Search

Background: Optimal treatment of completely displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in adolescents remains controversial, with some favoring surgical management and others favoring a nonoperative approach. Few studies have comprehensively assessed longer-term nonoperative outcomes. Purpose: To prospectively assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and radiographic remodeling ≥5 years after injury in teenagers undergoing nonoperative treatment of completely displaced clavicular fractures. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Adolescent patients previously enrolled in a prospective study from a single institution with nonoperatively treated, completely displaced midshaft clavicular fractures ≥5 years from injury were eligible for the study. Patients were clinically evaluated for scapular dyskinesia and strength deficits. Bilateral clavicular imaging assessed residual shortening, displacement, and angulation. PROs included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), the shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), Marx Shoulder Activity Scale, cosmesis, and return to sports data. Results: A total of 24 patients were available for the follow-up, of whom 17 (71%) consented to additional imaging. The mean cohort age at the time of injury was 14.5 ± 1.1 years, with 88% being male. At a mean follow-up of 6.1 years, all fractures had healed, with no patient requiring secondary interventions. Significant remodeling was observed across all measurements, with improvements of 70% in shortening (22.8 to 6.8 mm; P <.001), 73% in superior displacement (13.4 to 3.6 mm; P <.001), and 83% in angulation (10.4° to 1.8°; P <.001). Thirteen patients (72%) had a >2-cm initial shortening, and all remodeled to <2 cm. PROs were almost universally excellent, with mean ASES, QuickDASH, and Marx activity scores of 99 ± 3, 1 ± 3, and 20 ± 1, respectively, with 79% of patients reporting perfect scores in all 3 domains. Most patients (58%) were completely satisfied with their shoulder appearance, 38% were more satisfied than not, 1 patient (4%) was neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and no patients were dissatisfied. All patients except 1 who were interested in sports returned to sporting activities. PROs were not associated with bony remodeling (P >.05). Conclusion: Teenaged patients with completely displaced clavicular fractures treated nonoperatively can expect excellent radiographic and clinical outcomes 5 years after injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: When stable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions of the femoral condyle in a skeletally immature patient fail to heal with nonoperative methods, the standard of care treatment is condylar OCD drilling. Two primary OCD drilling techniques have been described, but no prospective studies have compared their relative effectiveness. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the healing and function after transarticular drilling (TAD) with that after retroarticular drilling (RAD). It was hypothesized that there would be no difference in rate or time to healing, rate or time to return to sports, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), or secondary OCD-related surgery. Study Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Skeletally immature patients with magnetic resonance imaging–confirmed stable OCD lesions of the medial femoral condyle who did not demonstrate substantial healing after a minimum of 3 months of nonoperative treatment were prospectively enrolled by 1 of 17 surgeon-investigators at 1 of 14 centers. Patients were randomized to the TAD or RAD group. Tourniquet time, fluoroscopy time, and complications were compared between the treatment groups. Postoperatively, serial radiographs were obtained every 6 weeks to assess healing, and PROs were obtained at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. Results: A total of 91 patients were included, consisting of 51 patients in the TAD and 40 patients in the RAD group, who were similar in age, sex distribution, and 2-year PRO response rate. Tourniquet time and fluoroscopy time were significantly shorter with TAD (mean, 38.1 minutes and 0.85 minutes, respectively) than RAD (mean, 48.2 minutes and 1.34 minutes respectively) (P =.02; P =.004). In the RAD group, chondral injury from K-wire passage into the intra-articular space was reported in 9 of 40 (22%) patients, but no associated postoperative clinical sequelae were identified in these patients. No significant differences between groups were detected in follow-up Pediatric–International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, Marx Activity Scale, or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Quality of Life scores. Healing parameters were superior at 6 months and 12 months in the TAD group, compared with the RAD group, and secondary OCD surgery occurred in 4% of patients who underwent TAD and 10% of patients who underwent RAD (P =.40). Patients in the TAD group returned to sports earlier than those in the RAD group (P =.049). Conclusion: TAD showed shorter operative time and fluoroscopy time and superior healing parameters at 6 and 12 months, but no differences were seen in 24-month healing parameters or PROs at all follow-up time points, when compared with RAD. Registration: NCT01754298 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The most common presentation of knee osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a stable lesion on the lateral aspect of the medial femoral condyle (MFC) in an adolescent or pre‐adolescent athlete. The standard of care for primary treatment is non‐operative, and includes rest/activity modification and often weight bearing protection or bracing. Failed conservative management often leads arthroscopy and drilling of the lesion. Two different primary drilling techniques have been utilized, but no prospective studies have compared their relative effectiveness. The study hypothesis was that retro‐articular drilling (RAD), the slightly newer technique, would not be inferior to trans‐ articular (TAD), with regard to rate of healing, time to return to sports (RTS), and patient‐reported outcome scores (PROs). Methods: Skeletally immature (n=113) patients presenting with MRI‐confirmed stable OCD of the MFC who did not demonstrate substantial healing after a minimum of 3 months of non‐operative treatment were prospectively enrolled by one of seventeen surgeon‐investigators (at 14 centers, representing all major geographic regions in the U.S.) and randomized to TAD or RAD. Post‐operatively, serial radiographs were obtained every 6 weeks to assess healing, and PROs were obtained at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. Twelve patients were closed out at time of surgery due to lesion instability detected during arthroscopy. Power analysis determined that in order to detect a difference in 2‐year IKDC score between RA and TA groups with 80% power, sample sizes of 37 subjects per group would be required if the true standard deviation were 15. This analysis was based on conducting an independent samples Student’s t‐test with alpha set to 5%. Results: Ninety‐one study subjects were included, consisting of 51 TAD and 40 RAD patients, respectively, with the two groups being similar in age (12.6 years vs. 11.9 years), sex distribution (45% vs. 27% female, p=0.081), and 2‐year PRO response rate (both 90%). No significant differences between TAD and RAD were detected in follow‐up Pedi‐ IKDC, Lysholm, Marx knee activity score, or KOOS QOL scores (Table 1). Revision/additional OCD surgery occurred in 10% of patients in RAD and 4% in TAD (p=0.40). 73% of TAD patients reached a ‘healed’ status at a mean of 1.15 years, compared with 60% RAD patients at a mean of 1.21 years. Conclusions: While both primary forms of OCD drilling (TAD and RAD) showed consistent post‐operative healing, achieving a completely ‘healed’ status was often a more prolonged process, taking approximately 1 year, despite clinical improvement and RTS being achieved much sooner. PROs were similar between drilling techniques. Significantly higher powered studies are needed to better elucidate the greater revision surgery rates in RAD compared with TAD, but overall risk is low and absolute risk only 6%. The current data support either drilling technique, which may be technically simpler, without the need for fluoroscopy, with TAD, and may be more protective of the chondral articular surface with RAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The most common presentation of knee osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a stable lesion on the lateral aspect of the medial femoral condyle (MFC) in an adolescent or pre‐adolescent athlete. Standard of care for conservative treatment, include activity modification and weight bearing protection. Failed conservative management often leads arthroscopy and drilling of the lesion. Two different primary drilling techniques have been utilized, but no prospective studies have compared their relative effectiveness. Hypothesis/Purpose: The study hypothesis was that trans‐articular (TAD) and retro‐articular drilling (RAD) would demonstrate similar rates of healing, times to return to sports, and patient‐reported outcome scores (PROs). Methods: Skeletally immature (n=113) patients presenting with radiograph indicated stable OCD of the MFC who did not demonstrate healing despite a minimum of 3 months of non‐operative treatment were prospectively enrolled and randomized to TAD or RAD, for which 17 surgeon‐investigators (at 14 centers, representing all major regions in the U.S.). Serial radiographs were obtained every 6 weeks to assess healing, and PROs were obtained at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. Twelve patients were due to lesion instability detected at the time of surgery, Results: Ninety‐one study subjects were included, consisting of 51 TAD and 40 RAD patients, with the two groups being of similar age (12.6 years vs. 11.9 years), sex distribution (45% vs. 27% female, p=0.081), and 2‐year PRO response rate (both 90%). No significant difference between TAD and RAD was detected in follow‐up Pedi‐IKDC, Lysholm, Marx knee activity score, or KOOS QOL scores (Table 1). Revision/additional OCD surgery occurred in 10% of patients in RAD and 4% in TAD. 71% of TAD patients reached a ‘healed’ status at a mean of 1.15 years, compared with 58% RAD patients at a mean of 1.06 years. Conclusion: While both primary forms of OCD drilling (TAD and RAD) showed consistent post‐operative healing, achieving a completely ‘healed’ status was often a more prolonged process, taking approximately 1 year, despite clinical improvement being achieved much sooner. While PROs were similar between drilling techniques, revision surgery rates were more than twice as common with RAD compared with TAD but the overall risk was low and the Absolute Risk was only 6%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]