Search

Background Through recent years there has been a shift from inpatient hospital care out to primary care in a home care setting for many patients with different diseases and conditions. This ongoing transition for more primary care-based treatments in general has also been the case for wound treatment with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Aim To get an overview of the current organisation of NPWT in primary care in different European countries Method An electronic survey was sent to 53 cooperating organisations of the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) in 35 countries in Europe. Results In total, representatives from 32 EWMA cooperation organisations in 22 different European countries answered the survey. In 95% of the countries NPWT was used in primary care (n=21); only one country stated that the treatment was not used in primary care at all. The treatment was most commonly initiated from the hospital who prescribes it, and they were also then responsible for the treatment (63%). Conclusion NPWT in primary care is used, organised, monitored and financed differently in different European countries. The general perception is that treatment with NPWT in primary care is limited and could and should be increased. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims Low-risk alcohol drinking guidelines require a scientific basis that extends beyond individual or group judgements of risk. Life-time mortality risks, judged against established thresholds for acceptable risk, may provide such a basis for guidelines. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate alcohol mortality risks for seven European countries based on different average daily alcohol consumption amounts. Methods The maximum acceptable voluntary premature mortality risk was determined to be one in 1000, with sensitivity analyses of one in 100. Life-time mortality risks for different alcohol consumption levels were estimated by combining disease-specific relative risk and mortality data for seven European countries with different drinking patterns (Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy and Poland). Alcohol consumption data were obtained from the Global Information System on Alcohol and Health, relative risk data from meta-analyses and mortality information from the World Health Organization. Results The variation in the life-time mortality risk at drinking levels relevant for setting guidelines was less than that observed at high drinking levels. In Europe, the percentage of adults consuming above a risk threshold of one in 1000 ranged from 20.6 to 32.9% for women and from 35.4 to 54.0% for men. Life-time risk of premature mortality under current guideline maximums ranged from 2.5 to 44.8 deaths per 1000 women in Finland and Estonia, respectively, and from 2.9 to 35.8 deaths per 1000 men in Finland and Estonia, respectively. If based upon an acceptable risk of one in 1000, guideline maximums for Europe should be 8-10 g/day for women and 15-20 g/day for men. Conclusions If low-risk alcohol guidelines were based on an acceptable risk of one in 1000 premature deaths, then maximums for Europe should be 8-10 g/day for women and 15-20 g/day for men, and some of the current European guidelines would require downward revision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: A score to identify local wound infections was developed by a panel of experts from seven European countries. The Therapeutic Index for Local Infections (TILI) score was designed for health professionals who are not specialised in wound care. This study was carried out to test the validity of the TILI score in everyday practice., Method: Content validity was analysed by means of evaluation by a panel of experts, individually and face-to-face, followed by a European multicentred, retrospective, observational study. Participating clinicians sent anonymised copies of completed TILI scores for patients with leg ulcers along with a photograph of the wound for analysis by two blinded reviewers. Concordance (Kappa index) and convergent criterion validity (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Youden's J Index and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) or area under the curve (AUC) curve) were calculated to construct validity and reliability., Results: A total of 307 patients with leg ulcers from seven institutions in five European countries were included in this retrospective analysis. It was shown that the diagnosis of local wound infection could be documented well with five of the six clinical criteria included in the TILI score. By summing up these facultative criteria in comparison with any direct criteria that may be present, there would have been an indication for local antiseptic wound therapy in 22% of patients examined., Conclusions: The results show that the TILI score is concordant with the expert assessment of patients and with good diagnostic characteristics. Thus, the easy-to-use TILI score can now be used in the daily routine practice of health professionals to diagnose local wound infections.

Aim: The European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, the Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance, and the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel are updating the 'Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Clinical Practice Guideline' (CPG) in 2019. The aim of this contribution is to summarize and to discuss the guideline development protocol for the 2019 update., Methods: A guideline governance group determines and monitors all steps of the CPG development. An international survey of consumers will be undertaken to establish consumer needs and interests. Systematic evidence searches in relevant electronic databases cover the period from July 2013 through August 2018. Risk of bias of included studies will be assessed by two reviewers using established checklists and an overall strength of evidence assigned to the cumulative body of evidence. Small working groups review the evidence available for each topic, review and/or draft the guideline chapters and recommendations and/or good practice statements. Finally, strength of recommendation grades are assigned. The recommendations are rated based on their importance and their potential to improve individual patient outcomes using an international formal consensus process., Discussion: Major methodological advantages of the current revision are a clear distinction between evidence-based recommendations and good practice statements and strong consumer involvement., Conclusion: The 2019 guideline update builds on the previous 2014 version to ensure consistency and comparability. Methodology changes will improve the guideline quality to increase clarity and to enhance implementation and compliance. The full guideline development protocol can be accessed from the guideline website (http://www.internationalguideline.com/)., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)