Search

Objective: National guidelines recommend periprocedural antibiotics before percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), yet it is not clear which is superior. We conducted a randomized trial to compare two guideline-recommended antibiotics: ciprofloxacin (cipro) vs cefazolin, on PCNL outcomes, focusing on the development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. Methods: Adult patients who were not considered high risk for surgical or infectious complications and undergoing PCNL were randomized to receive either cipro or cefazolin perioperatively. All had negative preoperative urine cultures. Demographic and perioperative data were collected, including SIRS criteria, intraoperative urine culture, duration of hospitalization, and need for intensive care. SIRS is defined by ≥2 of the following: body temperature <96.8°F or >100.4°F, heart rate >90 bpm, respiratory rate >20 per minute, and white blood cell count <4000 or >12,000 cells/mm3. Results: One hundred forty-seven patients were enrolled and randomized (79 cefazolin and 68 cipro). All preoperative characteristics were similar (p > 0.05), except for mean age, which was higher in the cipro group (64 vs 57 years, p = 0.03). Intra- and postoperative findings were similar, with no difference between groups (p > 0.05), except a longer mean hospital stay in the cefazolin group (2 hours longer, p = 0.02). There was no difference between SIRS episodes in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Despite the relatively broader coverage for urinary tract pathogens with ciprofloxacin, this prospective randomized trial did not show superiority over cefazolin. Our findings therefore support two appropriate options for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing PCNL who are nonhigh risk for infectious complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with an increased risk of nephrolithiasis and is often treated with metformin. The relationship between metformin and nephrolithiasis formation remains unclear, as studies have demonstrated conflicting results. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of stone-forming patients at our stone clinic prior to the initiation of stone-directed medical management. Patients were grouped based on diabetic status and diabetic medication regimen. Outcomes evaluated were 24-hour urinary parameters and specimen stone type using univariate Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-squared analyses. Multivariate analyses controlling for metabolic syndrome components and HbA1c were performed. Results: Data were available for 505 patients, of whom 147 were diabetic and 358 were not. On multivariate analyses controlling for HbA1c and other comorbidities, diabetic patients on metformin still had worse urinary parameters, including urine pH, than nondiabetic patients (pH=-0.33, -0.37, p<0.05). Patients with DM on metformin did not exhibit significant differences in 24-hour urine findings compared to patients with DM not on metformin (p>0.05 for all urinary parameters). Conclusions: Stone-forming patients with DM on metformin were associated with urinary abnormalities similar to those not on metformin. Cohort studies comparing urinary parameters of patients prospectively started on metformin are necessary to further elucidate metformin's role, if any, in combatting nephrolithiasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare neonatal outcomes following URS, stent, or PCN in pregnant women presenting with suspected renal colic., Methods: Women undergoing a procedure for suspected renal colic during pregnancy at a large multi-center institution between 2008 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed and categorized by initial intervention. Neonatal outcomes were recorded and linked to maternal and obstetric data. Groups were compared by a Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA, or Fisher's Exact test, followed by pairwise post-hoc testing as appropriate (α = 0.05). Multivariate analyses were also conducted., Results: 95 patients were analyzed, of whom 32 were managed with PCN, 47 with stent, and 16 with URS. Maternal baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for lower gravidity and parity in the stent group. Rates of premature delivery did not differ, but gestational age at delivery was lower in the PCN group versus the stent and URS groups (p = 0.006 and p = 0.025, respectively). Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission rates were higher in the PCN group versus the stent and URS groups (p = 0.006 and 0.036, respectively). Respiratory distress syndrome significantly differed between groups (p = 0.041). Neonatal birth weight, Apgar scores, and other complications did not significantly differ., Conclusion: This study demonstrated higher rates of NICU admissions and lower gestational age at delivery for neonates born to mothers managed with PCN compared to stent and URS. Larger multi-institutional studies are warranted to further explore these associations., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Smita De reports a relationship with Boston Scientific Corporation that includes: consulting or advisory. Sri Sivalingam reports a relationship with Fortec medical that includes: consulting or advisory and travel reimbursement. Sri Sivalingam reports a relationship with BD Urology that includes: consulting or advisory and travel reimbursement. Sri Sivalingam reports a relationship with Karl Storz Endoscopy America Inc that includes: consulting or advisory and travel reimbursement. Sri Sivalingam reports a relationship with Cook Medical Inc that includes: consulting or advisory and travel reimbursement. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Anesthesia choice during the procedural management of suspected renal colic during pregnancy may vary based on available resources and patient or provider preferences, as there are no specific recommendations. Our objective was to evaluate whether preterm birth (<37 weeks) was associated with anesthesia type, anesthesia timing by trimester, or procedure type., Methods: We retrospectively identified pregnant patients who required procedural management with ureteral stent, percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN), or ureteroscopy (URS) for suspected renal colic based on laboratory and imaging findings from 2009-2021 at our center. Analyzed data included anesthesia type (local analgesia only, monitored anesthesia care [MAC], spinal anesthesia, or general anesthesia), trimester of procedure, procedure type, and obstetric outcomes including preterm birth., Results: The study cohort included 96 patients who underwent 231 total procedures, including primary URS, PCN, stent, as well as PCN and stent change. The median gestational age was 38.7 (37.1-39.5) weeks, and preterm birth rate was 15.8%. The most common anesthetic used across all procedures and trimesters was MAC. PCN was associated with the use of less invasive analgesia or anesthesia, whereas endoscopic procedures were more commonly performed with spinal or general anesthesia. Using multivariable logistic regression, procedure type was associated with preterm birth, but not anesthesia type or timing by trimester., Conclusions: Anesthesia type and timing were not associated with preterm birth, and selection may be influenced by resources, clinical scenario, or patient and provider preferences.