Search

Background and objective Pembrolizumab (PEM) has been shown to be effective in clinical trials for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but clinical trials were based on cohorts of patients selected on specific criteria, and whether the findings are consistent with real-world patients is debatable. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEM in the treatment of advanced NSCLC based on real-world data. Methods A retrospective collection of real-world data from patients with advanced NSCLC receiving PEM was conducted. Propensity score matching was used to eliminate inter-group differences and assess the efficacy and safety of PEM compared to chemotherapy. Results Among 450 matched patients, the incidence rates of any-grade adverse events were 79.87% in the PEM group and 86.71% in the chemotherapy group, while the incidence rates of grade ≥3 adverse events were 4.03% and 7.31%, respectively. The objective response rates were 48.63% for PEM and 36.00% for chemotherapy (P=0.011). The median progression-free survival was 15.5 months for PEM and 8.8 months for chemotherapy (P

Abstract Background Respiratory diseases impose an immense health burden worldwide. Epidemiological studies have revealed extensive disparities in the incidence and severity of respiratory tract infections between men and women. It has been hypothesized that there might also be a nasal microbiome axis contributing to the observed sex disparities. Results Here, we study the nasal microbiome of healthy young adults in the largest cohort to date with 1593 individuals, using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. We compile the most comprehensive reference catalog for the nasal bacterial community containing 4197 metagenome-assembled genomes and integrate the mycobiome, to provide a valuable resource and a more holistic perspective for the understudied human nasal microbiome. We systematically evaluate sex differences and reveal extensive sex-specific features in both taxonomic and functional levels in the nasal microbiome. Through network analyses, we capture markedly higher ecological stability and antagonistic potentials in the female nasal microbiome compared to the male’s. The analysis of the keystone bacteria reveals that the sex-dependent evolutionary characteristics might have contributed to these differences. Conclusions In summary, we construct the most comprehensive catalog of metagenome-assembled-genomes for the nasal bacterial community to provide a valuable resource for the understudied human nasal microbiome. On top of that, comparative analysis in relative abundance and microbial co-occurrence networks identify extensive sex differences in the respiratory tract community, which may help to further our understanding of the observed sex disparities in the respiratory diseases.

Introduction: Cadonilimab (AK104) is an innovative human programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) bispecific antibody. Compared with the combination therapy of PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockers, less cellular toxicity of cadonilimab was significantly manifested. As one of the characteristic adverse effects of cadonilimab, infusion-related reactions (IRRs) represent fever, chills, rash, decreased blood pressure, and other symptoms. Case Presentation: Here, we documented seven cases of IRRs after the administration of cadonilimab. The symptoms of IRRs were relieved after the discontinuation of cadonilimab and the administration of diphenhydramine, dexamethasone, and cimetidine. Notably, 3 patients were able to tolerate the subsequent cadonilimab therapy under the pretreatment. Conclusion: In this study, we discovered that cadonilimab-related IRRs might be lessened or prevented by administering medication and the proper pretreatment and lowering the infusion rate.

Background: Malignant melanoma is a highly aggressive cancer that spreads and metastasizes quickly. In recent years, the antiangiogenic drug bevacizumab has been trialed to treat malignant melanoma. We conducted the first meta-analysis to examine the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with other drugs in malignant melanoma.Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-comparative clinical studies of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy, targeted medicine, and interferon to treat malignant melanoma in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Meta-analysis of RCT was performed using Review Manager (version 5.4), and non-comparative meta-analysis was performed using R (version 4.0.3). The primary outcome was the objective response rate. Depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies, the pooled outcomes and 95% CI were calculated using either random-effects or fixed-effect models. Subgroup outcomes were calculated with possible relevant variables. Sensitivity analyses were carried out by excluding each study from the highly heterogeneous pooled results in turn. Funnel plot and Begg’s test were used to test the included studies' potential publication bias. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.Results: This meta-analysis included 20 trials: five RCTs and 15 non-comparative clinical studies with a total of 23 bevacizumab intervention arms. In 14 treatment arms, bevacizumab was combined with chemotherapy drugs such as fotemustine, dacarbazine, carboplatin/paclitaxel, and temozolomide. In six treatment arms, bevacizumab was combined with targeted medicines such as imatinib, everolimus, sorafenib, erlotinib, and temsirolimus. There were also six treatment arms that used bevacizumab in combination with interferon. The pooled objective response rate was 15.8% (95% CI, 11.4%–20.2%). Bevacizumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel significantly increased the overall survival compared to carboplatin/paclitaxel (HR = 0.64, 95% CI, 0.49-0.85, p < 0.01). Fatigue, nausea, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia were the most common adverse events. The pooled incidence of hypertension of all bevacizumab arms in malignant melanoma was 32.4% (95% CI, 24.5%–40.3%).Conclusion: This study showed that bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy might be effective and well-tolerated in patients with stage III or IV unresectable malignant melanoma.Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=304625], identifier [CRD42022304625].

BackgroundAfatinib is a potent, irreversible second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor which has demonstrated efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring either common or uncommon EGFR mutations. However, data on its activity against brain metastases are limited. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of afatinib as first-line treatment for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases.MethodsTreatment-naive advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations and brain metastases treated with afatinib were retrospectively reviewed to assess the central nervous system (CNS) efficacy and also the systematic benefits.ResultsTotally 43 patients with measurable or non-measurable brain metastases were enrolled in the CNS full analysis (cFAS) set. Among them, 23 patients with measurable brain metastases were included in the CNS evaluable for response (cEFR) set. The CNS ORR was 48.8% (95% CI, 33.3 - 64.5%) in the cFAS set and 82.6% (95% CI, 61.2 - 95.0%) in the cEFR set, respectively. CNS mDoR was 8.9 months (95% CI, 4.7 - 13.1 months) and CNS mPFS was 12.7 months (95% CI, 6.9 - 18.5 months) in the cFAS set. In the subgroup analysis stratified by EGFR mutation types, CNS ORR of cEFR set in the common mutation cohort was 100% (95% CI, 75.3 - 100%) and 60% (95% CI, 26.2 - 87.8%) in the uncommon mutation cohort (p = 0.024); CNS ORR of cFAS set was 57.7% (95% CI, 36.9 - 76.6%) and 35.3% (95% CI, 14.2 - 61.7%), respectively (p = 0.151). CNS mPFS was 14.4 months in patients with common mutations and 6.1 months in patients with uncommon mutations (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.22 - 1.00; p = 0.045). Patients with common mutations showed a significantly lower cumulative incidence of CNS failure than uncommon mutation cohort (p = 0.0026). Most of patients experienced grade 1/2 treatment-related adverse events.ConclusionsFirst-line afatinib demonstrated encouraging efficacy on brain metastases in NSCLC patients harboring either common or major uncommon EGFR mutations in a real-world setting, with manageable toxicities. Patients with common mutations showed better CNS outcomes than those with uncommon mutations.

Prevalent copy number alteration is the most prominent genetic characteristic associated with ovarian cancer (OV) development, but its role in immune evasion has not been fully elucidated. In this study, we identified RAD21, a key component of the cohesin complex, as a frequently amplified oncogene that could modulate immune response in OV. Through interrogating the RAD21-regulated transcriptional program, we found that RAD21 directly interacts with YAP/TEAD4 transcriptional corepressors and recruits the NuRD complex to suppress interferon (IFN) signaling. In multiple clinical cohorts, RAD21 overexpression is inversely correlated with IFN signature gene expression in OV. We further demonstrated in murine syngeneic tumor models that RAD21 ablation potentiated anti–PD-1 efficacy with increased intratumoral CD8+ T cell effector activity. Our study identifies a RAD21–YAP/TEAD4–NuRD corepressor complex in immune modulation, and thus provides a potential target and biomarker for precision immunotherapy in OV.

Background: Afatinib is a potent, irreversible second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor which has demonstrated efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring either common or uncommon EGFR mutations. However, data on its activity against brain metastases are limited. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of afatinib as first-line treatment for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases. Methods: Treatment-naive advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations and brain metastases treated with afatinib were retrospectively reviewed to assess the central nervous system (CNS) efficacy and also the systematic benefits. Results: Totally 43 patients with measurable or non-measurable brain metastases were enrolled in the CNS full analysis (cFAS) set. Among them, 23 patients with measurable brain metastases were included in the CNS evaluable for response (cEFR) set. The CNSORR was 48.8% (95% CI, 33.3 - 64.5%) in the cFAS set and 82.6% (95% CI, 61.2 - 95.0%) in the cEFR set, respectively. CNS mDoR was 8.9 months (95% CI, 4.7 - 13.1 months) and CNS mPFS was 12.7 months (95% CI, 6.9 - 18.5 months) in the cFAS set. In the subgroup analysis stratified by EGFR mutation types, CNSORR of cEFR set in the commonmutation cohortwas 100% (95% CI, 75.3 - 100%) and 60% (95% CI, 26.2 - 87.8%) in the uncommon mutation cohort (p = 0.024); CNS ORR of cFAS set was 57.7% (95% CI, 36.9 - 76.6%) and 35.3% (95% CI, 14.2 - 61.7%), respectively (p = 0.151). CNS mPFS was 14.4 months in patients with common mutations and 6.1 months in patients with uncommonmutations (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.22 - 1.00; p=0.045). Patients with common mutations showed a significantly lower cumulative incidence of CNS failure than uncommon mutation cohort (p = 0.0026). Most of patients experienced grade 1/2 treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions: First-line afatinib demonstrated encouraging efficacy on brain metastases in NSCLC patients harboring either common or major uncommon EGFR mutations in a real-world setting, with manageable toxicities. Patients with common mutations showed better CNS outcomes than those with uncommon mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]