Search

Objectives Thirty-day readmission is used as a quality measure for patient care and Medicare-based hospital reimbursement. The primary study objective was to describe the 30-day readmission rate to an academic gynecologic oncology service. Secondary objectives were to identify risk factors and costs related to readmission. Methods This was a retrospective, concurrent cohort study of all surgical admissions to an academic, high volume gynecologic oncology service during a two-year period (2013–2014). Data were collected on patient demographics, medical comorbidities, psychosocial risk factors, and results from a hospital discharge screening survey. Mixed logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with 30-day readmission and costs of readmission were assessed. Results During the two-year study period, 1605 women underwent an index surgical admission. Among this population, a total of 177 readmissions (11.0%) in 135 unique patients occurred. In a surgical subpopulation with > 1 night stay, a readmission rate of 20.9% was observed. The mean interval to readmission was 11.8 days (SD 10.7) and mean length of readmission stay was 5.1 days (SD 5.0). Factors associated with readmission included radical surgery for ovarian cancer (OR 2.87) or cervical cancer (OR 4.33), creation of an ostomy (OR 11.44), a Charlson score of ≥ 5 (OR 2.15), a language barrier (OR 3.36), a median household income in the lowest quartile (OR 6.49), and a positive discharge screen (OR 2.85). The mean cost per readmission was $25,416 (SD $26,736), with the highest costs associated with gastrointestinal complications at $32,432 (SD $32,148). The total readmission-related costs during the study period were $4,523,959. Conclusions Readmissions to a high volume gynecologic oncology service were costly and related to radical surgery for ovarian and cervical cancer as well as to medical, socioeconomic and psychosocial patient variables. These data may inform interventional studies aimed at decreasing unplanned readmissions in gynecologic oncology surgical populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: Although the majority of women with ovarian carcinoma report symptoms prior to diagnosis, little is known about comparative symptom presentation by histological type, stage, grade, or ethnicity. Methods: We conducted a population-based study including 622 women with invasive ovarian carcinoma diagnosed from 1993 to 2008. Epidemiological and symptom data were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Symptoms established as significant predictors of ovarian carcinoma were examined in relation to patient and tumor characteristics, using unconditional multivariate logistic regression and general linear models. Results: Symptom presentation and duration differed significantly among women with ovarian carcinoma by stage, tumor histology, and grade, but not ethnicity. Significant differences were observed by histology in reporting a distended abdomen, abnormal vaginal bleeding, and bowel symptoms. Compared to women diagnosed with serous carcinoma, women with mucinous tumors were 2.6 times more likely to report a distended abdomen; women with endometrioid carcinoma were three times more likely to report abnormal bleeding. Women with serous tumors were significantly more likely to report bowel symptoms than were women diagnosed with other histological types. The majority of women with serous tumors were diagnosed with advanced cancer and had shorter duration of symptoms than women with early stage disease. In contrast, women with mucinous tumors were generally diagnosed at an early stage and had longer duration of symptoms (p =0.009) if diagnosed at an advanced stage. Conclusion: The study provides evidence that the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer is largely determined by tumor histological type. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]