Search

Background: There is paucity of data regarding the clinical outcome of second generation drug- eluting stents (DES) post rotational atherectomy (RA) for heavily calcified coronary lesions (HCCL)., Methodology: The study cohort comprised 99 (116 lesions) consecutive patients who underwent RA for HCCL at our institution and received either a first generation DES (40 patients, 53 lesions) or a second generation DES (59 patients, 63 lesions). The analyzed clinical parameters were the 12-month rates of death (all cause and cardiac), Q-wave MI, target lesion revascularization (TLR), definite stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as the composite of death, Q-wave MI, or TLR., Results: The two groups were well matched for their baseline characteristics except for a lower left ventricular ejection fraction in the second generation DES group (46.0±23.0% vs. 55.0±9.0%; p=0.02). The group receiving second generation DES had more type C lesions (81.0% vs. 58.8%; p=0.01), shorter stent length (19.9±6.1 mm vs. 22.7±7.3 mm; p=0.04) and was more likely to undergo stent postdilatation (52.4% vs. 23.1%; p=0.001). The 1-year analyzed clinical parameters were similar in the two groups: all cause death (8.5% vs. 10.3%; p=1.0), cardiac death (8.5% vs. 2.5%; p=0.40), Q-wave MI (0% vs. 0%), TLR (3.6% vs. 2.7%; p=1.0), ST (0% vs. 0%), and MACE (11.9% vs. 12.8%; p=1.0). The 1-year MACE-free survival rate was also similar in the two cohorts., Conclusion: The use of second generation DES, following RA for HCCL, is associated with similar short and long-term clinical outcomes to first generation DES., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The usefulness of drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) has not been fully elucidated in calcified coronary lesions (CCLs). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of DEBs compared to a drug-eluting stent (DES) in this setting. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane were searched through December 2023. The primary endpoint was 12 months major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Secondary endpoints included clinical outcomes and angiographic results after PCI and at a 12-month follow-up. Results: Five studies and a total of 1141 patients with 1176 coronary lesions were included. Overall, the DEB was comparable to DES in MACE (RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.62–1.19, p = 0.36), cardiac death (RR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.23–1.53, p = 0.28), myocardial infarction (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.25–3.24, p = 0.87) and target lesion revascularization (RR = 1.1, 95% CI: 0.68–1.77, p = 0.70). Although the DEB was associated with worse acute angiographic outcomes (acute gain; MD = −0.65, 95% CI: −0.73, −0.56 and minimal lumen diameter; MD = −0.75, 95% CI: −0.89, −0.61), it showed better results at 12 months follow-up (late lumen loss; MD = −0.34, 95% CI: −0.62, −0.07). Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed that the DEB strategy is comparable to DES in the treatment of CCLs in terms of clinical outcomes. Although the DEB strategy had inferior acute angiographic results, it may offer better angiographic results at follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]