Search

Objective: A long-standing observation is that the Mismatch Response (MMR) has the potential to offer a clinically feasible index of sound discrimination. However, findings that positively identify MMRs at the individual level have been mixed, even for those who are normally hearing and who can discriminate sounds behaviourally. This complicates interpretation when an MMR is not observed. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability of the MMR using an optimised paradigm and a range of stimuli relevant to audiological applications in relation to objective verification of hearing aid fittings., Design: MMRs were measured using an optimised 3-deviant paradigm in response to a range of sounds designed for aided and unaided sound field assessments, including complex tones (CTs) and speech-like signals., Study Sample: Seventeen normally hearing adults (18-56 years)., Results: The most robust MMRs were recorded in response to CTs; responses were positively identified in 50 out of 51 instances (98%), assessed via objective Hotelling's T 2 bias-free statistical analyses., Conclusions: The results indicate that CTs in conjunction with optimised recording and analysis parameters offer the potential to elicit robust MMRs, supporting future utilisation of MMRs for clinical audiological applications.

Background: Dizziness and imbalance are common following traumatic brain injury (TBI). While these symptoms are often attributed to vestibular dysfunction, the relative contribution of peripheral vs. central mechanisms is unclear. This study investigated the prevalence of semicircular canal and otolith abnormalities in a cohort of patients with chronic TBI and symptoms of dizziness or imbalance. The relationship between vestibular, oculomotor and posturography results was further explored., Methods: Clinical records of patients attending the New Zealand Dizziness and Balance Centre from January 2015 to December 2019 were reviewed for consideration in the study. Inclusion required: an age of 18-80 years, a diagnosed TBI, and vestibular assessment using three-dimensional video head impulses (vHIT), cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (c and o VEMPs, respectively) and caloric testing. Severe TBI, pre-existing vestibular diagnoses, and incomplete test results were excluded. Rates of abnormalities were determined for each test and compared with results of oculomotor function testing and postural control, measured using the sensory organization test (SOT)., Results: Of 158 reviewed records, 99 patients aged 49 ± 15 years (59 female) fulfilled criteria for inclusion in the study. The median time between the head injury and the clinical assessment was 12 (IQR 6-21) months. Abnormalities involving one or more components of the vestibular labyrinth and/or nerve divisions were identified in 33 of 99 patients (33.3%). The horizontal semicircular canal was most frequently affected (18.2%), followed by the saccule (14.1%), utricle (8.1%), posterior (7.1%) and anterior (2.0%) semicircular canals. Vestibular test abnormalities were associated with skull-base fractures, superior canal dehiscence, and focal ear trauma. Oculomotor dysfunction and postural instability were recorded in 41.1 and 75.5% of patients, respectively. Postural instability correlated with abnormal oculomotor function ( p = 0.008) but not peripheral vestibular hypofunction ( p = 0.336)., Conclusions: Dizziness and/or imbalance in chronic TBI was associated with impaired postural stability for tasks requiring high levels of use of vestibular and visual input for balance. Vestibular hypofunction identified through vHIT, VEMP and caloric testing was recorded but was less common, except when the injury involved a fractured skull-base. There was no specific pattern of end-organ or nerve involvement which characterized this group of patients., Competing Interests: Author DT is a Co-Director of the New Zealand Dizziness and Balance Centre (NZDBC). Authors RT and KW are either currently, or have previously been employed by the NZDBC to assess patients. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Taylor, Wise, Taylor, Chaudhary and Thorne.)