Search

Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) functional MRI (fMRI) is commonly used to measure cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), which can convey insightful information about neurovascular health. Breath-holding (BH) has been shown to be a practical vasodilatory stimulus for measuring CVR in clinical settings. The conventional BOLD fMRI approach has some limitations, however, such as susceptibility-induced signal dropout at air tissue interfaces and low BOLD sensitivity especially in areas of low T2*. These drawbacks can potentially be mitigated with multi-echo sequences, which acquire several images at different echo times in one shot. When combined with multiband techniques, high temporal resolution images can be acquired. This study compared an advanced multiband multi-echo (MBME) echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence with an existing multiband single-echo (MB) sequence to evaluate the repeatability and sensitivity of BH activation and CVR mapping. Images were acquired from 28 healthy volunteers, of which 18 returned for repeat imaging. Both MBME and MB data were pre-processed using both standard and advanced denoising techniques. The MBME data was further processed by combining echoes using a T2*-weighted approach and denoising using multi-echo independent component analysis. BH activation was calculated using a general linear model and the respiration response function. CVR was computed as the percent change related to the activation. To account for differences in CVR related to TE, relative CVR (rCVR) was computed and normalized to the mean gray matter CVR. Test–retest metrics were assessed with the Dice coefficient, rCVR difference, within subject coefficient of variation, and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Our findings demonstrate that rCVR for MBME scans were significantly higher than for MB scans across most of the gray matter. In areas of high susceptibility-induced signal dropout, however, MBME rCVR was significantly less than MB rCVR due to artifactually high rCVR for MB scans in these regions. MBME rCVR showed improved test–retest metrics compared with MB. Overall, the MBME sequence displayed superior BOLD sensitivity, improved specificity in areas of signal dropout on MBME scans, enhanced reliability, and reduced variability across subjects compared with MB acquisitions. Our results suggest that the MBME EPI sequence is a promising tool for imaging CVR.

BACKGROUND Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) functional MRI (fMRI) has been widely applied to detect brain activations. Recent advances in multiband (MB) and multiecho (ME) techniques have greatly improved fMRI methods. MB imaging improves temporal and/or spatial resolution, while ME imaging has been shown to improve BOLD sensitivity. This study aimed to evaluate the novel MBME echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence utilizing MB and ME simultaneously to determine if the MBME outperform the MB single echo (MBSE) sequence for task fMRI. PURPOSE To compare the performance of MBME with MBSE in a task fMRI study. STUDY TYPE Prospective. POPULATION A total of 29 healthy volunteers aged 20-46 years (9 male, 20 female). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE MBSE and MBME gradient-echo EPI sequences were applied at 3T. Additional T1 -weighted magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE) was collected. ASSESSMENT A checkerboard visual task was presented during the functional MBSE and MBME scans. The MBME or MBSE signal was evaluated using the temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR). Task activation was evaluated using the z-score, volume, sensitivity, and specificity. Test-retest metrics of task activation were examined with the Dice coefficient (DC) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) on subjects with repeated scans. STATISTICAL TESTS A linear mixed-effects model was used to compared MBME and MBSE activation at the voxel base. The paired t-test was used to compare tSNR, activation z-score, and volume, along with sensitivity, specificity, and DC between MBSE and MBME. RESULTS While similar task activation was detected in the visual cortex, MBME showed higher activation volume and higher sensitivity compared with MBSE (P