Search

Peter Geach describes the ‘doctrine of distribution’ as the view that a term is distributed if it refers to everything that it denotes, and undistributed if it refers to only some of the things that it denotes. He argues that the notion, so explained, is incoherent. He claims that the doctrine of distribution originates from a degenerate use of the notion of ‘distributive supposition’ in medieval supposition theory sometime in the 16th century. This paper proposes instead that the doctrine of distribution occurs at least as early as the 12th century, and that it originates from a study of Aristotle's notion of a term's being ‘taken universally’, and not from the much later theory of distributive supposition. A detailed version of the doctrine found in the Port Royal Logic is articulated, and compared with a slightly different modern version. Finally, Geach's arguments for the incoherence of the doctrine are discussed and rejected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Discusses the book "Aquinas on Being," by Anthony Kenny and logicism. Observations regarding the book; Metaphysical doctrine of Thomas Aquinas; Views of both Aquinas and Kenny on logicism.

Explores the philosophical work of Willard Van Orman Quine regarding intensional entities. Importance of his work in contemporary philosophy and logic; Focus on extensionalism; Foundations of his extensionalist shift.

Explores some aspects in Charles Sanders Peirce's philosophical logic. Distinction between a proposition and an assertion or affirmation; Difference between the immediate object and the dynamical object; Ways of using fictional names.