Search

Summary: Carotenoids are indispensable to plants and critical components of the human diet. The carotenoid metabolic pathway is conserved across plant species, but our understanding of the genetic basis of carotenoid variation remains limited for the seeds of most cereal crops. To address this issue, we systematically performed linkage and association mapping for eight carotenoid traits using six recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations. Single linkage mapping (SLM) and joint linkage mapping (JLM) identified 77 unique additive QTLs and 104 pairs of epistatic QTLs. Among these QTLs, we identified 22 overlapping hotspots of additive and epistatic loci, highlighting the important contributions of some QTLs to carotenoid levels through additive or epistatic mechanisms. A genome‐wide association study based on all RILs detected 244 candidate genes significantly associated with carotenoid traits, 23 of which were annotated as carotenoid pathway genes. Effect comparisons suggested that a small number of loci linked to pathway genes have substantial effects on carotenoid variation in our tested populations, but many loci not associated with pathway genes also make important contributions to carotenoid variation. We identified ZmPTOX as the causal gene for a QTL hotspot (Q10/JLM10/GWAS019); this gene encodes a putative plastid terminal oxidase that produces plastoquinone‐9 used by two enzymes in the carotenoid pathway. Natural variants in the promoter and second exon of ZmPTOX were found to alter carotenoid levels. This comprehensive assessment of the genetic mechanisms underlying carotenoid variation establishes a foundation for rewiring carotenoid metabolism and accumulation for efficient carotenoid biofortification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: The nutritional traits of maize kernels are important for human and animal nutrition, and these traits have undergone selection to meet the diverse nutritional needs of humans. However, our knowledge of the genetic basis of selecting for kernel nutritional traits is limited. Here, we identified both single and epistatic quantitative trait loci (QTLs) that contributed to the differences of oil and carotenoid traits between maize and teosinte. Over half of teosinte alleles of single QTLs increased the values of the detected oil and carotenoid traits. Based on the pleiotropism or linkage information of the identified single QTLs, we constructed a trait–locus network to help clarify the genetic basis of correlations among oil and carotenoid traits. Furthermore, the selection features and evolutionary trajectories of the genes or loci underlying variations in oil and carotenoid traits revealed that these nutritional traits produced diverse selection events during maize domestication and improvement. To illustrate more, a mutator distance–relative transposable element (TE) in intron 1 of DXS2, which encoded a rate‐limiting enzyme in the methylerythritol phosphate pathway, was identified to increase carotenoid biosynthesis by enhancing DXS2 expression. This TE occurs in the grass teosinte, and has been found to have undergone selection during maize domestication and improvement, and is almost fixed in yellow maize. Our findings not only provide important insights into evolutionary changes in nutritional traits, but also highlight the feasibility of reintroducing back into commercial agricultural germplasm those nutritionally important genes hidden in wild relatives. Significance Statement: The identification and selection‐feature characterization of genetic loci contributing to nutritional trait variation between maize and teosinte is of fundamental importance in understanding the evolutionary interface between plant and human. Most favorable alleles associated with nutritional traits exist in teosinte and are not fixed in modern maize, underscoring the potential benefit of introducing teosinte alleles during maize breeding regimens to yield hybrids with desirable nutritional traits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

English Writing Assignments and Students' Self-Perceived Writing Needs: A Survey of Undergraduates at a Chinese University Our urge to investigate the status quo of English writing tasks and students' self-perceived writing needs in higher education in China has arisen out of our work at the university writing center where we noticed that the genres for which we aim to provide tutorial are inconsistent with students' self-expressed needs. The analysis reveals that students in general have taken only a small portion of English writing courses (2.13 out of 13 EWCs per student) and English-medium disciplinary content courses (6.42 out of 80 EMCs per student) that are offered to them despite individual differences. English major students have taken more EWCs ( I M i = 2.98, I SD i = 1.49) than non-English major students ( I M i = 1.56, I SD i = 2.54), I t i (294) = 6.11, I p i <.001, I d i = 0.68, and more EMCs ( I M i = 9.04, I SD i = 4.62) than non-English major students ( I M i = 4.66, I SD i = 2.62), I t i (172) = 9.48, I p i <.001, I d i = 1.17. [Extracted from the article]