Search

Comparative trials among biological drugs for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) provided conflicting results. After patent expire of infliximab originator, adalimumab, infliximab biosimilar, golimumab and vedolizumab have been approved in Italy.We compared the efficacy of these four biologics in UC according to the concept of continuous clinical remission (CCR).In a retrospective, multicentre study, all UC patients treated with adalimumab, infliximab biosimilar, golimumab or vedolizumab between 2014 and 2019 were included. All drugs were compared to each other according to the 1-year CCR rate, defined as Mayo partial score ≤2, with bleeding subscore = 0, without any relapse or optimization with dose escalation, topical treatments or steroid use after first clinical remission.Four-hundred sixteen patients (adalimumab = 90, infliximab biosimilar = 105, golimumab = 79, vedolizumab = 142) were included. CCR was achieved in similar percentages among the groups (33%, 37%, 28%, 37%, respectively). All drugs were equivalent in biologic-naive patients, while vedolizumab was better than a second anti-TNFα in prior anti-TNFα agent failures. No differences were found according to type of adverse events or severe adverse events.Based on a strict definition of clinical remission, all biologics appear equally effective at 1 year. Changing to vedolizumab is more effective than switching to another anti-TNFα in TNFα failures.

Background It is unclear whether patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of COVID-19. Objectives This observational study compared the prevalence of COVID-19 symptoms, diagnosis and hospitalization in IBD patients with a control population with non-inflammatory bowel disorders. Methods This multicentre study, included 2733 outpatients (1397 IBD patients and 1336 controls), from eight major gastrointestinal centres in Lombardy, Italy. Patients were invited to complete a web-based questionnaire regarding demographic, historical and clinical features over the previous 6 weeks. The prevalence of COVID-19 symptoms, diagnosis and hospitalization for COVID-19 was assessed. Results 1810 patients (64%) responded to the questionnaire (941 IBD patients and 869 controls). IBD patients were significantly younger and of male sex than controls. NSAID use and smoking were more frequent in controls. IBD patients were more likely treated with vitamin-D and vaccinated for influenza. Highly probable COVID-19 on the basis of symptoms and signs was less frequent in the IBD group (3.8% vs 6.3%; OR:0.45, 95%CI:0.28–0.75). IBD patients had a lower rate of nasopharyngeal swab-PCR confirmed diagnosis (0.2% vs 1.2%; OR:0.14, 95%CI:0.03–0.67). There was no difference in hospitalization between the groups (0.1% vs 0.6%; OR:0.14, 95%CI:0.02–1.17). Conclusion IBD patients do not have an increased risk of COVID-19 specific symptoms or more severe disease compared with a control group of gastroenterology patients.

Objective Circulating lymphocyte subtypes are not fully explored parameters for monitoring chronic T cell activation during inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), one of the main mediators of IBD related inflammation induces expression of CD70 on T cells. CD70 limits T cell expansion and controls CD27 receptor on activated B lymphocytes. Aim of this study was to assess the number and the frequency of CD70+ T cells and CD27+ B cells in IBD patients during inactive phase of the disease under or without anti-TNFα treatment. Design We studied 91 patients with inactive IBD, 31 untreated, 29 treated with infliximab (IFX), and 31 treated with adalimumab (ADA). Lymphocyte phenotypes were assessed by flow cytometry using anti-CD45, CD19, CD27, CD3, and CD70 monoclonal antibodies. IFX and ADA actual capacity of TNFα neutralization in serum was estimated by the recoveryELISA technique. Results Whereas CD3+ T cells were increased in treated compared to untreated patients, the percentage of the CD70+ T cells was significantly lower in treated patients indicating a ‘cooling’ effect of the biological therapy. This effect differs between samples according to the therapeutic range of the circulating drug. Although the CD19+ B-cell percentage tended to be lower in treated patients, CD19+27+ memory B cells did not show significant differences between groups. Conclusions Frequency of peripheral blood CD70+ T cells was significantly reduced by treatment with anti-TNFα antibodies. Monitoring of this parameter of T cells can give better insight to the disease progression and therapy application in IBD patients.

ObjectivesCOVID-19 has rapidly become a major health emergency worldwide. Patients with IBD are at increased risk of infection, especially when they have active disease and are taking immunosuppressive therapy. The characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with IBD remain unclear.DesignThis Italian prospective observational cohort study enrolled consecutive patients with an established IBD diagnosis and confirmed COVID-19. Data regarding age, sex, IBD (type, treatments and clinical activity), other comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)), signs and symptoms of COVID-19 and therapies were compared with COVID-19 outcomes (pneumonia, hospitalisation, respiratory therapy and death).ResultsBetween 11 and 29 March 2020, 79 patients with IBD with COVID-19 were enrolled at 24 IBD referral units. Thirty-six patients had COVID-19-related pneumonia (46%), 22 (28%) were hospitalised, 7 (9%) required non-mechanical ventilation, 9 (11%) required continuous positive airway pressure therapy, 2 (3%) had endotracheal intubation and 6 (8%) died. Four patients (6%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 while they were being hospitalised for a severe flare of IBD. Age over 65 years (p=0.03), UC diagnosis (p=0.03), IBD activity (p=0.003) and a CCI score >1 (p=0.04) were significantly associated with COVID-19 pneumonia, whereas concomitant IBD treatments were not. Age over 65 years (p=0.002), active IBD (p=0.02) and higher CCI score were significantly associated with COVID-19-related death.ConclusionsActive IBD, old age and comorbidities were associated with a negative COVID-19 outcome, whereas IBD treatments were not. Preventing acute IBD flares may avoid fatal COVID-19 in patients with IBD. Further research is needed.

Background & Aims: COVID-19 pandemic causes more severe illness in patients with pre-existing comorbidities and the elderly. It is unclear whether patients with chronic inflammatory disorders, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), are at increased risk of infection and of more severe disease. We performed a case-control study in Lombardy, Italy, aimed at comparing the prevalence of COVID-19 symptoms, diagnosis and hospitalization in IBD patients and matched controls referred for other digestive disorders or complaints. Patients and Methods: This multicentre study included 2733 consecutive outpatients (1397 IBD patients; cases, and 1336 patients with non-inflammatory bowel disorders, controls), from eight major gastrointestinal centres. Patients were invited to complete a web-based questionnaire regarding their demographic, historical and clinical features over the previous 6 weeks. The prevalence of COVID-19 symptoms, diagnosis and hospitalization for COVID-19 was assessed in IBD cases and controls. Results: One thousand eight hundred and ten patients (64%) responded to the questionnaire (941 IBD patients and 869 controls). IBD patients were significantly younger and of male sex than controls. Comorbidities were not significantly different other than oncologic and rheumatological diseases. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) use and active smoking were more frequent in controls. IBD patients were more likely treated with vitamin D and vaccinated for seasonal influenza. Highly probable COVID-19 on the basis of symptoms and sign was less frequent in the IBD group (3.8% vs 6.3%; OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28-0.75, p 0.0018). IBD patients had a lower rate of nasopharyngeal swab-PCR confirmed diagnosis (0.2% vs 1.2%; OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.67, p 0.024). There was no difference in hospitalization between the groups (0.1% vs 0.6%; OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02 -1.17, p 0.07). Conclusion: IBD patients do not have an increased risk of COVID-19 or more severe disease compared with a matched gastroenterology patient cohort. Several factors may be protective including higher rates of influenza vaccination, vitamin D levels, decreased NSAID use, lower smoking rates, biologic use and higher compliance to social distancing. Funding Statement: No external funding for this manuscript. Declaration of Interests: All authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose. Ethics Approval Statement: The study was approved by Luigi Sacco University Hospital ethics committee (Code. n. 2020/ST/062). The identity and privacy of each patient was secured and response to each questionnaire was anonymised.

BACKGROUND: Budesonide-MMX has an established role in the management of relapsing mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Data regarding effectiveness and tolerability in real-life clinical practice are limited. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the use of budesonide-MMX in ulcerative colitis, as well as short-term effectiveness and tolerability in real-life practice. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of adult patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis treated with budesonide-MMX at four tertiary inflammatory bowel disease centres in Italy from June 2016 to February 2018. Demographic and clinical features of patients, the use of budesonide-MMX, disease course and concomitant therapy were recorded. The primary outcome assessed was clinical remission at 2 months. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients with active mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis were included in the study with a mean age of 45.9 years and a median partial Mayo Score of 4 (interquartile range 3–5). A total of 41 patients were male. Overall, 36 had extensive colitis, 38 left-sided colitis and eight proctitis. Treatments at the time of inclusion included 10 patients receiving biologic therapy, seven azathioprine and 54 mesalazine or salazopyrin. The main reasons for the addition of budesonide-MMX were clinical relapse (47.5%) or inadequate response to current therapy (39.0%). In total, 50% of patients achieved clinical remission, whereas 9.8% had clinical improvement. No response was noted in 40.2% of subjects. Using multivariate binary logistic regression, a moderate degree of activity was the main independent predictor of non-response. Eight significant adverse effects were reported in six patients with three discontinuing treatment. CONCLUSION: In real-life clinical practice, budesonide-MMX is commonly used in combination with other therapies, both for acute disease flares and for partial response to therapy.

Background Recently, comparative trials among biologics in ulcerative colitis (UC) provided conflicting results on their reciprocal superiority or equivalence. Therefore, in patients naive to biologics, the first-choice biological drug is uncertain. Methods In a retrospective, real-life, multicentre inception cohort study involving 11 Italian IBD tertiary centres, all consecutive patients, naive to biologics, treated with adalimumab (ADA), infliximab biosimilar (CTP-13), golimumab (GOL) or vedolizumab (VDZ) after their postmarketing approval (2014–2018) for moderate–severe active UC, were followed up for 1 year or until relapse. All drugs were compared with each other and to naive patients treated with IFX-originator (IFX-O, Remicade) in 2013–2014 as a reference group. A propensity score analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was the 1 year relapse-free, optimisation-free, steroid-free remission, defined as Mayo score ≤2, with bleeding subscore = 0, no relapse after first clinical remission and no optimisation with dose intensification or steroids courses. Multiple further secondary endpoints were analysed (Table 1). Results Two hundred ninety-six naive patients (ADA = 56, CTP-13 = 73, GOL = 60, VDZ = 34, IFX-O = 73) were included. The primary end-point was achieved in similar percentages in all groups, irrespective of optimisation. IFX-O and ADA had similar rates of clinical remission achieved once during the follow-up but higher rates than GOL and VDZ. The 1-year relapse rate, however, was lower with VDZ than ADA, GOL and IFX-O. Treatment failure for primary/secondary no response was higher with GOL than IFX-O and ADA. Treatment failures for intolerance were similar among all drugs. CTP-13 performed differently than the originator for some secondary end-points. Conclusion Based on a strict definition of clinical remission, all biologics appear equally effective at 1 year in patients naive to these drugs. IFX originator and ADA appear more effective in the induction phase, while patients responders to VDZ had more prolonged clinical remission. Some differences on secondary questionable outcomes between IFX biosimilar and originator have been observed.

Background Until 2014, infliximab originator (Remicade, IFX-O) was the only biological treatment approved in Italy for ulcerative colitis (UC), followed by the sequential approval of adalimumab (ADA), infliximab biosimilar (CTP-13), golimumab (GOL) and vedolizumab (VDZ). Recently, comparative trials among these drugs provided conflicting results on their reciprocal superiority or equivalence. Methods In a retrospective, real-life, multicenter inception cohort study involving 11 Italian IBD tertiary centres, all consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe active UC, treated with ADA, CTP-13, GOL or VDZ after their post-marketing approval (2014–2018) were followed-up for 1 year or until relapse. All drugs were compared with each other and to patients treated with Remicade in 2013–2014 (reference group). The 80% power calculation of the study required at least 75 patients in each arm. A propensity score analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was the 1 year relapse-free, optimisation-free, steroid-free remission, defined as Mayo partial score ≤2, with bleeding subscore = 0, no relapse after first clinical remission and no optimisation with dose intensification or steroids courses. Multiple further secondary endpoints were analysed (Table 1). Results 492 patients (ADA=90, CTP-13=105, GOL=79, VDZ=142, IFX-O=76) were included. Overall, 65% achieved clinical remission once during the follow-up, with IFX-O performing better than GOL and VDZ. The relapse rate was 24%, with the lowest rates with VDZ. The primary end-point was achieved in similar percentages in all groups, except for lower rates with GOL than IFX-O. IFX-O performed better than each other drug for other clinical outcomes (Table 1). Discontinuation for intolerance was similar among the drugs, but CTP-13 had more frequent adverse events (mainly infusion reactions) than ADA, VDZ and IFX-O. Conclusion Based on a strict definition of clinical remission, all biologics appear equally effective at 1 year, except for GOL vs. IFX originator. IFX-O appears more effective in multiple questionable clinical outcomes. IFX biosimilar had more adverse events than the other drugs. IFX originator should be used as the reference drug in head to head, controlled, comparison trials for current and future biologics in UC.

BACKGROUND We report a prospective, nationwide cohort evaluating the safety and effectiveness of CT-P13. METHODS A structured database was used to record serious adverse events (SAEs), clinical remission/response, inflammatory biomarkers (CRP and calprotectin), and endoscopic findings. RESULTS Eight hundred ten patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (452 Crohn's disease [CD]) were enrolled. Four hundred fifty-nine patients were naive to anti-TNFα (group A), 196 had a previous exposure (group B), and the remaining 155 were switched to CT-P13 (group C). All patients were included in the safety evaluation with a mean follow-up of 345 ± 215 days and a total number of 6501 infusions. One hundred fifty-four SAEs were reported (19%), leading to cessation of the biosimilar in 103 subjects (12.7%). Infusion reactions were 71, leading to cessation of the biosimilar in 53 subjects (6.5%), being significantly more frequent in patients pre-exposed to anti-TNFα (P = 0.017). The efficacy of therapy was calculated in 754 IBD patients, with a mean follow-up of 329 ± 202 days. Forty-eight patients had a primary failure (6.4%), and 188 (25.6%) lost response during follow-up. Six hundred twenty-eight (364 CD) and 360 IBD patients (222 CD) completed the follow-up at 6 and 12 months, respectively. At 12 months, patients without loss of response were 71%, 64%. and 82% in groups A, B, and C, respectively (log rank P = 0.01). Clinical/endoscopic scores and inflammatory biomarkers dropped significantly in CD and UC patients (P = 0.01 and P < 0.0001) compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS In this large prospective cohort, no further signals of difference in safety and effectiveness of CT-P13 in IBD has been observed.

Background Laparoscopic ileo-pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has been reported as having low morbidity and several advantages. Aims To evaluate safety, efficacy and long-term results of laparoscopic IPAA, performed in elective or emergency settings, in consecutive unselected IBD patients. Methods All the patients received totally laparoscopic 2-stage (proctocolectomy and IPAA – stoma closure) or 3-stage (colectomy – proctectomy and IPAA – stoma closure) procedure according to their presentation. Results From July 2007 to July 2016, 160 patients entered the study. 50.6% underwent a 3-stage procedure and 49.4% a 2-stage procedure. Mortality and morbidity were 0.6% and 24.6%. Conversion rate was 3.75%. 8.7% septic complications were associated with steroids and Infliximab treatment (p = 0.0001). 3-stage patients were younger (p = 0.0001), with shorter disease duration (p = 0.0001), minor ASA scores of 2 and 3 (p = 0.0007), lower inflammatory index and better nutritional status (p = 0.003 and 0.0001), fewer Clavien-Dindo’s grade II complications (p = .0001), reduced rates of readmission and reoperation at 90 days (p = 0.03), and shorter hospitalization (p = .0001), but with similar pouch and IPAA leakage, compared to 2-stage patients. 8 years pouch failure and definitive ileostomy were 5.1% and 3.7%. Conclusion A totally laparoscopic approach is safe and feasible, with very low mortality and morbidity rates and very low conversion rate, even in multi-stage procedures and high-risk patients.

SummaryPatients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at higher risk of venous thromboembolism and coronary artery disease despite having a lower burden of traditional risk factors. Platelets from IBD patients release more soluble CD40 ligand (CD40L), and this has been implicated in IBD platelet hyper-activation. We here measured the urinary F2-isoprostane 8-iso-prostaglandin (PG)2α (8-iso-PGF2α), urinary 11–dehydro–thromboxane (TX) B2 (11-dehydro–TXB2) and plasma CD40L in IBD patients, and explored the in vitro action of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)–α antibody infliximab on IBD differentiating megakaryocytes. Urinary and blood samples were collected from 124 IBD patients and 37 healthy subjects. Thirteen IBD patients were also evaluated before and after 6–week infliximab treatment. The in vitro effect of infliximab on patient-derived megakaryocytes was evaluated by immunoflorescence microscopy and by flow cytometry. IBD patients had significantly (pSupplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

Inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients are still under-diagnosed or diagnosed with serious delay. We examined whether diagnostic delay [DD] in IBD has changed over the last 60 years, and explored the risk factors of longer DD.In total, 3392 IBD patients recorded in the registry of four IBD Italian centres were divided according to the year of diagnosis into a historical cohort [HC: 1955-84] and modern cohort [MC: 1985-2014]. DD, i.e. time lapse between onset of symptoms indicative of IBD and definitive diagnosis, was divided into four sub-periods [0-6, 7-12, 13-24,24 months], which were correlated with age and disease location/behaviour at diagnosis.Median DD in IBD was 3.0 months, it was significantly [P0.0001] higher in Crohn's disease [CD] [7.1 months] than in ulcerative colitis [UC] [2.0 months], and did not differ either between the HC and the MC or over the last three decades. However, the proportion of patients with a DD24 months was significantly [P0.0001] higher in the HC [26.0%] than in the MC [18.2%], and the same trend was evident over the last three decades [1985-94: 19.9%; 1995-2004: 16.4%; 2005-14: 13.9%; P = 0.04]. At logistic regression analysis, age at diagnosis40 years (CD: odds ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-2.28, P0.0001; UC: 1.41, 95% CI 1.02-1.96, P = 0.04) and complicated disease at CD diagnosis [1.39, 95% CI 1.06-1.82, P = 0.02] were independently associated with a DD24 months.DD duration has not changed over the last 60 years in Italy, but the number of IBD patients with a longer DD significantly decreased. Older age at diagnosis and a complicated disease at CD diagnosis are risk factors for longer DD.

OBJECTIVES: Whether the duration of maintenance treatment with azathioprine (AZA) affects the outcome of ulcerative colitis (UC) is unclear. We investigated clinical outcomes and any predictive factors after withdrawal of AZA in UC. METHODS: In this multicenter observational retrospective study, 127 Italian UC patients, who were in steroid-free remission at the time of withdrawal of AZA, were followed-up for a median of 55 months or until relapse. The frequency of clinical relapse or colectomy after AZA withdrawal was analyzed according to demographic, clinical, and endoscopic variables. RESULTS: After drug withdrawal, a third of the patients relapsed within 12 months, half within 2 years and two-thirds within 5 years. After multivariable analysis, predictors of relapse after drug withdrawal were lack of sustained remission during AZA maintenance (hazard ratio, HR 2.350, confidence interval, CI 95% 1.434-3.852; P=0.001), extensive colitis (HR 1.793, CI 95% 1.064-3.023, P=0.028 vs. left-sided colitis; HR 2.024, CI 95% 1.103-3.717, P=0.023 vs. distal colitis), and treatment duration, with short treatments (3-6 months) more disadvantaged than >48-month treatments (HR 2.783, CI 95% 1.267-6.114, P=0.008). Concomitant aminosalicylates were the only predictors of sustained remission during AZA therapy (P=0.009). The overall colectomy rate was 10%. Predictors of colectomy were drug-related toxicity as the cause of AZA withdrawal (P=0.041), no post-AZA drug therapy (P=0.031), and treatment duration (P

Background: Colonoscopy is frequently performed in ulcerative colitis (UC), but its benefit in the management of the disease is a matter of debate. The objective was to determine the clinical impact of colonoscopy in UC. Methods: Consecutive patients with UC undergoing colonoscopy were studied. The design and main outcome measurement was appropriateness of indications, evaluated according to guidelines. Endoscopic findings altering the management of the patients were registered. The endoscopist's management decisions based on patient's clinical picture were compared with those selected after endoscopy. Need for further investigations was recorded. Endpoints for colonoscopy-improving management were prospectively defined: change in medical therapy, need for adjuctive procedures, identification or exclusion of cancer, adenomatous polyps, or other conditions with clinical impact. The setting was an open access endoscopy service in a tertiary care center. Results: In all, 507 patients (268 male, 239 female, mean age 42 years) were included. Colonoscopy was indicated in 60.8% of cases. In 46% of patients endoscopy revealed a significant lesion; this rate was higher for indicated (67.2) than for not indicated procedures (13.5%, P < 0.0001). The endoscopist's decision was altered by the endoscopic finding in 7.6% of cases and was not different between appropriate and inappropriate procedures. Conclusions: Endoscopy is a potent tool in the management of UC if correctly used. However, in the majority of cases a correct therapeutic decision may be established simply on the basis of the clinical picture. Relevant endoscopic findings have a relatively low impact on the medical treatment, but may have a very important value in the prognostic assessment of the disease. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2008)

The treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) has changed over the last decade. It is extremely important to optimize the therapies which are available nowadays and commonly used in daily clinical practice, as well as to stimulate the search for more powerful drugs for the induction and maintenance of sustained and durable remission, thus preventing further complications. Therefore, it is mandatory to identify the patients' prognostic variables associated with an aggressive clinical course and to test the most potent therapies accordingly.To date, the conventional therapeutic approach based on corticosteroids, salicylates (sulfasalazine, 5-aminosalicylic acid) or immunosuppressive agents is commonly used as a first step to induce and to maintain remission. However, in recent years, knowledge of new pathogenetic mechanisms of ulcerative colitis have allowed us to find new therapeutic targets leading to the development of new treatments that directly target proinflammatory mediators, such as TNF-alpha, cytokines, membrane migration agents, cellular therapies.The aim of this review is to provide the most significant data regarding the therapeutic role of drugs in UC and to give an overview of biological and experimental drugs that will become available in the near future. In particular, we will analyse the role of these drugs in the treatment of acute flare and maintenance of UC, as well as its importance in mucosal healing and in treating patients at a high risk of relapse.

Management of oesophageal leaks is controversial. Covered self-expandable-metallic stents have been used for several conditions, but migration of the stents is frequent. We report the case of a patient with post-surgery oesophageal fistula in which, to prevent dislocation, a covered self-expandable-metallic stent was fixed externally using a polypectomy snare.

Background Hepcidin, a peptide produced by hepatocytes, regulates body iron homeostasis. Inflammation increases serum hepcidin, and its determination can be useful in the differential diagnosis of anemias during inflammatory diseases. Methods We measured serum hepcidin-25 and hepcidin-20 isoforms in 54 patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and 54 reference subjects (36 healthy controls and 18 anemic patients without inflammation or renal failure). Disease activity, blood counts, iron status, and erythropoiesis-related parameters were obtained for all study subjects. Results In IBD hepcidin-25, the peptide bioactive isoform correlated positively with C-reactive protein and serum ferritin; an inverse correlation was observed with transferrin, the soluble transferrin receptor, and the soluble transferrin receptor to Log(ferritin) ratio. Similar correlations were found in reference subjects. Patients with anemia of inflammation had higher hepcidin-25 levels than those with iron deficiency anemia or a combination of iron deficiency anemia and inflammation (P = 0.0061). In patients with inflammation and serum ferritin concentration 100 to 200 ng/mL, hepcidin-25 was low, suggesting that these patients had iron deficiency. A serum hepcidin-25 concentration below 2.0 nM differentiated 85% of patients with iron deficiency anemia (with or without inflammation) from patients with anemia of inflammation. In IBD, hepcidin-20 correlated with both hepcidin-25 and C-reactive protein. Conclusions In IBD, iron stores, inflammation, and iron requirement for erythropoiesis influence serum hepcidin-25. Hepcidin-25 determination can be useful in the differential diagnosis of IBD-associated anemias. Serum hepcidin-20 is linked to hepcidin-25, but inflammation has an independent regulatory role on its concentration, indicating that hepcidin-20 may have a biological function.

BACKGROUND: CD4(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells (Treg) inhibit T-cell proliferation in vitro and are effective in suppressing colitis in mouse models. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, which is centrally involved in Crohn's disease (CD) pathogenesis, also impairs Treg function. Here we investigated the influence of anti-TNF therapy on Treg frequency and function in CD. METHODS: Twenty CD patients were treated with infliximab administered at weeks 0, 2, and 6. Blood was collected immediately before the first infusion and after 10 weeks. Treg frequency was quantified by flow cytometry. Treg function was measured using a standard coculture assay. Serum levels of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 and interleukin (IL)-10 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Pretreatment Treg frequency and serum TGF-β1 levels were significantly higher in nonresponder than responder patients. Clinical improvement in 12 CD patients was associated with a significant increase of Treg frequency after 10 weeks. Treg were functionally active before and after treatment with infliximab, both in responder and nonresponder CD patients. In responder patients the restoration of Treg pool was accompanied by a parallel significant increase of serum TGF-β1 and IL-10. No significant change in the elevated Treg or serum TGF-β1 was seen in nonresponder patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that there may be a relationship between numbers of Treg in the blood, serum TGF-β1, and response to infliximab; however, further prospective studies are needed.

Background & Aims It is uncertain whether mucosal healing after the first course of corticosteroids therapy predicts outcome in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We evaluated whether early clinical and endoscopic responses to this therapy are associated with late outcomes in UC. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed UC who were prescribed corticosteroid therapy (n = 157) were followed up for 5 years. They were evaluated using clinical (Powel–Tuck [PT]) and endoscopic (Baron) indexes after 3 and 6 months, then every 6 months. Outcomes at month 3 (early response) were used to identify patients with complete (group A: PT, 0–1; Baron, 0), partial (group B: PT, 0–1; Baron, 1–3), or no response (group C: persistence of clinical and endoscopic activity). The association between early and late outcomes was assessed. Results After 5 years, there were significant differences between complete and partial responders in the rates of hospitalization (25% in group A vs 48.7% in group B; P = .0152; odds ratio [OR], 2.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21–6.72), immunosuppression therapy (5% in group A vs 25.6% in group B; P = .0030; OR, 6.55; 95% CI, 1.67–25.67), colectomy (3.3% in group A vs 18.0% in group B; P = .0265; OR, 6.34; 95% CI, 1.24–32.37), and their combination (26.7% in group A vs 48.7% in group B; P = .0249; OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.12–6.11). After multivariate analysis, lack of mucosal healing was the only factor associated with negative outcomes at 5 years (immunosuppressors: hazard risk [HR], 10.581; 95% CI, 2.193–51.039; P = .0033; hospitalization: HR, 3.634; 95% CI, 1.556–8.485; P = .0029; colectomy: HR, 8.397; 95% CI, 1.278–55.186; P = .0268). Conclusions No mucosal healing after corticosteroid therapy is associated with a more aggressive disease course.

Background Anemia is a common complication of inflammatory bowel disease, but its epidemiology may be changing due to earlier diagnosis and improved treatments. We investigated the prevalence and pathogenesis of anemia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Design and Methods In a cross-sectional study 263 out-patients with inflammatory bowel disease (165 with Crohn’s disease, 98 with ulcerative colitis) were investigated. The influence of time from diagnosis, disease activity, inflammation and the status of iron and hematinic vitamins on the level of hemoglobin and prevalence of anemia were evaluated. In a second group of 27 patients with Crohn’s disease, undergoing anti-tumor necrosis factor-α treatment with infliximab because of refractory or fistulizing disease, we determined the effects of infliximab on disease activity, hemoglobin, serum erythropoietin levels, iron status and inflammation.Results In all, 104 of the 263 patients with inflammatory bowel disease were anemic. Age, gender and azathioprine treatment had no influence on anemia. The prevalence of anemia was highest at diagnosis (65%), decreased during the first 4 years after disease onset, and was stable thereafter. Active disease was associated with higher rates of anemia. At diagnosis most anemic patients had anemia of chronic disease; during follow-up iron deficiency and multifactorial forms of anemia became more prevalent. Eighteen of 27 patients undergoing treatment with infliximab were anemic; most of them had anemia of chronic disease. Infliximab reduced disease activity and improved anemia in 12 patients. This was mediated by an increased production of erythropoietin for the degree of anemia. In vitro infliximab increased the growth of erythroid progenitors from the peripheral blood of patients with active disease.Conclusions Anemia is a common problem in out-patients with inflammatory bowel disease; the prevalence and severity of anemia are related to the activity of the bowel disorder. The pathogenesis of anemia changes during the course of the disease, with anemia of chronic disease having a major role at diagnosis and iron deficiency and multifactorial forms of anemia during follow-up. In patients requiring anti-tumor necrosis factor-α treatment, response to therapy improves erythropoiesis.

Crohn's disease (CD) is associated with a higher type-1-helper T cell (Th1) cytokine expression, whereas ulcerative colitis (UC) appears to express a modified Th2 response. In addition to its classic role in calcium homeostasis, calcitriol, the hormonal active form of vitamin D, exerts immunoregulatory effects such as modulation of Th1/Th2 cytokines. Therefore, calcitriol administration could modify immune dysfunction in CD and UC. Nine patients with UC (M/F: 5/4; mean age 47 years, remission(R)/active(A) disease: 7/2), 8 patients with CD (M/F: 2/6; mean age 36, R/A 5/3) and 6 healthy controls (HC) (M/F: 3/3, mean age 4) were enrolled. Peripheral blood was collected after a drug-washout of 15 days and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated with mitogens alone or in the presence of physiological concentrations of calcitriol (100 pg/ml). Type 1 (IL-2, TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma) and type 2 (IL-10) cytokine production was assayed on supernatants by ELISA. Compared to HC, TNF-alpha production was significantly higher both in UC (p=0.0002) and CD (p=0.0001) patients, at baseline and after incubation with calcitriol (UC p=0.0003, CD p=0.0009). The effects of calcitriol incubation were: 1) reduced IFN-gamma (p=0.024) and increased IL-10 (p=0.06) production in UC patients; 2) reduced TNF-alpha production in CD (p=0.032); 3) no significant effects in HC. Calcitriol increased, albeit not significantly, IL-10 production in UC compared to CD patients (p=0.09). These results suggest an important modulatory role of vitamin D in the Th1/Th2 immune response. The observation that the effect of this modulation was different in CD compared to UC patients provides an interesting area of research into the pathogenesis and treatment of these inflammatory conditions.

Introduction: Colonoscopy is a necessary tool in the management of Crohn’s disease, but the benefit achieved by the procedure is a matter of debate. In the present study we evaluate the clinical impact of performing colonoscopy in Crohn’s disease patients. Methods: Consecutive patients with Crohn’s disease undergoing colonoscopy were considered. The following issues were considered: appropriateness of indications; relevant findings able to change the management of the patients; the endoscopist’s management decisions based on patient’s clinical picture, i.e. increased, maintained or decreased treatment, compared with those selected after performing endoscopy. Results: 204 patients (116 male/88 female, mean age 41 years) were included. Colonoscopy was judged indicated in 52.9% cases, according to current guidelines. In 54% of patients, endoscopy revealed a significant lesion, and this rate was significantly lower for non-indicated procedures (25.9%, p < 0.0001). The endoscopic findings were in disagreement with symptoms in about 25% of cases, but the impact of the endoscopic findings on the endoscopist’s decision was likely to be very small without any differences between appropriate and inappropriate procedures. Conclusions: Endoscopy is a potent tool in the management of Crohn’s disease, if correctly used, but in the majority of cases a correct therapeutic decision may be established simply on the basis of clinical picture and non-invasive markers, whilst relevant endoscopic findings have a relatively low impact on the medical treatment. © 2008 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Background: Mesenteric adipose tissue hypertrophy is a frequent sonographic finding in Crohn's disease (CD). This study assessed its sonographic prevalence, the correlation with the degree of clinical or biochemical activity of the disease, and its impact on disease outcome in CD patients. Methods: In all, 185 consecutive CD patients underwent bowel ultrasound to assess the presence of mesenteric fat tissue alteration as well as thickness and echopattern of the bowel wall, site and extent of CD, and presence of stenosis, fistulas, and abscesses. Clinical and biochemical parameters of disease activity were also assessed. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables related to mesenteric adipose tissue alteration. Results: Mesenteric adipose tissue alteration, detected in 88 (47.6%) patients, showed a significant correlation both with clinical and biochemical CD activity and with internal fistulas, bowel wall thickness, and length of thickened bowel wall. Logistic regression analysis showed that internal fistulas (odds ratio [OR] = 13.5), thickened bowel wall (OR = 7.6), C-reactive protein (OR = 6.1), CD Activity Index (CDAI) (OR = 3.1), and length of diseased bowel walls (OR = 2.6) were significantly associated with mesenteric adipose tissue alteration. Of the 111 patients with quiescent CD, 22 showed mesenteric adipose tissue hypertrophy. These patients did not show increased risk of relapse compared with quiescent patients without mesenteric fat alteration. Conclusions: Mesenteric adipose tissue alteration is correlated with biochemical and clinical activity of CD and with internal fistulas and increased bowel wall thickness. In quiescent CD, mesenteric hypertrophy does not appear to be a risk factor of relapse. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2008)

Perianal fistulas and abscesses are common complications of Crohn's disease, affecting up to 50% of patients during their disease course. Accurate diagnosis and classification of perianal disease is crucial before and during treatment to plan an adequate approach for each patient and to avoid irreversible functional consequences. Although examination under anaesthesia has been considered the gold standard for diagnosis and classification of Crohn's disease perianal fistulas, taken alone it does not have perfect accuracy, stressing the need for concomitant or alternative, non-invasive, methods of evaluation. In this context, imaging modalities assessed for diagnosis, classification and monitoring of Crohn's disease perianal fistulas include pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, anorectal endoscopic ultrasonography, transcutaneous perianal ultrasound, fistulography and computed tomography. In particular, magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic ultrasonography findings have shown the best accuracy, and the ability to influence therapeutic management of these patients. For transcutaneous perianal ultrasound too, good preliminary data have been reported. This paper reviews the available data on imaging methods for the management of perianal Crohn's disease.

We present the case of a 52-year-old man with steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis, needing immunosuppressive therapy with azathioprine. The drug had been started 3 years earlier, but stopped after a few months because the patient reported palpitations, lipothymia, nausea and vomiting. Given the continued steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis and the lack of clinical documentation about a reaction with a dubious relationship to azathioprine, we decided to rechallenge the patient with the drug under clinical monitoring and after informed consent. After starting 50 mg of azathioprine, the patient showed general malaise, nausea and vomiting. An ECG showed atrial fibrillation, and the patient reported that the symptoms were similar to those previously experienced. We have found two other cases of similar onset of atrial fibrillation after azathioprine use, although some confounding elements in these episodes make the possible causal relationship between the drug and this adverse event uncertain.