Search

Ronja Thallner,1 Christoph Gumbinger,1 Anja Hohmann,1 Antje Wick,1 Wolfgang Wick,1 Loraine Busetto1,2 1Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; 2Institute for Medical Virology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyCorrespondence: Loraine Busetto, Institute for Medical Virology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Paul-Ehrlich-Straße 40, Frankfurt am Main, 60590, Germany, Tel/Fax +49 69 6301-86103, Email busetto@med.uni-frankfurt.dePurpose: There is a lack of evidence regarding how patients with malignant brain tumor and their relatives experience participation in neurooncological clinical trials. Similarly, insights from the perspective of trial staff caring for this group of patients are missing. This study aims to investigate patient, relative and trial staff experiences regarding participation in clinical neurooncological trials.Methods: Within a qualitative exploratory study, 29 semi-structured interviews with brain tumor patients, relatives and trial staff were conducted and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) by Braun and Clarke. A patient researcher and patient council were involved in data analysis and interpretation.Results: Four themes were developed reflecting significant aspects of the trial experience: 1. “It all revolves around hope”; 2. “Trial participation: experiencing unique medical care”; 3. “Everyone’s roles are changing”; 4. “Communication as a possible area of conflict”. Experiencing trial participation and general medical treatment were found to be interconnected to such a degree that they were often not meaningfully distinguished by patients and relatives.Conclusion: In addition to assessing traditional endpoints for patient outcomes, we recommend increased emphasis on investigating the impact of the “soft” components constituting trial participation. Due to the interconnectedness of medical treatment and trial participation, we recommend further investigation in comparison to experiences in regular care. A deeper understanding of trial participation is needed to inform improvements for patient experiences and staff satisfaction alongside medical and scientific progress.Plain Language Summary: The treatment options available to patients with (malignant) brain tumors are currently very limited. Therefore, patients are sometimes offered to participate in a clinical trial. This means that they receive an experimental treatment (eg new medicine) for which it is not yet clear whether it works better than regular medical care. Currently, little is known about how this group of patients, their relatives and the hospital staff who care for them experience the participation in these clinical trials – which is what we aimed to explore in our study reported here.Based on interviews with patients, relatives and staff, we found that:trial participation mainly revolves around hope;trial participation entails experiencing unique medical care;trial participation significantly changes the previous roles of patients, relatives and staff;trial participation intensifies communication as a possible area of conflict.By providing information on how patients, relatives and staff make sense of their trial experiences, this study constitutes an important addition to the traditional focus of clinical trials on medical and scientific endpoints (eg progression-free survival). This may help clinicians and researchers involved in cancer research and treatment to understand why “unsuccessful” trials can still be perceived as positive by patients or how hopeful communication may support their patients even when perceived as “unrealistic” from the clinicians’ perspective. An in depth understanding of trial participation from the perspective of those affected is needed for improved care experiences alongside medical and scientific progress for cancer treatment.Keywords: cancer research, brain tumor, qualitative research, care experiences

BACKGROUND Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)--mutant grade 2 gliomas are malignant brain tumors that cause considerable disability and premature death. Vorasidenib, an oral brain-penetrant inhibitor of mutant IDH1 and IDH2 enzymes, showed preliminary activity in IDH-mutant gliomas. METHODS In a double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with residual or recurrent grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma who had undergone no previous treatment other than surgery to receive either oral vorasidenib (40 mg once daily) or matched placebo in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was imaging-based progression-free survival according to blinded assessment by an independent review committee. The key secondary end point was the time to the next anticancer intervention. Crossover to vorasidenib from placebo was permitted on confirmation of imaging-based disease progression. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS A total of 331 patients were assigned to receive vorasidenib (168 patients) or placebo (163 patients). At a median follow-up of 14.2 months, 226 patients (68.3%) were continuing to receive vorasidenib or placebo. Progression-free survival was significantly improved in the vorasidenib group as compared with the placebo group (median progression-free survival, 27.7 months vs. 11.1 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.56; P<0.001). The time to the next intervention was significantly improved in the vorasidenib group as compared with the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.43; P<0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 22.8% of the patients who received vorasidenib and in 13.5% of those who received placebo. An increased alanine aminotransferase level of grade 3 or higher occurred in 9.6% of the patients who received vorasidenib and in no patients who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS In patients with grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma, vorasidenib significantly improved progression-free survival and delayed the time to the next intervention. (Funded by Servier; INDIGO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04164901.) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging has emerged as a promising imaging biomarker, but its reliability for clinical practice remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the robustness of CEST parameters in healthy volunteers and patients with brain tumours., Methods: A total of n = 52 healthy volunteers and n = 52 patients with histologically confirmed glioma underwent two consecutive 3-T MRI scans separated by a 1-min break. The CEST measurements were reconstructed using two models: with and without fluid suppression and included the evaluation of both amide (amidePTw) and amine (aminePTw) offsets. Mean intensity values in healthy volunteers were compared from volumetric segmentations (VOI) of grey matter, white matter, and the whole brain. Mean intensity values in brain tumour patients were assessed from VOI of the contrast-enhancing, non-enhancing and whole tumour, as well as from the normal-appearing white matter. Test-retest reliability was assessed using ICC and Bland-Altman plots., Results: The amidePTw/aminePTw signal intensity distribution was significantly affected by fluid suppression (p < 0.001 for each VOI). Test-retest reliability in healthy volunteers showed fair to excellent agreement (ICC = 0.53-0.74), with the highest signal intensity values observed by amidePTw (ICC = 0.73-0.74). In patients, an excellent agreement of both amidePTw and aminePTw measurements was observed across different tumour regions (ICC = 0.76-0.89), with the highest ICC for contrast-enhancing tumour measurements. Bland-Altman analysis indicated negligible systematic bias and no proportional bias in measurement errors., Conclusion: Measurements from amide/aminePTw imaging obtained from an adequately powered test-retest study yield consistent and reproducible results in glioma patients, as a prerequisite for robust imaging biomarker discovery in neuro-oncology., Key Points: Question The clinical reliability of chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging remains uncertain, necessitating further investigation to establish its robustness as a biomarker in neuro-oncology. Findings This study demonstrates that amide/amine proton transfer imaging provides repeatable, high-agreement measurements in glioma patients, particularly in contrast-enhancing tumour regions. Clinical relevance This test-retest study demonstrates that chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging using two models and assessing amide and amine offsets yield consistent and repeatable results in glioma patients, as a prerequisite for robust imaging biomarker discovery for neuro-oncology studies and clinical practice., Competing Interests: Compliance with ethical standards. Guarantor: The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. Philipp Vollmuth. Conflict of interest: The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies: S.C. and C.P. are employees of Olea Medical. P.L. is an employee of Siemens Healthcare Gmbh. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest. Statistics and biometry: One of the authors has significant statistical expertise (Rouven Behnisch). Informed consent: Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study. Ethical approval: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Study subjects or cohorts overlap: Study subjects or cohorts have never been previously reported. Methodology: Prospective Case-control study Performed at one institution, (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.)

Objectives: Recurrent glioma is highly treatment resistant due to its metabolic, cellular, and molecular heterogeneity and invasiveness. Tumor monitoring by conventional MRI has shortcomings to assess these key glioma characteristics. Recent studies introduced chemical exchange saturation transfer for metabolic imaging in oncology and assessed its diagnostic value for newly diagnosed glioma. This prospective study investigates amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI at 3 T as an imaging biomarker to elucidate the molecular heterogeneity and invasion patterns of recurrent glioma in comparison to pseudoprogression (PsPD)., Materials and Methods: We performed a monocenter, prospective trial and screened 371 glioma patients who received tumor monitoring between August 2021 and March 2024 at our institution. The study included IDH wildtype astrocytoma and IDH mutant astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma, graded according to the WHO 2021 classification. Patients had received clinical standard of care treatment including surgical resection and radiochemotherapy prior to study inclusion. Patients were monitored by 3 monthly MRI follow-up imaging, and response assessment was performed according to the RANO criteria. Within this cohort, we identified 30 patients who presented with recurrent glioma and 12 patients with PsPD. In addition to standard anatomical sequences (FLAIR and T1-w Gd-enhanced sequences), MRI included APTw imaging. After sequence co-registration, semiautomated segmentation was performed of the FLAIR lesion, CE lesion, resection cavity, and the contralateral normal-appearing white matter, and APTw signals were quantified in these regions of interest., Results: APTw values were highest in solid, Gd-enhancing tumor parts as compared with the nonenhancing FLAIR lesion (APTw: 1.99% vs 1.36%, P = 0.001), whereas there were no detectable APTw alterations in the normal-appearing white matter (APTw: 0.005%, P < 0.001 compared with FLAIR). Patients with progressive disease had higher APTw levels compared with patients with PsPD (APTw: 1.99% vs 1.26%, P = 0.008). Chemical exchange saturation transfer identified heterogeneity within the FLAIR lesion that was not detectable by conventional sequences. There were also focal APTw signal peaks within contrast enhancing lesions as putative metabolic hotspots within recurrent glioma. The resection cavity developed an APTw increase at recurrence that was not detectable prior to recurrence nor in patients with PsPD (APTw before recurrence: 0.6% vs 2.68% at recurrence, P = 0.03)., Conclusions: Our study shows that APTw imaging can differentiate PD and PsPD. We identify previously undetectable imaging patterns during glioma recurrence, which include alterations within resection cavity associated with disease progression. Our work highlights the clinical potential of APTw imaging for glioma monitoring and further establishes it as an imaging biomarker in neuro-oncology., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Radiographic assessment plays a crucial role in the management of patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumors, aiding in treatment planning and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy by quantifying response. Recently, an updated version of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria (RANO 2.0) was developed to improve upon prior criteria and provide an updated, standardized framework for assessing treatment response in clinical trials for gliomas in adults. This article provides an overview of significant updates to the criteria including (1) the use of a unified set of criteria for high and low grade gliomas in adults; (2) the use of the post-radiotherapy MRI scan as the baseline for evaluation in newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas; (3) the option for the trial to mandate a confirmation scan to more reliably distinguish pseudoprogression from tumor progression; (4) the option of using volumetric tumor measurements; and (5) the removal of subjective non-enhancing tumor evaluations in predominantly enhancing gliomas (except for specific therapeutic modalities). Step-by-step pragmatic guidance is hereby provided for the neuroradiologist and imaging core lab involved in operationalization and technical execution of RANO 2.0 in clinical trials, including the display of representative cases and in-depth discussion of challenging scenarios., (© 2024 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.)

Background: The majority of patients diagnosed with glioblastoma are >60 years. Three randomized trials addressed the roles of radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) for elderly patients. NORDIC and NOA-08 compared RT versus TMZ, while CE.6 randomized between hypofractionated RT and RT + TMZ. All showed significant benefits for the TMZ arms, especially for those patients with O 6 -methylguanine DNA methyltransferase ( MGMT ) promoter-methylated tumors. This pooled analysis aimed at identifying additional factors that could improve individualized treatment recommendations., Methods: Analyses were performed separately in the RT and TMZ arms of the pooled NORDIC and NOA-08 data, and in the RT and TMZ/RT arms of CE.6. The prognostic value of baseline clinical factors, comorbidities, and quality of life (QoL) scores were assessed., Results: NORDIC + NOA-08 (NN) included 715 patients and CE.6 included 562 patients. Median age for NN was 71 and 73 years for CE.6. In NN and CE.6 respectively, 66.2% versus 70.5% underwent resection and 50.9% and 75.3% were on steroids. In NN, 401 patients received RT alone and 281 in CE.6, while 314 were randomized to TMZ alone in NN and 281 to concomitant RT + TMZ in CE.6. Known clinical prognostic factors, such as extent of resection and WHO performance status were confirmed, as was MGMT promoter methylation status for TMZ-treated patients. TMZ-treated patients with 2 or 3 comorbidities; hypertension, diabetes, and/or stroke had worse survival, both in NN ( P  = .022) and CE.6 ( P  = .022). Baseline QoL had a minor association with outcome., Conclusion: Consideration of comorbidities allows improved personalized treatment decisions for elderly glioblastoma patients., Competing Interests: A.M., F.B.O., C.O.C., N.L., T.G., E.C., G.R., C.M., and J.P. none. M.W. has received research grants from Quercis and Versameb, and honoraria for lectures or advisory board participation or consulting from Bayer, Curevac, Medac, Novartis, Novocure, Orbus, Philogen, Roche, and Servier. R.H. has since the start of the Nordic study received honoraria for lectures or advisory board participation or consulting from Novocure, MSD, Roche, Astra Zeneca, and BrainCool. W.W. Honoraria for consultation or non-financial clinical trial support from Apogenix, Bayer, Merck Sharp & Dome, AstraZeneca, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche and Mundipharma, with compensation paid to the Medical Faculty at Heidelberg University. B.H.G. research funding from AstraZeneca and Roche, and honoraria from MSD, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Janssen, Sanofi, Takeda, Eli Lilly, BMS, Gilead and Debiopharm. W.M. consultant for Merck, Servier, Novocure, Boehringer Ingelheim, and chairs a data monitoring committee for Ono Therapeutics. M.P. has received research grants and support from Bayer, Merck, Pfizer and Roche, and advisory board participation compensation from Cellula Therapeutics., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.)

Background: Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)s plays a central role in the diagnosis and monitoring of neurovascular or neurooncological disease. However, conventional processing techniques are limited in their ability to capture relevant characteristics of the perfusion dynamics and suffer from a lack of standardization., Purpose: We propose a physics-informed deep learning framework which is capable of analyzing dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI data and recovering the dynamic tissue response with high accuracy., Methods: The framework uses physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to learn the voxel-wise TRF, which represents the dynamic response of the local vascular network to the contrast agent bolus. The network output is stabilized by total variation and elastic net regularization. Parameter maps of normalized cerebral blood flow (nCBF) and volume (nCBV) are then calculated from the predicted residue functions. The results are validated using extensive comparisons to values derived by conventional Tikhonov-regularized singular value decomposition (TiSVD), in silico simulations and an in vivo dataset of perfusion MRI exams of patients with high-grade gliomas., Results: The simulation results demonstrate that PINN-derived residue functions show a high concordance with the true functions and that the calculated values of nCBF and nCBV converge towards the true values for higher contrast-to-noise ratios. In the in vivo dataset, we find high correlations between conventionally derived and PINN-predicted perfusion parameters (Pearson's rho for nCBF: 0.84 ± 0.03 $0.84 \pm 0.03$ and nCBV: 0.92 ± 0.03 $0.92 \pm 0.03$ ) and very high indices of image similarity (structural similarity index for nCBF: 0.91 ± 0.03 $0.91 \pm 0.03$ and for nCBV: 0.98 ± 0.00 $0.98 \pm 0.00$ )., Conclusions: PINNs can be used to analyze perfusion MRI data and stably recover the response functions of the local vasculature with high accuracy., (© 2024 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Lymphomatous infiltration of the peripheral nervous system (PNS), termed neurolymphomatosis, represents a distinct extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma variant with dismal outcome. CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CD19-CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a safe and effective treatment for B-cell lymphomas. We aimed to assess toxicity and efficacy of CD19-CAR T-cells in neurolymphomatosis. Neurolymphomatosis patients treated with CD19 CAR T-cells were retrospectively identified at Massachusetts General Hospital over a six-year period. Toxicities were graded according to the ASTCT classification, management, and response rates were recorded. Eleven neurolymphomatosis patients were identified with a median of 2 lines of PNS-directed treatments (range: 1-3) prior to receiving CD19-CAR T-cells. Neurolymphomatosis localized to the nerve roots (8/11, 73%), plexus (5/11, 45%), peripheral (4/11, 36%) and cranial nerves (5/11, 45%). Low grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was detected in 8/11 (73%; grade 1: N = 7; grade 2: N = 1) cases. Low- and high-grade immune cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were recorded in 5/11 (45%; grade 1: N = 4; grade 2: N = 1) and 1/11 (9%; grade 4) patients, respectively. CRP levels at infusion were predictive of ICANS (area under the curve: 0.96, p = 0.01). Seven of eleven neurolymphomatosis patients (64%) responded to CD19-CAR T-cells. Complete remissions (CR) were achieved in three cases (27%), with 2 patients in sustained CR nine and 46 months after CD19-CAR infusion. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4 months. Collectively, CD19-CAR T-cell treatment was well tolerated and showed promising efficacy in recurrent neurolymphomatosis, a difficult to treat condition with unmet medical need. Findings suggest that CD19-CAR may sufficiently penetrate the blood-nerve barrier. Toxicity and outcomes were overall similar to CAR-T cell therapy in CNS lymphoma., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Glioblastoma is characterized by a pronounced resistance to therapy with dismal prognosis. Transcriptomics classify glioblastoma into proneural (PN), mesenchymal (MES) and classical (CL) subtypes that show differential resistance to targeted therapies. The aim of this study was to provide a viable approach for identifying combination therapies in glioblastoma subtypes. Proteomics and phosphoproteomics were performed on dasatinib inhibited glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) and complemented by an shRNA loss-of-function screen to identify genes whose knockdown sensitizes GSCs to dasatinib. Proteomics and screen data were computationally integrated with transcriptomic data using the SamNet 2.0 algorithm for network flow learning to reveal potential combination therapies in PN GSCs. In vitro viability assays and tumor spheroid models were used to verify the synergy of identified therapy. Further in vitro and TCGA RNA-Seq data analyses were utilized to provide a mechanistic explanation of these effects. Integration of data revealed the cell cycle protein WEE1 as a potential combination therapy target for PN GSCs. Validation experiments showed a robust synergistic effect through combination of dasatinib and the WEE1 inhibitor, MK-1775, in PN GSCs. Combined inhibition using dasatinib and MK-1775 propagated DNA damage in PN GCSs, with GCSs showing a differential subtype-driven pattern of expression of cell cycle genes in TCGA RNA-Seq data. The integration of proteomics, loss-of-function screens and transcriptomics confirmed WEE1 as a target for combination with dasatinib against PN GSCs. Utilizing this integrative approach could be of interest for studying resistance mechanisms and revealing combination therapy targets in further tumor entities., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)