Search

Background Methods Results Conclusion Patients with early‐stage lung cancer and interstitial lung disease have a poorer prognosis than those without interstitial lung disease. This study aimed to compare the long‐term outcomes of lobar and sublobar resections in these patients.We retrospectively analyzed 138 consecutive patients with clinical stage I non‐small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease who underwent surgical treatment at two institutions between January 2010 and December 2020. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to adjust for baseline characteristics.Thirty‐six patients underwent sublobar resection and 102 underwent lobar resection. The median follow‐up was 45.7 months. In all patients, 5‐year overall survival (OS) rates were 33.2% and 73.2%, and 5‐year recurrence‐free survival (RFS) rates were 24.2% and 60.1% in the sublobar and lobar resection groups, respectively (p < 0.01, <0.01). Death due to lung cancer and locoregional recurrence were significantly more frequent in the sublobar resection group than in the lobar resection group (p = 0.034, <0.01, respectively). On propensity score matching analysis, the 5‐year OS rates of the 19 matched pairs were 46.3% and 73.2%, and the RFS rates were 31.6% and 67.6% in the sublobar and lobar resection groups, respectively (p = 0.036, <0.01). The Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated a significant association between lobar resection and improved survival (p = 0.047).The patients in the lobar resection group had better survival rates than those in the sublobar resection group. In terms of long‐term prognosis, deliberately limited surgery may not be necessary for patients who tolerate lobectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES An adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) of the lung is a relatively rare tumor. In this multi-institutional cohort study, we tested the hypothesis that an ASC exhibits more aggressive clinical behavior as compared to adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SC). METHODS This retrospective cohort study used a prospective database produced by the Japan National Hospital Organization Study Group for Lung Cancer over a 7-year period (operations from 1997 to 2003, follow-up data until March 2010). During that period, 4668 cases underwent an operation for various types of primary malignant lung tumors. When a sample from a tumor comprised at least 20% each of SC and AC, the case was classified as ASC. Pathologic staging was done according to the seventh edition of the International Union against Cancer (UICC) Tumor Node Matastasis (TNM) classification of malignant tumors. RESULTS We identified 114 patients with ASC (2.4%), 2993 with AC (64.2%), and 1369 with SC (29.3%). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for all stage cases, p-stage IA, IB, and IIIA tumors indicated that ASC cases had the least favorable survival. The 5-year survival rates for all stage cases were 23.3% for ASC, 58.0% for AC (p < 0.0001), and 40.8% for SC (p < 0.0001). The 5-year survival rates for p-stage IA were 42.0% for ASC, 81.8% for AC (p = 0.0005), and 63.4% for SC not significant (NS), while those for p-stage IB were 19.3%, 65.3% (p = 0.0024), and 46.8% (NS), respectively, and those for p-stage IIIA were 17.8%, 24.8% (p = 0.0154), and 18.8% (NS), respectively. There was a tendency for greater survival differences between ASC and AC in earlier tumor stages. A step-wise multivariable model demonstrated that sex, age, performance status, histology, tumor size, p-stage, operative method, and neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION ASC of the lung is more aggressive than AC and SC. The decreased survival of patients with ASC as compared with either of those single histology tumors suggests the need for a clinical trial of adjuvant chemotherapy that includes early-stage patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: The mortality of lung cancer remains high, despite improved diagnostic techniques that allow small lung tumors to be detected. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic significance of the tracheal mucin MUC4 by immunohistochemical investigation of the expression profiles of MUC4, ErbB2, p27 and MUC1 in lung adenocarcinoma specimens (non-bronchiolo-alveolar type, ≤3cm) from 185 patients. MUC4 is a membrane mucin, similarly to MUC1, and in addition MUC4 functions as an intra-membrane ligand for receptor tyrosine kinase ErbB2 and is associated with regulation of p27. However, MUC4 expression was found to be unrelated to expression of MUC1, ErbB2 and p27 in small-sized lung adenocarcinomas. The disease-free interval (DFI) and survival rate of 25 patients with high MUC4 expression (≥25% of neoplastic cells stained) were significantly lower than those of 160 patients with low MUC4 expression (<25% of neoplastic cells stained) (P <0.05), whereas ErbB2 and p27 expression showed no significant correlation with DFI and survival. Univariate analysis showed that high MUC4 and p27 expression correlated with blood vessel invasion (P =0.0004), and MUC4 expression was frequently detected in regions of stromal invasion. In addition, the survival rate of stage IA patients with high MUC4 expression was significantly lower than that of stage IA patients with low MUC4 expression (P <0.05). In conclusion, high MUC4 expression in small-sized lung adenocarcinomas correlates with a short DFI and a poor survival rate. Therefore, MUC4 expression might be a new independent factor for prediction of outcome and indication of poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]