Search

Background: Very-late-onset schizophrenia-like psychosis (VLOSLP) is associated with significant burden. Its clinical importance is increasing as the global population of older adults rises, yet owing to limited research in this population, the neurobiological underpinnings of VLOSP remain insufficiently clarified. Here we address this knowledge gap using novel morphometry techniques to investigate grey matter volume (GMV) differences between VLOSLP and healthy older adults, and their correlations with neuropsychological scores. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we investigated whole-brain GMV differences between 35 individuals with VLOSLP (mean age 76.7, 26 female) and 36 healthy controls (mean age 75.7, 27 female) using whole-brain voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and supplementary source-based morphometry (SBM) on high resolution 3D T1-weighted MRI images. Additionally, we investigated relationships between GMV differences and cognitive function assessed with an extensive neuropsychological battery. Results: VBM showed lower GMV in the thalamus, left inferior frontal gyrus and left insula in patients with VLOSLP compared to healthy controls. SBM revealed lower thalamo-temporal GMV in patients with VLOSLP. Processing speed, selective attention, mental flexibility, working memory, verbal memory, semantic fluency and confrontation naming were impaired in patients with VLOSLP. Correlations between thalamic volumes and memory function were significant within the group of individuals with VLOSLP, whereas no significant associations remained in the healthy controls. Conclusions: Lower GMV in the thalamus and fronto-temporal regions may be part of the underlying neurobiology of VLOSLP, with lower thalamic GMV contributing to memory impairment in the disorder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundA number of studies have shown the feasibility of using adjunctive drugs in late onset psychosis (LOP).AimTesting hypothesis that among LOP people treated with antipsychotics and antidepressants, basing on certain clinical characteristics a subgroup of patients might be distinguished, for whom adjunctive therapy is advantageous. This subgroup might be identified by measurement of blood biochemical parameters.Methods59 in-patients with LOP, treated neuroleptics and antidepressants, were included, and followed in real clinical practice. Database containing demographic, clinical data (scores by PANSS, CDSS, CGI-S, HAMD-17), prescribed therapy, adverse effects of antipsychotic and antidepressant treatment, and blood biochemical parameters (enzymatic activities of glutamate- and glutathione metabolism enzymes in platelets and erythrocytes) at baseline and after the treatment course was created.ResultsThree groups of patients (Gr1, Gr2, and Gr3), based on the adjunctive therapy usage were identified: Gr1 (n = 16) was without adjunctive therapy, two other groups (Gr2 and Gr3) were with adjunctive medicines, such as 2-ethyl-6-methyl-3-hydroxypyridine succinate (EMHS; Gr2, n = 20), or other drugs, such as citicoline, cerebrolysin, cortexin, actovegin, gliatilin (choline alfoscerate; Gr3, n = 23). The enzymatic activities were assessed also in the matched control group (n = 38). In all three patient groups, as compared with controls, activity of erythrocyte glutathione reductase was decreased at baseline and after the treatment course. In Gr2, unlike Gr1 or Gr3, there was a significant decrease in baseline glutamate dehydrogenase and glutathione-S-transferase activities. Certain clinical criteria were also elucidated for prescription of EMHS as adjunctive therapy for patients of Gr2. Glutamate dehydrogenase and glutathione-S-transferase activities returned closer to control levels after the treatment course in Gr2, unlike Gr1, where they declined yet more after psychotropic treatment without adjunctive medicine. Different significant links between biochemical parameters and scores by clinical scales were observed in Gr1, Gr2, and Gr3, some having predictive value for evaluation of antipsychotic treatment efficacy.ConclusionWe demonstrate the validity of adjunctive neuroprotective medicines’ usage in addition to antipsychotic and antidepressant therapy in distinct subgroups of patients suffering with LOP, especially those who have prominent side effects accompanying their psychotropic treatment. Returning of biochemical parameters to control range following the treatment course observed in patients of the subgroup treated with adjunctive EMHS is evidence for their metabolism normalization.

Introduction Women present a second peak of incidence of psychosis during menopausal transition, partially explained by the loss of estrogen protection conferred during the reproductive years. Despite this, few studies compare sociodemographic, biological, clinical varibles and neurocognitive performance between women with early onset of psychosis (EOP) and those with late onset of psychosis (LOP). Objectives Our aim was to characterize both groups in a large sample of women, of which 294 were FEP patients (EOP = 205; LOP = 85) and 202 were healthy controls (HC) grouped following cutoff point (<>40 years of age) in previous studies. Methods Clinical and laboratory assessments were completed. Neurocognitive performance was also evaluated, and a cognitive global deficit score (GDS) was derived. ANCOVA was used for comparisons. Results EOP women were more frequently single and unemployed than comparable HC. Cholesterol levels in LOP women were higher than those of EOP women. LOP presented less severe symptoms, and higher scores in processing speed and premorbid IQ than EOP patients. Cannabis and alcohol use were also more frequent in EOP than LOP women. Conclusions Women with EOP and LOP show several sociodemographic, neuropsychological and clinical differences which may be valuable for planning personalized treatment emphasizing in socialization and differential generational dynamics. Some of these differences may be due to the aging process, while others might be influenced by factors such as lack of estrogen neuroprotection. In turn, drug consumption, low IQ and recent experienced trauma could as well reduce efficacy of hormonal neuroprotection. Disclosure No significant relationships.

Background: A number of studies have shown the feasibility of using adjunctive drugs in late onset psychosis (LOP)., Aim: Testing hypothesis that among LOP people treated with antipsychotics and antidepressants, basing on certain clinical characteristics a subgroup of patients might be distinguished, for whom adjunctive therapy is advantageous. This subgroup might be identified by measurement of blood biochemical parameters., Methods: 59 in-patients with LOP, treated neuroleptics and antidepressants, were included, and followed in real clinical practice. Database containing demographic, clinical data (scores by PANSS, CDSS, CGI-S, HAMD-17), prescribed therapy, adverse effects of antipsychotic and antidepressant treatment, and blood biochemical parameters (enzymatic activities of glutamate- and glutathione metabolism enzymes in platelets and erythrocytes) at baseline and after the treatment course was created., Results: Three groups of patients (Gr1, Gr2, and Gr3), based on the adjunctive therapy usage were identified: Gr1 (n = 16) was without adjunctive therapy, two other groups (Gr2 and Gr3) were with adjunctive medicines, such as 2-ethyl-6-methyl-3-hydroxypyridine succinate (EMHS; Gr2, n = 20), or other drugs, such as citicoline, cerebrolysin, cortexin, actovegin, gliatilin (choline alfoscerate; Gr3, n = 23). The enzymatic activities were assessed also in the matched control group ( n = 38). In all three patient groups, as compared with controls, activity of erythrocyte glutathione reductase was decreased at baseline and after the treatment course. In Gr2, unlike Gr1 or Gr3, there was a significant decrease in baseline glutamate dehydrogenase and glutathione-S-transferase activities. Certain clinical criteria were also elucidated for prescription of EMHS as adjunctive therapy for patients of Gr2. Glutamate dehydrogenase and glutathione-S-transferase activities returned closer to control levels after the treatment course in Gr2, unlike Gr1, where they declined yet more after psychotropic treatment without adjunctive medicine. Different significant links between biochemical parameters and scores by clinical scales were observed in Gr1, Gr2, and Gr3, some having predictive value for evaluation of antipsychotic treatment efficacy., Conclusion: We demonstrate the validity of adjunctive neuroprotective medicines' usage in addition to antipsychotic and antidepressant therapy in distinct subgroups of patients suffering with LOP, especially those who have prominent side effects accompanying their psychotropic treatment. Returning of biochemical parameters to control range following the treatment course observed in patients of the subgroup treated with adjunctive EMHS is evidence for their metabolism normalization., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Boksha, Savushkina, Sheshenin, Tereshkina, Prokhorova, Pochueva and Burbaeva.)