutoffs of 66% and 70% at PET2 and PET4, respectively) and the Deauville scale. In "special cases," when the baseline SUV max was less than 10.0 or the interim residual tumor SUV max was greater than 5.0, the Menton 2011 experts' consensus agreed that the ΔSUV max may not be reliable and that the Deauville score is preferable. Prognostic values of Menton 2011 and ΔSUV max were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analyses in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Seventeen percent of patients at PET2 (100/581) and 8% at PET4 (49/581) had PET-negative results by ΔSUV max but were considered to have PET-positive results according to Menton 2011 with residual SUV max of greater than 5.0. For the population with PET2-positive results, 2-y PFS was 70% (range, 58%-80%) with ΔSUV max alone, whereas the outcome tended to be better for those who were considered to have PET-positive results by Menton 2011, 81% (range, 72%-87%). Conversely, all 10 patients with baseline SUV max of less than 10.0 had PET2-positive results by ΔSUV max but were considered to have PET2-negative results by Menton 2011. These patients had the same 2-y PFS as patients with PET2-negative/PET4-negative results, indicating that the ΔSUV max yielded false-positive results in this situation. Conclusion: We recommend the use of the ΔSUV max alone rather than the Menton 2011 criteria for assessing the interim metabolic response in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, except when the baseline SUV max is less than 10.0., (© 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the standard curative treatment for patients with high-risk relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R HL). The AETHERA study showed survival gain with Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) maintenance after ASCT in BV-naive patients, which was recently confirmed in the retrospective AMAHRELIS cohort, including a majority of BV-exposed patients. However, this approach has not been compared to intensive tandem auto/auto or auto/allo transplant strategies, which were used before BV approval. Here, we matched BV maintenance (AMAHRELIS) and tandem SCT (HR2009) cohorts, and observed that BV maintenance was associated with better survival outcome in patients with HR R/R HL., (© 2023 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Patients (pts) with asymptomatic low-burden follicular lymphoma (FL) are usually observed at diagnosis. Time to lymphoma treatment (TLT) initiation can however be very heterogeneous and risk factors of progression are poorly studied. Our study evaluated 201 pts with grade 1-3a low-tumor burden FL diagnosed in four French centers between 2010 and 2020 and managed by a watch and wait strategy in real-life settings. After a median follow-up of 4.8 years, the median TLT was 4.2 years (95% confidence interval, 3.1-5.5). On multivariate analysis, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.2; P = 0.02), more than 4 nodal areas involved (HR = 1.7; P = 0.02) and more than 1 extranodal involvement (HR = 2.7; P = 0.01) were identified as independent predictors of TLT. The median TLT was 5.8 years for pts with no risk factor, 2.4 years for 1 risk factor, and 1.3 years for >1 risk factors ( P < 0.01). In a subanalysis of 75 pts staged with positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) ≥14 cm 3 and standardized Dmax (reflecting tumor dissemination) >0.32 m -1 were also associated with shorter TLT (HR = 3.4; P = 0.004 and HR = 2.4; P = 0.007, respectively). In multivariate models combining PET-CT parameters and clinical variables, TMTV remained independent predictor of shorter TLT. These simple parameters could help to identify FL patients initially observed at higher risk of early progression. The role of PET-CT (extranodal sites and PET metrics) in low-burden FL appears promising and warrants further assessment in large cohorts., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Hematology Association.)

Low baseline NK-cell counts (NKCCs) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are associated with a poor prognosis. The REMARC phase III trial (NCT01122472) showed that lenalidomide maintenance prolonged PFS in rituximab-chemotherapy responders. We conducted a REMARC ancillary study analysing the impact of lenalidomide maintenance on the prognostic value of low NKCCs. Blood samples from 335 elderly French patients enrolled in the REMARC trial were analysed by flow cytometry to obtain NKCCs at diagnosis (n = 220), at randomization (n = 186) and/or six months after randomization (n = 184). Baseline NKCCs < 100 cells/μl were associated with shorter PFS and OS (HRs = [2.2 (1.4, 3.3), p < 0.001] and [2.8 (1.7, 4.5), p < 0.001], respectively), independently of aaIPI. In a competing risk analysis, low NKCCs at baseline were associated with a higher risk of relapse/progression (p = 0.0025), but not of death without progression (p = 0.33). Lenalidomide did not affect the prognosis value of low baseline NKCCs (p  = 0.6349). Similar results were obtained for low NKCCs at randomization. Our results demonstrate that low NKCCs at baseline and post rituximab-chemotherapy are robust prognostic factors in DLBCL and reveal that lenalidomide has no impact on this parameter. Other therapeutic strategies aiming at improving NK-cell function could improve outcomes in DLBCL., (© 2023 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. In 2004, the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) Network initiated the randomized open-label, phase III MCL Younger trial for first-line treatment of patients with advanced-stage MCL, age < 66 years, comparing an alternating rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone/rituximab plus dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin (R-CHOP/R-DHAP) induction followed by high-dose cytarabine-containing myeloablative radiochemotherapy conditioning and autologous peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation (R-DHAP arm) to R-CHOP with standard myeloablative radiochemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (R-CHOP arm). After a median follow-up of 10.6 years, the time to treatment failure was still significantly improved in the R-DHAP versus R-CHOP arms (medians 8.4 v 3.9 years, 5-/10-year rates 64%/46% v 41%/25%, P = .038, hazard ratio, 0.59). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in the R-DHAP arm versus 11.3 years in R-CHOP arm (5-/10-year rates, 76%/60% v 69%/55%, P = .12). The unadjusted OS hazard ratios (0.80 [95% CI, 0.61 to 1.06], P = .12) reached significance when adjusted for Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) and MIPI + Ki-67 (MIPI-c) (0.74; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.98; P = .038 and .60; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.87; P = .0066). The incidence of secondary hematologic malignancies tended to be higher in the R-DHAP arm (4.5% v 1.4% at 10 years). With mature long-term data, we confirm the previously observed substantially prolonged time to treatment failure and, for the first time to our knowledge, show an improvement of OS. Some patients with MCL may be cured.

Purpose: The prognosis of patients with early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma remains unsatisfactory. We assessed the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (BV-AVD) in previously untreated, early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02292979)., Methods: BREACH is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial. Eligible patients were age 18-60 years with ≥ 1 unfavorable EORTC/LYSA criterion. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to four cycles of BV-AVD or standard doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, and dacarbazine (ABVD), followed by 30 Gy involved node radiotherapy. The primary end point was the positron emission tomography (PET) response rate after two cycles by expert independent review using the Deauville score. The study was designed to test if the PET-negative rate after two cycles of BV-AVD was superior to 75%. We hypothesized a 10% increase in the PET-negative rate after two cycles of BV-AVD., Results: Between March 2015 and October 2016, 170 patients were enrolled. After two cycles, the primary end point of the study was met: 93 (82.3%; 90% CI, 75.3 to 88.0) of 113 patients in the BV-AVD arm were PET-negative (Deauville score 1-3) compared with 43 (75.4%; 90% CI, 64.3% to 84.5%) of 57 in the ABVD arm. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 97.3% (95% CI, 91.9 to 99.1) and 92.6% (95% CI, 81.4% to 97.2%) in the BV-AVD and ABVD arms, respectively. High total metabolic tumor volume was associated with a significantly shorter PFS (hazard ratio, 17.9; 95% CI, 2.2 to 145.5; P < .001). For patients with high total metabolic tumor volume, the 2-year PFS rate was 90.9% (95% CI, 74.4 to 97.0) and 70.7% (95% CI, 39.4% to 87.9%) in the BV-AVD and ABVD arms, respectively., Conclusion: BV-AVD demonstrated an improvement in the PET-negative rate compared with ABVD after two cycles.

Introduction: Whereas numerous studies on several cancers describe the link between social conditions and disease severity, little is known about the social and demographic characteristics of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. At diagnosis, 10-15% of the patients in the advanced stages have a well-known poor outcome owing to their chemoresistance, but the determinants of the more advanced stages remain elusive. The objective of the present study was to decipher the potential impact of social disparities on the disease features at diagnosis and analyze how the sociodemographic patient features could impact the HL outcome of patients with advanced-stage HL enrolled in the AHL2011 trial., Methods: This ancillary study was conducted on a cohort of patients from French centers that had recruited more than five patients in the phase III AHL2011 study (NCT0135874). Patients had to be alive at the time of the ancillary study and had to have given their consent to answer the questionnaire. Pre-treatment data (age, gender, stage, B symptoms, IPS), the treatment received, the responses to PET-CT, and the presence of serious adverse events (serious adverse events-SAEs) were all extracted from the AHL2011 trial database. Sociodemographic data-marital status, living area, level of education, socio-professional category, and professional situation-were extracted from the questionnaires. The population density at the point of diagnosis was determined based on ZIP Code, and the distance from the reference medical center was then calculated by the road network. Baseline PET acquisition was performed before any treatment. PET images at baseline were centrally reviewed. The total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) at the baseline was calculated using a 41% SUVmax cutoff for each lesion. Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the first progression, relapse, or death from any cause or the last follow-up. The data cutoff for the analyses presented here was 31 October 2017. The progression-free survival was analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis., Results: Among the 823 patients enrolled in the AHL2011 study, the questionnaire was sent to 394 patients, of whom 232 (58.9%) responded. At the time of HL diagnosis, 61.9% (N = 143) of patients declared that they were not socially isolated, 38.1% (N = 88) that they were single, 163 (71.2%) had a professional activity, and 66 (28.8%) were inactive owing to unemployment, retirement, or sick leave. Of the patients, 31.1% (N = 71) lived in a rural region, compared to 68.9% (N = 157) that lived in an urban region. The residence ZIP Code at the time of HL diagnosis was available for 163 (70%). Sociodemographic characteristics did not influence the presence of usual prognostic factors (ECOG, B symptoms, bulky mass, IPS) except for professional activity, which was associated with more frequent low IPS (0-2) (79 (48.5%) active versus 20 (30.3%) inactive patients; p = 0.012). Likewise, no correlation was observed between TMTV and sociodemographic characteristics. However, the TMTV quartile distribution was different according to the living area, with the two upper quartiles being enriched with patients living in a rural area ( p = 0.008). Moreover, a negative correlation between the average number of the living area's inhabitants and TMTV (R Pearson = -0.29, p = 0.0004) was observed., Conclusion: This study focused on sociodemographic parameters in advanced-stage HL patients and shows that professional activity is associated with more favorable disease features (low IPS), while patients living in rural or low-populated areas are more likely to have an unfavorable HL presentation with a high tumor burden (high TMTV). These data suggest that some patient sociodemographic characteristics might impact either access to medical care or environmental exposure, leading to a higher frequency of unfavorable presentations. Further prospective sociodemographic studies are necessary to confirm these preliminary results.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. The RELEVANCE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01650701) showed that lenalidomide plus rituximab (R 2 ) provided similar efficacy to rituximab plus chemotherapy (R-chemo) in patients with advanced-stage, previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL). We report the second interim analysis of the RELEVANCE trial after 6 years of follow-up. Patients with previously untreated grade 1-3a FL were assigned 1:1 to R 2 or R-chemo, followed by rituximab maintenance. Coprimary end points were complete response (confirmed/unconfirmed) at week 120 and progression-free survival (PFS). At median follow-up of 72 months, 6-year PFS was 60% and 59% for R 2 and R-chemo, respectively (hazard ratio = 1.03 [95% CI, 0.84 to 1.27]). Six-year overall survival was estimated to be 89% in both groups. Median PFS and overall survival were not reached in either group. Overall response after progression was 61% and 59%, and 5-year estimated survival rate after progression was 69% and 74% in the R 2 and R-chemo groups, respectively. The transformation rate per year in the R 2 and R-chemo groups was 0.68% and 0.45%, and secondary primary malignancies occurred in 11% and 13% ( P = .34), respectively. No new safety signals were observed. R 2 continues to demonstrate comparable, durable efficacy and safety versus R-chemo in previously untreated patients with FL and provides an acceptable chemo-free alternative.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) have both demonstrated impressive clinical activity in relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In this study, we analyzed the outcome of 809 patients with R/R DLBCL after two or more previous lines of treatment who had a commercial chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells order for axi-cel or tisa-cel and were registered in the retrospective French DESCAR-T registry study ( NCT04328298 ). After 1:1 propensity score matching (n = 418), the best overall response rate/complete response rate (ORR/CRR) was 80%/60% versus 66%/42% for patients treated with axi-cel compared to tisa-cel, respectively (P &lt; 0.001 for both ORR and CRR comparisons). After a median follow-up of 11.7 months, the 1-year progression-free survival was 46.6% for axi-cel and 33.2% for tisa-cel (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.46-0.79; P = 0.0003). Overall survival (OS) was also significantly improved after axi-cel infusion compared to after tisa-cel infusion (1-year OS 63.5% versus 48.8%; HR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45-0.88; P = 0.0072). Similar findings were observed using the inverse probability of treatment weighting statistical approach. Grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome was significantly more frequent with axi-cel than with tisa-cel, but no significant difference was observed for grade ≥3. Regarding immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), both grade 1-2 and grade ≥3 ICANS were significantly more frequent with axi-cel than with tisa-cel. In conclusion, our matched comparison study supports a higher efficacy and also a higher toxicity of axi-cel compared to tisa-cel in the third or more treatment line for R/R DLBCL., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Despite a number of treatment options, patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) whose disease has become refractory to treatment have a poor prognosis. Selinexor is a novel, oral drug that is approved to treat patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. In this post hoc analysis of the SADAL study, a multinational, open-label study, we evaluated subpopulations to determine if response to single agent selinexor is impacted by number of lines of prior treatment, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), response to first and most recent therapies, and time to progressive disease., Patients: Patients (n = 134) with DLBCL after 2-5 prior therapies were enrolled in SADAL and received 60mg selinexor twice weekly., Results: The median overall survival was 9.0 months and median progression free survival was 2.6 months. Patients who had the best overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate were those who had prior ASCT (42.5% and 50.0%) or responded to last line of therapy (35.9% and 43.5%). Patients with primary refractory DLBCL also showed responses (ORR 21.8%). Adverse events between subgroups were similar to the overall study population, the most common being thrombocytopenia (29.1%), fatigue (7.5%), and nausea (6.0%)., Conclusion: Regardless of prior therapy and disease refractory status, selinexor treatment demonstrated results consistent with its novel mechanism of action and lack of cross-resistance. Thus, single agent oral selinexor can induce deep, durable, and tolerable responses in patients with DLBCL who have recurrent disease after several chemoimmunotherapy combination regimens., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Cytarabine-based immuno-chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) consolidation is standard of care for fit patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL). BEAM (Carmustine, Etoposide, Aracytine, Melphalan) is among the most frequently used conditioning regimen. Studies comparing BEAM with Bendamustine-EAM (BeEAM) have suggested that patients treated with BeEAM have a better progression-free survival (PFS). We performed a cross-study analysis to better evaluate BeEAM. Thirty-five patients from a retrospective study who received R-DHAP/BeEAM were compared to 245 patients from the LyMa trial (NCT00921414) who all received R-DHAP followed by R-BEAM. PFS and Overall Survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. At 2 years there was no difference between R-BEAM and BeEAM in either PFS (84.9% versus 87.9%; p = 0.95) or OS (91.8% versus 94.2%; p = 0.30). Analyses were repeated on a propensity score to reduce biases. Each patient from the BeEAM cohort (n = 30) was matched to three patients from the R-BEAM cohort (n = 90) for age, sex, MIPI score, pre-transplant status disease and rituximab maintenance (RM). PFS and OS at 2 years remained similar between R-BEAM and BeEAM with more renal toxicity in BeEAM group. MCL patients who received R-DHAP induction before ASCT have similar outcome after R-BEAM or BeEAM conditioning regimen., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Purpose: The AHL2011 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01358747) demonstrated that a positron emission tomography (PET)-driven de-escalation strategy after two cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) provides similar progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and reduces early toxicity compared with a nonmonitored standard treatment. Here, we report, with a prolonged follow-up, the final study results., Methods: Patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (stage III, IV, or IIB with mediastinum/thorax ratio > 0.33 or extranodal involvement) age 16-60 years were prospectively randomly assigned between 6 × BEACOPP and a PET-driven arm after 2 × BEACOPP delivering 4 × ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) in PET2- and 4 × BEACOPP in PET2+ patients. PET performed after four cycles of chemotherapy had to be negative to complete the planned treatment., Results: In total, 823 patients were enrolled including 413 in the standard arm and 410 in the PET-driven arm. With a 67.2-month median follow-up, 5-year PFS (87.5% v 86.7%; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.57; P = .67) and OS (97.7% in both arms; HR = 1.012; 95% CI, 0.50 to 2.10; P = .53) were similar in both randomization arms. In the whole cohort, full interim PET assessment predicted patients' 5-year PFS (92.3% in PET2-/PET4-, 75.4% [HR = 3.26; 95% CI, 18.3 to 5.77] in PET2+/PET4- and 46.5% [HR = 12.4; 95% CI, 7.31 to 19.51] in PET4+ patients, respectively; P < .0001) independent of international prognosis score. Five-year OS was also affected by interim PET results, and PET2+/PET4- patients (93.5%; HR = 3.3; 95% CI, 1.07 to 10.1; P = .036) and PET4+ patients (91.9%; HR = 3.756; 95% CI, 1.07 to 13.18; P = .038) had a significant lower OS than PET2-/PET4- patients (98.2%). Twenty-two patients (2.7%) developed a second primary malignancy, 13 (3.2%) and 9 (2.2%) in the standard and experimental arms, respectively., Conclusion: The extended follow-up confirms the continued efficacy and favorable safety of AHL2011 PET-driven strategy, which is noninferior to standard six cycles of BEACOPP. PET4 provides additional prognostic information to PET2 and allows identifying patients with particularly poor prognosis., Competing Interests: René-Olivier CasasnovasHonoraria: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, AmgenConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, IncyteResearch Funding: Roche/Genentech (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), Takeda (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pauline BriceResearch Funding: Takeda, BMSTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Amgen, AbbVie/Genentech Julien LazaroviciTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Mundipharma Hervé GhesquieresHonoraria: Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Celgene, RocheConsulting or Advisory Role: Gilead Sciences, Celgene, Roche, MundipharmaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Gilead Sciences, Celgene, Takeda Aspasia StamatoullasTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer Jehan DupuisConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZenecaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Gilead Sciences Thomas GastinneHonoraria: Pfizer, Takeda, Gilead SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: Takeda, Gilead SciencesTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Pfizer Krimo BouabdallahHonoraria: Roche, Takeda Science Foundation, AbbVie, Kite/GileadConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Takeda, Kite/GileadTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Takeda Pierre FeugierHonoraria: Roche/Genentech, Janssen, Gilead Sciences, Amgen, AbbVieConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Janssen, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Amgen, AstraZenecaSpeakers' Bureau: Roche/Genentech, AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: Roche/Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, AbbVie, AmgenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Roche/Genentech, AbbVie Franck MorschhauserConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Epizyme, ServierSpeakers' Bureau: RocheExpert Testimony: Roche/Genentech David SibonConsulting or Advisory Role: Takeda, Iqone healthcare, Janssen, Roche, AbbVieTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Takeda, Janssen Christophe BonnetConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche Diane DamotteResearch Funding: AstraZeneca/MedImmune Marc AndréConsulting or Advisory Role: Takeda, BMSiResearch Funding: Takeda (Inst), Roche (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Celgene, Gilead Sciences Michel MeignanHonoraria: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Cédric RossiConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, AbbVie, Roche, TakedaResearch Funding: TakedaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVieNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Selinexor, an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export, was evaluated in the Phase 2b SADAL study in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who previously received two to five prior systemic regimens. In post hoc analyses, we analyzed several categories of patient characteristics (age, renal function, DLBCL subtype, absolute lymphocyte count, transplant status, number of prior lines of therapy, refractory status, Ann Arbor disease stage, and lactate dehydrogenase) at baseline, i.e., during screening procedures, to determine their potential contributions to the efficacy (overall response rate [ORR], duration of response [DOR], overall survival [OS]) and tolerability of selinexor. Across most categories of characteristics, no significant difference was observed in ORR or DOR. OS was significantly longer for patients < 65 vs. ≥ 65 years, and for those with lymphocyte counts ≥ 1000/µL vs. < 1000/µL or lactate dehydrogenase ≤ ULN vs. > ULN. The most common adverse events (AEs) across the characteristics were thrombocytopenia and nausea, and similar rates of grade 3 AEs and serious AEs were observed. With its oral administration, novel mechanism of action, and consistency in responses in heavily pretreated patients, selinexor may help to address an important unmet clinical need in the treatment of DLBCL.

Background: No study has focused on the economic burden in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survivors, even though this knowledge is essential. This study reports on health care resource use and associated health care costs as well as related factors in a series of 1671 French long-term NHL survivors., Methods: Health care costs were measured from the payer perspective. Only direct medical costs (medical consultations, outpatient treatments, hospitalizations, and medical transport) in the past 12 months were included (reference year 2015). Multiple linear regression was used to search for explanatory factors of health care costs., Results: In total, 1100 survivors (66%) reported having used at least 1 health care resource, and 867 (52%) reported having used at least 1 outpatient treatment. After the authors accounted for missing data, the mean health care cost was estimated at €702 ± €2221. Hospitalizations and outpatient treatments were the main cost drivers. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. For the 1100 survivors who reported using at least 1 health care resource, the mean health care cost was €1067 ± €2268. Several factors demonstrated statistically significant relationships with health care costs. For instance, cardiovascular disorders increased costs by 66% ± 16%. In contrast, rituximab or autologous stem cell transplantation as initial therapy had no effect on health care costs., Conclusions: The consideration of economic constraints in health care is now a reality. This retrospective study reports on a better understanding of health care resource use and associated health care costs as well as related factors. It may help health care professionals in their ongoing efforts to design person-centered health care pathways., (© 2021 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: Romidepsin, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, has demonstrated activity in relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) as a single agent. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) therapy is widely used as first-line treatment of PTCL; however, it has limited efficacy. Results from a phase Ib and II study showed the feasibility of combining romidepsin with CHOP (Ro-CHOP)., Methods: This study is a randomized phase III study of Ro-CHOP versus CHOP in adult patients with previously untreated PTCL. All patients received CHOP in 3-week cycles for six cycles. Romidepsin, 12 mg/m 2 , was administered intravenously over a 4-hour period on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle for six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) according to International Working Group 1999 criteria., Results: Between January 2013 and December 2017, 421 patients were enrolled (Ro-CHOP, n = 211; CHOP, n = 210). The median PFS for Ro-CHOP versus CHOP was 12.0 months (95% CI, 9.0 to 25.8) versus 10.2 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 13.2) with a hazard ratio of 0.81 ( P = .096). In the Ro-CHOP versus CHOP arms, the median overall survival was 51.8 versus 42.9 months and the objective response rate was 63% versus 60% with complete response plus unconfirmed complete response rates of 41% versus 37% ( P > .1 in all comparisons), respectively. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in ≥ 30% of patients in the Ro-CHOP arm included thrombocytopenia (50% v 10% in the Ro-CHOP v CHOP arms, respectively), neutropenia (49% v 33%), anemia (47% v 17%), and leukopenia (32% v 20%)., Conclusion: The addition of romidepsin to CHOP did not improve PFS, response rates, nor overall survival and increased the frequency for grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Ro-CHOP does not represent a significant advance in the standard of care for patients with previously untreated PTCL., Competing Interests: Emmanuel BachyHonoraria: Gilead Sciences, Roche, Amgen, Janssen-CilagConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, TakedaResearch Funding: Amgen Foundation (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen-Cilag, Roche, Gilead Sciences, Incyte Vincent CamusHonoraria: Roche/Genentech, Incyte, Janssen, Gilead Sciences, NovartisConsulting or Advisory Role: RocheResearch Funding: iQone Healthcare (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer, Roche Catherine ThieblemontHonoraria: Celgene, AbbVie, Bayer, Janssen, Roche, Incyte, Novartis, Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Kite/Gilead, Novartis David SibonConsulting or Advisory Role: Takeda, iQone Healthcare, Janssen, Roche, AbbVieTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Takeda, Janssen René-Olivier CasasnovasHonoraria: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, AmgenConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, IncyteResearch Funding: Roche/Genentech (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), Takeda (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Loïc YsebaertHonoraria: AbbVieConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: Roche (Inst), Janssen-Cilag (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst) Gandhi DamajConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, iQoneResearch Funding: TakedaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: PFIZEE, Roche/Genentech, AbbVie Stéphanie GuidezConsulting or Advisory Role: Kite/GileadTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen Marc AndréConsulting or Advisory Role: Takeda, BMSiResearch Funding: Takeda (Inst), Roche (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Celgene, Gilead Sciences Alejandro Martín García-SanchoHonoraria: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, Servier, Gilead Sciences, TakedaConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Celgene, MorphoSys, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, iQone, EUSA Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Servier, IncyteExpert Testimony: Gilead SciencesTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Celgene¸ Servier Maria Jesus PenarrubiaHonoraria: AbbVie, Celgene, Servier, Takeda, RocheConsulting or Advisory Role: Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Celgene, AbbVie, Takeda, Clinigen GroupResearch Funding: CelgeneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, Servier, Novartis, Janssen, Celgene, Takeda Philipp B. StaberHonoraria: Roche, Amgen, Takeda, Abbott/AbbVie, Janssen Oncology, Incyte, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, MSD Oncology, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Roche (Inst) Judith TrotmanResearch Funding: BeiGene (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), Pharmacyclics (Inst), Janssen-Cilag (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Celgene (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech Andreas HüttmannHonoraria: TakedaConsulting or Advisory Role: TakedaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Pharma AG Philippe GaulardHonoraria: Takeda, Gilead SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: TakedaResearch Funding: Takeda (Inst), Innate Pharma (Inst), Sanofi (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Marie-Helene Delfau-LarueHonoraria: Gilead Sciences, AmgenResearch Funding: Roche, CelgeneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Mundipharma Laurence de LevalHonoraria: Novartis (Inst)Consulting or Advisory Role: Lunaphore Technologies (Inst), Bayer (Inst) Michel MeignanHonoraria: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Ju LiEmployment: Bristol Myers Squibb/CelgeneStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol Myers Squibb/CelgeneResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb/CelgeneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene Franck MorschhauserConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Epizyme, ServierSpeakers' Bureau: RocheExpert Testimony: Roche/Genentech Richard DelarueEmployment: Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, BeiGeneStock and Other Ownership Interests: Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, BeiGeneNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Background: The SADAL study evaluated oral selinexor in patients with relapsed and/or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapy. In this post-hoc analysis, we analyzed the outcomes of the SADAL study by DLBCL subtype to determine the effects of DLBCL subtypes on efficacy and tolerability of selinexor., Patients and Methods: Data from 134 patients in SADAL were analyzed by DLBCL subtypes for overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), duration of treatment response, progression-free survival, and adverse events rate., Results: ORR in the entire cohort was 29.1%, and similar in patients with germinal center (GCB) versus non-GCB DLBCL (31.7% vs. 24.2%, P = 0.45); transformed DLBCL showed a trend towards higher ORR than de novo DLBCL: 38.7% vs. 26.2% (P = 0.23). Despite similar prior treatment regimens and baseline characteristics, patients with DLBCL and normal C-MYC/BCL-2 protein expression levels had a significantly higher ORR (46.2% vs.14.8%, P = 0.012) and significantly longer OS (medians 13.7 vs. 5.1 months, hazard ratio 0.43 [95% CI, 0.23-0.77], P = 0.004) as compared with those whose DLBCL had C-MYC and BCL-2 overexpression. Among patients who had normal expression levels of either C-MYC or BCL-2 and baseline hemoglobin levels ≥ 10g/dL, ORR was 51.5% (n = 47), with median OS of 15.5 months and median PFS of 4.6 months. Similar rates of adverse events were noted in all subgroups., Conclusions: Overall, single agent oral selinexor showed strong responses in patients with limited treatment alternatives regardless of germinal center B-cell type or disease origin., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent lymphoma. Despite the clear benefit of CD20-based therapy, a subset of FL patients still progress to aggressive lymphoma. Thus, identifying early biomarkers that incorporate PET metrics could be helpful to identify patients with a high risk of treatment failure with Rituximab. We retrospectively included a total of 132 untreated FL patients separated into training and validation cohorts. Optimal threshold of baseline SUVmax was first determined in the training cohort (n=48) to predict progression-free survival (PFS). The PET results were investigated along with the tumor and immune microenvironment, which were determined by immunochemistry and transcriptome studies involving gene set enrichment analyses and immune cell deconvolution, together with the tumor mutation profile. We report that baseline SUVmax >14.5 was associated with poorer PFS than baseline SUVmax ≤14.5 (HR=0.28; p=0.00046). Neither immune T-cell infiltration nor immune checkpoint expression were associated with baseline PET metrics. By contrast, FL samples with Ki-67 staining ≥10% showed enrichment of cell cycle/DNA genes (p=0.013) and significantly higher SUVmax values (p=0.007). Despite similar oncogenic pathway alterations in both SUVmax groups of FL samples, 4 out of 5 cases harboring the infrequent FOXO1 transcription factor mutation were seen in FL patients with SUVmax >14.5. Thus, high baseline SUVmax reflects FL tumor proliferation and, together with Ki-67 proliferative index, can be used to identify patients at risk of early relapse with R-chemotherapy.

Absolute count of circulating monocytes has been proposed as an independent prognostic factor in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, monocyte nomenclature includes various subsets with pro-, anti-inflammatory, or suppressive functions, and their clinical relevance in DLBCL has been poorly explored. Herein, we broadly assessed circulating monocyte heterogeneity in 91 DLBCL patients. Classical- (cMO, CD14 pos CD16 neg ) and intermediate- (iMO, CD14 pos CD16 pos ) monocytes accumulated in DLBCL peripheral blood and exhibited an inflammatory phenotype. On the opposite, nonclassical monocytes (ncMOSlan pos , CD14 low CD16 pos Slan neg and ncMOSlan neg , CD14 low CD16 pos , Slan neg ) were decreased in peripheral blood. Tumor-conditioned monocytes presented similarities with ncMO phenotype from DLBCL and were prone to migrate in response to CCL5 and CXCL12, and presented similarities with DLBCL-infiltrated myeloid cells, as defined by mass cytometry. Finally, we demonstrated the adverse value of an accumulation of nonclassical monocytes in 2 independent cohorts of DLBCL., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Le Gallou, Lhomme, Irish, Mingam, Pangault, Monvoisin, Ferrant, Azzaoui, Rossille, Bouabdallah, Damaj, Cartron, Godmer, Le Gouill, Casasnovas, Molina, Houot, Lamy, Tarte, Fest and Roussel.)

Circulating tumor-derived DNA (ctDNA) is an emerging biomarker for many cancers, but the limited sensitivity of current detection methods reduces its utility for diagnosing minimal residual disease. Here we describe phased variant enrichment and detection sequencing (PhasED-seq), a method that uses multiple somatic mutations in individual DNA fragments to improve the sensitivity of ctDNA detection. Leveraging whole-genome sequences from 2,538 tumors, we identify phased variants and their associations with mutational signatures. We show that even without molecular barcodes, the limits of detection of PhasED-seq outperform prior methods, including duplex barcoding, allowing ctDNA detection in the ppm range in participant samples. We profiled 678 specimens from 213 participants with B cell lymphomas, including serial cell-free DNA samples before and during therapy for diffuse large B cell lymphoma. In participants with undetectable ctDNA after two cycles of therapy using a next-generation sequencing-based approach termed cancer personalized profiling by deep sequencing, an additional 25% have ctDNA detectable by PhasED-seq and have worse outcomes. Finally, we demonstrate the application of PhasED-seq to solid tumors., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Purpose: The prospective, randomized AHL2011 trial demonstrated that the use of the doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine regimen (ABVD) after two cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP escalated ) in early responders on the basis of a positron emission tomography (PET)-driven strategy was safe and minimized toxicity compared with standard 6 BEACOPP escalated cycles. This substudy investigated the benefit of this strategy in gonadal function and fertility in patients under 45 years old., Methods: Ovarian function was assessed by serum measurement of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol, and anti-müllerian hormone in women, and semen analysis, FSH, and testosterone levels were used to evaluate testicular function in men at baseline, end of treatment, and during 5 years of follow-up., Results: A total of 145 women and 424 men, enrolled between May 19, 2011, and April 29, 2014, were included. The risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (FSH > 24 IU/L) and of having a low ovarian reserve (anti-müllerian hormone < 0.5 ng/mL) was reduced after treatment in the PET-driven group (odds ratio [OR], 0.20; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.50; P = .001 and OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.56, P = .005, respectively). Both parameters were correlated with age and dose of alkylating agents. However, no significant differences were observed in terms of pregnancy rates. Men in the PET-driven group had a higher recovery rate of sperm parameters after treatment compared with the standard BEACOPP escalated group, as well as a lower risk of severe testicular damage (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.5; P < .0001) and a higher likelihood of achieving pregnancy (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.4 to 9.3; P = .004)., Conclusion: Although both treatments affected ovarian reserve and spermatogenesis, the PET-driven strategy decreased the risk of gonadal dysfunction and infertility in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma., Competing Interests: Isabelle DemeestereConsulting or Advisory Role: RocheResearch Funding: Roche diagnosisTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Ferring Jehan DupuisConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZenecaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Gilead Sciences Franck MorschhauserConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Epizyme, ServierSpeakers' Bureau: RocheExpert Testimony: Roche/Genentech Virginie De WildeConsulting or Advisory Role: Takeda, Janssen Oncology Julien LazaroviciTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Novartis, Sandoz, Janssen-Cilag, Jazz Pharmaceuticals France, Daiichi Sankyo Oncology France, Mundipharma, Pfizer, AbbVie Hervé GhesquieresHonoraria: Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Celgene, RocheConsulting or Advisory Role: Gilead Sciences, Celgene, Roche, MundipharmaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Gilead Sciences, Celgene, Takeda Mohamed TouatiHonoraria: AmgenConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene David SibonConsulting or Advisory Role: Takeda, Iqone healthcare, Janssen, RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Takeda, Janssen Luc-Matthieu ForneckerConsulting or Advisory Role: Takeda, RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Takeda, Roche Marc AndréConsulting or Advisory Role: Takeda, BMSiResearch Funding: Takeda, RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Celgene, Gilead Sciences René-Olivier CasasnovasHonoraria: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, AmgenConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, IncyteResearch Funding: Roche/Genentech, Gilead Sciences, TakedaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, JanssenNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

A comprehensive approach to the mineral composition of black teas of different origins was studied using the Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (FAAS) method, supported by chemometric tools including Principal Component Analysis PCA) and Classification and Regression Trees (CART). Significant differences between the teas from seven countries (Japan, Nepal, Kenya, Iran, Sri Lanka, India, and China) were shown. K was the main element determined in all teas, with an average concentration of 11,649 mg/kg, followed by Ca, Mg and Mn. In general, regarding all investigated black teas, the element content was ranked in the following order: K > Ca > Mg > Mn > Fe > Na > Zn > Cu. The applied chemometric methods allowed us to recognize black tea clusters based on their mineral composition and place of cultivation, and allowed us to find correlations between particular elements in black teas. The performed analyses revealed interesting correlations between the concentration of various elements in black teas: K was negatively correlated with Na, Fe, Mn and Cu; K was positively correlated with the content of Ca and Mg. Significant positive correlations between Mn and Fe and Mn and Zn in the studied black tea samples were also revealed. It was shown that mineral composition may be a significant factor regarding the origin of the black tea, not only considering the country, but also the region or province.

Background: Muscle depletion (MD) assessed by computed tomography (CT) has been shown to be a predictive marker in solid tumors, but has not been assessed in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Despite software improvements, MD measurement remains highly time-consuming and cannot be used in clinical practice., Methods: This study reports the development of a Deep-Learning automatic segmentation algorithm (DLASA) to measure MD, and investigate its predictive value in a cohort of 656 diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients included in the GAINED phase III prospective trial (NCT01659099)., Results: After training on a series of 190 patients, the DLASA achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.97 ± 0.03. In the cohort, the median skeletal muscle index was 50.2 cm 2 /m 2 and median muscle attenuation (MA) was 36.1 Hounsfield units (HU). No impact of sarcopenia was found on either progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Muscular hypodensity, defined as MA below the tenth percentile according to sex, was associated with a lower OS and PFS, respectively (HR = 2.80 (95% CI 1.58-4.95), p < 0.001, and HR = 2.22 (95% CI 1.43-3.45), p < 0.001). Muscular hypodensity appears to be an independent risk factor for mortality in DLBCL and because of DLASA can be estimated in routine practice.