Search

Constitutional chromosome deletions result in wide ranging morbidity and often fatality. Information about risks and causes of death in these patients is important for counselling, and may illuminate the functions of the part of the chromosome deleted. There have been no cohort studies analysing mortality risks in persons with specific deletions compared with general population rates. We therefore conducted a cohort study following cause-specific mortality in 2,561 patients with autosomal chromosome deletions diagnosed by light microscopy or fluorescence in situ hybridisation at cytogenetic laboratories across Britain, 1965–2002. The commonest deletions were of 22q (544 patients), 15q (460) and 7q (210) and the least common 19q (0) and 20q (2). The prevalence of visible deletions of different chromosome arms was significantly inversely correlated with gene density of the arm ( p < 0.001). Mortality was 11-fold raised in the cohort compared with the general population (standardised mortality ratio = 11.4 (95% confidence interval 10.0–12.8)), was significantly raised for each deletion with ≥25 subjects in the study, and had a lower confidence limit >10 for deletions of 1p, 1q, 3p, 4p, 5q and 22q. Overall, 29% of deaths were due to congenital anomalies; significantly raised mortality occurred also from many other causes, varying by chromosome and arm of deletion. The data imply that viability of foetuses with visible chromosome deletions may be inversely related to gene density, and that all visible and fluorescence in situ hybridisation-detectable deletions lead to much raised mortality, but the extent and causes of mortality vary according to the specific deletion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with the probe p15 (D15Z1), we investigated the distribution of the polymorphic 15p signal which has been reported to occur on acrocentric chromosomes in addition to chromosome 15. The short arm of chromosome 15 has a characteristic signal pattern when hybridized with the FISH probe D15Z1. However, the D15Z1 signal can occasionally be seen on the short arm of other acrocentric chromosomes. We studied the distribution of the D15Z1 probe in 1657 patients consisting both of individuals with a normal karyotype and those with a variety of chromosome abnormalities involving the acrocentric chromosomes. Our results show that one in six individuals, regardless of their patient ascertainment category or karyotypic status, had one or more additional D15Z1 signals, and that there were no significant differences in the distribution of extra signals among the patient groups.European Journal of Human Genetics (2007) 15, 441–445. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201780; published online 21 February 2007 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To test the hypothesis that translocation breakpoints in normal individuals are simple and do not disrupt genes, we characterised the breakpoints in 13 phenotypically normal individuals incidentally ascertained with an apparently balanced reciprocal translocation. Cases were karyotyped, and the breakpoints were refined by fluorescence in situ hybridisation until breakpoint-spanning clones were identified. 1 Mb array-CGH was performed as a whole genome analysis tool to detect any imbalances in chromatin not directly involved in the breakpoints. Breakpoint-associated imbalances were not found in any of the patients analysed in this study. However, breakpoints which disrupted known genes were identified in two patients, with RYR2 disrupted in one patient and COL13A1 in the other. In a further eight patients, Ensembl mapping data suggested that a gene might be disrupted by a breakpoint. In one further patient, the translocation was shown to be nonreciprocal. This study shows that apparently balanced reciprocal translocations in phenotypically normal patients do not have imbalances at the breakpoints, in contrast to phenotypically abnormal patients where the translocation breakpoints are often associated with cryptic imbalances. However, phenotypically normal individuals, and phenotypically abnormal individuals may have genes disrupted and therefore inactivated by one of the breakpoints. The significance of these disruptions remains to be determined.European Journal of Human Genetics (2005) 13, 1205–1212. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201488; published online 24 August 2005 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The details of all cytogenetic abnormalities diagnosed in the Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory (WRGL) since 1967 to the present day have been recorded in the Salisbury Treasury of Interesting Chromosomes (STOIC). From this resource, we identified 137 patients with constitutional autosomal supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMC) ascertained in four principal groups: (i) 37%with abnormal phenotypes; (ii) 7%couples with reproductive difficulties; (iii) 47%antenatal diagnoses and (iv) 9%miscellaneous. Overall, 81 (59%) SMCs were mosaics and 56 (41%) nonmosaics. Of the 109 cases with known parental origins, 70%were de novo, 19%maternally and 11%paternally inherited. The chromosomal origins of 112/137 (82%) of the SMCs have been determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In all, 36/112 (32%) were derived from nonacrocentric autosomes, and 76/112 (68%) from the acrocentric autosomes 13/21, 14, 15 and 22. Of these acrocentric SMCs, 39 (51%) were derived from chromosome 15, so that SMC(15) constituted 39/112 (35%) of all SMCs with known chromosomal origins. The frequencies with which mosaicism was observed varied considerably according to the chromosomal origin of the SMCs and accounted for 8/39 (20%) SMC(15), 13/37 (35%) SMCs from other acrocentrics and 25/36 (69%) of nonacrocentric SMCs. The data were analysed for parental age effects, and only de novo SMC(15)s were found to be associated with a significantly increased maternal age.European Journal of Human Genetics (2005) 13, 154-160. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201311 Published online 27 October 2004 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fifty chromosomally normal couples with three or more miscarriages were examined using fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) and a library of subtelomere-specific probes together with alphoid repeats mapping to the acrocentric centromeres. Six abnormalities were found. Firstly, a cryptic reciprocal subtelomere translocation between the long arm of a chromosome 3 and the short arm of a chromosome 10. The other five cryptic abnormalities involved the acrocentric chromosome pericentromeric regions and in one case also Yp. Two patients had a rearranged chromosome 13, where the centromeric region was found to be derived from the short arm, centromere and proximal long arm of chromosome 15. Another two patients had a derived chromosome 22, where the centromere was replaced by two other centromeres, one derived from chromosome 14 and the other from either chromosome 13 or 21, while one patient had the subtelomere region of Yp translocated onto the short arm of a chromosome 21. These abnormalities may be the underlying cause of the recurrent miscarriages, because they may result in abnormal pairing configurations at meiosis leading to non-disjunction of whole chromosomes at metaphase I. The frequency of rearrangements seen in the recurrent miscarriage patient population was significantly different from that in the control group (P=0.0096, Fisher's exact test) due to the acrocentric pericentromeric abnormalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]