51. Emotional response to testing positive for human papillomavirus at cervical cancer screening: a mixed method systematic review with meta-analysis.
- Author
-
McBride, Emily, Tatar, Ovidiu, Rosberger, Zeev, Rockliffe, Lauren, Marlow, Laura A. V., Moss-Morris, Rona, Kaur, Navdeep, Wade, Kristina, and Waller, Jo
- Subjects
PAPILLOMAVIRUS disease diagnosis ,AVERSION ,META-analysis ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,EARLY detection of cancer ,FEAR ,COGNITION ,BEHAVIOR ,CONCEPTUAL structures ,PSYCHOLOGY of women ,PAPILLOMAVIRUS diseases ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,EMOTIONS ,CERVIX uteri tumors ,ANXIETY ,SHAME ,PSYCHOLOGICAL distress - Abstract
Tens-of-millions of women every year test positive for human papillomavirus (HPV) at routine cervical screening. We performed a mixed-methods systematic review using a results-based convergent design to provide the first comprehensive overview of emotional response to testing positive for HPV (HPV+). We mapped our findings using the cognitive behavioural framework. Six electronic databases were searched from inception to 09-Nov-2019 and 33 papers were included. Random-effects meta-analyses revealed that HPV+ women with abnormal or normal cytology displayed higher short-term anxiety than those with normal results (MD on State-Trait Anxiety Inventory = 7.6, 95% CI: 4.59–10.60 and MD = 6.33, CI: 1.31–11.35, respectively); there were no long-term differences. Psychological distress (general/sexual/test-specific) was higher in HPV+ women with abnormal cytology in the short-term and long-term (SMD = 0.68, CI: 0.32–1.03 and SMD = 0.42, CI: 0.05–0.80, respectively). Testing HPV+ was also related to disgust/shame, surprise and fear about cancer. Broadly, adverse response related to eight cognitive constructs (low control, confusion, cancer-related concerns, relationship concerns, sexual concerns, uncertainty, stigma, low trust) and six behavioural constructs (relationship problems, social impact, non-disclosure of results, idiosyncratic prevention, indirect clinical interaction, changes to sexual practice). Almost exclusive use of observational and qualitative designs limited inferences of causality and conclusions regarding clinical significance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF