1. Shared decision-making performance of general practice residents: an observational study combining observer, resident, and patient perspectives
- Author
-
Baghus, A., Giroldi, E., Geel, J. van, Leferink, A., Pol, M.H.J. van de, Sanders, A., Dielissen, P.W., Bisschop, I., Pieterse, A.H., Muris, J.W., Timmerman, A.A., Weijden, T.T. van der, Baghus, A., Giroldi, E., Geel, J. van, Leferink, A., Pol, M.H.J. van de, Sanders, A., Dielissen, P.W., Bisschop, I., Pieterse, A.H., Muris, J.W., Timmerman, A.A., and Weijden, T.T. van der
- Abstract
Contains fulltext : 305029.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is considered fundamental to person-centred care. However, applying SDM may be a challenge for residents in general practice, since it is a complex competence that requires the integration of knowledge and skills from several competency domains. OBJECTIVE: To support learning of SDM during medical residency, we aimed to gain insight in Dutch residents' observed and perceived SDM performance in general practice. METHODS: We evaluated residents' SDM performance from an observer, resident, and patient perspective. Consultations of first- and third-year residents were recorded. Trained observers used the validated Observing Patient Involvement (OPTION5) scale to assess observed SDM performance of residents in 98 actual recorded consultations. Perceived SDM performance was evaluated by residents and patients completing validated SDM questionnaires, supplemented with questions about (the context of) the consultation and perceived relevance of SDM immediately after the consultation. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics (mean, SD, minimums, and maximums) and explorative bivariate analyses. RESULTS: The residents' observed mean SDM performance was 19.1 (range, 0-100, SD = 10.9), mean resident self-reported SDM performance was 56.9 (range, 0-100, SD = 18.5), and mean patient-reported SDM performance was 73.3 (range, 0-100, SD = 26.8). We found a significant and positive correlation between observed SDM performance and residents' perceived relevance of SDM for the consultation (t = 4.571, P ≤ 0.001) and the duration of the consultation (r = 0.390, P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that there is room for increasing awareness of the potential incongruence between observed and perceived SDM performance during medical residency, in order to facilitate the implementation of SDM in clinical practice. THE PROBLEM: Shared decision making is an important process in which healthcare professional and patient work together t
- Published
- 2024