Search

End-of-life patients with cancer may find expressing their symptoms difficult if they can no longer communicate verbally because of deteriorating health. In this study, we assessed these symptoms using machine learning, which has excellent predictive capabilities and has recently been applied in healthcare. We performed a retrospective clinical survey involving 213 patients with cancer from August 2015 to August 2016. We divided the reported symptoms into two groups—visible and nonvisible symptoms. We used decision tree analysis, an analytical machine learning method that organizes and analyzes information in the form of a tree diagram to visually represent the information structure. Our machine learning model used patient background data and visible symptoms to predict nonvisible symptoms: pain, dyspnea, fatigue, drowsiness, anxiety, delirium, inadequate informed consent, and spiritual issues. The highest and/or lowest values for prediction accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 88.0%/55.5%, 84.9%/3.3%, and 96.7%/24.1%, respectively. This work will facilitate better assessment and management of symptoms in patients with cancer. This study was the first to predict nonvisible symptoms using decision tree analyses for patients with cancer receiving palliative care. Notably, applications based on our results may assess symptoms to the same extent as healthcare professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context Policymaking plays an important role in national palliative care services. The Japanese Cancer Control Act was implemented in 2006. Objectives To evaluate changes in the structure and processes of palliative care services after implementation of the Cancer Control Act. Methods We conducted annual nationwide surveys in designated cancer care hospitals (DCCHs, n = 349) between 2008 and 2010. The 65-item questionnaire was divided into seven domains: institutional framework, information to patient and family, practice of palliative care, activities of the palliative care teams (PCTs), members of PCTs, regional medical cooperation, and education. Increasing trends were tested using generalized estimating equation models. Results The response rates were ≥99%. All domains showed an increasing trend ( P < 0.001). There were significant increases in full-time PCT physicians (27.4%–45.7%, P trend < 0.001), full-time PCT nurses (38.9%–88.0%, P trend < 0.001), and the median number of annual referrals to PCTs (60–80 patients, P < 0.001). Essential drugs were available in most DCCHs from baseline. Although outpatient clinics increased significantly (27.0%–58.9%, P trend < 0.001), community outreach programs did not (9.0%–12.6%, P = 0.05). Basic education was actively introduced for in-hospital physicians and nurses (78.2% and 91.4% in 2010), but often unavailable for regional health care providers (basic education for regional physicians and nurses: 63.9% and 71.1% in 2010). Conclusion The Cancer Control Act promoted the development and enhancement of palliative care services in DCCHs. Regional medical cooperation and education are the future challenges of palliative care in Japan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study aimed at developing the first consensus syllabus of palliative medicine for undergraduate medical education in Japan using a modified Delphi method. The three innovative processes used included email discussion and panel meeting; evaluation of the degree of difficulty; and enrolling of patients, family members and medical students as panelists. Also discussed are the three differences in Japanese syllabus as compared with the curriculum in the Great Britain and USA.

Although sedation for symptom relief in terminally ill patients has been the focus of recent medical studies, the interpretation of research findings is difficult due to the confusing terminology. To clarify the agreements and inconsistencies in the definitions of sedation, a systematic review was performed. We searched the literature through MEDLINE from 1990 to July 2001. A total of 7 articles met the inclusion criteria. All studies included the use of sedative medications or the intention to reduce patient consciousness as an essential element of sedation. All but one study explicitly described that the primary aim of sedation was symptom palliation. Three definitions stated that target symptoms were severe, and 4 articles reported the refractory nature of the distress. On the other hand, there were marked inconsistencies in the definition of the degree of sedation, duration, pharmacological properties of medications used, target symptoms, and target populations. This review suggests that sedation includes two core factors: the presence of severe suffering refractory to standard palliative management, and the use of sedative medications with the primary aim to relieve distress. Thus, “palliative sedation therapy” can be defined as “the use of sedative medications to relieve intolerable and refractory distress by the reduction in patient consciousness.” The marked inconsistencies in the definition of sedation should be considered to be subcategories of palliative sedation therapy, and we recommend that researchers define the degree of sedation, duration, pharmacological properties of medications, target symptoms, and target populations in future studies. This clarification of terminology will contribute to improving the accuracy and depth of sedation research. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: There is ongoing debate on whether continuous deep sedation (CDS) for psycho-existential suffering is appropriate. Objective: We aimed to (1) clarify clinical practice of CDS for psycho-existential suffering and (2) assess its impact on patients' survival. Methods: Advanced cancer patients admitted to 23 palliative care units in 2017 were consecutively enrolled. We compared patients' characteristics, CDS practices, and survival between those receiving CDS for psycho-existential suffering ± physical symptoms and only for physical symptoms. Results: Of 164 patients analyzed, 14 (8.5%) received CDS for psycho-existential suffering ± physical symptoms and only one of them (0.6%) solely for psycho-existential suffering. Patients receiving CDS for psycho-existential suffering, compared with those only for physical symptoms, were likely to have no specific religion (p = 0.025), and desired (78.6% vs. 22.0%, respectively; p < 0.001) and requested a hastened death more frequently (57.1% vs. 10.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). All of them had a poor physical condition with limited estimated survival, and mostly (71%) received intermittent sedation before CDS. CDS for psycho-existential suffering caused greater physicians' discomfort (p = 0.037), and lasted for longer (p = 0.029). Dependency, loss of autonomy, and hopelessness were common reasons for psycho-existential suffering that required CDS. The survival time after CDS initiation was longer in patients receiving it for psycho-existential suffering (log-rank, p = 0.021). Conclusion: CDS was applied to patients who suffered from psycho-existential suffering, which often associated with desire or request for a hastened death. Further studies and debate are warranted to develop feasible treatment strategies for psycho-existential suffering. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The objective prognostic score (OPS) needs to be modified to reflect practical palliative care circumstances. Objectives: We aimed to validate modified models of OPS with few or no laboratory tests for patients with advanced cancer. Design: An observational study was performed. Setting/Subjects: A secondary analysis of an international, multicenter cohort study of patients in East Asia was performed. The subjects were inpatients with advanced cancer in the palliative care unit. Measurements: We developed two modified OPS (mOPS) models to predict two-week survival: mOPS-A consisted of two symptoms, two objective signs, and three laboratory results, while mOPS-B consisted of three symptoms, two signs, and no laboratory data. We compared the accuracy of the prognostic models using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Calibration plots for two-week survival and net reclassification indices (NRIs) were compared for the two models. Survival differences between higher and lower score groups of each model were identified by the log-rank test. Results: We included a total of 1796 subjects having median survival of 19.0 days. We found that mOPS-A had higher specificity (0.805–0.836) and higher AUROCs (0.791–0.797). In contrast, mOPS-B showed higher sensitivity (0.721–0.725) and acceptable AUROCs (0.740–0.751) for prediction of two-week survival. Two mOPSs showed good concordance in calibration plots. Considering NRIs, replacing the original OPS with mOPSs improved overall reclassification (absolute NRI: 0.47–4.15%). Higher score groups of mOPS-A and mOPS-B showed poorer survival than those of lower score groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions: mOPSs used reduced laboratory data and had relatively good accuracy for predicting survival in advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Little is known about accuracy and confidence of clinicians' prediction of survival (CPS) in East-Asian countries. Objective: We aimed to examine accuracy of CPS for 7-, 21-, and 42-day survival in palliative inpatients and its association with prognostic confidence. Design: An international prospective cohort study in Japan (JP), Korea (KR), and Taiwan (TW). Setting/Subjects: Subjects were inpatients with advanced cancer admitted to 37 palliative care units in three countries. Measurements: Discrimination of CPS was investigated through sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROCs) according to 7-, 21-, and 42-day survival. The accuracies of CPS were compared with those of Performance Status-based Palliative Prognostic Index (PS-PPI). Clinicians were instructed to rate confidence level on a 0–10-point scale. Results: A total of 2571 patients were analyzed. The specificity was highest at 93.2–100.0% for the 7-day CPS, and sensitivity was highest at 71.5–86.8% for the 42-day CPS. The AUROCs of the seven-day CPS were 0.88, 0.94, and 0.89, while those of PS-PPI were 0.77, 0.69, and 0.69 for JP, KR, and TW, respectively. As for 42-day prediction, sensitivities of PS-PPI were higher than those of CPS. Clinicians' confidence was strongly associated with the accuracy of prediction in all three countries (all p-values <0.01). Conclusions: CPS accuracies were highest (0.88–0.94) for the seven-day survival prediction. CPS was more accurate than PS-PPI in all timeframe prediction except 42-day prediction in KR. Prognostic confidence was significantly associated with the accuracy of CPS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To explore the unclear association between temporary discharge home from the palliative care unit and achievement of good death, in the background of increases in discharge from the palliative care unit. Association between experiences and circumstances of patient and family and duration of temporary discharge was also examined. Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of data from a nationwide post‐bereavement survey. Results: Among 571 patients, 16% experienced temporary discharge home from the palliative care unit. The total good death inventory score (p <.05) and sum of 10 core attributes (p <.05) were significantly higher in the temporarily discharged and stayed home ≥2 weeks group. Among all attributes, "Independent in daily activities" (p <.001) was significantly better in the temporarily discharged and stayed home ≥2 weeks group. Regarding the experience and circumstance of patient and family, improvement of patient's appetite (p <.05), and sleep (p <.05) and peacefulness (p <.05) of family caregivers, compared to the patient being hospitalized, were associated with longer stay at home after discharge. Conclusions: Patient's achievement of good death was better in the temporarily discharged and stayed home longer group, but this seemed to be affected by high levels of independence of the patient. Temporary discharge from the palliative care unit and staying home longer was associated with improvement of appetite of patients and better sleep and mental health status of family caregivers. Discharging home from palliative care unit is worth being considered even if it is temporary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Few large-scale studies have focused on the prevalence of symptoms and signs during the last days of patients diagnosed with advanced cancer. Identifying the patterns of specific symptoms according to cancer type is helpful to provide end-of-life care for patients with advanced cancer. We investigated the prevalence and severity of symptoms and signs associated with impending death in patients with advanced cancer.Methods: In this secondary analysis of an international multicenter cohort study conducted in three East Asian countries, we compared the severity of symptoms and signs among dying patients in the last 3 days of life according to the type of primary cancer using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Post hoc analysis was conducted for multiple comparisons of each symptom according to the type of primary cancer.Results: We analyzed 2131 patients from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. The prevalence of most symptoms and signs were relatively stable from 1 week after admission to the last 3 days of life. According to cancer type, edema of the lower extremities was the most common symptom and fatigue/ ascites were the most severe symptoms in digestive tract cancer. For lung cancer, respiratory secretion was the most prevalent and dyspnea/respiratory secretion were the most severe symptoms.Conclusion: We demonstrated the prevalence and severity of symptoms and signs associated with the impending death of patients with advanced cancer in East Asia. Our study can enable clinicians to recognize the specific symptoms and signs at the very end of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Some patients experience intense symptoms refractory to intensive palliative care, and palliative sedation is sometimes used. Palliative sedation may be classified into proportional and continuous deep sedation (CDS). The primary aim of this study was to compare family experience between families of patients who received proportional or CDS.Methods: A multicenter questionnaire survey was conducted involving bereaved families of cancer patients who received proportional or CDS based on a sedation protocol. Overall evaluation of sedation (satisfaction, family-perceived distress, appropriateness of timing, and patient distress) and 13-item family concerns, good death, satisfaction with care, depression, quality of care, unfinished business, and balance between symptom relief and maintaining communication were measured.Results: Among the 2120 patients who died, 222 patients received a continuous infusion of midazolam. A sedation protocol was used in 147 patients, and questionnaires were sent to 124 families. A total of 78 responses were finally returned (proportional, 58 vs. CDS, 20). There were no significant differences in the overall evaluation, family concerns, total score of good death, satisfaction, depression, or balance between symptom relief and maintaining communication. On the other hand, some quality of care items, i.e., relationship with medical staff (P < 0.01), physical care by nurses (P = 0.04), and coordination and consistency (P = 0.04), were significantly better in the CDS group than in the proportional sedation group. Family-reported unfinished business was also better in the CDS group, with marginal significance.Conclusions: Family experience of CDS was not less favorable than proportional sedation, and actually rated more favorably for some elements of quality of care and unfinished business. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: No study has been conducted to compare the clinicians' prediction of survival (CPS) with Palliative Prognostic Scores (PaP) across countries. We aimed to compare the performance of the CPS in PaP (PaP-CPS), the PaP without the CPS, and the PaP total scores in patients with advanced cancer in three East Asian countries.Methods: We compared the discriminative accuracy of the three predictive models (the PaP-CPS [the score of the categorical CPS of PaP], the PaP without the CPS [sum of the scores of only the objective variables of PaP], and the PaP total score) in patients admitted to palliative care units (PCUs) in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. We calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for 30-day survival to compare the discriminative accuracy of these three models.Results: We analyzed 2,072 patients from three countries. The AUROC for the PaP total scores was 0.84 in patients in Japan, 0.76 in Korea, and 0.79 in Taiwan. The AUROC of the PaP-CPS was 0.82 in patients in Japan, 0.75 in Korea, and 0.78 in Taiwan. The AUROC of the PaP without the CPS was 0.75 in patients in Japan, 0.66 in Korea, and 0.67 in Taiwan.Conclusion: The PaP total scores and the PaP-CPS consistently showed similar discriminative accuracy in predicting 30-day survival in patients admitted to PCUs in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. It may be sufficient for experienced clinicians to use the CPS alone for estimating the short-term survival (less than one month) of patients with far-advanced cancer. The PaP may help to improve prognostic confidence and further reduce subjective variations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Although home care improves patients' quality of life (QOL), several studies have suggested that home care lowers the QOL of family caregivers and decreases their mortality. To alleviate the deleterious impact of home care on caregivers, the major burdens on caregivers and the clinical characteristics of the caregivers vulnerable to the major burden needs to be clarified. Method: A survey questionnaire was distributed to 710 family caregivers of patients with cancer in Japan, and 342 valid responses were obtained (valid response rate: 48.2%). The Burden Index of Caregivers was used to identify the major burden on caregivers. To assess the associations of the patients' care needs level and other clinically relevant factors with the major burden, a multivariable-adjusted logistic regression model was used. Results: The time-dependent burden was identified as a major burden. An adjusted model showed a nonlinear association between the care needs level and the time-dependent burden, in which the caregivers of the patients who required moderate care needs level had the highest time-dependent burden [adjusted odds ratio of none, mild, moderate, and severe care needs levels: 0.50 (95% confidence interval 0.07–2.12), 1.08 (0.43–2.57), 1.87 (1.01–3.52), and 1.00 (reference), respectively]. Additionally, older patients and younger caregivers were significantly associated with a time-dependent burden. Conclusion: The time-dependent burden was highest in caregivers at the moderate care needs level and younger caregivers. An imbalance between the demand and supply of care services may be improved by considering the clinical characteristics of both patients and caregivers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with life-limiting illnesses frequently experience urinary difficulties, and urinary catheterization is one of the interventions for managing them. However, evidence supporting the effects of urinary catheters on the quality of death (QoD) is lacking in this population. Objectives: To investigate whether urinary catheterization affects QoD in patients with advanced cancer in palliative care units. Design: A secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Setting/Subjects: The study enrolled consecutive patients with advanced cancer admitted to palliative care units in Japan between January and December 2017. Those who were not catheterized on admission and who died while in a palliative care unit were analyzed. Measurements: QoD was evaluated at death using the Good Death Scale (GDS). Results: Of 885 patients, 297 (33.6%) were catheterized during their palliative care unit stay. Females and patients with a long palliative care unit stay were more likely to be catheterized. In inverse probability-weighted propensity score analysis, patients with urinary catheterization during their palliative care unit stay had higher total GDS scores than those without catheterization (coefficient 0.410, 95% confidence interval 0.068–0.752). In subgroup analyses stratified by sex, age, and length of palliative care unit stay, urinary catheterization was associated with higher total GDS scores in patients younger than 65 years of age and those who died after a palliative care unit stay of 21 days or fewer. Conclusions: This study suggested that urinary catheterization during a palliative care unit stay may have a positive impact on overall QoD in patients with advanced cancer. This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000025457). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Few studies have investigated appropriate referral timing of specialized palliative care (SPC) from the perspective of cancer patients' and families' experiences. We aimed to clarify appropriate SPC referral timing for patients with advanced cancer and their families. We used data from a nationwide bereaved family survey in Japan. We sent a questionnaire to 999 bereaved families of cancer patients who died in 164 palliative care units (PCUs) and analyzed the first SPC referral timing and how patients evaluated it. We defined SPC as outpatient or inpatient palliative care service comprising certified palliative care physicians, advanced-practice nurses, and multidisciplinary practitioners. Finally, 51.6% (n = 515) of all responses were analyzed. The SPC referral timing was evaluated as appropriate (26.1%), late or too late (20.2%), early or too early (1.2%), or none of these (52.5%). Of these, 32.3% reported that they were referred to an SPC when diagnosed with advanced or incurable cancer or during anti-cancer treatment, and 62.6% reported they were referred after anti-cancer treatment. Patient-perceived appropriateness of SPC referral timing was associated with their good death process. After excluding "none of these" responses, a significantly higher proportion of respondents who reported being referred to SPC at diagnosis and during anti-cancer treatment evaluated the response timing as appropriate, compared to those who reported being referred after anti-cancer treatment. Appropriate timing for SPC referrals relates to quality of death; findings suggest that appropriate timing is at the time of diagnosis or during anti-cancer treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Terminal dyspnea in dying cancer patients is frequent and distressing, and the impact extends to their families. Families are often involved in providing care for terminal dyspnea.Objectives: This study aimed to describe various care strategies for terminal dyspnea in cancer patients hospitalized in palliative care units (PCUs), evaluate families' satisfaction with care for terminal dyspnea, and explore determinants contributing to families' satisfaction.Methods: A nationwide, cross-sectional survey was conducted using a self-reported questionnaire among bereaved families of cancer patients who died in PCUs. The questionnaire consisted of questions on the perceptions of care offered to patients with terminal dyspnea and their families, satisfaction with care for terminal dyspnea, family-perceived intensity of terminal dyspnea, use of oxygen, and background data of patients and families.Results: In total, 533 participants (response rate = 54%) returned the completed questionnaires, and 231 reported that their loved one had experienced terminal dyspnea. Dedicated and compassionate care was perceived by 60%-89% of the participants as the strategy provided for patients. Care for family members was perceived by 58%-69% of the participants. Perception of dedicated and compassionate care for patients and that of care for family members were significantly associated with high satisfaction (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 8.64, 3.85-19.36 and 15.37, 5.00-47.25, respectively).Conclusion: Dedicated and compassionate care may be the essential part of the care for terminal dyspnea. Dedicated and compassionate care for patients and care for family members have a potential of improving the care satisfaction among family caregivers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Some patients require continuous deep sedation (CDS) for refractory symptoms despite intensive palliative care. The principle of proportionality is proposed on the basis of clinical decisions, but no validated tools to assist such decision making are available. Aim: To develop a scoring system to determine whether CDS is proportionally appropriate. Subjects and Methods: A secondary analysis of a nationwide questionnaire survey of Japanese palliative care specialists was performed. Physicians were asked to rate the degree that they believed CDS to be appropriate in a total of 27 scenarios based on a combination of 3 factors with 3 levels: (1) the estimated survival (days, weeks, and months), (2) the patient's wish (clear and consistent, somewhat unclear and/or inconsistent, and unclear or inconsistent), and (3) confidence in refractoriness of the symptom (definite, probable, and unsure). Based on logistic regression analyses, a scoring system with two formulas (the proportionality score to determine that continuous deep sedation is appropriate [ProScoreCDS-appropriate] and proportionality score to determine that continuous deep sedation is inappropriate [ProScoreCDS-inappropriate]) to predict specialists' decision that CDS is appropriate or inappropriate was developed. The accuracy of the formulas was investigated. Results: Among 695 palliative care specialists, 469 returned the questionnaire (response rate, 69%) and 440 were analyzed. Logistic regression analyses identified that all three factors were significantly associated with physicians' decisions about the appropriateness of performing CDS. Using weighted value, the total score ranged from 3 to 67 for ProScoreCDS-appropriate, and 3 to 27 for ProScoreCDS-inappropriate. The area under the curve (AUC) values of ProScoreCDS-appropriate and ProScoreCDS-inappropriate were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87–0.89) and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.81–0.82), respectively. Using cutoff points of 41 and 14, sensitivity and specificity were 68.6% and 88.9% for ProScoreCDS-appropriate and 67.7% and 76.0% for ProScoreCDS-inappropriate, respectively. Conclusion: A scoring system to determine whether CDS is proportionally appropriate can be constructed, and a further study to develop a clinical tool is promising. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Referral to palliative care units tends to be delayed. In Japan, the Cancer Control Act was established in 2006 to improve the quality of life of cancer patients by facilitating greater access to specialized palliative care services. The primary aims of this study were to clarify the family-perceived appropriateness of the timing of referral to palliative care units after the Cancer Control Act, and to determine the effects of the involvement of the palliative care team on the family-perceived referral timing. An additional aim of this study was to clarify the family-perceived usefulness of the palliative care team. A multicenter questionnaire survey was conducted on a sample of 661 bereaved family members of cancer patents who were admitted to palliative care units in Japan. A total of 451 responses were analyzed (response rate: 68%). Half of the bereaved family members regarded the timing of referrals to palliative care units as late or too late: too late (25%, n =114), late (22%, n =97), appropriate (47%, n =212), early (2.4%, n =11), and very early (1.8%, n =8). Among 228 families who reported that patients had commented on the timing of referrals, about half reported that the patients said the timing of referral was late or too late: too late (23%, n =52), late (21%, n =49), appropriate (48%, n =110), early (4.4%, n =10), and very early (3.1%, n =7). The families of patients with a palliative care team (n =191) tended to report less frequently that they believed the referral timing to be late or too late (43% vs. 51%, P =0.073); they also reported significantly less frequently that the patients said that the referral timing was late or too late (36% vs. 52%, P =0.037). The percentages of families who evaluated the palliative care team as useful or very useful were: 93% (symptom control), 90% (emotional support), 92% (family support), and 87% (care coordination). Half of the Japanese bereaved families of patients admitted to palliative care units regarded the timing of referrals as late or too late, and the rates identified in the survey were similar to those recorded before the Cancer Control Act. Involvement of the palliative care team, however, significantly correlated with lower family- and patient-perceived late referrals, and palliative care team activity was generally perceived as useful by the bereaved family members. Further dissemination of palliative care teams could contribute to better access to palliative care units and quality palliative care throughout the country. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

In palliative care, steroids are often used to alleviate symptoms such as pain, fatigue, anorexia, nausea, and vomiting. Steroids occasionally induce psychiatric adverse effects. It has been reported that treatment of the steroid-induced psychiatric symptoms involves dosage reduction or discontinuation of steroid, and concomitant administration of psychotropics. There were few reports on effectiveness of treatment of steroid-induced psychiatric symptoms by switching from one steroid to the other. We experienced the case of 67-year-old man with malignant pleural mesothelioma and pulmonary emphysema who developed psychiatric symptoms after switching from oral prednisolone 10mg/day to intravenous betamethasone 2mg/day. He began to complain that “time repeats cycles of going and coming” and that he was “unable to distinguish between daytime and night,” and his face became expressionless. He gazed at familiar healthcare professionals as if seeing them for the first time, complaining: “I feel something obscure or strange in my head.” He was unable to remember events on the same or the previous day at all, and made no verbal response to questions by healthcare professionals. He did not know how to eat or use the toilet, and thus required assistance in daily life activities. He did not respond even when talked to by his family members. He continued gazing at them, sometimes saying: “Where am I now? Am I sick?” He behaved restlessly, repeating cycles of lying and sitting. The symptoms disappeared gradually after re-switching from intravenous betamethasone 2mg/day to oral prednisolone 10mg/day. “Steroid switching” may serve as a valid alternative treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is one of the most important end-of-life care decisions. However, the experience of bereaved families during code status discussions is not well documented.Objective: The aims of this study were to describe the degree of emotional distress of bereaved families when discussing code status, identify their perceived areas for improvement and determine associated factors.Methods: This study is part of a nationwide post-bereavement survey, the Japan Hospice and Palliative care Evaluation 3 (J-HOPE3) study. Questionnaires were sent to the relatives of cancer patients who had died in palliative care units in Japan in 2014.Results: From an analysis of 338 questionnaires, 37% of families reported high emotional distress during code status discussions and 32% reported a need for improvement. Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed the following were associated with high-level distress: the family had hoped for the miraculous and spontaneous recovery of the patient (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-4.43, P = 0.0049), the family felt they could not voice their opinion about Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR 2.07, CI 1.12-3.81, P = 0.02), or the physician failed to adapt the explanation to the family's preparation level (OR 0.36, CI 0.18-0.68, P = 0.0015). Factors identified for improvement were: holding discussions in a relaxing atmosphere conducive to questioning (OR 0.36, CI 0.16-0.80, P = 0.012), and ensuring the physician adapted the explanation to the family's preparation level (OR 0.47, CI 0.23-0.96, P = 0.037).Conclusion: We recommend the development of educational programs for code status discussions to improve the experience of bereaved family members. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Some factors associated with spiritual well-being in dying patients have previously been reported. However, there has been no cross-cultural study comparing factors related to spiritual well-being. The current investigation may shed light on this under-investigated area through a comparison of diverse factors. Aim: We aimed to (1) examine factors associated with spiritual well-being in the last days and (2) compare those factors across three East Asian countries. Design: This is an international multicenter prospective cohort study. Setting/participants: Newly admitted inpatients with far advanced cancer in palliative care units in Japan, Korea and Taiwan were enrolled. Each patient was classified into one of two groups based on spiritual well-being score in the last days of life. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the factors related to better spiritual well-being score in each country. Results: A total of 1761 patients treated at 37 palliative care units from January 2017 to September 2018 were analyzed. Seven variables were significant in Japan, three in Korea, and five in Taiwan. "Good death scale [acceptance]," "fatigue" and "expressed wish for hastened death" were unique in Japan. "Visit from a pastoral care worker within 48 h of death" was unique in Korea. "Patient's preferences for place of death," "dyspnea" and "continuous deep sedation" were unique in Taiwan. Conclusions: This study found novel factors related to spiritual well-being in the last days of life, several of which differed according to country. Recognition of factors associated with spiritual well-being can improve the quality of palliative care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examined differences in sociodemographic characteristics and the achievement of a good death between cancer patients who live alone and those who do not live alone prior to death in different settings. Secondary analysis of data collected across two cross‐sectional self‐reported questionnaire surveys was undertaken. The participants were bereaved family members of cancer patients who had died in palliative care units (PCUs), acute hospitals or homes. We stratified the data by the place of death and examined the differences in sociodemographic characteristics to determine the relationship between cancer patients achieving a "good death" and whether they were living alone. The data were collected through 15,949 surveys. On the Good Death Inventory, significantly higher total scores emerged for cancer patients who were living alone than for those who not living alone in PCUs (effect size [ES] = 0.11, Student's t‐test: p <.0001), but not in acute hospitals (ES = −0.03, p = 0.74) or home care services (ES = 0.02, p = 0.86). Cancer patients who were living alone were more likely to have been female, been older and have earned a lower annual income than those who were not living alone. Thus, among those who had received specialized palliative care, there was no difference in the quality of palliative care between cancer patients who were or were not living alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Studies on the appropriate use of urinary catheters for cancer patients at the end of life are limited. Aim: To clarify the differences among institutions in the prevalence of and indications for urinary catheterization of advanced cancer patients at palliative care units. Design: Pre-planned secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study; East-Asian collaborative cross-cultural Study to Elucidate the Dying process (EASED). Setting/participants: This study enrolled consecutive advanced cancer patients admitted to palliative care units between January and December 2017. The final study group comprised 1212 patients from 21 institutions throughout Japan. Results: Out of the 1212 patients, 380 (31.4%; 95% confidence interval, 28.7%–34.0%) underwent urinary catheterization during their palliative care unit stay, and the prevalence of urinary catheterization in patients who died at palliative care units by institution ranged from 0.0% to 55.4%. When the 21 participating institutions were equally divided into three groups according to the institutional prevalence of catheterization, patients with difficulty in moving safely, exhaustion on movement, and restlessness or agitation were more likely to be catheterized in institutions with a high prevalence of catheterization than in those with a low or moderate prevalence (p < 0.008, p = 0.008, and p < 0.008, respectively). Conclusion: This study revealed that the institutional prevalence of urinary catheterization in advanced cancer patients at palliative care units widely varied. Further studies are needed to establish the appropriate use of urinary catheters, especially in patients with difficulty in moving safely, exhaustion on movement, and restlessness or agitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: In end-of-life care, rehabilitation for patients with cancer is considered to be an important means for improving patients' quality of death and dying.Objectives: To determine whether the provision of rehabilitation for patients with cancer in palliative care units is associated with the achievement of a good death.Methods: This study involved a cross-sectional, anonymous, and self-report questionnaire survey of families of patients with cancer who died in palliative care units in Japan. We evaluated the short version of Good Death Inventory (GDI) on a seven-point scale. A logistic regression model was used to calculate the propensity score. Covariates included in this model were survey year, patients' characteristics, and families' characteristics. The associations between rehabilitation and GDI were tested using trend tests after propensity score matching adjustment.Results: Of the 1965 family caregivers who received the questionnaires, available data were obtained from 1008 respondents (51.2%). Among them, 285 (28.2%) cases received rehabilitation in palliative care units. There was no difference in total GDI score between the groups with and without rehabilitation. In exploratory analyses, patients receiving rehabilitation were significantly more likely to feel maintaining hope and pleasure (mean 4.50 [SE 0.10] vs. 4.05 [0.11], respectively; effect size [ES] 0.31; P = 0.003), good relationships with medical staff (mean 5.67 [SE 0.07] vs. 5.43 [0.09], respectively; ES 0.22; P = 0.035), and being respected as an individual (mean 6.08 [SE 0.06] vs. 5.90 [0.07], respectively; ES 0.19; P = 0.049) compared with patients not receiving rehabilitation.Conclusion: Rehabilitation in palliative care units may contribute to several domains of quality of death and dying, particularly maintaining hope and pleasure. Further research is needed to investigate whether palliative rehabilitation contributes to the achievement of a good death. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: There has been a growing consensus that parenteral nutrition and hydration is to be forgone in terminally ill patients with cancer. However, it remains unclear what the beliefs and perceptions of parenteral nutrition and hydration by the family members are.Objectives: To clarify their beliefs and perceptions and examine the relationships between the factors of family members, their beliefs and perceptions, and their overall satisfaction with the care the patient received at the place of death.Methods: This study was performed as a part of the cross-sectional anonymous nationwide survey of the bereaved family members of patients with cancer in Japan.Results: In total, 1001 questionnaires were sent, and 610 questionnaires were returned. Among these, 499 were analyzed. Regarding the prevalence of beliefs and perceptions about parenteral nutrition and hydration, when a patient cannot eat enough, parenteral hydration is needed was the highest (87.7%), followed by the opinions of medical staff are important in the issue of parenteral nutrition and hydration, parenteral hydration serves as a substitute for oral hydration, and if I were a patient and could not eat enough, parenteral hydration would be needed (85.1%, 81.0%, and 80.0%, respectively). We extracted two concepts as follows: belief that parenteral nutrition and hydration are beneficial and perceived need for parenteral nutrition and hydration. They were not identified as independent determinants of overall care satisfaction.Conclusion: This study showed that beliefs and perceptions about parenteral nutrition and hydration were important in the family members in palliative care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purposes: Despite extensive debate on palliative sedation over the last few decades, no studies have explored longitudinal changes in physicians' opinion. Moreover, little is known about how physicians' opinions affect their practice. This study aimed to clarify (1) changes in palliative care specialists' opinions on palliative sedation and (2) the effects of these opinions on clinical practice.Methods: In 2000 and 2016, nationwide questionnaire surveys involving Japanese palliative care specialists were performed: measurement was based on agreement with opinions on palliative sedation. In 2016, the physicians reported their practice of continuous deep sedation (CDS) and answered their thoughts on what factors lead to a good death as factors potentially affecting their practice.Results: Of the 695 physicians enrolled in the 2016 survey, 469 responded (67%) and 417 were analyzed (60%). Compared with 54 physicians in 2000, the present respondents were more likely to consider palliative sedation is difficult to perform based on appropriate indications (ES = 0.84, P < 0.001), is unnecessary if conventional palliative care is performed sufficiently (ES = 0.30, P = 0.013), and may result in legal action (ES = 0.35, P = 0.003). The physicians' opinions more strongly affected their practice than their characteristics or thoughts on good death components.Conclusions: Recently, palliative care specialists in Japan tend to encounter more difficulties determining what conventional palliative care is and what palliative sedation is. They also fear legal ramifications. It is necessary to standardize methods of alleviating patients' suffering, to make CDS criteria clearer, and to create a legal basis that respects patients' rights at their end of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Although little improvement has been made in the survival rate among young cancer patients over recent decades, whether they have achieved a good death has never been systematically explored. We aimed to clarify whether young cancer patients (aged 20-39 years) have achieved a good death, and compare their achievement with that of middle-aged patients (aged 40-64 years).Methods: We analyzed combined data of three nationwide, cross-sectional surveys of families of cancer patients who died at inpatient hospices in Japan (2007-2014). We measured 10 core items of the Good Death Inventory (GDI) short-version on a 7-point scale, and calculated rates of "agree/absolutely agree" and the mean scores.Results: We analyzed 245 and 5140 responses of families of young and middle-aged patients, respectively. Less than 60% of families of young patients reported "agree/absolutely agree" regarding 9 items, which included "feeling that one's life was completed" in 44 (18%; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 14-23%), "being independent in daily life" in 48 (20%; 95% CI = 15-25%), and "being free from physical distress" in 103 (42%; 95% CI = 36-48%) young patients. Young patients were significantly less likely to feel "one's life was completed" (mean = 3.3 (standard deviation = 2.0) vs. 3.8 (1.9), respectively; effect size (ES) = 0.29; adjusted p value = 0.000) and "not being a burden to others" (3.1 (1.5) vs. 3.5 (1.6), respectively; ES = 0.24; adjusted p value = 0.010) than the middle-aged.Conclusions: Overall, young cancer patients did not achieve a good death. Future efforts are needed to improve the quality of palliative care for young patients, focusing on psychosocial/spiritual suffering. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Complicated grief (CG) is considered a distinctive symptom from other bereavement-related mental impairments such as major depressive disorder (MDD). CG and MDD may appear independently or co-morbidly; however, the factors associated with each situation are unclear.Methods: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey involving bereaved family members of cancer patients in 175 institutions. The following items were included in the questionnaires to assess the prevalence of CG and MDD, and the following associated factors: demographic characteristics; bereaved family depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and grief status (Brief Grief Questionnaire); structure and process of care (Care Evaluation Scale); overall care satisfaction; and achievement of a good death (Good Death Inventory).Results: A total of 9123 questionnaires were returned. The prevalence of CG and MDD was 14% and 17%, respectively. Additionally, 58% of the possible CG participants showed co-morbid symptoms. Common factors that showed significant association with either independent or co-morbid symptoms of CG and MDD were pre-existing mental impairment; belief in the survival of the soul after physical death; unpreparedness for the death; poor physical or psychological health status; and the belief that the deceased felt themselves as a burden to others (all P < 0.05). The duration of bereavement did not remain significant after multivariate analysis.Conclusions: While there were many common factors associated with both CG and MDD independently, few participants exhibited associations to both CG and MDD. Therefore, CG and MDD can be considered as distinctive symptoms, which frequently appear co-morbidly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Bereaved family members are present from diagnosis to the end of life and can look back and evaluate the experience; in addition, the family itself is also an important subject in the care of the patient. Therefore, although it is essential to determine the priority research issues from the viewpoint of the patients and health care workers, it is also crucial to know the important research themes from the viewpoint of the bereaved family members.Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify research priorities for palliative care in Japan, based on the viewpoint of bereaved family members.Methods/design: We conducted a cross-sectional, self-report questionnaire survey. Content analysis was performed on free-text answers for research priorities. This study was carried out as part of the third Japan HOspice and Palliative Care Evaluation (J-HOPE3) study.Results: We extracted 1658 codes from the transcripts and organized them into 120 subcategories on the basis of similarity. Subcategories were then organized into eight categories as follows: ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and .Conclusion: The findings of this study can be used as a research agenda for palliative care, which should take first priority in the future, and could be carried out using limited resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To clarify the verbal communication of feelings between families and patients in Japanese palliative care units from the perspective of bereaved family members by examining (1) proportions of families' and patients' verbalization of six feelings (gratitude, love, seeking forgiveness, giving forgiveness, wishes after death, and continuing bonds), (2) recognition of receiving these feelings through verbalization from the family's perspective, and (3) the specific attitudes of family members that influence their verbalizations.Methods: In 2010, a cross-sectional survey was conducted with 968 bereaved families of cancer patients in palliative care units across Japan.Results: Five hundred thirty-seven responses were analyzed. (1) "Gratitude" was verbalized most often (families: 47%; patients: 61%), and "expressing forgiveness" least often (families: 16%; patients: 11%). (2) Even if the words were not used, 81.2% to 88.2% of families answered that they had received the patient's feelings, and 71.8% to 85.4% of families felt the patient had received their feelings. (3) Multiple logistic regression analyses indicated that the strongest attitudes determining verbalizing were "not wanting to say farewell without conveying feelings," "a daily basis of expressing," and "heart-to-heart communication" (ishin-denshin).Conclusions: For both families and patients, verbalizing feelings was difficult. Our results showed that families' and patients' verbalizing and receiving of feelings must be aligned to understand their communication at the end of life in Japan. Future research is needed to verify how attitude helps promote or inhibit verbalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Unfinished business often causes psychological issues after bereavement. Providing care for families of terminally ill patients with cancer to prevent unfinished business is important.Objectives: To clarify the prevalence and types of unfinished business in families of end-of-life patients with cancer admitted to palliative care units (PCUs), explore depression and grief associated with unfinished business, and explore the factors affecting unfinished business.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, anonymous, self-report questionnaire survey with 967 bereaved families of patients with cancer admitted to PCUs. The questionnaire assessed the presence or the absence of unfinished business, content of unfinished business, depression, grief, process of preparedness, condition of the family and patient, and the degree of involvement of health care professionals.Results: Questionnaires were sent to 967 families, and 73.0% responded. In total, 26.0% of families had some unfinished business, with improvement of the patient-family relationship being a common type of unfinished business. Families with unfinished business had significantly higher depression and grief scores after bereavement compared with those without. Factors that influenced the presence or the absence of unfinished business were preparedness for the patient's death (P = 0.001), discussion between the patient and family about the disease trajectory and way to spend daily life (P < 0.001), good patient-family relationship (P = 0.011), and family and health care professionals considering together the appropriate timing to accomplish the family's wishes (P = 0.021).Conclusion: Many families have unfinished business. Health care professionals should coordinate the appropriate timing for what the family wishes to do, with consideration of family dynamics, including the family's preparedness, communication pattern, and relationships. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Few studies have explored the clinical significance of the family's presence or absence at the moment of a patient's death and meaningful communication (saying "goodbye") in terms of post-bereavement outcomes.Objectives: To explore the potential association between the family's depression/complicated grief and their presence at the moment of a patient's death and the patient's communication with the family.Methods: A nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted on 965 family members of cancer patients who had died at palliative care units.Results: More than 90% of family members wished to have been present at the moment of death (agree: 40%, n = 217; strongly agree: 51%, n = 280); 79% (n = 393) thereof were present. Families' presence at death was not significantly associated with the occurrence of depression and complicated grief, but the dying patient's ability to say "goodbye" to the family beforehand was (depression: adjusted odds rate, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.26-0.69 adjusted P = 0.001; complicated grief: adjusted odds rate, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.94 adjusted P = 0.009).Conclusion: Many families wished to be present at the moment of the patient's death; however, meaningful communication (saying "goodbye") between the patient and family members, and not their presence or absence itself, was associated with better outcomes on measures of depression or complicated grief. Health care professionals could consider promoting both mutual communication (relating to preparation for death) between family members and patients before imminent death, as well as the family's presence at the moment of death. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Continuous deep sedation until death (CDS) is a type of palliative sedation therapy, and it has recently become a focus of intense debate. Marked inconsistencies in intervention procedures (i.e., what is CDS?) and unstandardized descriptions of patient backgrounds lead to difficulty in comparing the results in the literature. The primary aim of this article was to propose a conceptual framework to perform empirical studies on CDS. We propose the definition of CDS using the intervention protocol. As there are two types of CDS proposed in world-wide literature, we recommend to prepare two types of intervention protocol for CDS: "continuous deep sedation as a result of proportional sedation" (gradual CDS) and "continuous deep sedation to rapidly induce unconsciousness" (rapid CDS). In addition, we recommend that researchers characterize study patients' general condition using a validated prognostic tool, Prognosis in Palliative Care Study predictor model-A. Using this conceptual framework, we can compare the outcomes following the same exposures among homogenous patients throughout the world. This article proposes a provisional definition of two types of CDS. Defining CDS using the intervention protocol and describing patient backgrounds using validated prognostic tools enable comparisons and interpretations of empirical research about CDS. More empirical studies are urgently needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Psychological distress is problematic for patients and their family caregivers in the oncological setting. The level of stress is influenced by the health status of the patient and their family members as well as the support system for home care. However, it remains unclear how best to support distressed caregivers providing end-of-life care at home.Methods: The present study was performed as part of the Japan Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation study among caregivers whose family members are provided home palliative care. The caregivers were asked whether they wished to receive psychological support from mental health specialists, and factors associated with the need for psychological support were analyzed.Results: Of the 1052 caregivers, 628 completed the questionnaire. As a whole, 169 subjects [27%; 23-30% (95% confidence interval)] reported needing psychological support from a mental health specialist. According to a multiple regression analysis, factors associated with the need for psychological support included (1) emotional distress due to the need to adapt to rapid worsening of the patient's condition [adjusted odds ratio: 2.62 (95% CI 1.77-3.88), p < 0.001], (2) the poor health conditions of the caregivers [2.93 (1.61-5.36), p < 0.001], and (3) having someone else available to care for the patient in place of the caregiver [0.51 (0.34-0.78), p = 0.002].Conclusions: Psychological support is required for caregivers tending to patients at home. Further studies are needed to construct a system to provide continuous support to caregivers. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context Although the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 15-Palliative Care (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) have been examined previously, that study had several limitations, for example, small sample size. Objectives To examine the validity and reliability, including test-retest reliability, of the Japanese version of EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL for cancer patients with metastasis or recurrence. Methods A cross-sectional anonymous questionnaire was administered to cancer patients who were being treated on an oncology inpatient ward, in an oncology outpatient clinic, and in seven inpatient palliative units in Japan, from August 2007 to March 2008. Results Data from a total of 312 cancer patients were analyzed. The proportion of missing values was less than 4% for all items. The factor structure was reproduced identically with the original EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL, English version. The correlation of subscales showed a reasonable matrix. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.76 to 0.86, and intraclass correlation coefficients, which indicate test-retest reliability, ranged from 0.52 to 0.77. All subscales, especially physical functioning, fatigue, and pain, were significantly correlated with self-reported Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. Conclusion The Japanese version of EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL has sufficient validity, acceptable reliability, and feasibility for patients with advanced cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context Many surveys have evaluated patient-related barriers to pain management. Objectives To explore associations between a preference for opioids and general attitudes toward drugs, the experience and information received as a bereaved family, and beliefs regarding a good death. Methods A cross-sectional survey, performed in 2010, of bereaved families of patients with cancer in palliative care units across Japan. Questionnaires were sent to 997 families. Results A total of 66% of families responded. Of these, 224 responses were excluded because the family declined to participate in the study ( n = 38), the patient was not receiving any opioid analgesics, and there were missing data ( n = 164), or data were missing for the primary end points ( n = 22). Thus, 432 responses were finally analyzed (43%). In total, 26%, 41%, and 31% of family members stated that they strongly want to receive, want to receive, or slightly want to receive opioids if needed in the future, respectively. Determinants associated with a preference for receiving opioid treatment were the following: a general appreciation of the drugs ( P = 0.005), witnessing an improvement in the patient's quality of life as a result of pain relief ( P = 0.003), information provided by medical professionals that the opioid could be discontinued if side effects developed ( P = 0.042), and the belief that a good death was one that was free from pain and physical distress ( P < 0.001). Conclusion More than 90% of bereaved families whose relatives were treated with opioid analgesics reported a preference to receive opioid analgesics for the treatment of cancer pain, if necessary, in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Context: Both maintaining hope and preparing for the patient''s death are important for families of terminally ill cancer patients. Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to clarify the level of the family''s achievement of maintaining hope and preparing for death and the professional''s behavior related to their evaluations. Methods: A cross-sectional, anonymous, nationwide survey was conducted involving 663 bereaved families of cancer patients who had been admitted to 100 palliative care units throughout Japan. Results: A total of 454 family members returned the questionnaire (effective response rate, 68%). Overall, 73% of families reported that they could both maintain hope and prepare for the patient''s death. The independent determinants of the family''s agreement in reference to the professional''s behavior are pacing the explanation with the family''s preparation; coordinating patient and family discussions about priorities while the patient was in better condition; willingness to discuss alternative medicine; maximizing efforts to maintain the patient''s physical strength (e.g., meals, rehabilitation); discussing specific, achievable goals; and not saying “I can no longer do anything for the patient.” Conclusion: About 20% of family members reported that they could neither “maintain hope nor prepare for death.” A recommended care strategy for medical professionals could include 1) discussing achievable goals and preparing for the future and pacing explanation with the family''s preparation, 2) willingness to discuss alternative medicine, 3) maximizing efforts to maintain the patient''s physical strength, and 4) avoid saying they could do nothing further for the patient. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: Our goal was to better facilitate the desire of terminally ill patients to die in a favorite place, which may not always be the case for patients admitted to palliative care units. Our aims were to assess the perspectives of bereaved family members about (1) available and preferred places of care when their ill loved one was admitted to a palliative care unit and (2) why patients preferred to live at home but could not. Methods: A questionnaire was answered by 407 of 663 bereaved family members of cancer patients who were admitted to 95 inpatient palliative care units in Japan. Results: Seventy-three percent of respondents answered that a palliative care unit was the only available option. Patients lacking other places for care preferred their home (49%), a hospital (26%), or a long-term care facility (28%). Only 9% retrospectively considered that living at home was feasible for the following reasons: anxiety about the patient's deteriorating physical condition (85%), insufficient care at home compared to a hospital (84%), imminent hospitalization (63%), and the patient's concern about being burdensome (60%). Conclusion: Seventy-three percent of terminally ill cancer patients admitted to palliative care units had no other options for care. Improving outpatient treatment at palliative care units and establishing a palliative care system in patients' homes would greatly benefit patients and their families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Context: Prognosis is difficult to discuss with patients who have advanced cancer and their families. Objectives: This study aimed to explore the experiences of families of patients with cancer in Japan in receiving prognostic disclosure, explore family perception of the way the prognosis was communicated, and investigate relevant factors of family-perceived need for improvement. Methods: A multicenter questionnaire survey was conducted with 666 bereaved family members of patients with cancer who were admitted to palliative care units in Japan. Results: In total, 86.3% of the families received prognostic disclosure. The overall evaluation revealed that 60.1% of the participants felt that the method of prognostic disclosure needed some, considerable, or much improvement. The parameter with the highest value explaining the necessity for improvement was the family perception that the amount of information provided by the physician was insufficient (beta=0.39, P <0.001). Furthermore, the family perception that they had lost hope and that health care providers failed to facilitate preparation for the patient’s death had significant direct effects on the necessity for improvement (beta=0.21, P <0.001; and beta=0.18, P <0.001, respectively). The feelings for the necessity for improvement also were affected significantly by seven communication strategies (i.e., not saying “I can do nothing for the patient any longer,” pacing explanation with the state of the patient’s and family’s preparation, saying “We will respect the patient’s wishes,” making an effort to understand the family’s distress, being knowledgeable about the most advanced treatments, assuring continuing responsibility as the physician for medical care, and respecting the family’s values). Conclusion: This model suggests that strategies for care providers to improve family perception about prognostic disclosure should include 1) providing as much prognostic information as families want; 2) supporting families’ hopes by keeping up with up-to-date treatments and by assuring the continuing responsibility for medical care; 3) facilitating the preparation for the patient’s death by providing information in consideration of the family’s preparations and values; 4) stressing what they can do instead of saying that nothing can be done for the patient; and 5) assuring the family that they will respect the patient’s wishes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Context: Anorexia is one of the most common symptoms in terminally ill cancer patients and causes considerable distress for both patients and their families. Objectives: The primary aims of the present study were to clarify the level of the family-perceived emotional distress and necessity for improvement in professional practice when a relative becomes unable to take nourishment orally and explore the determinants of these outcomes. The ultimate aim was to develop an effective care strategy for family members of terminally ill cancer patients who become unable to take nourishment orally. Methods: A cross-sectional anonymous nationwide survey was conducted involving 662 bereaved family members of cancer patients who had been admitted to 95 palliative care units throughout Japan. Results: A total of 452 bereaved family members returned the questionnaires (effective response rate, 68%). Overall, 80% of family members experienced the situation where a terminally ill relative became unable to take nourishment orally. The reported level of family-perceived emotional distress was very distressing (38%) and distressing (33%). Responses to the family-perceived necessity for improvement in professional practice they received were much improvement needed (4%), considerable improvement needed (10%), and some improvement needed (46%). The independent determinants of a high level of family perceived emotional distress were a sense of helplessness and guilt, and belief that dehydration causes profound distress for dying patients. Independent determinants of a high level of family-perceived necessity for improvement in professional practice were a sense of helplessness and guilt, experience that health care providers did not pay enough attention to family members'' concerns, and insufficient relief of the patient''s symptoms. Conclusion: A considerable number of family members experienced high levels of emotional distress when a terminally ill cancer patient became unable to take nourishment orally, and many perceived a necessity for improvement in professional practice they received. A recommended care strategy includes the following four major domains: 1) relieving the family members'' sense of helplessness and guilt, 2) providing up-to-date information about hydration and nutrition at the end of life, 3) understanding family members'' concerns and providing emotional support, and 4) relieving the patient''s symptoms. Further research is needed to evaluate the effects of this care strategy on family members'' outcomes, including clinical studies to obtain more accurate understanding of the symptomatic effects of hydration and nutrition in terminally ill cancer patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Context: Terminally ill cancer patients often experience a self-perceived burden that affects their quality of life; however, no standard care strategy for coping with this form of suffering has ever been established. Objectives: The objectives of this present study were 1) to investigate the prevalence of self-perceived burden among terminally ill cancer patients based on a survey of family members, 2) to assess the level of family perceived usefulness of expert-recommended care strategies, and 3) to categorize the care strategies. Methods: The subjects were bereaved family members of patients who had died in certified palliative care units throughout Japan. The Good Death Inventory was used to evaluate patients'' self-perceived burden based on the proxy ratings of family members. The perceived usefulness of care was assessed using a 27-item questionnaire developed by a focus group of palliative experts and a systematic review. Results: A total of 429 responses (64%) received from a member of each of 666 bereaved families was analyzed. In their responses, 25% of the bereaved family members reported that the patient had experienced a mild self-perceived burden, whereas 25% reported that the patient had experienced a moderate to severe self-perceived burden. The family members recommended the following as particularly effective care strategies: “Eliminate pain and other symptoms that restrict patient activity (53%);” “Quickly dispose of urine and stools so that they are out of sight (52%);” and “Support patients'' efforts to care for themselves (45%).” A factor analysis showed that the expert-recommended care strategies could be categorized into seven different components. Conclusion: Many terminally ill cancer patients suffer from a self-perceived burden. Family members recommended a variety of care strategies to alleviate patient-perceived burden. Palliative care specialists should have adequate knowledge of promising care strategies for alleviating patient-perceived burden. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: The use of opioid analgesics and nonopioid medicines for the treatment of various symptoms in regional cancer centers is considered to be an index of the effectiveness of the structural plan for palliative care in such institutions. The present study aimed to establish an accurate representation of the actual use of opioid analgesics for palliative care in regional cancer centers. Methods: In November 2007, a questionnaire regarding the use of medications for palliative care was conducted in 288 regional cancer centers in Japan. Valid responses were received from 264 institutions (response rate, 91.4%). Results: All regional cancer centers reported using both opioid analgesics and nonopioid medicines. However, regarding opioid analgesics, the use of each standard strength ranged from 7% to 100%. The total amount of opioid analgesics used was 1739.6 ± 1216.5 g (mean ± SD). Factors found to be significantly related to the total amount of opioid analgesics used in an institution were the number of opioid analgesic medicines in use ( p = 0.008), the number of inpatients with cancer ( p < 0.001), the number of deaths among patients with cancer ( p < 0.001), and the number of beds ( p < 0.001). Discussion: Increase in the amount of opioid analgesics might improve the quality of palliative care at regional cancer centers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Appropriate use of anti-infective drugs is essential in clinical practice. No evidence-based guidelines or protocols have been published on the appropriate use of anti-infective drugs in patients receiving palliative care as yet. Methods: The medical records, which included the demographic data of patients, anti-infective drug use, bacteriologic findings, symptoms, and hematologic findings were reviewed retrospectively to determine the potential factors that contribute to symptom improvement of patients in terminal phase. Results: Seventy-one patients (64%) who received anti-infective drugs and had a total of 326 episodes of infection were assessed. Symptom improvement was seen in 33.1%. A total of 22.6% of episodes were started on anti-infective drugs during the last week of life and the symptom improvement in these episodes was 9.2%. Symptom improvement was hardly observed when the anti-infective drug was administered during the last week of life. The association between the decrease in the C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, the decrease of the leukocyte count, reduction of fever, and symptom improvement was determined. The decrease of CRP levels was 42.4%; leukocyte, 56.7%; and reduction of fever was 28.4%. The symptom improvement of individual treatment history was also investigated. The symptom improvement of the group who took positive treatment such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, and catheter placement was significantly lower than that of no-treatment group. Conclusions: Active cancer treatment probably induces the symptoms related to infection and the use of anti-infective drugs. Unnecessary and excessive treatment should be avoided, and the symptoms should be managed with consideration of the patient's state of mind in order to improve the quality of life of terminally ill patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this study is to clarify the actual experiences and preferences of the bereaved family for the care of their deceased family member. Methods: At 95 palliative care units in Japan, a cross-sectional nationwide survey of the bereaved families of cancer patients was performed in 2007. Results: Of the 670 questionnaires sent to bereaved families, 492 were returned (response rate of 76%). The overall requirement to improve the end-of-life care was rated as follows: improvement needed (42.7%) and no improvement needed (58%). In total, 9.4% of the families reported that they experienced problems with the deceased body after leaving the hospital, including a change in the facial appearance (8.5%), stains on the body (8%), and an odor emanating from the body (4%). Regarding the preferences for treatment procedures, over half the families preferred not to have traditional procedures performed in which the deceased's hands are joined with a band, the jaws are tied with a band around the face to close the mouth, and the body is wrapped in a sheet. The most preferable treatment procedure was to have makeup applied lightly and moderately. Maintaining the appearance of the deceased body was related to the overall care evaluation of end–of-life care. Conclusions: As the preferences for the care of deceased bodies are changing, end-of-life care needs to be improved with respect to culture, religious views, and the wishes of the patient and their family. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Palliative care specialists are faced with extensive barriers to providing effective palliative care. We carried out a survey to identify existing barriers from the point of view of palliative care experts in Japan and determine the priorities for future actions to overcome these barriers. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional mail survey in December 2004. We sent out 2607 questionnaires to members of the Japanese Society of Palliative Medicine and Hospice Palliative Care Japan. We asked all respondents two open-ended questions regarding barriers and future actions in the context of palliative care in Japan. In total, 426 questionnaires were returned (response rate of 16%). Results: We identified 95 different answers concerning barriers to providing effective palliative care. The three most frequent answers were “general medical practitioners' lack of interest, knowledge, and skills” ( n = 203), “general population's lack of knowledge and misunderstandings about palliative care” ( n = 122), and “general medical practitioners' failure to provide information and lack of communication skills” ( n = 89). We identified 136 different answers concerning future actions required to improve palliative care. The three most frequent answers were “organize study sessions on palliative care or case conferences in hospitals” ( n = 122), “provide information about palliative care to the general population” ( n = 117), and “in undergraduate education, make palliative care a compulsory course” ( n = 88). Conclusions: We identified numerous barriers to providing effective palliative care, related to not only medical practitioners, but also economic factors and the general population. These findings suggest that to overcome these barriers, we need to take action on many fronts, including increasing social awareness and effecting political change, as well as addressing problems relating to practitioners. We prioritized the future actions. The most frequent urgent problems were identified. We hope that collaborative efforts by the relevant organizations will improve palliative care in Japan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In order to improve the quality of palliative care, we can learn from bereaved families who were dissatisfied with the care they received. The primary aim of this study was to explore why bereaved families were dissatisfied with specialized inpatient palliative care. Methods: This qualitative study formed part of a nationwide questionnaire survey administered to 1225 bereaved family members of cancer patients who died in certified palliative care units in Japan. The participants were 22 consecutive family members who reported a greater need for improvement in care. Data were analysed by the content analysis. Results: The reasons that the bereaved families listed are classified into 27 categories and seven themes: (1) lack of perceived support for maintaining hope; (2) lack of perceived respect of individuality, especially in attitudes toward death; (3) perceived poor quality of care, especially psychological care, not being treated with dignity and inadequate explanation from physicians; (4) inadequate staffing and equipment, especially physician availability; (5) unavailability of timely administration; (6) lack of accurate information about palliative care units; and (7) family's practical and economic burden. Conclusions: This study identified the multiple sources of dissatisfaction with specialized inpatient palliative care for bereaved families. These findings could be useful in developing a more desirable system of specialised inpatient palliative care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The characteristics of physician communication with patients at the end of life (EOL) in East Asia have not been well studied. We investigated physicians' communications with imminently dying patients with cancer and their families in palliative care units (PCUs) in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan.Methods: This observational study included patients with cancer newly admitted and deceased during their first admission to 39 PCUs in three countries. We evaluated 1) the prevalence and timing of informing patients and families of patients' impending death and 2) the prevalence of communication to assure the families of the patient's comfort.Results: We analyzed 2138 patients (Japan: 1633, South Korea: 256, Taiwan: 249). Fewer Japanese (4.8%: 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.8%-5.9%) and South Korean (19.6%: 95% CI, 15.2%-25.0%) patients were informed of their impending death, whereas 66.4% (95% CI, 60.2%-72.1%) of Taiwanese were informed; among all three countries, ≥90% of families were informed. Although most patients in all three countries and the families in South Korea and Taiwan were informed of the impending death greater than or equal to four days before death, 62.1% (95% CI, 59.6%-64.6%) of Japanese families were informed less than or equal to three days prior. Most families in all three countries received assurance that the patient would remain comfortable (could hear until death, no distress with death rattle or respiration with mandibular movement).Conclusions: Physicians in Taiwan communicated about patient's impending death most frequently, and physicians in all three countries generally provided assurance to families that the patients would remain comfortable. Further studies should explore the reasons for these differences and the effects of such communications in East Asia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Constant evaluation is important for maintaining and improving the quality of end-of-life care. We therefore conduct the fourth Japan Hospice and Palliative Evaluation Study (J-HOPE4) as a continuous evaluation study. In this present paper, we describe the design of J-HOPE4. The main purposes of J-HOPE4 are as follows:1) to evaluate the processes, structures, and outcomes of palliative care acute hospitals, palliative care units, and home hospice services; 2) to examine bereaved family members' self-reported psychosocial conditions, such as grief and depression as bereavement outcomes;3) to provide data to ensure and improve the quality of care provided by participating institutions via feedback based on the results from each institution; and 4) provide clinical and academic information concerning the implications of various issues in palliative care by conducting additional studies. Methods: We will conduct a cross-sectional, anonymous, self-reported questionnaire survey. In total, 190 institutions will participate in this study, meaning that 12,000 bereaved family members will be sent a questionnaire. Discussion: This is one of the largest cross-sectional surveys involving hospice and palliative care, both in Japan and worldwide. Because this study will have a large sample size, the findings are expected to be generalizable to other settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: The importance of communication between the cancer bereaved and others has been emphasized, but little is known about the more problematic aspects of this communication such as "unhelpful communication."Objectives: The aim of this study was to establish which types of communication are perceived by the bereaved to be unhelpful.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, anonymous, nationwide survey at 103 certified hospice facilities/palliative care units in Japan.Results: A total of 630 (63%) bereaved responded. Over 60% of the bereaved experiencing such communication considered it to be unhelpful, with the most unhelpful communication being "They emphasized the positive aspects of death." Thirteen items related to communication were separated into two factors ("advice for recovery" and "comments on cancer") by factor analysis. "Comments on cancer" were more unhelpful to them and were more often provided by those around them. With regard to "advice for recovery," losing a spouse was a stronger predictor with a higher odds ratio for communication distress than losing a parent (odds ratio, 5.34; 95% CI, 1.63-17.57).Conclusion: A number of the bereaved have experienced unhelpful communication regarding advice on dealing with bereavement and cancer. To prevent putting an unnecessary burden on the bereaved with such unhelpful communication, it is essential to understand problematic aspects. Even when people have no intention of hurting the bereaved, some communication may do so. Communication with the bereaved is also a core clinical skill required by health professionals, and further efforts are required to support the grieving process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]