Search

Objective: To report our experience with 18F‐fluoro‐ethyl‐tyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography‐computed tomography (PET‐CT) co‐registered with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (FET‐PET/MRICR) in the care trajectory for persistent acromegaly. Design: Prospective case series. Patients: Ten patients with insufficiently controlled acromegaly referred to our team to evaluate surgical options. Measurements: FET‐PET/MRICR was used to support decision‐making if MRI alone and multidisciplinary team evaluation did not provide sufficient clarity to proceed to surgery. Results: FET‐PET/MRICR showed suspicious (para)sellar tracer uptake in all patients. In five patients FET‐PET/MRICR was fully concordant with conventional MRI, and in one patient partially concordant. FET‐PET/MRICR identified suggestive new foci in four other patients. Surgical re‐exploration was performed in nine patients (aimed at total resection (6), debulking (2), diagnosis (1)), and one patient underwent radiation therapy. In 7 of 9 (78%) operated patients FET‐PET/MRICR findings were confirmed intraoperatively, and in six (67%) also histologically. IGF‐1 decreased significantly in eight patients (89%). All patients showed clinical improvement. Complete biochemical remission was achieved in three patients (50% of procedures in which total resection was anticipated feasible). Biochemistry improved in five and was unchanged in one patient. No permanent complications occurred. At six months, optimal outcome (preoperative intended goal achieved without permanent complications) was achieved in six (67%) patients and an intermediate outcome (goal not achieved, but no complications) in the other three patients. Conclusions: In patients with persisting acromegaly without a clear surgical target on MRI, FET‐PET/MRICR is a new tracer to provide additional information to aid decision‐making by the multidisciplinary pituitary team. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs) are highly prevalent and constitute an important cause of mortality in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Still, the optimal age to initiate screening for pNETs is under debate.Objective: The aim of this work is to assess the age of occurrence of clinically relevant NF-pNETs in young MEN1 patients.Methods: Pancreatic imaging data of MEN1 patients were retrieved from the DutchMEN Study Group database. Interval-censored survival methods were used to describe age-related penetrance, compare survival curves, and develop a parametric model for estimating the risk of having clinically relevant NF-pNET at various ages. The primary objective was to assess age at occurrence of clinically relevant NF-pNET (size ≥ 20 mm or rapid growth); secondary objectives were the age at occurrence of NF-pNET of any size and pNET-associated metastasized disease.Results: Five of 350 patients developed clinically relevant NF-pNETs before age 18 years, 2 of whom subsequently developed lymph node metastases. No differences in clinically relevant NF-pNET-free survival were found for sex, time frame, and type of MEN1 diagnosis or genotype. The estimated ages (median, 95% CI) at a 1%, 2.5%, and 5% risk of having developed a clinically relevant tumor are 9.5 (6.5-12.7), 13.5 (10.2-16.9), and 17.8 years (14.3-21.4), respectively.Conclusion: Analyses from this population-based cohort indicate that start of surveillance for NF-pNETs with pancreatic imaging at age 13 to 14 years is justified. The psychological and medical burden of screening at a young age should be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Denosumab (Dmab) treatment can benefit patients with fibrous dysplasia/McCune‐Albright syndrome (FD/MAS) by suppressing the receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL)‐mediated increased bone resorption. However, limited data of two pediatric cases indicate that a rebound phenomenon may occur after withdrawal. Therefore we studied the safety of Dmab discontinuation in FD/MAS. Thirty‐seven patients using Dmab, mostly after unsuccessful bisphosphonate (BP) treatment, were included. Health records were screened for pain scores, side effects, and bone turnover markers (BTMs) (calcium, alkaline phosphatase [ALP], procollagen 1 N‐terminal propeptide [P1NP], and β‐crosslaps [B‐CTX, also termed β–C‐terminal telopeptide]) during treatment, and for BTMs and clinical rebound effects after withdrawal. BTM levels after withdrawal were compared to pretreatment values. Data were calculated as median (interquartile range [IQR]). BTMs normalized in two‐thirds of patients and pain scores decreased significantly during treatment (p = 0.002). One patient (2.7%) developed osteonecrosis of the jaw. Sixteen patients discontinued Dmab treatment after a median of 1.6 years (IQR 1.0 years) because of insufficient effect on pain (n = 10, 63%), side effects (n = 4, 25%), or other reasons (n = 4, 25%). Follow‐up posttreatment was 3.2 (2.8) years, wherein no fractures, pain flares, or lesion progression occurred. Calcium remained normal in all but one patient, who had a mild asymptomatic hypercalcemia (2.73 mmol/L) 5 months after discontinuation. ALP passed pretreatment levels in five of 11 patients (46%), increased most after 6 months by 18 (43) U/L, and returned to baseline levels thereafter. P1NP exceeded pretreatment levels in four of nine patients (44%), CTX in eight of nine patients (89%). P1NP rose most after 3 months and stabilized thereafter. CTX showed the highest relative elevation. Patients with high pretreatment levels responding well to Dmab seemed to have the highest rebound. These results suggest beneficial effects of Dmab on pain and BTMs, and show a biochemical but asymptomatic rebound phenomenon after withdrawal in adults with FD/MAS, mainly in case of high pretreatment levels, good response, and multiple injections. Further studies on the safety of Dmab and withdrawal are needed and ongoing. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To report our experience with 18 F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) co-registered with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (FET-PET/MRI CR ) in the care trajectory for persistent acromegaly., Design: Prospective case series., Patients: Ten patients with insufficiently controlled acromegaly referred to our team to evaluate surgical options., Measurements: FET-PET/MRICR was used to support decision-making if MRI alone and multidisciplinary team evaluation did not provide sufficient clarity to proceed to surgery., Results: FET-PET/MRI CR showed suspicious (para)sellar tracer uptake in all patients. In five patients FET-PET/MRI CR was fully concordant with conventional MRI, and in one patient partially concordant. FET-PET/MRI CR identified suggestive new foci in four other patients. Surgical re-exploration was performed in nine patients (aimed at total resection (6), debulking (2), diagnosis (1)), and one patient underwent radiation therapy. In 7 of 9 (78%) operated patients FET-PET/MRI CR findings were confirmed intraoperatively, and in six (67%) also histologically. IGF-1 decreased significantly in eight patients (89%). All patients showed clinical improvement. Complete biochemical remission was achieved in three patients (50% of procedures in which total resection was anticipated feasible). Biochemistry improved in five and was unchanged in one patient. No permanent complications occurred. At six months, optimal outcome (preoperative intended goal achieved without permanent complications) was achieved in six (67%) patients and an intermediate outcome (goal not achieved, but no complications) in the other three patients., Conclusions: In patients with persisting acromegaly without a clear surgical target on MRI, FET-PET/MRI CR is a new tracer to provide additional information to aid decision-making by the multidisciplinary pituitary team., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Endocrinology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: First-line treatment for prolactinomas is a medical treatment with dopamine agonists (DAs), which effectively control hyperprolactinaemia in most patients, although post-withdrawal remission rates are approximately 34%. Therefore, many patients require prolonged DA treatment, while side effects negatively impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Endoscopic transsphenoidal resection is reserved for patients with severe side effects, or with DA-resistant prolactinoma. Surgery has a good safety profile and high probability of remission and may thus deserve a more prominent place in prolactinoma treatment. The hypothesis for this study is that early or upfront surgical resection is superior to DA treatment both in terms of HRQoL and remission rate in patients with a non-invasive prolactinoma of limited size., Methods: We present a combined randomised clinical trial and observational cohort study design, which comprises three unblinded randomised controlled trials (RCTs; PRolaCT-1, PRolaCT-2, PRolaCT-3), and an observational study arm (PRolaCT-O) that compare neurosurgical counselling, and potential subsequent endoscopic transsphenoidal adenoma resection, with current standard care. Patients with a non-invasive prolactinoma (< 25 mm) will be eligible for one of three RCTs based on the duration of pre-treatment with DAs: PRolaCT-1: newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients; PRolaCT-2: patients with limited duration of DA treatment (4-6 months); and PRolaCT-3: patients with persisting prolactinoma after DA treatment for > 2 years. PRolaCT-O will include patients who decline randomisation, due to e.g. a clear treatment preference. Primary outcomes are disease remission after 36 months and HRQoL after 12 months., Discussion: Early or upfront surgical resection for patients with a limited-sized prolactinoma may be a reasonable alternative to the current standard practice of DA treatment, which we will investigate in three RCTs and an observational cohort study. Within the three RCTs, patients will be randomised between neurosurgical counselling and standard care. The observational study arm will recruit patients who refuse randomisation and have a pronounced treatment preference. PRolaCT will collect randomised and observational data, which may facilitate a more individually tailored practice of evidence-based medicine., Trial Registration: US National Library of Medicine registry (ClinicalTrials.gov) NCT04107480 . Registered on 27 September 2019, registered retrospectively (by 2 months)., (© 2021. The Author(s).)