Search

This paper investigates the shortcomings of the AISC 360–22 and Eurocode 3–22 provisions for calculating the plateau and lateral-torsional buckling (LTB) flexural resistance of thin-web singly-symmetric steel I-section members with the larger flange in compression. In addition, the paper proposes and evaluates corresponding newly recommended AISC 360 procedures, which eliminate the tension flange yielding (TFY) limit state check and implement a more mechanistically-based solution accounting for the inelastic reserve strength associated with flexural yielding in tension. The recommended procedures incorporate other recently proposed improvements to AISC 360, solving substantive LTB overprediction problems for certain types of built-up I-section members. The results from six large-scale experimental tests, associated finite element analysis (FEA) simulations, and parametric FEA simulation studies are considered. The results demonstrate improved accuracy and substantial gains in the predicted strengths by the recommended procedures relative to the AISC 360–22 and Eurocode 3–22 calculations for a significant range of geometries and loadings. In addition, the recommended methods address LTB overprediction problems exhibited by AISC 360–22 for a limited range of the member types studied. • Experimental evidence shows current flexure design codes can be overly conservative. • Accounting for tensile yield in flexure can result in substantial strength gains. • Codes do not calculate the true stain distribution for larger flanges in compression. • Experimental evidence shows current flexure design codes can overpredict capacity. • Improvements can be made to the design codes through simple modification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The AquaCrop simulation model, originally designed for annual crops, is expanded here to simulate alfalfa, a perennial forage crop. A new routine was added to the model to mimic the assimilate partitioning between above and below-ground plant parts to account for the utilization of reserves in Spring and for their storage in the Fall. The simulation of the transfer of assimilates requires only three extra crop parameters which makes the model also easy to calibrate. To evaluate the model, yield data collected in Louvain-La-Neuve (Belgium), Isparta (Turkey), and Ottawa (Canada) for different alfalfa cultivars, various years and field and irrigation management strategies were used. To assess the accuracy and robustness of the simple assimilate remobilization process, simulations were run for the three different environments with a common set of crop parameters which were parameterized. The dispersion between the observed and simulated cumulative dry above-ground biomass during the growing cycle was small (r² = 0.97; nRMSE = 11%; Nash-Sutcliffe model EF = 0.97), and a systematic over- or underestimation by the model was not observed (Willmott's index of agreement, d = 0.99). When evaluating the goodness of fit of the 81 individual harvest events, the results were still very satisfactory although the nRMSE doubled. The simulations indicated that the AquaCrop model adapted to perennial crops and with a novel storage-remobilization routine, could predict well alfalfa yields in various climates and environments, with and without water and fertility stress, and for three different alfalfa cultivars. • The AquaCrop simulation model is expanded to simulate perennial forage crops. • A simple routine describes the transfer of assimilates between the above ground biomass and the below-ground storage organs. • Variations in partitioning along the season was simulated by increasing or reducing the crop water productivity. • Simulations were run with a common set of crop parameters for different years, alfalfa cultivars, climates, and environments. • The simulations indicated that AquaCrop can well predict the total yield of alfalfa that can be expected in various environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: This paper investigates the relationship between financing constraints and investment–cash flow sensitivities by focusing on cash holdings of firms as the main classification variable to separate firms into financially constrained and unconstrained categories. The idea is that high cash reserves increase the ability of firms to undertake profitable investment opportunities. Our classification is based on an optimal cash model, which helps us identify the firms that deviate significantly from their target cash ratio. We conduct the analysis for an emerging market, before and during a financial crisis to test the hypothesis that the hedging role of cash is more critical in states of the world characterized by high asymmetric information and excessive costs of external finance. The results are in line with our expectations and show that constrained firms exhibit greater investment–cash flow sensitivities than unconstrained firms. Also, there is strong evidence that cash stands as an effective device for firms, mainly during the crisis period. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Developing countries’ reserves have increased dramatically in recent years—growing by over 60% since the Asian financial crisis. This paper explores the self-insurance motivation behind this. As a first step, it revisits the literature on international reserve demand. This paper then examines the reserve-holding trends in a sample of 65 developing countries. It seeks to answer the following: Have reserves increased across the board or have these been concentrated in a few countries? If so, does it represent a break in previous policy? At what cost? This paper concludes by briefly examining some policy implications and avenues for future research. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]