Search

Background Patients with low and intermediate risk chest pain features comprise the greatest proportion presenting to emergency services for evaluation of suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The efficient and timely identification of patients with these features remains a major challenge within clinical practice. Troponin assays are increasingly being used for the determination of risk among patients presenting with chest pain potentially facilitating more appropriate care. To date, no economic evaluation comparing high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) reporting to standard troponin T (c-TnT) reporting in the routine management of suspected ACS and based on longer-term clinical outcomes has been conducted. Methods and results An economic evaluation was conducted with 1937 participants randomized to either hs-TnT ( n = 973) or c-TnT ( n = 964) with 12 month follow-up. The primary outcome measure was the number of cumulative combined outcomes of all-cause mortality and new or recurrent ACS avoided. Mean per participant Australian Medicare costs were higher in the hs-TnT arm compared to the c-TnT arm (by $1285/patient). Mean total adverse clinical outcomes avoided were higher in the hs-TnT arm (by 0.0120/patient) resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $108,552/adverse clinical outcome avoided. An ICER of $49,030/adverse clinical outcome avoided was obtained when the analysis was restricted to patients below the threshold of normal Troponin testing (actual c-TnT levels < 30 ng/L). Conclusions hs-TnT reporting leads to fewer adverse clinical events but at a high ICER. For the routine implementation of hs-TnT to be more cost-effective, substantial changes in clinical practice will be required. Clinical trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12614000189628). https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=365726 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been established as an independent predictor of long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction. However, this is less well defined across the whole spectrum of acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). The Acute Coronary Syndrome Prospective Audit is a prospective multicenter registry with 12-month outcome data for 3,393 patients (755 with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 1942 with high-risk non–ST-segment elevation ACS [NSTE-ACS], and 696 with intermediate-risk NSTE-ACS). A total of 149 patients (4.4%) had new-onset AF and 387 (11.4%) had previous AF. New-onset AF was more, and previous AF was less frequent in those with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction than in those with high-risk NSTE-ACS or intermediate-risk NSTE-ACS (p <0.001). Compared to patients without arrhythmia, patients with new-onset AF and previous AF were significantly older and had more high-risk features at presentation (p <0.004). Patients with new-onset AF more often had left main coronary artery disease, resulting in a greater rate of surgical revascularization (p <0.001). Only new-onset AF resulted in adverse in-hospital outcomes (p <0.001). Only patients with previous AF had greater long-term mortality (hazard ratio 1.42, p <0.05). New-onset AF was only associated with a worse long-term composite outcome (hazard ratio 1.66, p = 0.004). However, the odds ratio for the composite outcome was greatest for patients with new-onset AF with intermediate-risk NSTE-ACS (odds ratio 3.9, p = 0.02) than for those with high-risk NSTE-ACS (odds ratio 2.0, p = 0.01) or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (odds ratio 1.4, p = 0.4). In conclusion, new-onset AF was associated with worse short-term outcomes and previous AF was associated with greater mortality even at long-term follow-up. The prognostic burden of new-onset AF differed with the type of ACS presentation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]