Search

Supplementary Figure 4. The FGFR3-TACC3 fusion gene and protein are retained in recurrent GBM.

Supplementary Figure 3. Evaluation of the expression of FGFR3-TACC3 fusion elements.

Supplementary Figure 2. Schematics of FGFR3-TACC3 genomic breakpoints.

Supplementary Figure Legends

Supplementary Table 1. Summary of FGFR-TACC fusion transcripts identified in all cancer types.

Supplementary Figure 6. Analysis of SNP6.0 arrays of GBM harboring CNVs of FGFR3 and TACC3 genomic loci.

Purpose: Oncogenic fusions consisting of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) and TACC are present in a subgroup of glioblastoma (GBM) and other human cancers and have been proposed as new therapeutic targets. We analyzed frequency and molecular features of FGFR–TACC fusions and explored the therapeutic efficacy of inhibiting FGFR kinase in GBM and grade II and III glioma.Experimental Design: Overall, 795 gliomas (584 GBM, 85 grades II and III with wild-type and 126 with IDH1/2 mutation) were screened for FGFR–TACC breakpoints and associated molecular profile. We also analyzed expression of the FGFR3 and TACC3 components of the fusions. The effects of the specific FGFR inhibitor JNJ-42756493 for FGFR3–TACC3–positive glioma were determined in preclinical experiments. Two patients with advanced FGFR3–TACC3–positive GBM received JNJ-42756493 and were assessed for therapeutic response.Results: Three of 85 IDH1/2 wild-type (3.5%) but none of 126 IDH1/2-mutant grade II and III gliomas harbored FGFR3–TACC3 fusions. FGFR–TACC rearrangements were present in 17 of 584 GBM (2.9%). FGFR3–TACC3 fusions were associated with strong and homogeneous FGFR3 immunostaining. They are mutually exclusive with IDH1/2 mutations and EGFR amplification, whereas they co-occur with CDK4 amplification. JNJ-42756493 inhibited growth of glioma cells harboring FGFR3–TACC3 in vitro and in vivo. The two patients with FGFR3–TACC3 rearrangements who received JNJ-42756493 manifested clinical improvement with stable disease and minor response, respectively.Conclusions: RT-PCR sequencing is a sensitive and specific method to identify FGFR–TACC–positive patients. FGFR3–TACC3 fusions are associated with uniform intratumor expression of the fusion protein. The clinical response observed in the FGFR3–TACC3–positive patients treated with an FGFR inhibitor supports clinical studies of FGFR inhibition in FGFR–TACC–positive patients. Clin Cancer Res; 21(14); 3307–17. ©2015 AACR.See related commentary by Ahluwalia and Rich, p. 3105

Supplementary Figure 1. Genomic PCR images and Sanger sequences of FGFR3-TACC3 genomic breakpoints.

Supplementary Figure 5. PFS and OS of FGFR3-TACC3-positive glioma patients.

Little is known about the genomic basis of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) tumorigenesis. To investigate the mutational profile of PCNSL, we analyzed nine paired tumor and germline DNA samples from PCNSL patients by high throughput exome sequencing. Eight genes of interest have been further investigated by focused resequencing in 28 additional PCNSL tumors to better estimate their incidence. Our study identified recurrent somatic mutations in 37 genes, some involved in key signaling pathways such as NFKB, B cell differentiation and cell cycle control. Focused resequencing in the larger cohort revealed high mutation rates for genes already described as mutated in PCNSL such as MYD88 (38%), CD79B (30%), PIM1 (22%) and TBL1XR1 (19%) and for genes not previously reported to be involved in PCNSL tumorigenesis such as ETV6 (16%), IRF4 (14%), IRF2BP2 (11%) and EBF1 (11%). Of note, only 3 somatically acquired SNVs were annotated in the COSMIC database. Our results demonstrate a high genetic heterogeneity of PCNSL and mutational pattern similarities with extracerebral diffuse large B cell lymphomas, particularly of the activated B-cell (ABC) subtype, suggesting shared underlying biological mechanisms. The present study provides new insights into the mutational profile of PCNSL and potential targets for therapeutic strategies.

Purpose: Our objective was to identify the genetic changes involved in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) oncogenesis and evaluate their clinical relevance. Experimental Design: We investigated a series of 29 newly diagnosed, HIV-negative, PCNSL patients using high-resolution single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays (n = 29) and whole-exome sequencing (n = 4) approaches. Recurrent homozygous deletions and somatic gene mutations found were validated by quantitative real-time PCR and Sanger sequencing, respectively. Molecular results were correlated with prognosis. Results: All PCNSLs were diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, and the patients received chemotherapy without radiotherapy as initial treatment. The SNP analysis revealed recurrent large and focal chromosome imbalances that target candidate genes in PCNSL oncogenesis. The most frequent genomic abnormalities were (i) 6p21.32 loss (HLA locus), (ii) 6q loss, (iii) CDKN2A homozygous deletions, (iv) 12q12-q22, and (v) chromosome 7q21 and 7q31 gains. Homozygous deletions of PRMD1, TOX, and DOCK5 and the amplification of HDAC9 were also detected. Sequencing of matched tumor and blood DNA samples identified novel somatic mutations in MYD88 and TBL1XR1 in 38% and 14% of the cases, respectively. The correlation of genetic abnormalities with clinical outcomes using multivariate analysis showed that 6q22 loss (P = 0.006 and P = 0.01) and CDKN2A homozygous deletion (P = 0.02 and P = 0.01) were significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival and overall survival. Conclusions: Our study provides new insights into the molecular tumorigenesis of PCNSL and identifies novel genetic alterations in this disease, especially MYD88 and TBL1XR1 mutations activating the NF-κB signaling pathway, which may be promising targets for future therapeutic strategies. Clin Cancer Res; 18(19); 5203–11. ©2012 AACR.

Purpose: Oncogenic fusions consisting of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) and TACC are present in a subgroup of glioblastoma (GBM) and other human cancers and have been proposed as new therapeutic targets. We analyzed frequency and molecular features of FGFR–TACC fusions and explored the therapeutic efficacy of inhibiting FGFR kinase in GBM and grade II and III glioma. Experimental Design: Overall, 795 gliomas (584 GBM, 85 grades II and III with wild-type and 126 with IDH1/2 mutation) were screened for FGFR–TACC breakpoints and associated molecular profile. We also analyzed expression of the FGFR3 and TACC3 components of the fusions. The effects of the specific FGFR inhibitor JNJ-42756493 for FGFR3–TACC3–positive glioma were determined in preclinical experiments. Two patients with advanced FGFR3–TACC3–positive GBM received JNJ-42756493 and were assessed for therapeutic response. Results: Three of 85 IDH1/2 wild-type (3.5%) but none of 126 IDH1/2-mutant grade II and III gliomas harbored FGFR3–TACC3 fusions. FGFR–TACC rearrangements were present in 17 of 584 GBM (2.9%). FGFR3–TACC3 fusions were associated with strong and homogeneous FGFR3 immunostaining. They are mutually exclusive with IDH1/2 mutations and EGFR amplification, whereas they co-occur with CDK4 amplification. JNJ-42756493 inhibited growth of glioma cells harboring FGFR3–TACC3 in vitro and in vivo. The two patients with FGFR3–TACC3 rearrangements who received JNJ-42756493 manifested clinical improvement with stable disease and minor response, respectively. Conclusions: RT-PCR sequencing is a sensitive and specific method to identify FGFR–TACC–positive patients. FGFR3–TACC3 fusions are associated with uniform intratumor expression of the fusion protein. The clinical response observed in the FGFR3–TACC3–positive patients treated with an FGFR inhibitor supports clinical studies of FGFR inhibition in FGFR–TACC–positive patients. Clin Cancer Res; 21(14); 3307–17. ©2015 AACR. See related commentary by Ahluwalia and Rich, p. 3105

Background: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare extranodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Little is known about the genomic basis of tumorigenesis in PCNSL partly explained by the rarity of biological material available for research studies. PCNSL patients display poor outcomes compared to systemic DLBCL and it is still unclear whether this is linked to the organ-specific microenvironment or reflects a specific, aggressive, intrinsic biological behavior. To our knowledge, the mutational landscape of PCNSL has never been investigated Experimental design: We analyzed 9 paired tumor and germline DNA samples from PCNSL patients by high throughput exome sequencing. Then, we performed focused sequencing in 28 additional PCNSL tumors to validate somatic genomic alterations and better estimate their incidence. Mutational data were correlated with copy number variations (CNV) identified by SNP and CGH arrays and clinical data. Results: We identified recurrent somatic mutations in genes involved in key signalling pathways such as NFκB (i.e. MYD88, CD79B, TBL1XR1), B cell differentiation (i.e. ETV6, EBF1, IRF4) and cell cycle control (i.e. BTG1, PIM1). We found somatic mutations on MYD88 (38%), CD79B (30%), TBL1XR1 (22%) or ETV6 (16%) genes and described bi-allelic inactivation of TBL1XR1 and ETV6 genes. Interestingly, the correlation with the outcome showed a significant negative impact of TBL1XR1 mutation on survival in a multivariate analysis. Conclusions: The present study showed that PCNSLs have high genetic heterogeneity and that their mutational patterns display similarities with extracerebral DLBCL, particularly of the ABC subtype, suggesting shared underlying biological mechanisms. These results provide new insights into the mutational landscape of PCNSL and potential targets for therapeutic strategies. This work benefited from the LOC study group network (réseau national de centres experts des lymphomes primitifs du SNC, INCa). Citation Format: Aurélie Bruno, Blandine Boisselier, Karim Labreche, Yannick Marie, Marc Polivka, Anne Jouvet, Clovis Adam, Dominique Figarella-Branger, Catherine Miquel, Anne Vital, Caroline Houillier, Carole Soussain, Karima Mokhtari, Romain Daveau, Khê Hoang-Xuan. Mutational analysis of primary central nervous system lymphoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 5192. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-5192