Search

Food insecurity and poor nutrition are prevalent in the United States and associated with chronic diseases. Understanding relationships among food insecurity, diet, and health care utilization can inform strategies to reduce health disparities. Our aim was to determine associations between food security status and inpatient and outpatient health care utilization and whether they differed by dietary quality in lower-income adults. This was a cross-sectional study of data from the 2009-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Participants were 13,956 lower-income (<300% federal poverty level) adults 18 years and older in the United States. Self-reported health care utilization in the past 12 months included no usual source of care, any outpatient visit, any mental health service use, and any hospitalization. Multiple logistic regression was used to study the association between food insecurity and health care utilization. Analyses were stratified by diet-related comorbidities to account for potential confounding and mediation of health care utilization, and by dietary quality. In a sample of lower-income adults <300% federal poverty level, 4,319 participants (27.4%) were food insecure, 2,208 (15.0%) were marginally food secure, and 7,429 (57.6%) were food secure. Food insecurity was associated with having no usual source of care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.30; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.52), any mental health service use (aOR 2.02; 95% CI 1.61 to 2.52), and any hospitalization (aOR 1.19; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.41). Food-insecure adults were more likely to report no outpatient visits if they had diet-related comorbidities (aOR 1.45; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.92) or the lowest dietary quality (aOR 1.53; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.23). Marginal food security was associated with having no usual source of care (aOR 1.22; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.44). Adults with food insecurity were more likely to be hospitalized, use mental health services, and have no usual source of care. Food-insecure participants with diet-related comorbidities or poor diet were less likely to have outpatient visits. Hospitalizations and mental health visits represent underused opportunities to identify and address food insecurity and dietary intake in lower-income patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) mandated a label change for leukotriene inhibitors (LTIs) to include neuropsychiatric adverse events (eg, depression and suicidality) as a precaution. This study investigated how this label change affected the use of LTIs and other asthma controller medications, mental health visits, and suicide attempts. Methods: We analyzed data (2005-2010) from 5 large health plans in the US Population-Based Effectiveness in Asthma and Lung Diseases (PEAL) Network. The study cohort included children and adolescents (n = 30,000), young adults (n = 20,0), and adults (n = 90,000) with asthma. We used interrupted time series to examine changes in rates of LTI dispensings, non-LTI dispensings, mental health visits, and suicide attempts (using a validated algorithm based on a combination of diagnoses of injury or poisoning and psychiatric conditions). Findings: The label change was associated with abrupt reductions in LTI use among all age groups (relative reductions of 8.3%, 15.1%, and 6.0% among adolescents, young adults, and adults, respectively, compared with expected rates at 1 year after the warnings). Although we detected immediate offset increases in non-LTI asthma medication use, these increases were not sustained among adolescents and young adults. There were small increases in mental health visits among LTI users. Implications: The FDA label change for LTIs communicated possible risk of neuropsychiatric events. Communication and enhanced awareness may have increased reporting of mental health symptoms among young adults and adults. It is important to assess intended and unintended consequences of FDA warnings and label changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]