Faiz, Sarah, Giovannelli, Jonathan, Podevin, Céline, Jachiet, Marie, Bouaziz, Jean-David, Reguiai, Ziad, Nosbaum, Audrey, Lasek, Audrey, Ferrier le Bouedec, Marie-Christine, Du Thanh, Aurélie, Raison-Peyron, Nadia, Tetart, Florence, Duval-Modeste, Anne-Bénédicte, Misery, Laurent, Aubin, François, Dompmartin, Anne, Morice, Cécile, Droitcourt, Catherine, Soria, Angèle, and Arnault, Jean-Philippe
Background: Dupilumab is the first biologic available to treat atopic dermatitis (AD). Its effectiveness and safety were demonstrated in clinical trials.Objective: We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adults with AD in a real-life French multicenter retrospective cohort.Methods: We included patients treated during March 2017-April 2018. Efficacy outcomes, including Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores, were collected at baseline and 3 months when available. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded at follow-up.Results: We included 241 patients. The median ± interquartile range (IQR) follow-up time was 3.8 ± 3.7 months. A ≥75% improvement in SCORAD was achieved in 27 of 163 (16.6%) patients, and a ≥75% improvement in EASI was achieved in 40 of 82 (48.8%) patients. The median SCORAD and EASI scores at 3 months were significantly lower than those at baseline (SCORAD ± IQR, 25 ± 21 vs 56 ± 27.4, P < 10-9 and EASI ± IQR, 4.1 ± 6.8 vs 17.9 ± 15.4, P < 10-9, respectively). Conjunctivitis was reported in 84 of 241 (38.2%) patients. The proportion with eosinophilia (>500 cells/mm3) during follow-up (57%) was higher than that at baseline (33.7%) (n = 172, P < 10-6). Dupilumab was stopped in 42 cases; 27 patients stopped because of AEs.Limitations: No control group, missing data.Conclusion: This real-life study demonstrated a similar dupilumab effectiveness as that seen in clinical trials, but it also revealed a higher frequency of conjunctivitis and eosinophilia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]