Search

Objective·To systematically evaluate the application of return-to-work intervention programs to young and middleaged cancer survivors and its effectiveness in improving work-related outcomes in cancer survivors. Methods·An initial literature search of eight electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI and Wanfang was conducted with a time frame from inception to Aug 2nd, 2022 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies of return-towork interventions on work-related outcomes among cancer survivors. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, data extraction, and methodological quality evaluation using the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) Methodology Quality Evaluation Tool. Results·A total of 13 original studies were included, involving 11 return-to-work intervention programs, containing 2 045 cancer survivors. The results of the systematic evaluation showed that 10 of the intervention programs were multidisciplinary, with intervention modules on disease/mental health education, group discussions, physical rehabilitation, work capacity exercises, multidisciplinary team meetings and counselling. Among them, three interventions also included employers in the support program. The duration of the interventions ranged from 7 d to one year. Eight of the included interventions took return-to-work rates as a primary outcome, but only three reported that the difference was statistically significant, two of which were quasiexperimental studies without control group. Besides, no clear positive effects were found on work-related outcome such as length of return-to-work, change of work status, work ability, and work meaning. Conclusion·The content, format, intensity and frequency of return-to-work intervention programs for cancer survivors vary widely, and the effects of interventions on work-related outcomes are still unclear. Researchers should further explore the mechanisms that influence cancer survivors′ return-to-work, and develop multidisciplinary intervention programs based on this to effectively help young and middle-aged cancer survivors return-to-work and society. In addition, due to the limitations of study quality and intervention program heterogeneity, more high-quality experimental studies are needed to further validate the above findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Food Research & Development is the property of Food Research & Development Editorial Department and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Food & Machinery is the property of Food & Machinery Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective To investigate the effect of applying the risk management measures in the high quality nursing activities on the safety of hospitalized elderly patients. Methods Totally 598 elderly inpatients aged≥60 years old in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2015 were selected as the research subjects. The prevention and control situation in elderly inpatients (298 cases and 300 cases) before and after implementing the risk management measures during the process of high quality nursing activities were retrospectively analyzed. Results Compared with before the implementation of risk management measures, the occurrence rates of adverse events such as falling down, falling bed, choke, pressure sores, phlebitis, piping slippage and deep vein thrombosis after implementing the risk management measures were significantly decreased compared with before implementation, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the patient satisfaction after the implementation of risk management measures was 99.33% (298/300), which was significantly higher than 95.30% (284/298) before implementation, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Implementing the risk management measures during the process of the high quality nursing activities is conducive to reduce the risk of adverse events occurrence during the period of elderly patients hospitalization and improves the patient satisfaction on nursing quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute lung injury(ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) is a common clinical syndrome, the vast majority of ALI/ARDS patients require mechanical ventilation treatment, mechanical ventilation represents the main therapeutic support to maintain acceptable pulmonary gas-exchange whilst treating the underlying disease, however, mechanical ventilation itself can also cause lung damage, namely mechanical aeration lung injury(VILI). The use of protective ventilation strategies, which can implemented by adjusting the mechanical ventilation parameter Settings, can significantly reduce lung injury degree of ALI/ARDS patients caused by mechanical aeration, thus reduce the pulmonary infection, shorten the time of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization time, reduce the28-day mortality, significantly improve the quality of the survival of patients with ALI/ARDS, maximize lung protection effect. In this paper, we respectively summarized different mechanical ventilation parameters, such as Pplat, VT and PEEP, discussing the influence of lung damage by using protective ventilation strategy for ALI/ARDS patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

目的:探究护理干预对内科住院老年患者睡眠质量的影响，提出有利于提高老年患者睡眠质量的护理方法。方法选取2014年1月至2015年1月内科住院存在睡眠问题老年患者300例，分为观察组和对照组，每组150例。利用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数（PSQI）评分观测患者睡眠质量。对照组患者入院时PSQI评分为（11.66±3.06）分，>7分108例（72.0%）；观察组患者入院时PSQI评分为（11.43±3.42）分，>7分110例（73.3%）。两组患者入院时PSQI评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），具有可比性。对照组实施常规护理，观察组在常规护理基础上进行护理干预。观察两组患者睡眠质量的差异。结果观察组患者护理干预治疗1周后及出院时PSQI评分[分别为（8.23±1.59）、（7.09±2.08）分]、PSQI评分大于7分患者比例[分别为45.3%（68/150）、34.0%（51/150）]均明显低于对照组[分别为（9.66±2.68）、（8.78±3.21）分、59.3%（89/150）、44.7%（67/150）]，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论经护理干预治疗一段时间后内科住院老年患者睡眠质量得到极大改善. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]