Search

This paper describes an empirical study of UK rights issues, involving various tests of semi-strong form market efficiency with respect to the announcement of rights issues. In addition, the Price Pressure Hypothesis, which asserts that equity issues, by increasing the supply of shares, temporarily depress the share price, is tested against the competing Substitution Hypothesis. Since this involves estimating the demand curve for a company's shares, our results provide evidence not only on market efficiency but also on market liquidity, and whether companies can raise new equity at existing market prices. The study is also of methodological interest in that it uses a number of alternative models for testing market efficiency, thus allowing us to test the sensitivity of our conclusions to the particular methodology employed. This is also one of the first studies to use the new London Share Price Database (LSPD), which is the first comprehensive source of UK share returns data to become available for research purposes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vegetables are commonly rejected by children, making it is important to consider factors that are associated with children's fussiness with vegetables. The current study aimed to investigate whether fussiness with vegetables is associated with a number of factors including caregiver and child vegetable consumption; caregivers' general feeding practices; and caregivers' vegetable-specific feeding practices. Caregivers ( N = 297) of preschool children completed questionnaire measures of their child's fussiness with vegetables, as well as several caregiver and child factors hypothesised to be associated with children's fussiness with vegetables. Findings indicate that children who are fussier with vegetables consume a smaller quantity of vegetables and that almost all have caregivers who eat a smaller quantity of vegetables. Children's fussiness with vegetables was not significantly related to any general feeding practices used by caregivers. However, children's fussiness with vegetables was significantly associated with the use of several vegetable specific feeding practices. Caregivers of fussier children used more encouragement/pressure to eat with vegetables ( r = 0.14, p = .01), hid vegetables within other foods more often ( r = 0.30, p = <.01), used more food rewards for vegetable consumption ( r = 0.19, p <.01), more other rewards for vegetable consumption ( r = 0.21, p < .01), and compromised more when feeding vegetables ( r = 0.14, p = .01). These findings suggest that rather than caregivers' general feeding practices being related to children's fussiness with vegetables, the specific feeding practices used when vegetables are rejected are more significant. It may therefore be helpful to develop advice for caregivers about which feeding practices to avoid when faced with a child who is fussy about eating vegetables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Personal and family data forms, completed by women referred to breast cancer genetics clinics, are valuable tools for verification and extension of family history, crucial steps in accurate risk evaluation. A significant minority of women do not complete and return these forms, despite reminders, even when completion is a pre‐requisite for a clinic appointment. Objective: To facilitate access of women at increased familial risk of breast cancer to screening and counselling services by investigating reasons for non‐return of the forms. Participants and Design: Based on a single regional ‘breast cancer family’ service in the UK, Analysis of quantitative data comparing women who did not return forms (n = 55) with those who had done so (n = 59), together with qualitative evaluation of potential barriers to form‐completion through semi‐structured telephone interviews with a random subset of ‘non‐returners’ (n = 23). Results: Non‐returners have higher proportions of the very young (below the age at which surveillance could be offered) and of women from lower social deprivation categories. Interviews revealed that the majority of non‐returners are anxious, rather than unconcerned about their breast cancer risk and circumstances and attitudes contributed to non‐compliance. Twenty‐one participants confirmed that they would welcome an appointment at a ‘breast cancer family’ clinic, but nine did not attend for the appointment. They were significantly younger than those who attend, but were not at lower familial risk. Discussion and Conclusions: Many women who fail to complete and return a family history form would benefit from risk assessment and genetic counselling. Several steps are suggested that might help them access the relevant services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quantitative analyses of the macronutrient content of eight popular commercial 'ready-to-feed' baby meals for 6-9-month old infants in the UK market have been undertaken in order to ascertain their nutritional suitability in relation to the total daily dietary intake as well as nutritional profiling of the products. The chemical analyses conducted included Kjeldhal for protein, acid hydrolysis and extraction for fat, phenol sulphuric acid for carbohydrate and Association of Official Analytical Chemists 985.29 for fibre. The only difference found between different varieties (meat- and vegetable-based) was with respect to the protein content ( P = 0.04) per 100 g of food. The experimentally determined concentrations of macronutrients (g/100 kcal) were compared with the declared values provided by the manufacturers on the product labels and, despite some variations, the values obtained comply with regulatory requirements ( Commission Directive 2006/125/ EC). The total daily intake of fat (27.0 g per day) - based on the menu composed from commercial complementary food - is suggested to exceed the daily recommended values for fat (31%), if the intake of snacks and desserts are incorporated. These findings imply that the formulation of recipes, based on a standard commercial menu, is an important consideration in relation to the nutritional quality of the diet of infants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]