Search

Erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), shows superior efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring activating EGFR mutations (EGFR Mut+). However, almost all tumors eventually develop resistance to erlotinib. Recently, the Phase II JO25567 study reported significant prolongation of progression-free survival (PFS) by erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination compared with erlotinib in EGFR Mut+ NSCLC. Herein, we established a preclinical model which became refractory to erlotinib after long-term administration and elucidated the mode of action of this combination. In this model, tumor regrowth occurred after remarkable shrinkage by erlotinib; regrowth was successfully inhibited by erlotinib plus bevacizumab. Tumor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was greatly reduced by erlotinib in the erlotinib-sensitive phase but significantly increased in the erlotinib-refractory phase despite continued treatment with erlotinib. Although EGFR phosphorylation remained suppressed in the erlotinib-refractory phase, phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK), phosphorylated AKT, and phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (pSTAT3) were markedly higher than in the erlotinib-sensitive phase; among these, pERK was suppressed by erlotinib plus bevacizumab. MVD was decreased significantly more with erlotinib plus bevacizumab than with each drug alone. In conclusion, the erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination demonstrated promising efficacy in the B901L xenograft model of EGFR Mut+ NSCLC. Re-induction of VEGF and subsequent direct or indirect VEGF-dependent tumor growth was suggested as a major mechanism of erlotinib resistance, and erlotinib plus bevacizumab achieved remarkably prolonged antitumor activity in this model.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-neutralizing therapy with bevacizumab has become increasingly important for treating colorectal cancer. It was demonstrated that second-line chemotherapy together with bevacizumab after disease progression (PD) on first-line therapy including bevacizumab showed clinical benefits in metastatic colorectal and breast cancers (ML18147 trial, TANIA trial). One of the rationales for these trials was that the refractoriness to first-line therapy is caused by resistance to not so much bevacizumab as to the chemotherapeutic agents. Nevertheless, resistance to bevacizumab cannot be ruled out because VEGF-independent angiogenesis has been reported to be a mechanism of resistance to anti-VEGF therapy. In this study, we used a xenograft model with the human colon cancer HT-29 cells to investigate the mechanisms underlying the effect of continued administration of bevacizumab plus capecitabine even after resistance to bevacizumab was acquired. The combination of capecitabine plus bevacizumab exhibited significantly stronger antitumor and anti-angiogenic activities than did monotherapy with either agent. Capecitabine treatment significantly increased the intratumoral VEGF level compared with the control group; however, the combination with bevacizumab neutralized the VEGF. Among angiogenic factors other than VEGF, intratumoral galectin-3, which reportedly promotes angiogenesis both dependent on, and independently of VEGF, was significantly decreased in the capecitabine group and the combination group compared with the control group. In an in vitro experiment, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), an active metabolite of capecitabine, inhibited galectin-3 production by HT-29 cells. These results suggested that capecitabine has a dual mode of action: namely, inhibition of tumor cell growth and inhibition of galectin-3 production by tumor cells. Thus, capecitabine and bevacizumab may work in a mutually complementary manner in tumor angiogenesis inhibition to overcome the resistance caused by angiogenic factors other than VEGF. These results suggest the clinical relevance and the mechanism of action of treatment with bevacizumab in combination therapy beyond PD.

Erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been shown to have benefits for non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer patients; however, almost all patients develop progressive disease during the therapy. On the other hand, it has been reported that a tumor continues to express epidermal growth factor receptor even after developing progressive disease. To demonstrate the clinical relevance of erlotinib treatment after progressive disease, we investigated whether continuous administration of erlotinib in combination with chemotherapy has a useful effect on progressive disease development during erlotinib treatment. For this purpose, we examined the antitumor effect of a combination therapy of a chemotherapeutic agent with erlotinib using two types of erlotinib-resistant tumor xenograft models: a non-small cell lung cancer model, in which EBC-1, H1975 and HCC827TR3 tumors were implanted, and an HPAC pancreatic cancer cell xenograft which generates erlotinib-resistant tumors in vivo. As a result, the combination therapy showed a significantly higher antitumor activity compared with chemomonotherapy in all xenograft models except the H1975 xenografts. Furthermore, erlotinib alone suppressed the phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor in HPAC tumors and the two non-small cell lung cancer cell lines other than H1975. Therefore, combination therapy which uses erlotinib can be considered effective if epidermal growth factor receptor phosphorylation is inhibited by erlotinib, even in erlotinib-resistant tumor xenograft models. Our results suggest that the continuous inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor phosphorylation by erlotinib after progressive disease enhances the antitumor activity of chemotherapy.

Erlotinib treatment in combination with gemcitabine is a standard therapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer in many countries, including the US and the EU. Since mutations of the K-ras oncogene (KRAS) occur in approximately 90% of pancreatic cancers, we examined the antitumor activity of erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine in KRAS-mutated pancreatic cancer cell lines, HPAC and Capan-1, which have the KRAS mutation G12D and G12V, respectively. We analyzed the mode of inhibition of in vitro tumor cell proliferation by means of a combination index and found that a combination treatment of erlotinib plus gemcitabine had an additive effect in the two cell lines. We then examined the effect of erlotinib and gemcitabine on the phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Erlotinib strongly suppressed, while gemcitabine augmented the phosphorylation of EGFR, which was completely blocked by erlotinib in the two cell lines. An in vivo tumor growth inhibition test was then performed using the HPAC tumor xenograft model. The combination therapy of erlotinib and gemcitabine resulted in a significant inhibition of tumor growth compared with erlotinib or gemcitabine monotherapy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show the combination effect of erlotinib and gemcitabine in vivo using a xenograft model of a KRAS-mutated pancreatic cancer cell line.

Erlotinib is used as a standard treatment for recurrent advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in NSCLC have been shown to be a predictive factor of erlotinib, although the relationship between K-ras oncogene (KRAS) mutations and erlotinib resistance is controversial. Recently, in vitro sequence-dependent interactions of erlotinib and docetaxel have been studied on as a novel therapeutic approach against NSCLC. The purpose of the present study was to determine the optimum novel regimen of erlotinib and docetaxel against NSCLC cells which have EGFR mutation (HCC827 cells), KRAS mutation (A549 cells) or both wild-type (NCI-H292 cells). First, we analyzed the effects of in vitro combination for cell proliferation-inhibition using a combination index. In all cell lines, docetaxel followed by erlotinib treatment showed nearly additive effects. On the other hand, erlotinib followed by docetaxel treatment showed remarkable antagonistic interactions. Second, we examined the effect of combinations on the in vitro apoptosis induction. Erlotinib followed by docetaxel treatment reduced apoptosis induction compared with docetaxel alone; in contrast, docetaxel followed by erlotinib treatment had no inhibitory effects on docetaxel-induced apoptosis in any of the cell lines. Finally, an in vivo tumor growth inhibition test was performed using xenograft models. Docetaxel followed by erlotinib administration resulted in significant tumor growth inhibition compared with erlotinib or docetaxel monotherapy in all models. In conclusion, we demonstrated that docetaxel followed by erlotinib therapy was a potentially optimum regimen against NSCLC regardless of the mutation status of EGFR and KRAS.