Search

• A south-north-gradient of the yield can be identified in most years. • More than half of roof-top PV systems operate worse than expectable. • At least 5 years of data must be available for a quality statement of PV systems. • There is no correlation of yield and capacity of roof-top PV systems. The photovoltaic (PV) sector is a central pillar for the global energy transition process which aims to reach the climate change mitigation goals. Roof-mounted systems in particular can make a significant contribution to greenhouse gas-free energy generation. By the end of 2018, more than 1.5 million rooftop systems have been installed in Germany. The yield data measured by monitoring systems and provided by web-based online systems from 2012 to 2018, as well as the configuration information of 23,944 PV systems, are evaluated in this publication. Long-term indicators are derived from the spatial and temporal distribution of the yield data. The yield analysis shows a typical south-north gradient in Germany. 2018 was the year with the highest yield, 2013 the year with the lowest. The annual specific yield varies between 816 kWh/kW p in 2017 at the Baltic Sea and 1049 kWh/kW p in 2018 in Bavaria. If analysis of data evaluation is narrowed to one to two years, a deviation of five percent and more from the long-term yield can be observed. In order to obtain detailed information on the quality of PV systems, at least five years of data are required. The yield data evaluation can be used by PV system operators and owners to identify an undersupply of their PV system and to initiate countermeasures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Estimation of the C sequestration potential in Bavaria according to the 4‰ initiative. • Analysis of current (2012–2015) soil management for each agricultural field. • Development of C sequestration scenarios for five promising management practices. • Annual C sequestration potential of 0.3–0.4 Mt C, around 1‰ of SOC stocks. • Cover crops and agroforestry as most effective management options. An increase of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in agricultural soils does not only have positive effects on soil quality and soil resilience but may also contribute to climate change mitigation. The '4 per 1000′ (4p1000) initiative launched at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris aims at increasing global SOC stocks in 0–40 cm depth by annually 4‰ in order to compensate the increase of anthropogenic CO 2 emissions. In this study we analysed the feasibility of this target for agricultural soils in Bavaria, Southeast Germany. Assuming a total organic carbon (OC) amount of 276 Tg currently stored in the upper 40 cm of agricultural soils in Bavaria (cropland and grassland), the 4p1000 goal corresponds to an annual carbon (C) sequestration of 1.1 Tg. Based on a site-specific analysis of present soil management, we developed spatially explicit C sequestration scenarios including five promising management practices (cover cropping, improved crop rotation, organic farming, agroforestry and conversion of arable land to grassland). The results revealed that the 4p1000 target is not feasible for Bavaria. The total potential of the five practices to sequester C resulted in increases in 0.3 to 0.4 Tg OC per year corresponding to around 1‰ of the present SOC stocks. Expansion of cover crops and agroforestry were identified as most promising options to increase SOC in agricultural soils. Although only around 1.5% of Bavaria's yearly GHG emissions would be compensated, this represents an essential contribution to climate change mitigation. Besides the need to develop new incentive systems (particularly for agroforestry), implementation of networks including farms and/or field trials that demonstrate improved soil management practices would be required to inform farmers and other stakeholders about the benefits of such practices. To maintain a resilient agriculture that withstands more extreme weather conditions in the future, healthy soils are needed. We therefore conclude that expected positive effects of a SOC stock increase on nutrient and water storage, soil erosion, biodiversity and food security are crucial for climate change adaptation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]