Search

Perennial energy grasses have gained attention in recent years as a promising resource for the bioeconomy because of their benign environmental profile, high stress tolerance, high biomass yields and low input requirements. Currently, strong breeding efforts are being made to extend the range of commercially available miscanthus and switchgrass genotypes. In order to foster farmers' acceptance of these crops, and especially of novel hybrids, more information is required about how they can be efficiently integrated into cropping rotations, how they can be removed at the end of their productive lifespan, and what effect they have on subsequently grown crops. Farmers in Europe are meanwhile increasingly constrained in the methods available to them to remove these crops, and there is a risk that the herbicide glyphosate, which has been used in many studies to remove them, will be banned in coming years. This study looks at the removal of seven‐year‐old stands of miscanthus and switchgrass over 1 year at an experimental site in Southern‐Germany. Three novel miscanthus genotypes were studied, alongside one variety of switchgrass, and the impact of each crop's removal on the yield of maize grown as a follow‐on crop was examined. A combination of soil tillage and grass herbicides for maize cultivation was successful in controlling miscanthus regrowth, such that yields of maize grown after miscanthus did not differ significantly from yields of maize grown in monoculture rotation (18.1 t dry biomass ha−1). Yields of maize grown after switchgrass (14.4 t dry biomass ha−1) were significantly lower than maize in monoculture rotation caused by insufficient control of switchgrass regrowth by the applied maize herbicide. Although some regrowth of miscanthus and switchgrass was observed in the follow‐on crop maize, complete eradication of both crops was achieved by subsequent winter wheat cultivation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During the last years, a demand for regionally produced biogas feedstocks was created by government subsidies to biogas production in Germany—contrary to the trend of specialization of agricultural production towards global commodity markets. The question arose whether this trend could contribute to an increased cultivation of uncommon crops and diversification of cropping patterns, owing to comparably different and less restricted feedstock requirements. In the cooperative research project "EVA," a multi-site experimental crop rotation field trial was conducted over 8 years at eight sites, representing the variety of soil-climatic conditions in Germany. The aim of the trial was to assess a variety of established and novel crops for anaerobic digestion. This paper presents the key findings of the trial. Special emphasis is given to biomass productivity and profitability. The chances for the approach "diversification of cropping patterns via energy cropping" are discussed. Results show that maize (average 4-year dry matter yield varied site-specific between 14.22 and 25.12 t ha−1) is clearly the most efficient crop for biogas production in Central Europe. Some cropping options for biogas feedstock production, such as winter triticale (whole crop, average yield of 6.71 to 15.17 t ha−1) or perennial fodder mixtures (average yield of 7.51 to 19.44 t ha−1) are feasible choices for farmers in some regions, which could contribute to diverse cropping systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Perennial energy crop production methods such as short rotation coppice (SRC) have gained interest among farmers and policy makers. SRC is characterised by rapid biomass production, low inputs, and high managerial flexibility. SRC plantations also provide environmental advantages relative to annual crop production and contribute to the transition towards renewable energy. Yet, the combination of high sunk costs and high uncertainty hampers SRC adoption among farmers. Policy instruments currently implemented to foster SRC adoption exhibit limited success. In this paper we assess the performance of different policy measures intended to stimulate SRC adoption in terms of efficiency and farm-level effects, taking into account related uncertainty. We use a combination of stochastic programming and the real options approach in our model featuring SRC poplar cultivation in Germany. We analyse four policy measures intended to foster SRC adoption: an establishment subsidy, a price floor, a guaranteed price, and increasing the “Ecological Focus Area” (EFA) value for SRC systems within the European Union Common Agricultural Policy. Our results indicate that a guaranteed price can stimulate immediate SRC adoption; however, it is inferior to the other instruments in other dimensions. An establishment subsidy as recently implemented in the study area might incentivise farmers to adopt SRC by contributing substantially to farm income, but should be modified because it may encourage postponement of SRC adoption. Increasing the EFA coefficient and a price floor are more efficient measures in terms of governmental expenditures, while having limited positive effects on bioenergy produced. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biomass provides two thirds of the total energy produced from renewables in Europe. The share of bioenergy from energy crops is growing rapidly. Given the environmental pressures arising from pesticide pollution from current agricultural food production, a substantial increase in energy crop cultivation might put additional pressure on biodiversity and soil and water resources. In the present study, we examine the potential of energy crops for pesticide contamination and develop general conclusions and recommendations for the future large-scale expansion of agricultural bioenergy. We base our analysis on the development of energy crop cultivation in Germany, the European country with the largest share of energy crops. Our findings reveal that there will not necessarily be an increase or decrease in the amounts of pesticides released into the environment. Due to the great variety of energy crops, the potential effects will depend rather on the future design of the agricultural systems. Possible risks are associated with the increased cultivation of pesticide-intensive energy crops, such as rapeseed, especially when grown in monocultures or on formerly set-aside land or converted grassland. Instead, energy crops should be integrated into the existing food production systems. Financial incentives and further education are needed to encourage the use of sustainable crop rotations, innovative cropping systems and perennial energy crops, which may add to crop diversity and generate lower pesticide demands than intensive food farming systems. Optimised cultivation systems with diverse crop rotations could help to improve monotonous agricultural landscapes, increase biodiversity and minimise pesticide exposure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Power based on biomass, in particular biogas, is increasing, with a concomitant increase in the need for energy crop production. The objective of this study was to determine the profitability of biogas substrate production on a marginal site in southwestern Germany. The effects of crop rotation and nitrogen fertilization level were evaluated in a three-year filed experiment. Production costs for supply of biogas substrates and sales of produced electricity were assessed using five crop rotations (CR1: annual monoculture maize; CR2: perennial monoculture perennial ryegrass; CR3: perennial monoculture Jerusalem artichoke; CR4: three-course crop rotation of sorghum – winter triticale – clover grass; CR5: four-course crop rotation of catch crop – maize – winter wheat – winter triticale) and three nitrogen fertilization levels (zero, middle and high levels of nitrogen). The variables were production costs, dry matter yield, substrate costs, energy output, biomass energy supply price, biomass energy sales price and sale/supply ratio. Production costs increased in the order CR4 (1252 € ha−1 a−1) < CR2 (1256 € ha−1 a−1) < CR5 (1404 € ha−1 a−1) < CR3 (1462 € ha−1 a−1) < CR1 (1649 € ha−1 a−1) due to differing mechanical cultivation needs. Dry matter yields ranged from 10.8 t ha−1 a−1 (CR3) to 4.0 t ha−1 a−1 (CR2) and showed significantly higher yields with increasing fertilization levels. Accounting for all variables, the lowest biomass energy supply price was achieved with CR3 (6.6 ct kWh−1), and increased in the order CR1 < CR5 < CR4 < CR2 (12.4 ct kWh−1). It was determined that only CR3 and CR1 were effective for the production of biogas substrates on marginal sites. The biogas substrate costs of the remaining crop rotations were not compensated for by the sale of electricity. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Introducing agro-ecological techniques such as no-tillage systems with cover crops in rotations with soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) could provide more resilience to changing climatic conditions and, at the same time, reduce soil erosion, nitrate leaching, and weed density in the main crop. However, there are challenges in introducing no-tillage techniques in crop systems in Europe as there is little quantitative knowledge about the agro-economic impact. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the agronomic and economic impacts of three soybean cropping systems involving a rye (Secale cereal L.) cover crop prior to soybean, i.e., two no-tillage systems; either herbicide-free with crimping the rye or herbicide-based without rye crimping and one plough-based in which rye was cut as green silage. The impacts of these cropping strategies were compared in a three-year cropping system experiment at a research station in north-eastern Germany with and without irrigation. The following parameters were measured: (1) cover crop biomass; (2) weed biomass; (3) soybean plant density; (4) soybean grain yield; and (5) gross margin of the cropping system. The results showed that all three soybean cropping systems can effectively suppress weeds. System (C), the no-tillage herbicide-based system, produced the lowest rye biomass and highest soybean yield; system (B), the no-tillage herbicide-free/crimped rye system, produced the highest rye biomass and lowest soybean yield compared to system (A), the standard cutting/plough-based system. The differences in rye biomass and soybean yield observed between the three systems could be mainly attributed to the timing of the cover crop termination and the soybean sowing date. The gross margin was highest in system (C), due to the high soybean grain yield. The low soybean grain yield in system (B) resulted in lower revenues and gross margins compared to systems (A) and (C), although system (B) could be economically attractive in organic farming with higher prices for organic soybean. In the particularly dry year 2016, gross margins were higher when soybean was irrigated compared to the rainfed cultivation, due to significantly higher grain yields. Before recommending the application of the no-tillage with cover crop technique for the conditions tested in north-eastern Germany, more investigations on the benefits and risks of this technique are needed. Further research needs to focus on maintaining a high rye biomass as well as on ensuring an early soybean planting date. Optimizing the crimping and drilling equipment is still required in order to develop good management practices for no-tillage herbicide-free systems in European conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]