Search

This position paper describes the view adopted by EUCAST on the role of daptomycin in the treatment of serious infections caused by Enterococcus species. High-dose daptomycin is considered effective in the treatment of enterococcal bloodstream infection (BSI) and endocarditis, although published clinical experience with the latter condition is limited. EUCAST reviewed the available published data on pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics (PK-PD), resistance selection, clinical efficacy and safety for the use of 10–12 mg/kg/day of daptomycin for these conditions, noting that the doses licensed by the European Medicines Agency are only 4–6 mg/kg/day, and only for infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus. The PK-PD evidence shows that, even with doses of 10–12 mg/kg/day, it is not possible to treat infections caused by isolates at the upper end of the wild-type distributions of Enterococcus faecalis (with MICs of 4 mg/L) and E. faecium (with MICs of 4 or 8 mg/L). For this reason, and because there are ongoing issues with the reliability of laboratory testing, EUCAST lists daptomycin breakpoints for Enterococcus species as "IE"—insufficient evidence. EUCAST advises increased vigilance in the use of high-dose of daptomycin to treat enterococcal BSI and endocarditis. Additional PK-PD studies and prospective efficacy and safety studies of serious Enterococcal infections treated with high-dose daptomycin may permit the setting of breakpoints in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Aims: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have recently gained greater credibility with regulatory bodies aiming to standardise their use and interpretation in RCTs, thereby supporting medicinal product submissions. For this reason, the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) have released guidelines. This review paper provides an overview of the current perspectives and views on these guidelines. Method: To evaluate the FDA and EMEA PRO guidelines, 47 expert responses to the FDA guidance were qualitatively reviewed. Two reviewers independently extracted data from these letters and checked these responses to warrant consistency and agreement in the evaluation process. A PubMed literature review was systematically examined to obtain supporting evidence or related articles for both the guidance documents. Results: Generally, there is agreement between regulatory authorities and the research community on the contents of the FDA and EMEA PRO draft guidance. However, disagreements exist on significant philosophical topics (e.g. the FDA focuses more on conceptual models and symptoms than the EMEA) and design topics (e.g. the FDA is more restrictive on issues of recall bias, blinding of oncology trials and degrees of psychometric validation than researchers and the EMEA). This could influence the approval of PRO claims. Conclusion: PRO guidance from the EMEA and FDA has been valuable, and has raised the profile and active debate of PROs in oncology. However, our review of the current opinion shows that there are controversial aspects of the guidance. Consequently, greater latitude should be given to how the guidance is interpreted and applied. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

A new LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of lenvatinib (LENVA) in venous Dried Blood Spot (DBS) samples has been presented. This method is characterized by a short run time (4 min), requires a volumetric sampling of 10 µL and extraction of the entire spot to avoid hematocrit (Hct) and spot volume effects. The quantification method was successfully validated in the range of 5.00–2000 ng/mL on two different DBS filter papers (Whatman 31 ET CHR and Whatman 903) according to European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines, European Bioanalysis Forum (EBF), and International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT) recommendations. During the validation process, the following parameters were evaluated: recovery (≥ 77% for both filter papers), absence of matrix effect, process efficiency (close to 72% for Whatman 31 ET CHR and close to 77% for Whatman 903), Hct effect (CV ≤ 6.3% and accuracy within 96–112%), linearity (r ≥ 0.998 for Whatman 31 ET CHR and r ≥ 0.999 for Whatman 903), intra- and inter-day precision (CV ≤ 8.8%) and accuracy (92.8–108%), selectivity and sensitivity, reproducibility with incurred samples reanalysis (ISR), and stability. This method was applied to quantify venous DBS samples from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with LENVA enrolled in a cross-validation study (CRO-2018–83). A good correlation between LENVA plasma concentration determined by standard procedure and the new developed DBS LENVA method (R2 ≥ 0.996) has been observed. • The first LC-MS method for the quantification of lenvatinib in DBS matrix has been developed. • The method has been fully validated according to FDA, EMA, and IATDMCT guidelines. • DBS is a non-invasive sampling method that may improve TDM application in a cost-effective manner. • A preliminary clinical validation was performed and showed very promising results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Europe needs a sustainable system for timely, high-quality evidence on vaccine benefits and risks. • European vaccine stakeholders have different perspectives but similar information needs. • The ADVANCE project (now VAC4EU) has developed and tested a system to generate the necessary evidence. The influenza A/H1N1 pandemic in 2009 taught us that the monitoring of vaccine benefits and risks in Europe had potential for improvement if different public and private stakeholders would collaborate better (public health institutes (PHIs), regulatory authorities, research institutes, vaccine manufacturers). The Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) subsequently issued a competitive call to establish a public-private partnership to build and test a novel system for monitoring vaccine benefits and risks in Europe. The ADVANCE project (Accelerated Development of Vaccine benefit-risk Collaboration in Europe) was created as a result. The objective of this paper is to describe the perspectives of key stakeholder groups of the ADVANCE consortium for vaccine benefit-risk monitoring and their views on how to build a European system addressing the needs and challenges of such monitoring. These perspectives and needs were assessed at the start of the ADVANCE project by the European Medicines Agency together with representatives of the main stakeholders in the field of vaccines within and outside the ADVANCE consortium (i.e. research institutes, public health institutes, medicines regulatory authorities, vaccine manufacturers, patient associations). Although all stakeholder representatives stated they conduct vaccine benefit-risk monitoring according to their own remit, needs and obligations, they are faced with similar challenges and needs for improved collaboration. A robust, rapid system yielding high-quality information on the benefits and risks of vaccines would therefore support their decision making. ADVANCE has developed such a system and has tested its performance in a series of proof of concept (POC) studies. The system, how it was used and the results from the POC studies are described in the papers in this supplementary issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Enhanced Safety Surveillance for seasonal influenza vaccines is mandatory in EU since 2014/15. • Data from Enhanced Passive Safety Surveillance for Influvac® and Influvac® Tetra are presented. • Passive surveillance implemented for Influvac® & Influvac® Tetra complies with EU requirements. • Results confirm the favourable safety profiles of Influvac® and Influvac® Tetra. In 2014, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) set out requirements for an enhanced safety surveillance for seasonal influenza vaccines. This paper presents data from the yearly Enhanced Passive Safety Surveillance (EPSS) implemented for Influvac® since season 2014/15 and continued for Influvac® Tetra from season 2018/19 onwards. In seven consecutive seasons, an EPSS, aiming for at least 1,000 vaccinees (additional target of 100 vaccinees per five predefined age groups), was conducted in Germany, where market characteristics were expected to allow for a quick generation of representative data. Reactogenicity data in terms of reporting rates, severity and duration of pre-specified local and systemic adverse events of interest (AEI) were collected using response cards, which were completed by vaccinees and returned seven days after vaccination via regular mail. In addition, response cards contained a call center number to enhance reporting of other than pre-specified adverse events. The primary target of at least 1,000 vaccinees was surpassed in all seasons, as was the additional target of 100 adults and elderly. Reactogenicity data were in line with known safety profile of Influvac® and Influvac® Tetra. In children, the target was mostly met in seasons when the EPSS was conducted for Influvac®, but not in seasons when it was conducted for Influvac® Tetra. Although the data for Influvac® Tetra are based on a low number of paediatric vaccinees, they do not indicate a different reactogenicity profile of Influvac® Tetra compared with Influvac®. No signals were identified. The EPSS set up for Influvac® and Influvac® Tetra proved a robust and effective methodology to comply with the objectives of EMÁ's guidance on enhanced safety surveillance of seasonal influenza vaccines. Safety data from seven consecutive seasons confirmed the favourable safety profile of both vaccines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For some years now, gadolinium oxysulfide nanoparticles (NPs) appear as strong candidates for very efficient multimodal in vivo imaging by: 1) Magnetic Resonance (MRI), 2) X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) and 3) photoluminescence imaging. In this paper, we present a selection of results centered on the evaluation of physico-chemical stability, toxicity, bio-distribution and excretion mechanisms of Gd 2 O 2 S:Ln3+ nanoparticles intravenously injected in rats. Two formulations are here tested with a common matrix and different dopants: Gd 2 O 2 S:Eu3+ 5% and Gd 2 O 2 S:Yb3+ 4% /Tm3+ 0.1%. The NPs appear to be almost insoluble in pure water and human plasma but corrosion/degradation phenomenon appears in acidic conditions classically encountered in cell lysosomes. Whole body in vivo distribution, excretion and toxicity evaluation revealed a high tolerance of nanoparticles with a long-lasting imaging signal associated with a slow hepatobiliary clearance and very weak urinary excretion. The results show that the majority of the injected product (>60%) has been excreted through the feces after five months. Experiments have evidenced that the NPs mainly accumulate in macrophage-rich organs, that is mainly liver and spleen and to a lesser extent lungs and bones (mainly marrow). No significant amounts have been detected in other organs such as heart, kidneys, brain, intestine and skin. Gd 2 O 2 S:Ln3+ NPs appeared to be very well tolerated up to 400 mg/kg when administered intravenously. Since 2011, we have focused our work on Gd 2 O 2 S nanoparticles (NPs) for multimodal bioimaging using fluorescence, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography with very efficient results already published. However, since the European Medicines Agency has concluded its review of gadolinium contrast agents, confirming recommendations to restrict the use of some linear gadolinium agents used in MRI, a particular attention must be paid to any new contrast media containing gadolinium. Therefore, we present in this paper a compilation of studies about toxicity, bio-distribution and excretion mechanisms of Gd 2 O 2 S:Ln3+ NPs intravenously injected into rats. We also present an in vitro kinetic study of NPs degradation in aqueous and biological media to provide some information on chemical and biological stability. Image, graphical abstract [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In June 2015, European Medicines Agency/Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT) released the new version of the reflection paper on classification of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) established to address questions of borderline cases in which classification of a product based on genes, cells or tissues is unclear. The paper shows CAT's understanding of substantial manipulation and essential function(s) criteria that define the legal scope of cell-based medicinal products. This article aims to define the authors' viewpoint on the reflection paper. ATMP classification has intrinsic weaknesses derived from the lack of clarity of the evolving concepts of substantial manipulation and essential function(s) as stated in the EU Regulation, leading to the risk of differing interpretations and misclassification. This might result in the broadening of ATMP scope at the expense of other products such as cell/tissue transplants and blood products, or even putting some present and future clinical practice at risk of being classified as ATMP. Because of the major organizational, economic and regulatory implications of product classification, we advocate for increased interaction between CAT and competent authorities (CAs) for medicines, blood and blood components and tissues and cells or for the creation of working groups including representatives of all parties as recently suggested by several CAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The source control of pharmaceuticals involves influencing the everyday consumption volume and compound choice. This paper evaluates how source control contributes to protecting the environmental health and decreasing the investment needs in urban wastewater infrastructure. Different levels of reduction in diclofenac consumption (as recommended by the European Medicines Agency) compensated by equivalent increases in naproxen consumption (a less environmentally harmful compound) are evaluated. The different loads of compounds are fed into a microcontaminant fate and transport model of the Llobregat river basin (Spain) to assess the investment needs in tertiary treatment to reach diclofenac and naproxen concentrations below environmental quality standards. The results show that, despite the implementation of source control measures, tertiary treatment upgrades are still required in every scenario evaluated. Even though source control of pharmaceuticals decreases the investment needs in urban wastewater infrastructure, apparent concentrations reductions (i.e. statistically significant differences relative to the reference situation) are only observed in drastic substitutions of diclofenac by naproxen (a reduction in the total diclofenac consumption by 73% and a corresponding increase in naproxen consumption). The results also show that Spain is on good track with regards to the substitution of diclofenac by naproxen (among the top 5 in Europe), and this paper shows how positive this substitution can be for the environment. ga1 • We assess the substitution of diclofenac by naproxen as a source-control measure. • Source control of pharmaceuticals has a positive effect on freshwater ecosystems. • Investment needs for tertiary treatment are reduced. • Substitution at the UK level would lead to significant savings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The scope of this paper is to present a gold standard method to evaluate functional activity of antibody (Ab)-based materials during the different phases of their development, after their exposure to forced degradations or even during routine quality control. Ab-based materials play a central role in the development of diagnostic devices, for example, for screening or therapeutic target characterization, in formulation development, and in novel micro(nano)technology approaches to develop immunosensors useful for the analysis of trace substances in pharmaceutical and food industries, clinical and environmental fields. A very important aspect in diagnostic device development is the construction of its biofunctional surfaces. These Ab surfaces require biocompatibility, homogeneity, stability, specificity and functionality. Thus, this work describes the validation and applications of a unique ligand binding assay to directly perform the quantitative measurement of functional Ab binding sites immobilized on the solid surfaces. The method called Antibody Anti-HorseRadish Peroxidase (A2HRP) method, uses a covalently coated anti-HRP antibody (anti-HRP Ab) and does not need for a secondary Ab during the detection step. The A2HRP method was validated and gave reliable results over a wide range of absorbance values. Analyzed validation criteria were fulfilled as requested by the food and drug administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidance for the validation of bioanalytical methods with 1) an accuracy mean value within +15% of the nominal value; 2) the within-assay precision less than 7.1%, and 3) the inter-day variability under 12.1%. With the A2HRP method, it is then possible to quantify from 0.04 × 10 12 to 2.98 × 10 12 functional Ab binding sites immobilized on the solid surfaces. A2HRP method was validated according to FDA and EMA guidance, allowing the creation of a gold standard method to evaluate Ab surfaces for their resistance under laboratory constraints. Stability testing was described through forced degradation studies after exposure of Ab-surfaces to storage, pH and aqueous-organic solvent mixture stresses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose This paper examines conditional approvals that allow the marketing of medicines with unsettled benefit–risk profiles in the European Union. Methods We identified medicines that had received conditional approval from the European Medicines Agency in the period January 2006–June 2015. We searched the reasons and bases for approvals, the median time to address the specific obligations imposed in order to cover the information gap and allow regular authorisations, and their extent of fulfilment. Results Of the 26 products conditionally authorised two were withdrawn for commercial reasons, ten were switched to regular approval, and 14 are still under conditional approval. Conditional approval was granted mainly to medicinal products intended for seriously debilitating disease or life-threatening disease. The median time to address the specific obligations was four years (range 0.2 to 7.7). There were delays or discrepancies in the fulfilment of these obligations in more than one third of the authorisation procedures. Conclusions In most cases there was limited evidence supporting the positive benefit–risk balance at the time of approval. Delays or discrepancies in the fulfilment of obligations allow medicinal products with unsettled benefit–risk profiles onto the market for several years. This should be taken into account when further early or step-wise licensing strategies are considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In genotoxicity testing of pharmaceuticals the rodent alkaline comet assay is being increasingly used as a second in vivo assay in addition to the in vivo micronucleus assay to mitigate in vitro positive results as recommended by the ICH S2(R1) guideline. This paper summarizes a survey suggested by the Safety Working Party of European Medicines Agency (EMA), and conducted by the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) to investigate the experience among European pharmaceutical companies by conducting the in vivo comet assay for regulatory purpose. A special focus was given on the typology of the obtained results and to identify potential difficulties encountered with the interpretation of study data. The participating companies reported a total of 147 studies (conducted in-house or outsourced) and shared the conclusion on the comet assay response for 136 studies. Most of the studies were negative (118/136). Only about 10% (14/136 studies) of the comet assays showed a positive response. None of the positive comet assay results were clearly associated with organ toxicity indicating that the positive responses are not due to cytotoxic effects of the compound in the tissue examined. The number of comet assays with an equivocal or inconclusive response was rare, respectively <1% (1/147 studies) and 2% (3/147 studies). In case additional information (e.g. repeat assay, organ toxicity, metabolism, tissue exposure) would have been available for evaluation, a final conclusion could most probably have been drawn for most or all of these studies. All (46) negative in vivo comet assays submitted alongside with a negative in vivo micronucleus assay were accepted by the regulatory authorities to mitigate a positive in vitro mammalian cell assay following the current ICH S2 guidance. The survey results demonstrate the robustness of the comet assay and the regulatory acceptance of the current ICH S2 guidance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Biopharmaceutics Classification System ( BCS) defines the solubility characteristics of an active pharmaceutical substance based on its dose-solubility ratio: for highly soluble drugs this ratio is less than 250 mL over a defined p H range. Prior to the revision of the European Medicines Agency ( EMA, formerly EMEA) guideline in 2010, the 'dose' in this ratio was consistently defined by the US FDA, the EMA, and the WHO biowaiver guidelines as the highest dosage strength. However, in the revised EMA guideline, the dose is defined as the highest single dose administered according to the Summary of Product Characteristics. The new EMA criterion for highly soluble may be closer to the actual conditions of use, but it is not in line with the dose that would be used in the in vivo bioequivalence study. This paper evaluates the impact on the BCS classification of the active pharmaceutical ingredients of the published biowaiver monographs and discusses the consequences of the possible change in classification on biowaiver recommendations. Using the current definition of dose by the EMA, the biowaiver recommendations for metoclopramide hydrochloride and verapamil hydrochloride are no longer valid according to EMA criteria. For prednisolone and prednisone, a reevaluation of the biowaiver recommendation, taking into account the usual dosing levels, seems appropriate. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 103:65-70, 2014 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) provides formal guidance for the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in support of labeling claims, whereas the European Medicines Agency (EMA) offers insight in a reflection paper relating to health-related quality of life in lieu of formal guidance. Objectives: PRO label claims granted for new molecular entities and biologic license applications from 2006 through 2010 were reviewed to evaluate consistencies and discrepancies in PRO label claims granted by the FDA and the EMA and to highlight trends in the acceptance of PRO claims across agencies. Methods: Products approved by both the FDA and the EMA were identified. By using US Drug Approval Packages and European Public Assessment Reports packages, any PRO label claims made for the same product by the same company were compared. Results: Both agencies approved a total of 75 products. Of these, 35 (47%) had at least one EMA-granted PRO label claim compared with 14 (19%) by the FDA. Most FDA-grated claims focused on symptoms; however, EMA-granted claims were more likely to include higher order concepts. Few (~12%) were granted the same label claims. Despite this discordance between the two agencies, where PRO label claims were granted by both the FDA and the EMA, there was similarity in the type of label claim. Conclusions: The EMA is more likely than the FDA to grant PRO claims and for higher order constructs. On a macro level, there appears to be poor concordance between claims granted by both agencies. On close examination, however, there appears to be greater concordance than previously recognized, which may be instructive in formulating future PRO strategies. Further research to create strategic alignment across agencies may be beneficial. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The applicant company Roche Registration Ltd. submitted to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) an application for marketing authorisation for vemurafenib. Vemurafenib is a low molecular weight, orally available, inhibitor of oncogenic V600 BRAF serine–threonine kinase. Mutations in the BRAF gene which substitute the valine at amino acid position 600 constitutively activate BRAF proteins, which will drive cell proliferation in the absence of growth factors. Results from a phase 3 trial (N =675) comparing vemurafenib 960mg twice daily (taken either with or without food) to standard treatment dacarbazine (DTIC) in patients with BRAF V600E mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma were submitted. The study met its primary efficacy objective after an interim analysis of overall survival. Patients were allowed to cross-over to the experimental arm following disclosure of the study results after the first interim analysis. In the update of the analysis, the median overall survival (OS) was 9.9months versus 13.2months for DTIC and vemurafenib, respectively (HR=0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54, 0.84; cut-off 3 October 2011). Based on the updated analysis, the CHMP concluded that a survival benefit over DTIC had been convincingly demonstrated, in the overall population. The follow-up was considered sufficiently mature with close to 50% of the events observed. The most common side effects (affecting more than 30% of patients) in vemurafenib treated patients included arthralgia, fatigue, rash, photosensitivity reaction, nausea, alopecia and pruritus. Some patients treated with vemurafenib developed cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma which was readily treated by local surgery. The objective of this paper is to summarise the scientific review of the application leading to regulatory approval in the European Union (EU). The full scientific assessment report and product information, including the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), are available on the EMA website (www.ema.europa.eu). [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: On 13 July 2011 the European Commission issued a marketing authorisation valid throughout the European Union (EU) for ipilimumab for the treatment of advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma in adults who have received prior therapy. Ipilimumab is a monoclonal antibody that specifically blocks the inhibitory signal of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), resulting in T cell activation, proliferation and lymphocyte infiltration into tumours, leading to tumour cell death. The recommended induction regimen of ipilimumab is 3mg/kg administered intravenously over a 90min period every 3weeks for a total of four doses. In a phase 3 trial in patients with advanced melanoma, median overall survival for ipilimumab was 10months versus 6months for gp100, an experimental melanoma vaccine (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51, 0.87; p =0.0026). Ipilimumab was most commonly associated with adverse reactions resulting from increased or excessive immune activity. Most of these, including severe reactions, resolved following initiation of appropriate medical therapy or withdrawal of ipilimumab. The most common side-effects (affecting more than 10% of patients) were diarrhoea, rash, pruritus, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, decreased appetite and abdominal pain. The objective of this paper is to summarise the scientific review of the application leading to approval in the EU. The detailed scientific assessment report and product information, including the summary of product characteristics (SmPC), are available on the European Medicines Agency (EMA) website (www.ema.europa.eu). [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The administration of biological therapeutics may result in the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in treated subjects. In some cases, ADA responses may result in the loss of therapeutic efficacy due to the formation of neutralizing ADAs (NAbs). An important characteristic of anti-drug NAbs is their direct inhibitory effect on the pharmacological activity of the therapeutic. Neutralizing antibody responses are of particular concern for biologic products with an endogenous homolog whose activity can be potentially dampened or completely inhibited by the NAbs leading to an autoimmune-type deficiency syndrome. Therefore, it is important that ADAs are detected and characterized appropriately using sensitive and reliable methods. The design, development and optimization of cell-based assays used for detection of NAbs have been published previously by Gupta et al. 2007 . This paper provides recommendations on best practices for the validation of cell-based NAb assay and suggested validation parameters based on the experience of the authors. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: To identify key challenges and propose technical considerations in designing electronic case report form (eCRF) for post-marketing studies, the author undertakes a comprehensive literature review of peer reviewed and grey literature to assess the key aspects, processes, standards, recommendations, and best practices in designing eCRFs based on industry experience in designing and supporting electronic data capture (EDC) studies. Literature search using strings on MEDLINE and PUBMED returned few papers directly related to CRF design. Health informatics and general practice journals were searched and results reviewed. Many conference, government commission, health professional and special interests group websites provide relevant information from practical experience — summarization of this information is presented. Further, we presented a list of concrete technical considerations in dealing with EDC technology/system limitations based on literature assessment and industry implementation experience. It is recognized that cross-functional teams be involved in eCRF design process and decision making. To summarize the keys in designing eCRFs to address post-market study safety and pharmacovigilance needs, the first is to identify required data elements from the study protocol supporting data analyses and reporting requirements. Secondly, accepted best practices, CDASH & CDISC guidelines, and company internal or therapeutic unit standard should be considered and applied. Coding (MedDRA & WHODD) mapping should be managed and implemented as well when possible. Finally, we need to be on top of the EDC technologies, challenge the technologies, drive EDC improvement via working with vendors, and utilize the technologies to drive clinical effectiveness. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

In recent years, there has been a proliferation of regulatory and industry-wide initiatives on structured benefit-risk (BR) assessment. Examples of structured BR frameworks include the PrOACT-URL (Problem formulation, Objectives, Alternatives, Consequences, Trade-Offs, Uncertainties, Risk Attitude and Linked Decisions) from European Medicines Agency Work Package 3, multiple U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance documents on benefit-risk assessment for medical devices, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration implementation plans for benefit-risk assessment in drug regulatory decision-making. In June 2016, the ICH Expert Working Group finalized the Common Technical Document (CTD) Section 2.5.6 on Benefit-Risk Evaluations. As a result of these efforts, the uptake and utilization of structured benefit-risk (BR) assessments has been increasing. However, the aforementioned BR frameworks are mostly qualitative in nature, and the utility of quantitative BR approaches has not been systemically explored, creating uncertainty about settings in which quantitative BR assessment (qBRA) could be optimally applied. In this paper, we will provide an overview of the current qBRA methods, discuss challenges of qBRA, and describe a structural qBRA framework. The performance of the described qBRA framework will be evaluated by simulations based on a case study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Highly selective imprinted sorbent for hordenine was constructed. • Selective response of material was proved theoretically and experimentally. • Characterization of material was provided. • Analytical strategy for determination of hordenine was validated. • Method was proved by analysis of hordenine in urine after beer consumption. The objective of this paper was to extend comprehensive theoretical and experimental investigations at the molecular level to identify factors responsible for the high selectivity of imprinted sorbents. This knowledge was utilized in a new analytical strategy devoted to the analysis of hordenine in human urine after beer consumption. Among the various polymeric compositions tested, the most effective material was built up from methacrylic acid and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (MIP 1), showing a satisfactory binding capacity (4.44 ± 0.15 µmol g−1) and high specificity towards hordenine (AF = 5.90). The comprehensive analyses of porosity data and surface measurements revealed differences between imprinted polymers. The characterization of binding sites of MIP 1 revealed a heterogeneous population with two values of K d (2.75 and 370 μmol L−1) and two values of B max (1.82 and 99 μmol g−1) for higher and lower affinity respectively. The extensive theoretical analyses of interactions between various analytes and the MIP model cavity showed the highest binding energy for hordenine (ΔE B1 = −175.17 kcal mol−1). The method was validated for selectivity, lowest limit of quantification, calibration curve performance, precision, accuracy, matrix effect, carry-over and stability in urine. Extracts were prepared according to guidelines of the European Medicines Agency. The validation criteria were fulfilled, and the method was satisfactorily applied to urine samples collected prior to, and 2 h after, consumption of 2 L of beer, revealing the presence of hordenine at the mean level of 129 ± 27 ng mL−1. Additionally, ability of the sorbent to purify the urine sample was assessed using flow injection analysis tandem mass spectrometry, for comparison with other extraction techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In Japan, maintaining the universal health insurance system has become a major social issue in our rapidly aging society with soaring expense of social security contributions and skyrocketing medical costs, etc. Nowadays generic medicines have become standard therapeutic medicines even in the field of cancer treatment. In terms of cost-effectiveness, biosimilars are expected to enhance patients' access to beneficial treatment and so contribute to patients' quality of life as well as reducing the economic burden and total medical expenses while providing equivalent therapeutic outcomes inexpensively compared to the original biologics. Regarding the approval requirements of biosimilars, unlike generic products, they need a Phase III clinical trial in addition to the characterization study which proves similarity to the originals. Biosimilars have been approved through a review process of an application package which is similar to that of new drugs. However, in Japan, biosimilars have not become standard therapeutic choices yet. Approvals of biosimilars and their prevalence in the medical front have been proceeding in Europe and those products have grown in popularity as standard therapeutic choices. In European countries, the European Medicines Agency, academic societies and governmental authorities in each country have implemented a variety of measures to facilitate use of biosimilars. As part of such efforts, the EMA published a guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing G-CSF in 2006. In overseas ASCO and ESMO have already issued a position paper and statement on biosimilar products. In Japan, the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology recommends the biosimilars in its guideline for acceptable use in 2013. This presentation covers the initiatives for biosimilars in Europe and the US, the situation and the challenges in Japan as well as the activities of the Japan Biosimilar Association. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In an era when the number of expedited and conditional review pathways for newly available brand-name drugs and biosimilar medicines to treat serious and life-threatening diseases is increasing, defining pharmacovigilance has never been more crucial. 21st century pharmacovigilance is not merely about uncovering, reporting, and addressing adverse events associated with already approved and marketed agents, but can be described as the systematic monitoring of the process of pre-market review and post-market surveillance, which includes the use of medicines in everyday practice. Pharmacovigilance identifies previously unrecognised adverse events or changes in the patterns of these effects, the quality and adequacy of drug supply, and should ensure effective communication with the public, health-care professionals, and patients about the optimum safety and effective use of medicines. In this paper, the first in a Series of three about drug safety in oncology, we discuss evolving challenges in the purview, roles, and responsibilities of the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency with respect to pharmacovigilance efforts, with a special emphasis on oncology treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]