Search

Objective: To describe patterns of use of the available Government-subsidised mental health services among people living in Australian residential aged care facilities. Methods: A retrospective population-based trend analysis was conducted, including all non-Indigenous people living in an Australian facility between 2012 and 2017. Adjusted incidence proportions and trends were estimated for four groups of mental health services. Results: The use of Medicare-subsidised mental health services was very low overall. The proportion of residents who accessed primary care mental health services increased from 1.3% in 2012/2013 to 2.4% in 2016/2017, while psychiatry service use increased from 1.9 to 2.3%. Claims for clinical psychology increased from 0.18 to 0.26%, and claims for a registered psychologist, occupational therapist or social worker rose from 0.45 to 1.2%. People with dementia were less likely than people without dementia to access all services aside from psychiatry services. Conclusions: Less than 3% of residents accessed funding subsidies for mental health services and people with dementia experienced pronounced barriers to service access. Mental health care is a pillar of the publicly-funded health system in Australia, and low use of these services among aged care residents indicates a need for organisational and policy changes to improve access. What is known about the topic? People living in residential aged care facilities report very high rates of mental health conditions, including depression and anxiety. What does this paper add? We demonstrate very low use (<3%) of Government-funded mental health services among people living in residential aged care facilities in Australia, with only small increases in use over time. What are the implications for practitioners? Practitioners should routinely assess the mental health needs of people living in residential aged care and refer for in-reach mental health services where needed, noting that facility staff are usually not trained for this role. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Risk factors and clinical outcomes of non-index hospital readmissions (readmissions to a hospital different from the previous admission) have not been studied in Australia. The present study compared characteristics and clinical outcomes between index and non-index hospital readmissions in the Australian healthcare setting. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included medical admissions from 2012 to 2016 across all major public hospitals in South Australia. Readmissions within 30 day to all public hospitals were captured using electronic health information system. In-hospital mortality and readmission length of hospital stay (LOS) were compared, along with 30-day mortality and subsequent readmissions among patients readmitted to index or non-index hospitals. Results: Of 114 105 index admissions, there were 20 539 (18.0%) readmissions. Of these, 17 519 (85.3%) were index readmissions and 3020 (14.7%) were non-index readmissions. Compared with index readmissions, patients in the non-index readmissions group had a lower Charlson comorbidity index, shorter LOS and fewer complications during the index admission and were more likely to be readmitted with a different diagnosis to the index admission. No difference in in-hospital mortality was observed, but readmission LOS was shorter and 30-day mortality was higher among patients with non-index readmissions. Conclusion: A substantial proportion of patients experienced non-index hospital readmissions. Non-index hospital readmitted patients had no immediate adverse outcomes, but experienced worse 30-day outcomes. What is known about the topic?: A significant proportion of unplanned hospital readmissions occur to non-index hospitals. North American studies suggest that non-index hospital readmissions are associated with worse outcomes for patients due to discontinuity of care, medical reconciliation and delayed treatment. Limited studies have determined factors associated with non-index hospital readmissions in Australia, but whether such readmissions lead to adverse clinical outcomes is unknown. What does this paper add?: In the Australian healthcare setting, 14.7% of patients were readmitted to non-index hospitals. Compared with index hospital readmissions, patients admitted to non-index hospitals had a lower Charlson comorbidity index, a shorter index LOS and fewer complications during the index admission. At the time of readmission there was no differences in discharge summary completion rates between the two groups. Unlike other studies, the present study found no immediate adverse outcomes for patients readmitted to non-index hospitals, but 30-day outcomes were worse than for patients who had an index hospital readmission. What are the implications for practitioners?: Non-index hospital readmissions may not be totally preventable due to factors such as ambulance diversions stemming from emergency department overcrowding and prolonged emergency department waiting times. Patients should be advised to re-present to hospital in case they experience recurrence or relapse of a medical condition, and preferably should be readmitted to the same hospital to prevent discontinuity of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examines how pregnant women living in South Australia use information and communication technologies (ICTs), principally Internet and mobile phones, to access pregnancy-related information. It draws on 35 semistructured interviews conducted as part of the 'Health-e Baby' project, a qualitative study designed to assess the information needs and ICT preferences of pregnant women cared for at a South Australian metropolitan teaching hospital. Our research shows that although ICTs offer exciting possibilities for health promotion and the potential for new forms of communication, networking and connection, we cannot assume the effectiveness of communicating through such channels, despite near universal levels of ICT access. In turn, this highlights that if e-mediated health promotion is to be effective, health promoters and practitioners need to better understand ICT access, usage and content preferences of their clients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Equity in resource allocation is central to the tenet of social justice in health care. The management of surgical waiting lists is of critical importance to clinicians, patients and regulators. In most hospital environments, the basic process has remained unchanged for decades. Patients are assigned to one of three urgency-related categories. Clinicians consequently administer three competing patient pools. The basis by which patients are selected for treatment may be difficult to define. The specific clinical circumstances of each patient are often unreported and may be unknown to those administering the list. Waiting list bias is also recognised. This may reflect clinician advocacy, pressure to meet category timeframe restrictions or perceived training requirements. In this environment, it is difficult to demonstrate propriety in care. We report the implementation of a pilot program to redesign waiting list management within a South Australian public hospital unit. This allows assemblage of patients into a single list. Overall priority is determined by balancing clinical acuity and waiting time. The determination of acuity takes into account both the primary category and the specific characteristics of each patient that are relevant to their intended procedure. Uniquely, the process is applicable to lists containing patients with dissimilar conditions. This paper reviews the limitations of current approaches in meeting reasonable community expectations. The principles and social justification underpinning this reform are introduced. Finally, the benefits offered by the program are discussed and interim results are reported. What is known about this topic? Current models for the management of hospital waiting lists have remained largely unchanged for several decades. Typically patients are allocated to urgent, semi-urgent and non-urgent categories of care. No methodology exists to systematically integrate these groups, or to account for specific patient factors. In this void, propriety in management is difficult to establish or defend. What does this paper add? A program is reported that unifies all categories of patients into a single prioritised waiting list. The order of patients is dynamic, and transparently reflects waiting time, category assignment and relevant individual patient factors. Uniquely, the program is applicable to lists containing patients with diverse clinical conditions. What are the implications for clinicians? Adoption of new technology is essential if reasonable community expectations in waiting list management are to be met. The current program provides unambiguous, defensible prioritisation of all patients awaiting care. The present reliance on individual managers is reduced, and the unique circumstances of each patient are recognised. We believe this approach affords significant benefit to patients, practitioners and regulators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Risk factors and clinical outcomes of non-index hospital readmissions (readmissions to a hospital different from the previous admission) have not been studied in Australia. The present study compared characteristics and clinical outcomes between index and non-index hospital readmissions in the Australian healthcare setting. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included medical admissions from 2012 to 2016 across all major public hospitals in South Australia. Readmissions within 30 day to all public hospitals were captured using electronic health information system. In-hospital mortality and readmission length of hospital stay (LOS) were compared, along with 30-day mortality and subsequent readmissions among patients readmitted to index or non-index hospitals. Results: Of 114 105 index admissions, there were 20 539 (18.0%) readmissions. Of these, 17 519 (85.3%) were index readmissions and 3020 (14.7%) were non-index readmissions. Compared with index readmissions, patients in the non-index readmissions group had a lower Charlson comorbidity index, shorter LOS and fewer complications during the index admission and were more likely to be readmitted with a different diagnosis to the index admission. No difference in in-hospital mortality was observed, but readmission LOS was shorter and 30-day mortality was higher among patients with non-index readmissions. Conclusion: A substantial proportion of patients experienced non-index hospital readmissions. Non-index hospital readmitted patients had no immediate adverse outcomes, but experienced worse 30-day outcomes. What is known about the topic?: A significant proportion of unplanned hospital readmissions occur to non-index hospitals. North American studies suggest that non-index hospital readmissions are associated with worse outcomes for patients due to discontinuity of care, medical reconciliation and delayed treatment. Limited studies have determined factors associated with non-index hospital readmissions in Australia, but whether such readmissions lead to adverse clinical outcomes is unknown. What does this paper add?: In the Australian healthcare setting, 14.7% of patients were readmitted to non-index hospitals. Compared with index hospital readmissions, patients admitted to non-index hospitals had a lower Charlson comorbidity index, a shorter index LOS and fewer complications during the index admission. At the time of readmission there was no differences in discharge summary completion rates between the two groups. Unlike other studies, the present study found no immediate adverse outcomes for patients readmitted to non-index hospitals, but 30-day outcomes were worse than for patients who had an index hospital readmission. What are the implications for practitioners?: Non-index hospital readmissions may not be totally preventable due to factors such as ambulance diversions stemming from emergency department overcrowding and prolonged emergency department waiting times. Patients should be advised to re-present to hospital in case they experience recurrence or relapse of a medical condition, and preferably should be readmitted to the same hospital to prevent discontinuity of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To describe the burden of bone and joint problems (BJP) in a defined regional population, and to identify characteristics and service-usage patterns. Methods In 2010, a health census of adults aged ≥15 years was conducted in Port Lincoln, South Australia. A follow-up computer-assisted telephone interview provided more specific information about those with BJP. Results Overall, 3350 people (42%) reported current BJP. General practitioners (GP) were the most commonly used provider (85%). People with BJP were also 85% more likely to visit chiropractors, twice as likely to visit physiotherapists and 34% more likely to visit Accident and Emergency or GP out of hours (compared with the rest of the population). Among the phenotypes, those with BJP with co-morbidities were more likely to visit GP, had a significantly higher mean pain score and higher levels of depression or anxiety compared with those with BJP only. Those with BJP only were more likely to visit physiotherapists. Conclusions GP were significant providers for those with co-morbidities, the group who also reported higher levels of pain and mental distress. GP have a central role in effectively managing this phenotype within the BJP population including linking allied health professionals with general practice to manage BJP more efficiently. What is known about the topic? As a highly prevalent group of conditions that are likely to impact on health-related quality of life and are a common cause of severe long-term disability, musculoskeletal conditions place a significant burden on individuals and the health system. However, far less is known about access and usage of musculoskeletal-related health services and programs in Australia. What does this paper add? As a result of analysing the characteristics of the overall BJP population, as well as phenotypes within it, a greater understanding of patterns of health service interactions, care pathways and opportunities for targeted improvements in delivery of care may be identified. The results emphasise that participants with BJP utilised the services of a narrow range of providers, which may have workforce implications for these sectors. The funding models for physiotherapists and chiropractors in Australia involve a mix of private and fees for service, which limits access to those who have private health insurance or can pay directly for these services. What are the implications for practitioners? These analyses indicate the importance of linking allied health professionals with general practice to manage BJP more efficiently. Alternative and appropriate care pathways need to be more strongly developed and identified for effective management of these conditions rather than relying on a traditional range of practitioners. Alternatively, greater ease of access to allied health practitioners may enable more effective treatment and improved quality of life for those with BJP. There is an urgent need to develop an effective population-based model of integrated care for BJP within regional Australia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Community Health Program of the 1970s was an attempt to introduce a national community health model. However, although community-based health care is an important element of the health systems of all Australian states and territories, the definition of what constitutes a 'community health service' in Australia today is not clear. Methods: A search of government websites failed to provide information about the types and characteristics of services that would be included in the term. Therefore, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 key informants in roles with responsibility for primary and community health services from health departments in all Australian states and territories. Questions explored their understanding of community health services as they operated in their jurisdiction. The study adopted a blended inductive and deductive orientation within a qualitative descriptive method. Results: There was little consistency in the way community health services were described across jurisdictions. The defining attributes of a 'community health centre' described by an international peak body did not apply to services in the majority of jurisdictions in Australia. Victoria was more aligned with the description than other jurisdictions, with organisations defined through legislation and a separate funding stream to support aspects of service delivery. Conclusions: Those designing and implementing national health system programs and reforms need to be aware that terms, such as 'community health', do not mean the same thing across jurisdictions; attempts to create consistency have to recognise differences that will affect new initiatives, as well as the spread of successful policies and programs from one jurisdiction to another. Without a consistent description, it is difficult to explore the current role of community-based health care across Australia in improving access to health care. 'Community health' is an important element of Australian health systems and recognised as such in national policy. Interviews with 13 key informants in roles with responsibility for primary and community health services from health departments in Australian states/ territories found little uniformity in the way community health was described. Inconsistencies in the use of the term 'community health' and the complexity of the multi-jurisdictional context need to be acknowledged when considering the design and implementation of national health system programs and reforms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Remnant natural populations of greater bilbies (Macrotis lagotis) are confined to the Australian arid zone where bilbies construct and shelter in multiple burrows within their home range. We investigated burrow use behaviour of bilbies in a translocated population in temperate southern Australia to determine if behaviour differed in this climatic zone. Over a 12 month period, 43 adult bilbies at Venus Bay Conservation Park were spool-and-line tracked to 118 burrows. Active burrow density was 0.55 per ha, and bilbies at the site used multiple burrows (up to 13 for males and 8 for females) and regularly moved between diurnal burrows. Male bilbies had significantly larger burrow ranges (10.2 ± 5.8 ha, MCP100, mean ± s.d.) than females (2.6 ± 1.8 ha), and were similar in size to those recorded in an arid zone population. Males' burrow ranges tended to overlap with the burrow range of multiple other males and females. The density of burrows in the current study suggests that bilby burrows were likely to have been a common landscape feature within the southern parts of the species range prior to their local extinction. Further research is needed to determine the impact of the loss of bilby burrows from southern Australia on other burrow commensal species. We describe burrow use behaviour in greater bilbies exposed to a temperate climate for the first time using a translocated population in southern South Australia. Bilbies in our study used multiple burrows within their home range, regularly moved between diurnal burrows and male bilbies had larger burrow ranges with more overlap than did females. Burrow density was 2.75–5.0 times the density of bilbies at the site, indicating that burrows were likely a common landscape feature in areas where bilbies were once in high density. Photograph by Karleah Berris. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article explores issues relating to access to physical and mental health care for people with mental health problems in light of Australia's endorsement in 2008 of the Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which established the right to health and to health care. Under the program, interviews were conducted with 10 key stakeholders with legal, policy, clinical and advocacy roles within South Australia and at a national and international level.

Nicotiana is found predominantly in the Americas and Australia, but also has representatives in Africa and the Pacific Islands. All native Australian Nicotiana species belong to section Suaveolentes. The number of species in this section is uncertain and subject to revision. An example of this uncertainty is the taxonomic status of a South Australian Nicotiana accession colloquially termed 'Corunna'. Here, we report sequences for nuclear and plastid markers for N. sp. Corunna (D.E.Symon 17088) and accessions of two other Australian species, N. burbidgeae and N. benthamiana. Phylogenetic comparison of these sequences with those of other members of Nicotiana places all three taxa in N. section Suaveolentes and shows that 'Corunna' represents a distinct phylogenetic lineage in a well supported clade along with N. goodspeedii , N. maritima , N. amplexicaulis and N. suaveolentes. Phenetic analysis of floral characters also supports recognition of N. sp. Corunna (D.E.Symon 17088) as a distinct species, which we describe here as Nicotiana paulineana Newbigin & P.M.Waterh., sp. nov. The enlarged molecular dataset described here contributes to a better understanding of taxonomic relationships within the section. We have used sequence and morphological characteristics to identify a new species of plant, exclusive to Australia, that was collected by the late David Symon from a region around Port Augusta, South Australia. It is named Nicotiana paulineana in honour of Prof. Pauline Ladiges (retired), a highly respected botanist at The University of Melbourne. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mating behaviour in lizards has been well studied, with most reports indicating that the male dominates in initiating the mating, characteristically displaying visually to attract partners. This strategy may be less successful in secretive species that remain in small areas around their refuge, infrequently encountering other conspecifics, like the endangered Australian pygmy bluetongue lizard (Tiliqua adelaidensis). Adult lizards of this species spend most of their time in or at the entrance of single-entrance vertical burrows, built by spiders, in patches of native grassland in South Australia. We filmed the behaviour of nine female lizards for 10 days in each month from October 2011 to February 2012. During filming in October, the austral spring, we observed 43 cases of females making moves away from their burrows, and back along the same path, in that month, that we did not observe among males, or among females in any other month. We observed 27 cases of males approaching female burrows, only in October and mostly along the paths previously taken by the females. Males attempted to mate, and were successful on five occasions. We describe the female movements and suggest that their function is to attract male mating partners. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Five species of phocid seal of the Southern Ocean and Antarctica come ashore occasionally on the southern Australian coast but do not breed there. We document records (specimens and sightings) of visits to South Australia (SA) by southern phocids from 1883 until August 2011. We used records from the SA Museum, reports from coastal officers of SA Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), the DENR fauna database, information from the public, the literature and newspapers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]