Search

This paper examines the feasibility of achieving U.S. health care reform and prognosis for success. In order to accomplish the task, this paper provides a check list of major problems which emerge continually in the field. In compiling a list of major problems, a tentative list of eight are presented. These problems include the following: unnecessary administrative costs; other major industrial countries can provide adequate health care at a lower rate of the national budget than does the U.S.; increase in malpractice insurance; shortage of primary care physicians in the rural and inner city areas; failure of health insurance; abundance of technology; distribution of care; and increase in health care costs. According to the author, these eight major problems give some indication to the complexity of the issues involved in the health care reform. These problems should be viewed in the context of the five major participant groups in health care: consumers, politicians, physicians and other health care providers, employers, and insurance companies. This paper briefly discusses the affected participants. It also provides a brief review of the proposed solutions to the problem of health care reform.

The fundamental problems that beset the U.S. health care system--cost, quality, and access--differ in scope and intensity in inner cities. Current trends in health care are systemwide but are more difficult to accommodate in inner cities because of scarce resources and stresses to the health care system. In this position paper, the American College of PhysiCians seeks to highlight directions and innovations in public policy for inner-city health care with renewed determination that health care problems in the United States must be solved, especially in cities, where they are most extreme. Many persons in inner cities experience an urban health penalty because of the concentration of economic decline, job loss, and major health problems. Because the problems originate in a complex interaction of socioeconomic factors, behavior, environment, and disease that is related to race and ethnicity, multifaceted approaches that extend beyond the medical model are needed to improve health status. The College argues for tackling health problems of the inner city in the context of a comprehensive urban policy that addresses the root: causes of poverty. In addition, this position paper contains more specific recommendations to improve health care delivery to inner cities. The College calls for a comprehenSiVe urban partnership initiative to address all aspects of the urban penalty-social, economic, and health-related--and recommends solutions through public and private collaborations that can be adapted to the circumstances of each Community in addition, policy recommendations address health care coverage, providers, public hearth initiatives, community involvement, and short-term improvements to such existing programs as Medicaid. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper analyzes the evolution of consumer-driven health care in terms of its original vision, its subsequent implementation, and the transformations it has endured as it moves into its second decade. The market is generating product designs that combine elements of consumerism with elements of managed care, but the trend is always toward a stronger role for consumer choice and a weaker role for management of those choices by physicians, insurers, employers, and regulators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: This paper presents analyses of recent natioanl survey data on access to medical care. In particular, information on major access indicators and special problems associated with the economic and political climate of the 1980s collected in a 1982 national telephone survey of 6.610 United Scales adults and children, representing some 4.802 families, is compared with previous national stirrers for kef population subgroups--by age. place of residence, income, race, insurance coverage, and type of regular source of care In general, the findings show that favorable progress has been made, but some inequities continue to persist. Some traditionally disadvantaged groups are more likely to have a regular family doctor, private insurance coverage, have been to a doctor, or had certain preventive tests and procedures than was true for them in the past. On the other hand, compared to the more economically and/or socially advantaged groups in 1982, they have still not "caught up" entirely. There also is evidence that they may be hardest hit by the exacerbation of the financial barriers to care thai result from unemployment, inflation, and cutbacks in health program eligibility and benefits that have characterized the decade of the 1980s. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]