Search

Reablement is considered a complex intervention due to its multicomponent, person-centered, holistic approach promoting older adults' active participation in daily activities. It is important to consider the unique context in which complex interventions are implemented, as contextual factors may interact and influence implementation outcomes. As part of the European TRANS-SENIOR project, this qualitative study aimed to gain insight into professionals' experiences with reablement implementation in Dutch community care. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, four focus groups were conducted comprising 32 professionals. Two groups were formed: one at operational level, including therapists, nursing staff, social workers, and domestic support; and one at organizational/strategic level, including project leaders, managers, directors, municipality representatives and health insurers. Participating care organizations had at least 6 months of experience with deploying and implementing reablement. Findings reflected three themes: (1) strength of interdisciplinary collaboration; highlighting significance of sharing goals and beliefs, (2) integrating the reablement philosophy into the organization; underscoring managements role in fostering support across all organizational layers, and (3) achieving a culture change in the healthcare system; emphasizing current funding models impeding value-based care tailored to the individual's goals and needs. The results offer valuable insights for implementation of complex interventions, like reablement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Over the last two decades, reablement programs have been studied and implemented internationally. Goal-setting and multidisciplinary collaboration are central elements of reablement. Unfortunately, limited intervention descriptions leave questions on how they are applied in practice and how goals set by the user are achieved. As a consequence, healthcare providers and organizations often lack knowledge to implement and align reablement to their national and local context. This study aimed to collect data on goal-setting and achievement, and multidisciplinary collaboration within reablement services to provide insight into how these processes inform reablement practice as well as to explore the experiences of healthcare professionals in Norway, New Zealand, and the Netherlands. Material and Methods: A qualitative exploratory design was used comprising three focus group interviews with 20 healthcare professionals (nursing and allied health) involved in reablement programs from the three countries. Purposive sampling was employed considering a mix of gender, age and educational level. Results: Findings reflected healthcare professionals' experiences and reablement processes in three main themes: (1) Goal-setting processes; clearly demonstrating goal-setting as an essential part of reablement and contributing to better understanding of users' motives; (2) Impact of goal-setting on multidisciplinary collaboration; promoting a sense of community, learning climate, job satisfaction and task-shifting; and (3) Behavior change techniques used to reach users' goals, promoting self-reflection and changing users' perspectives. Conclusion: This study offers valuable insights from three countries. Goal-setting serves a crucial role enabling effective reablement implementation across diverse contexts. More specifically, to facilitate tailoring of reablement programs to the user's needs as well as establish more effective multidisciplinary collaboration by promoting trust, shared vision, and utilizing each other's expertise. However, despite the acknowledgement of the significance of reablement, it was reported by all that a cultural shift is necessary for users, informal caregivers as well as healthcare professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and Objectives: We aimed to describe daily restraint practices and the factors which influence their use, from an outsider's perspective. Background: A reduction in restraint use is recommended in health care. However, somatic acute care hospital settings currently lack effective reduction strategies. Thus far, hospital restraint practice is described in terms of quantitative assessments and the 'insider' view of healthcare professionals. However, as factors such as routine or personal beliefs seem to play a relevant role in restraint use, these approaches might be incomplete and biased. Design: A qualitative observation study design was employed. Methods: Fieldwork with unstructured participant observation was conducted at a department of geriatrics and a department of intensive care in Switzerland between November 2019 and January 2020. Data were recorded as field notes. The analysis was conducted iteratively in two coding cycles using descriptive coding followed by pattern coding. We adhered to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR). Results: A total of 67 hours of observation were conducted. We found that daily restraint practice can be described in three categories: the context in which restraints are used, the decision‐making process on the use and continued use of restraints, and the avoidance of restraint use. Most processes and decisions seem to take place unconsciously, and their standardisation is weak. Conclusions: The lack of standardisation favours intuitive and unreflective action, which is prompted by what is also known as heuristic decision‐making. To transform daily restraint practice, a technical solution that leads restraint management in line with ethical and legal requirements might be useful. Relevance to clinical practice: The outsider perspective has allowed daily restraint practice to be described independently of existing routines, departmental cultures and personal attitudes. This is important to comprehensively describe restrictive practices, which is a prerequisite for the development of effective restraint reduction strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Worldwide, long‐term care tends to shift from institutional care towards home care. In order to deliver high‐quality and adequate care, the type, amount and cost of care is determined by a patient needs assessment. However, there are indications that this patient needs assessment varies between comparable patients. In the Netherlands, some home care organizations aim to improve patient needs assessments by implementing improvement measures to reduce this practice variation. The goal of this study was to explore the type and perceived impact of those implemented improvement measures. Design: A cross‐sectional explorative survey study was conducted among Dutch home care organizations between January and April 2021. Methods: An online questionnaire with 26 items was developed by the research team, which was distributed through Dutch nationwide home care sector organizations, the Dutch nurses' association (V&VN) and the Dutch society for home care nursing (NWG). Results: The survey was completed by 184 respondents, including home care nurses, managers and staff who are responsible for training, policy and quality of care. Intervision and peer review for home care nurses were the most common reported improvement measures that were implemented in home care organizations. The experiences of those improvement measures have been perceived as creating greater uniformity in the patient needs assessment, making home care nurses feel more supported and secure performing their patient needs assessment and that the provided care is more in line with patients' demand. Our findings give insights into type and perceived impact of improvement measures that Dutch home care organizations implemented. Further research is needed to find out whether improvement measures actually improve patient needs assessments and reduce practice variation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To identify personal beliefs of Dutch nursing staff about encouraging psychogeriatric nursing home residents in daily activities. Design: Qualitative study following COREQ guidelines. Methods: Fifteen semi‐structured interviews with Dutch nursing staff of wards hosting psychogeriatric residents were conducted in Spring 2021. Data were systematically analysed through deductive coding analysis in NVivo. Results: Most nurses indicated to encourage residents frequently to perform activities independently, although many also indicated to take over tasks habitually. Nurses seemed to show sufficient awareness, reflected by adequate knowledge of what encouraging residents entailed and insight in the risks of not encouraging residents. Nurses' motivation to encourage residents seemed high, reflected by expressing multiple advantageous and few disadvantageous beliefs and a high willingness to encourage residents. Managerial support was perceived ambiguous. Self‐efficacy was perceived high, although little time, staffing shortages and resistance of residents reduced self‐efficacy. Nurses were often unable to anticipate such situations and expressed the need of skills, e.g. patience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]