Writing a scientific paper is certainly a difficult task, however it is sometimes more difficult to read it. There are times that we have to force ourselves to follow a manuscript with profound concentration. Sometimes we get this unpleasant feeling as we take a glance at the abstract and sometimes it becomes more evident as we stroll through the later sections. Struggling to get an idea about the content of an article and especially the aim of the work from the abstract is quite a challenge especially when our time is limited. The main reasons for this is attaching the priority to introduction of the presented study without putting the aim forward and then briefly mentioning the materials, methods and result. Actually the reader is more concerned with the results and may be quite aware of the literature on the field. Another repulsive thing in an abstract is the presence of too many abbreviations. As we move to the introduction, it is at first nice to see some background information which prepares the reader for the aim of the present work or if one is familiar with the subject, it helps set our brains for concentration on the upcoming data. However, excessive knowledge gathered from the literature not put together properly may be boring and may make one loose his/her confidence on authors as they may be forcing us to believe that this work was a necessity. Materials and methods should contain sufficient information, despite the fact that methods are usually referred by references. Results presented in tables and figures must be presented in traditional format. Complicated formats may be tiresome and difficult to understand. Captions of these should also be informative and reader should be able to get a view of the work by first glancing at the tables and figures. Discussion must not contain irrelevant knowledge and connection between the results and the previous findings must be done properly by providing suitable references. Logical flow of ideas makes discussion more palatable and fluid. Above all, the article should not contain grammatical errors and should be written in a fluent style. Long and repetitive sentences must be avoided. Using word processor and spelling check is required in order to prevent grammatical and writing errors. If the errors due to specific words which the processor cannot detect are corrected by the author, problems arise as it needs to be declared in erratum within the next issue, and this in turn, effects the reliability of the journal. Authors should ensure that each sentence is a consequence of the proceeding one. Connection between the sentences gives the manuscript a narrative tone. The language used in the paper should neither be colloquial nor too sophisticated. To avoid confusing readers and loosing momentum, sentences must be populated with a single point. This also applies to other units of discourse- clauses, paragraphs and so on. To keep the reader engaged by using proper tense that portrays action. This helps the reader follow the story without getting distracted by superfluous detail. In conclusion, a paper should be target oriented, comprehensible and written in proper academic language. The issues related to the readability of a scientific paper will be discussed, some suggestions for making it more charming will be made by giving examples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]