Search

About one-sixth of the world's population is affected by a neglected tropical disease as defined by the World Health Organization and Center for Disease Control. Parasitic diseases comprise most of the neglected tropical disease list and they are causing enormous amounts of disability, morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs worldwide. The burden of disease of the top five parasitic diseases has been estimated to amount to a total 23 million disability-adjusted life-years. Despite the massive health and economic impact, most drugs currently used for the treatment of parasitic diseases have been developed decades ago and insufficient novel drugs are being developed. The current review provides a compilation of the systemic and target-site pharmacokinetics of established antiparasitic drugs. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetic profile of drugs allows for the examination and possibly optimization of existing dosing schemes. Many symptoms of parasitic diseases are caused by parasites residing in different host tissues. Penetration of the antiparasitic drug into these tissues, the target site of infection, is a prerequisite for a successful treatment of the disease. Therefore, for the examination and improvement of established dosing regimens, not only the plasma but also the tissue pharmacokinetics of the drug have to be considered. For the current paper, almost 7000 scientific articles were identified and screened from which 429 were reviewed in detail and 100 were included in this paper. Systemic pharmacokinetics are available for most antiparasitic drugs but in many cases, not for all the relevant patient populations and only for single- or multiple-dose administration. Systemic pharmacokinetic data in patients with organ impairment and target-site pharmacokinetic data for relevant tissues and body fluids are mostly lacking. To improve the treatment of patients with parasitic diseases, research in these areas is urgently needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper focuses on the question whether different estrogens (E) have different qualitative pharmacodynamic effects when used by women for contraception, Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) or prevention of osteoporosis. In this context estrogens have been defined as the estrogen agonists estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), estriol (E3), conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), diethylstilbestrol (DES) and ethinylestradiol (EE). Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator’s (SERM’s) have been excluded from this analysis primarily because of lack of comparative (clinical) data with estrogen agonists. A major problem when addressing the issue of comparability of estrogen agonists is the lack of data from head-to-head estrogen-only comparative studies. Comparative studies have been performed almost exclusively with estrogen agonists combined with a series of different progestogens (P), that have been added to protect the uterus from endometrial hyperplasia. Since progestogens are known to exhibit different intrinsic pharmacodynamic properties and interactions with estrogens, it is impossible to judge which role the estrogen plays when qualitative differences between different combined E/P preparations are observed. In summary, no convincing evidence has been found that the estrogens mentioned differ qualitatively. Obviously quantitative differences are present due to differences in e.g. receptor affinity, metabolism (half life) and route of administration (transdermal/vaginal). Since DES has been discarded for human use due to teratogenicity, EE used in all combined E/P oral contraceptives is the most potent estrogen agonist available at present. In HRT, E2 and CEE are equally effective for the treatment of hot flushes and urogenital atrophy and superior to any other treatment option. For long term treatment to prevent osteoporosis and even for short term HRT, estrogen agonists are heavily debated recently because of a small increased risk of breast cancer, that has been known for a long time already. Well informed and individualised choice of treatment seems the appropriate solution. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]