Search

Introduction To evaluate biosimilar understanding and preference trends of medical oncologists in Turkey. Methods A survey consisting of 24 multiple-choice questions with checkbox answers was conducted among medical oncologists. The questionnaire was divided into five parts to some intentions: demographic characteristics, general knowledge about biosimilars, knowledge about local approval and reimbursement issues, individual preference trends, and ranking the knowledge of their own. All answers were analyzed as whole cohort, specialists and fellows. Results Fellows (n = 47) consisted 42%, and academic clinicians (n = 37) consisted 35% of the participants. In the whole cohort, the overall rate of correct answers was 55.1% in the general knowledge about the biosimilars part, and 26.7% in the local approval and reimbursement issues part. At all, 57.7% of the participants declared that they object to switch from a reference product to a biosimilar product. The rate of those who defined themselves as extremely knowledgeable decreased from 8.1% to 2.7% in the whole cohort at the end of the survey. Conclusion The need for more accurate and clarified local regulations and education emerging in the biotechnology era must be met.

We aimed to compare the efficacy and the safety of the FOLFOX and the FLOT regimens in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) as first-line treatment. It was a retrospective multicenter observational study. The comparisons between groups were conducted in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and hematologic adverse events. Seventy-nine patients, diagnosed with mGC between March 2012 and December 2019, treated with FOLFOX (n = 43) or FLOT (n = 36) regimens as first-line treatment were included in the study. The mPFS was 10.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.8-16.1] in the FLOT arm and 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.1-9.1) in the FOLFOX arm (P < 0.001). The ORR was 63.9% in the FLOT arm and 30.2% in the FOLFOX arm (P = 0.003). The mOS was 13.3 months (95% CI, 11.3-15.4) in the FLOT arm and 10.9 months (95% CI, 8.2-13.5) in the FOLFOX arm (P = 0.103). The hematologic adverse events in all grades were 88.4% (n = 38) in the FOLFOX arm compared with 80.6% (n = 29) in the FLOT arm (P = 0.335). The FLOT regimen might be a preferred option in mGC with an improved PFS and ORR compared with the FOLFOX regimen.

Background: The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and the safety of the FLOT and the modified DCF (mDCF) regimens in patients with metastatic gastric (GC) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma as first-line treatment. Methods: The medical records of 72 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Survivals and hematological adverse events of the patients were examined. Factors affecting survivals were analyzed in univariate analysis. A multivariate analysis was performed with the factors contributing to survivals in univariate analysis. Results: The median PFS (mPFS) was 10.1 months (95% CI, 6.8-13.4) in the FLOT arm (n = 33) and 7.4 months (95% CI, 9.1-21.6) in the mDCF arm (n = 39) (p = 0.041). The median OS (mOS) was 12.9 months (95% CI, 9.7-16.1) in the FLOT arm and 15.4 months (95% CI, 9.1-21.6) in the mDCF arm (p = 0.622). It was found that all grade neutropenia was 51.3% vs. 72.7% (p = 0.063), febrile neutropenia was 8.3% vs. 6.3% (p = 0.743), and thrombocytopenia was 48.7% vs. 51.5% (p = 0.813) in the FLOT and mDCF arms, respectively. Anemia was 59% in the FLOT arm and 100% in the mDCF arm (p < 0.001). Grade 3-4 anemia was 7.7% in the FLOT arm and 24.2% in the mDCF arm (p = 0.052). Discussion: It was shown that the mPFS was significantly increased in the FLOT arm compared to the mDCF arm as the first-line treatment in patients with metastatic GC and GEJC. Hematological adverse events were more favorable in the FLOT arm than in the mDCF arm.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the serum albumin/globulin ratio (AGR) on the 30-day mortality of febrile neutropenia (FEN). The second aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the combination of the AGR with the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia (CISNE) risk indexes on 30-day mortality of FEN.A retrospective study evaluating the effect of serum AGR, MASCC and CISNE scores on 30-day FEN mortality.A total of 137 FEN episodes in 120 patients were included in this study. Nineteen patients (14%) died within the first 30 days of FEN episodes. The 30-day mortality rate was calculated as 4% in patients with high AGR and 23% in patients with low AGR (P = .002). According to the MASCC and CISNE risk scores, the mortality rates in low-risk patients were 8% and 6%, respectively, and in the high-risk group 22% and 29%, respectively (P = .024 vs P .001). In the group of patients with MASCC21 and CISNE ≥3, the 30-day mortality rate was 7%, when the AGR was1.13, and in those with AGR ≤1.13 mortality rate increased to 50% (P = .012).A low AGR in a patient with FEN was found to be associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality. Combining the AGR with MASCC and CISNE risk indexes might increase the predictive value of these scoring systems on 30-day mortality.

PurposeMetastatic gastric cancer is a common disease with poor prognosis. In this common disease, estimating the prognosis with a simple complete blood count has attracted the attention in many studies. However, the results of the studies are incompatible with each other. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between parameters of the complete blood count and disease prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer(AGC).MethodsBetween 2009 and May 2019, the files of patients with AGC were retrospectively evaluated. Blood counts of the patients were examined before receiving any treatment at the time of diagnosis of AGC. All parameters derived from complete blood count and defined in literature were evaluated in this study. These were; Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio(NLR), platelet lymphocyte ratio(PLR), monocyte lymphocyte ratio(MLR), systemic immune-inflammation index(SII), hemoglobin, lymphocyte, platelet. The patients were divided in two subgroups according to the median values of NLR, PLR, MLR and SII.ResultsA total of 105 patients with AGC were included in the study. The median survival in the patients with low NLR group was 14.6 months compared with high NLR group was 7.9 months (p=0.008). In low PLR and MLR group the median survivals were 12.7 and 14.6 months compared with high PLR and MLR were 8.2 and 7.9 months respectively (p=0.019, p=0.06). There was no significant relationship with SII (p=0.375). Multivariate analysis showed that NLR was an independent predictor of overall survival.ConclusionThrough the parameters derived from complete blood count, NLR appears to be a promising prognostic marker in patients with AGC.

Purpose The study was aimed to evaluate the effect of uric acid (UA) on the 30-day mortality of patients admitted to the tertiary referral hospital with a complaint of febrile neutropenia (FEN). The secondary aim was to evaluate the use of combining serum UA levels with the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk score. Methods A retrospective study in which the MASCC score and serum UA levels were used to evaluate the mortality risk within 30 days among patients with FEN. Results A total of 118 FEN episodes were included in the study and 17 (14%) of these patients died. While this rate is 23% in the high-risk group according to the MASCC score, it is 7% in the low-risk group (p = 0.011). In multivariate analysis of the parameters that significantly affect the 30-day FEN mortality, MASCC risk score (OR, 4.28; CI 95% 1.19-15.39,p = 0.013) and having a level of serum UA > 7 mg/dL (OR, 4.46; CI 95% 1.19-15.38,p = 0.032) was significantly increased the risk of in 30-day mortality of FEN. The rate of 30-day mortality of FEN was 0% in patients with a low MASCC risk score and UA level compared with 50% in the high MASCC risk score and high UA level group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion Increased level of UA at the time of FEN diagnosis was independently associated with an increased rate of 30-day mortality of FEN. The combination of the MASCC risk score and serum UA level might thoroughly predict the 30-day mortality of FEN.

Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a highly heterogeneous subtype of lung cancer. There are still no widely accepted prognostic parameters for stage III NSCLC. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of the standardized uptake value (SUV) max ratio of primary tumor to lymph node (T/N SUV max) and its correlation with various hematological parameters. Patient data were reviewed from the hospital database retrospectively. The T/N SUV max ratio was calculated by dividing the SUV max of the primary tumor by the maximal SUV max of the lymph node. The cut-off value for T/N SUV max ratio was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan–Meier method with the Long-rank test. P value 1.96 were defined as low risk patients. The median event (recurrence or progression) free survival was 24.3 months (95% confidence interval: 12.0–36.6) for low risk patients, and 9.2 months (95% confidence interval: 6.1–12.4) for high risk patients (P = .0015). There was an inverse correlation between T/N SUV max and hemoglobin concentration and mean corpuscular volume (rho: −0.349, P = .011; rho: −0.312, P = .025, respectively). Low risk patients had a more favorable prognosis compared to high risk patients. We demonstrated that T/N SUV max can be of prognostic value in stage III NSCLC. T/N SUV max correlated only with hemoglobin and mean corpuscular volume.