Search

The environmental consequences of using nonrenewable fossil fuels have motivated a global quest for sustainable alternatives from renewable sources. Carinata has been developed as a low carbon intensity, non‐food oilseed biomolecular platform to produce advanced drop‐in renewable fuels, meal, and co‐products. The crop is widely adaptable to grow in the humid subtropical and humid continental climatic regions of Asia, Africa, North America, South America, Europe, and Australia as a spring or winter crop. Carinata is heat tolerant, resistant to diseases and seed shattering with lower water‐use requirements than other oilseed brassicas. Adopting carinata in double‐cropping systems would require continuing research to integrate crop biology with agronomy, to understand growth and development and its interaction with agricultural inputs and management. Site‐specific best management agronomic practices and crop improvement research to develop frost‐tolerant, early‐maturing, nutrient use‐efficient, and high yielding varieties with desirable oil content and fatty acid profile will enhance the crop's adaptability and economic viability. The exploitation of intra‐ and interspecific and intra‐ and intergeneric diversity will further enhance carinata productivity and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. This review attempts to present a comprehensive description of carinata's biology, beginning with its origin and current state of distribution, availability of genetic and genomic resources, and a discussion of its morphology, phenology, and reproduction. A detailed analysis of the agronomy of the crop, including planting and germination and management practices, is presented in the context of crop growth and development. This will facilitate global adoption, sustainable production, and commercialization of carinata as a dedicated biofuel oilseed crop in diverse cropping systems and growing regions of the world, including the Southeast United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Brassica carinata has the potential to become an economical biofuel winter crop in the Southeast U.S. An IPM program is needed to provide management recommendations for B. carinata in the region. This study serves as the first steps in the developing IPM tactics documenting pest occurrence, pest position within the canopy, and the impact of defoliation on B. carinata yield. The study was performed in Jay, FL, during the 2017–2018 and 2018–2019 winter/spring crop seasons. Pest species in B. carinata were documented by plant inspection within 16 genotypes of B. carinata, and the presence of insect pests in three canopy zones (upper, medium, and lower canopy) was documented. The defoliation impact on B. carinata was evaluated by artificial defoliation. Five levels of defoliation (2017–2018 crop season: 0%, 5%, 25%, 50%, and 100%; 2018–2019 crop season: 0%, 50%, 75%, 90%, and 100%) were artificially applied during vegetative, flowering, and pod formation stages of the commercial cultivar "Avanza64." During the 2018–2019 crop season, two experiments were performed, a one‐time defoliation event and continuous defoliation. The plants were hand harvested and the average number of pods per plants, seeds per pod, thousand seed weight, and yield were estimated and correlated with defoliation levels. Results indicated the following species of pests associated with B. carinata: Microtheca ochroloma Stål (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Plutela xylostella larvae, Pieris rapae L. (Lepidoptera: Pieridae), Diabrotica undecimpunctata Barber (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Lipaphis pseudobrassicae Davis (Hemiptera: Aphididae), Leptoglossus phyllopus L. (Hemiptera: Coreidae), and Chloridea virescens F. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). The insect distribution within the plant canopy was not uniform. Different levels of artificial B. carinata defoliation did not affect seed weight, the number of seeds per pod, or the oil content of the seeds. The number of pods per plants and estimated yield were negatively impacted by defoliation during the vegetative and flowering stages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Brassica carinata A. Braun is a non‐edible, oilseed winter crop for biofuel production that can diversify crop rotations and improve integrated weed management. The research objective was to evaluate the influence of B. carinata on weed population dynamics in the southeastern United States cropping systems. B. carinata was grown after cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), peanut (Arachis hypogea L.), or a clean summer fallow, and winter weed pressure was modified with or without S‐metolachlor. The emergence of Lamium amplexicaule L. increased at least 40% after cotton or peanut in 2018–2019 and 50% after cotton in 2019–2020 compared to summer fallow. Stellaria media (L.) Vill. emergence was increased over threefold after peanut or cotton in 2019–2020. Senna obtusifolia (L.) H.S. Irwin & Barneby emergence after cotton was increased at least 43% during both experimental years, whereas Amaranthus hybridus L. emergence was increased over 50% after peanut in 2019–2020 compared to summer fallow. Even without S‐metolachlor, B. carinata reduced A. hybridus (>27%) and S. obtusifolia (>25%) emergence compared to weedy winter fallow. After B. carinata harvest, A. hybridus emergence was reduced >40% with or without S‐metolachlor compared to winter fallow in 2018–2019. Overall, B. carinata biomass was highest after peanut for both seasons. B. carinata seed yield did not differ among crop history treatments in the first season, whereas in 2019–2020, the yield was higher after peanut (2417 kg ha−1) or fallow (2520 kg ha−1) compared to cotton (1710 kg ha−1). Weed management treatments were not different for B. carinata biomass or yield in any year. The results indicate that B. carinata can enhance integrated weed management strategies at the rotational level for summer crops by reducing seed banks of summer weed species, in addition to its potential as a winter biofuel crop for the southeastern United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Row croppers in the Southeast United States (SE US) are interested in diversifying their cropping systems and increasing revenue by growing a winter cash crop between summer crops, especially cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Double-cropping carinata (Brassica carinata A. Braun) between summer crops has potential to boost grower revenue and increase land use efficiency in the region. Given that this winter crop is fairly new in the SE US, its successful establishment in the region depends on its rotational fit into current cropping systems. Since incorporating carinata into the existing cropping systems in the region could influence the productivity of those systems, it is crucial to determine what changes row croppers should expect. To resolve this, research was conducted to quantify the effects of summer cropping history on the performance of carinata as part of diversified crop rotations in the SE US. A randomized complete block design with eight replications was implemented in Jay, Florida, over three years. Summer cropping history treatments were peanut, cotton, and summer fallow. Data was collected on carinata aboveground biomass and stover [including carbon (C) and nitrogen (N)]; yield (including yield components); and seed chemical composition (glucosinolates concentration, protein and oil contents, and oil composition). Carinata biomass, biomass C and N, stover residue, stover residue C and N, and stover residue C:N ratio were not affected by summer cropping history across years. Likewise, yield and seed chemical composition were not affected by summer cropping history. In terms of combined productivity of summer crops and carinata, cotton-carinata was the most productive system while fallow-carinata was the least productive. Overall, results from this study show that the insensitivity of carinata yield or seed quality to previous summer crops allows for flexibility in integrating carinata into existing rotations in the SE US. This simplifies the agronomic management of carinata as a biofuel crop since growers can concentrate on meeting yield goals without the risk of affecting yield or seed quality with different summer cropping histories. • Carinata was evaluated for yield and seed quality following cotton, peanut, and fallow cropping histories. • Carinata can be grown after cotton or peanut without compromising yield or seed quality. • Carinata has potential to be a fallow replacement winter crop for producing jet fuel in the Southeast US. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Performance of 11 Brassica carinata genotypes was evaluated for agronomically important traits. • Seasonal variation in environmental conditions, such as precipitation and temperature influenced agronomic performance. • Significant correlations were observed between seed and oil yield; bolting and flowering; bolting and maturity. • Principal component analysis clustered genotypes with high oil content, erucic acid content and protein content together. Brassica carinata A. Braun, grown as a winter crop on underutilized agricultural land in the southeast United States (SE US), may provide a new rotation alternative and augment income for producers. Widespread adoption of Brassica carinata as a winter crop in the SE US requires varieties with cold tolerance, acceptable and stable seed yield, oil content, protein content so that the crop will be complementary with the normal cultivation of summer crops such as cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), corn (Zea mays L.), soybean (Glycine max L. Merr), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of 11 Brassica carinata genotypes for agronomically important traits including seed yield, oil and protein content, oil quality, days to bolting, flowering and maturity at three locations during two growing seasons (2015–2017) as a winter crop in the SE US. Interactions between genotype and environment played a crucial role in overall agronomic performance. This study provides key information on the effect of environmental conditions, such as precipitation and temperature on the agronomic performance of carinata along with generation of information related to region-specific requirements for the crop in the SE US. Days to maturity ranged from 154 to 165 days. The average yield of the 11 genotypes tested ranged from 2814 kg/ha to 3401 kg/ha, which were improved from earlier studies, demonstrating gain due to regional selection and breeding efforts. Total oil content ranged from 42.0 % to 52.4 %, while the erucic acid (C22:1) content ranged from 40.7 % to 42.9 % on a whole seed basis. Based on these results, specific genotypes with consistently high seed yield, oil, erucic acid and protein content with shorter life cycle irrespective of location or year were identified. Brassica carinata has potential as a viable bioenergy winter crop to be integrated into the cropping systems in the SE US and other regions of the world. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]