Search

Summary: Background: Over the last two to three decades there has been a marked decrease in certain bacterial infections in Turkey. One of them is tuberculosis. Of note, statistics published by the Turkish Ministry of Health (MoH) show decreasing pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), but on the other hand, increasing extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB). The most common form of EPTB is tuberculous cervical lymphadenitis (TCL). The increase in the number of TCL cases despite the decline in cases of PTB is seen as a paradoxical issue. In contrast there has been an increase in the number of oropharyngeal tularemia cases in the last decade in Turkey. The aim of this study was to draw attention to the importance of differentiating between TCL and tularemia lymphadenitis, because these diseases may have a similar histopathological appearance. Methods: Thirty-two cases diagnosed as TCL were identified from the archives of a pathology laboratory (Patomer Pathology Laboratory, Bursa, Turkey). PCR tests for Francisella tularensis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis were carried out on the paraffin tissue blocks of these cases. At the same time, statistical data on PTB and EPTB for the period 1996–2010 were retrieved from the MoH and reviewed. Statistics related to tularemia, which has been diagnosed since 1988 and has been increasing in the last 10 years, were obtained from the Department of Zoonoses of the MoH. Results: Six out of 32 (19%) cases who had previously been diagnosed with ‘casseifying granulomatous lymphadenitis consistent with tuberculosis’ were found to be positive for tularemia by PCR test of the cervical lymph nodes. Conclusions: Oropharyngeal tularemia should be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenitis in widespread geographic regions of the Northern Hemisphere, including the Asian continent. In particular, if granulomatous inflammation with necrosis is seen histopathologically, tularemia should be excluded before making the diagnosis of TCL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: We aimed to attract our colleagues’ attention to the oropharyngeal tularemia, which has been an infrequently diagnosed disease in otolaryngology clinics also becoming widespread in Turkey. Methods: A retrospective review of database of 3 patients was performed to find patients with Tularemia. The medical files, treatment charts, serological and PCR findings and radiological (magnetic resonance imaging), histopathological records of these patients were reviewed. Results: The study group consisted of 3 oropharyngeal tularemia patients. All of them presented with tonsillopharyngitis and cervical lymphadenitis and all were resistant to beta lactam or cephalosporin group antibiotics. Two patients had magnetic resonance imaging findings. All patients had positive serological tests. Strongly positive serological tests led to the diagnosis of tularemia. All patients had positive PCR and direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test. All patients responded to systemic streptomycin treatment. Conclusion: In the daily practice of an otolaryngologist, it is not usual to diagnose a patient with oropharyngeal tularemia. Tularemia should be considered in the differential diagnosis of massive adenotonsillar enlargement and extensive necrotic cervical lymphadenopathy not responding to beta lactam antibiotics as a result of the rising number of tularemia outbreaks outside the classic endemic areas. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]