Search

Study Design: This was a single-center prospective randomized controlled study., Objective: The aim was to compare the efficacy of endoscopic facet joint denervation (FJD) with that of the percutaneous technique in terms of pain, functional disability, and quality of life in patients with low back pain (LBP)., Summary of Background Data: Different controlled studies in patients with LBP have shown short-term benefits from percutaneous FJD. Observational studies have demonstrated that endoscopic FJD may be more effective. As the superiority of the endoscopic technique has not been clearly demonstrated in previous studies, a prospective randomized controlled study was conducted., Materials and Methods: For this study, 40 patients with LBP lasting more than 6 months duration and at least 50% pain reduction on the visual analog scale after medial branch block under fluoroscopy, were assigned randomly to receive percutaneous or endoscopic FJD. The primary outcome was pain, as indicated by visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes were functional disability, as assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), and quality of life, as assessed by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)., Results: After the intervention, the pain level decreased significantly in both groups ( P <0.001); however, the effect was still significant in the endoscopic group (EG) and diminished to lower than the statistical significance in the percutaneous group (PG) after 12 months. The ODI and RDQ scores also improved significantly in both groups ( P <0.001). However, the ODI and RDQ were significantly better ( P <0.001) in the EG after 12 months. In the SF-36, we observed significant improvement in both groups three months after the intervention. The effect decreased after six months in the PG and was predominantly not demonstrable after 12 months, whereas in the EG there was still a strong significant improvement on all scales ( P <0.001) after 12 months., Conclusion: Percutaneous and endoscopic FJD reduced pain and improved functionality and quality of life. However, the effects decreased or disappeared in the PG after 12 months, whereas there was still a strong significant improvement in the EG., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Study:  The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) may be the primary source of pain in 15 to 25% of patients with axial low back pain. Furthermore, 75% of patients who have had fusion surgery develop SIJ pain within 10 years. Treatment options include SIJ blocks, radiofrequency (RF) denervation, and fusion. The RF techniques range from ablation of the nerves supplying the joint, creating lesions to the joint itself, or a combination of both techniques. However, different clinical studies could only identify a limited or, in some cases, no effect in decreasing of pain intensity and duration of the effect., Methods:  In this retrospective study, we selected 23 patients with SIJ pain, with a duration of more than 12 months and a 50% pain reduction on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) after diagnostic block. All patients received endoscopic ablation of the medial branch L5/S1 and the lateral branches, exiting the sacral foramina on S1/S2 and S2/S3 on both sides while using only one incision on each side. Telephone interviews were conducted with all patients. The outcome was determined with Odom's criteria, percent reduction NRS, subjective assessment of the patient, and duration of the effect., Results:  According to Odom's criteria, 79% of the patients showed acceptable to excellent results and confirmed that denervation helped them to manage their daily lives better. The average pain reduction in the responder group was 57% with an average duration of 13.4 months., Conclusion:  In this retrospective study, we could demonstrate the practicability and effectiveness of endoscopic SIJ denervation in the treatment of SIJ pain using only one incision for three levels on each side. Further studies should investigate if this procedure is more effective than percutaneous RF., Competing Interests: Dr. Woiciechowsky reports grants from RiwoSpine, during the conduct of the study, and personal fees from presentations and workshops, outside the submitted work., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)