Search

The objective of this study was to report acute changes in patient-reported quality of life (PRQOL) using the 26-item Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire in a prospective study using hypofractionated intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (H-IMPT) targeting the prostate and the pelvic lymph nodes for high-risk or unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer.Fifty-five patients were enrolled. H-IMPT consisted of 45 GyE to the pelvic lymph nodes and 67.5 GyE to the prostate and seminal vesicles in 25 fractions. PRQOL was assessed with the urinary incontinence (UI), urinary irritative/obstructive symptoms (UO), and bowel function (BF) domains of EPIC-26 questionnaire. Mean changes in domain scores were analyzed from pretreatment to the end of treatment and 3 months posttreatment. A clinically meaningful change (or minimum important change) was defined as a score change 50% of the baseline standard deviation.The mean scores of UO, UI, and BF at baseline were 84.6, 91.1, and 95.3, respectively. At the end of treatment, there were statistically significant and clinically meaningful declines in UO and BF scores (-13.5 and -2.3, respectively), while the decline in UI score was statistically significant but not clinically meaningful (-13.7). A clinically meaningful decline in UO, UI, and BF scores occurred in 53.5%, 22.7%, and 73.2% of the patients, respectively. At 3 months posttreatment, all three mean scores showed an improvement, with fewer patients having a clinically meaningful decline in UO, UI, and BF scores (18.4%, 20.5%, and 45.0%, respectively). There was no significant reduction in the mean UO and UI scores compared to baseline, although the mean BF score remained lower than baseline and the difference was clinically meaningful.UO, UI, and BF scores of PRQOL declined at the end of H-IMPT. UO and UI scores showed improvement at 3 months posttreatment and were similar to the baseline scores. However, BF score remained lower at 3 months posttreatment with a clinically meaningful decline.

Supplementary Data from Molecular Profile Changes in Patients with Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer Pre- and Post-Abiraterone/Prednisone Treatment

Supplementary Figure from Molecular Profile Changes in Patients with Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer Pre- and Post-Abiraterone/Prednisone Treatment

We identified resistance mechanisms to abiraterone acetate/prednisone (AA/P) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the Prostate Cancer Medically Optimized Genome-Enhanced Therapy (PROMOTE) study.We analyzed whole-exome sequencing (WES) and RNA-sequencing data from 83 patients with metastatic biopsies before (V1) and after 12 weeks of AA/P treatment (V2). Resistance was determined by time to treatment change (TTTC).At V2, 18 and 11 of 58 patients had either short-term (median 3.6 months; range 1.4–4.5) or long-term (median 29 months; range 23.5–41.7) responses, respectively. Nonresponders had low expression of TGFBR3 and increased activation of the Wnt pathway, cell cycle, upregulation of AR variants, both pre- and posttreatment, with further deletion of AR inhibitor CDK11B posttreatment. Deletion of androgen processing genes, HSD17B11, CYP19A1 were observed in nonresponders posttreatment. Genes involved in cell cycle, DNA repair, Wnt-signaling, and Aurora kinase pathways were differentially expressed between the responder and non-responder at V2. Activation of Wnt signaling in nonresponder and deactivation of MYC or its target genes in responders was detected via SCN loss, somatic mutations, and transcriptomics. Upregulation of genes in the AURKA pathway are consistent with the activation of MYC regulated genes in nonresponders. Several genes in the AKT1 axis had increased mutation rate in nonresponders. We also found evidence of resistance via PDCD1 overexpression in responders.Implications:Finally, we identified candidates drugs to reverse AA/P resistance: topoisomerase inhibitors and drugs targeting the cell cycle via the MYC/AURKA/AURKB/TOP2A and/or PI3K_AKT_MTOR pathways.

Purpose: Androgen receptor (AR) variant AR-V7 is a ligand-independent transcription factor that promotes prostate cancer resistance to AR-targeted therapies. Accordingly, efforts are under way to develop strategies for monitoring and inhibiting AR-V7 in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The purpose of this study was to understand whether other AR variants may be coexpressed with AR-V7 and promote resistance to AR-targeted therapies.Experimental Design: We utilized complementary short- and long-read sequencing of intact AR mRNA isoforms to characterize AR expression in CRPC models. Coexpression of AR-V7 and AR-V9 mRNA in CRPC metastases and circulating tumor cells was assessed by RNA-seq and RT-PCR, respectively. Expression of AR-V9 protein in CRPC models was evaluated with polyclonal antisera. Multivariate analysis was performed to test whether AR variant mRNA expression in metastatic tissues was associated with a 12-week progression-free survival endpoint in a prospective clinical trial of 78 CRPC-stage patients initiating therapy with the androgen synthesis inhibitor, abiraterone acetate.Results: AR-V9 was frequently coexpressed with AR-V7. Both AR variant species were found to share a common 3′ terminal cryptic exon, which rendered AR-V9 susceptible to experimental manipulations that were previously thought to target AR-V7 uniquely. AR-V9 promoted ligand-independent growth of prostate cancer cells. High AR-V9 mRNA expression in CRPC metastases was predictive of primary resistance to abiraterone acetate (HR = 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.31–12.2; P = 0.02).Conclusions: AR-V9 may be an important component of therapeutic resistance in CRPC. Clin Cancer Res; 23(16); 4704–15. ©2017 AACR.

Supplementary Table 1: Baseline Characteristics of the Patients; Supplementary Table 2: Baseline RNA-seq Expression Levels for AR/ARVs (spliced reads per million); Supplementary Table 3: TaqMan Gene Expression Assays with Circulating Tumor Cells; Supplementary Figure 1: Actinomycin D responses of AR-V9 and AR-V7 mRNA in 22Rv1 cells; Supplementary Figure 2: 3’ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) for single molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing; Supplementary Figure 3: Purified AR-V9 polyclonal antibodies detect overexpressed AR-V9 in western blot with overexpressed AR-V9; Supplementary Figure 4: Relationship between tumor RNA p13 purity, AR-V7, and AR-V9 expression levels in CRPC metastases.

PURPOSE Enzalutamide and abiraterone both target androgen receptor signaling but via different mechanisms. The mechanism of action of one drug may counteract the resistance pathways of the other. We sought to determine whether the addition of abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) to enzalutamide prolongs overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the first-line setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS Men with untreated mCRPC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive first-line enzalutamide with or without AAP. The primary end point was OS. Toxicity, prostate-specific antigen declines, pharmacokinetics, and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) were also examined. Data were analyzed using an intent-to-treat approach. The Kaplan-Meier estimate and the stratified log-rank statistic were used to compare OS between treatments. RESULTS In total, 1,311 patients were randomly assigned: 657 to enzalutamide and 654 to enzalutamide plus AAP. OS was not statistically different between the two arms (median, 32.7 [95% CI, 30.5 to 35.4] months for enzalutamide v 34.2 [95% CI, 31.4 to 37.3] months for enzalutamide and AAP; hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; one-sided P = .03; boundary nominal significance level = .02). rPFS was longer in the combination arm (median rPFS, 21.3 [95% CI, 19.4 to 22.9] months for enzalutamide v 24.3 [95% CI, 22.3 to 26.7] months for enzalutamide and AAP; HR, 0.86; two-sided P = .02). However, pharmacokinetic clearance of abiraterone was 2.2- to 2.9-fold higher when administered with enzalutamide, compared with clearance values for abiraterone alone. CONCLUSION The addition of AAP to enzalutamide for first-line treatment of mCRPC was not associated with a statistically significant benefit in OS. Drug-drug interactions between the two agents resulting in increased abiraterone clearance may partly account for this result, although these interactions did not prevent the combination regimen from having more nonhematologic toxicity.

Background: The importance of the antitumor immune response in TNBC is well established. TNBC with higher TILs are less likely to recur and more responsive to systemic therapy. Likewise, PD-L1+ TNBC are more likely to benefit from chemoimmunotherapy. However, TNBC is highly heterogeneous. Of the TNBC molecular subtypes, LAR TNBC is less sensitive to systemic therapy, has lower TILs and lower rates of PD-L1 positivity. The role of other immune related proteins in LAR TNBC is not well established. Here, we evaluated differentially expressed (DE) immune related proteins in the stromal and intratumoral compartments of LAR vs non-LAR TNBC tumors. Methods: We used the Nanostring GeoMX DSP platform to quantitate 58 proteins within spatially distinct intraepithelial, cytokeratin (CK)-positive tumor segments and adjacent CK-negative/nuclei-positive stromal segments in 248 TNBC tumors included in a tissue microarray generated from a cohort of pts with centrally confirmed TNBC who underwent breast surgery without prior neoadjuvant therapy. A subset (n=111) underwent bulk tumor RNA sequencing and were classified as LAR or non-LAR TNBC. DE proteins were identified using a negative binomial generalized linear model (SNR>2, p Citation Format: Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Jodi M. Carter, David M. Zahrieh, David W. Hillman, Saranya Chumsri, Yaohua Ma, Jennifer M. Kachergus, Xue Wang, Judy C. Boughey, Minetta C. Liu, James N. Ingle, Krishna R. Kalari, Jose C. Villasboas Bisneto, Fergus J. Couch, E. Aubrey Thompson, Matthew P. Goetz. Digital spatial profiling of immune-related proteins in luminal androgen receptor (LAR) vs non-LAR triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-04-01.

Neutron-induced cross sections represent the main nuclear input to models of stellar and Big-Bang nucleosynthesis. While (n,γ) reactions are relevant for the formation of elements heavier than iron, (n,p) and (n,α) reactions can play an important role in specific cases. The time-of-flight method is routinely used at n_TOF to experimentally determine the cross section data. In addition, recent upgrades of the facility will allow the use of activation techniques as well, possibly opening the way to a systematic study of neutron interaction with radioactive isotopes. In the last 20 years n_TOF has provided a large amount of experimental data for Nuclear Astrophysics. Our plan is to carry on challenging measurements and produce nuclear data in the next decades as well.

Highlights • Acute patient-reported outcomes were compared with investigator-reported outcomes. • We identified low agreement between IR-CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE for prostate cancer. • Physicians underestimated the frequency and severity of GU symptoms and diarrhea. • The end of treatment was a key timepoint showing high levels of discordance., Purpose We report acute patient-reported outcomes using CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE) of proton beam radiotherapy for high-risk or unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer in a prospective clinical trial. PRO-CTCAE were correlated with investigator reported-CTCAE (IR-CTCAE) to assess the degree of concordance. Methods and materials 11 PRO-CTCAE questions assessed gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), or erectile function side effects. The correlation scheme between PRO-CTCAE and IR-CTCAE was independently developed by two physicians. Analyses of PRO-CTCAE and IR-CTCAE were conducted using both descriptive terms and the converted grade scores. The Kappa statistic described the degree of concordance. Results 55 patients were included. IR-CTCAE underestimated diarrhea compared to PRO-CTCAE at the end of treatment (EOT), with a 28% rate of underestimation (11% by ≥ 2 toxicity grades). Similarly, urinary tract pain was underestimated in 45% of cases (17% by ≥ 2 grades) at EOT. Differences were less pronounced at baseline or 3 months after radiotherapy. The incidence of urinary urgency and frequency tended to be overestimated prior to treatment (36% and 24%, respectively) but underestimated at EOT (35% and 31%, respectively). The degree of interference with daily activities was consistently overestimated by investigators (45%-85%). Finally, erectile dysfunction showed a 36–56% rate of discordance by ≥ 2 toxicity grades. Conclusions Our study shows a low agreement between IR-CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE in the setting of proton therapy for prostate cancer. Compared to patient-reported outcomes, physicians underestimated the frequency and severity of urinary symptoms and diarrhea at the end of treatment. Continued use of PROs should be strongly encouraged.

To evaluate late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity of moderately hypofractionated intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) targeting the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes.A target accrual of 56 patients with high-risk or unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer were enrolled into a prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02874014) of moderately hypofractionated IMPT. IMPT with pencil beam scanning was used to deliver 6750 and 4500 cGy relative biological effectiveness in 25 daily fractions simultaneously to the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes, respectively. All received androgen deprivation therapy. Late GI and GU toxicity was prospectively assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0, at baseline, weekly during radiation therapy, 3-month postradiation therapy, and then every 6 months. Actuarial rates of late GI and GU toxicity were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.Median age was 75.5 years. Fifty-four patients were available for late toxicity evaluation. Median follow-up was 43.9 months (range, 16-66). The actuarial rate of late grade ≥2 GI toxicity at both 2 and 3 years was 7.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2%-14.2%). The actuarial rate of late grade 3 GI toxicity at both 2 and 3 years was 1.9% (95% CI, 0%-5.4%). One patient experienced grade 3 GI toxicity with proctitis. The actuarial rate of late grade ≥2 GU toxicity was 20.5% (95% CI, 8.9%-30.6%) at 2 years, and 29.2 % (95% CI, 15.5%-40.7%) at 3 years. None had grade 3 GU toxicity. The presence of baseline GU symptoms was associated with a higher likelihood of experiencing late grade 2 GU toxicity.A moderately hypofractionated IMPT targeting the prostate and regional pelvic lymph nodes was generally well tolerated. Patients with pre-existing GU symptoms had a higher rate of late grade 2 GU toxicity. A phase 3 study is needed to assess any therapeutic gain of IMPT, in comparison with photon-based radiation therapy.

The authors examined how stability/change in working alliance predicted subsequent symptoms, and how stability/change in symptoms predicted subsequent alliance in a sample of 188 adult clients with 44 doctoral student therapists over the course of 893 eight-session time periods of individual psychodynamic psychotherapy. Clients completed the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR; HatcherGillaspy, 2006) after every session and the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ; Lambert et al., 1996) before intake and every eighth session. The authors used multilevel polynomial regression and response surface analyses to examine within-client effects. The authors found that change in the alliance across an eight-session period did not have an immediate temporal effect on symptoms, but when alliance was stable and stronger compared to other periods, subsequent symptoms were lower. Similarly, change in symptoms across an eight-session period did not have an immediate temporal effect on alliance, but when symptoms were stable and lower compared to other periods, subsequent alliance was stronger. These results suggest that sustained improvements in the alliance contribute to subsequent symptom improvements, and vice versa. The authors conclude that it is important to work to improve and maintain improvements in the working alliance and symptoms. Limitations and future directions are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

208 Background: In the Phase 3 PRESTO study, intensified androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with apalutamide (APA) with or without abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP), administered for a finite treatment period of 52 weeks, prolonged prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA PFS) in pts with high-risk biochemically relapsed prostate cancer (BRPC). We evaluated baseline factors associated with PSA PFS in this study. Methods: PRESTO is a randomized phase 3, open-label trial in pts with BRPC following radical prostatectomy (RP) and PSA doubling time (PSADT) ≤ 9 months (mo), without distant metastases on conventional imaging (NCT03009981). Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a finite 52-week treatment course with ADT, ADT + APA, or ADT + APA + AAP, stratified by PSADT (< 3 vs 3–9 mo), with post-treatment follow-up. Baseline factors associated with PSA PFS including Gleason sum at RP (6-7, 8, ≥ 9) were analyzed in a post hoc fashion. Results: 504 pts were randomized to ADT alone (N = 167), ADT + APA (N = 168) or ADT + APA + AAP (N = 169). Baseline patient characteristics including Gleason sum at diagnosis, serum PSA and PSADT at study entry, time interval from radical prostatectomy, and receipt of prior radiation (none, adjuvant, salvage) were well balanced across the three treatment arms. At the first planned interim analysis, both experimental arms significantly prolonged PSA PFS compared to the control arm (median 24.9 mo for ADT + APA vs 20.3 mo for ADT, HR = 0.52 (95% CI: 0.35–0.77); median 26.0 mo for ADT + APA + AAP vs 20.0 mo for ADT, HR = 0.48 (95% CI: 0.32–0.71)). Across the study cohort, Gleason sum ≥ 9 at diagnosis was associated with shorter PSA PFS (median 21.9 mo for Gleason ≥ 9 vs. 31.1 mo for Gleason 8 vs. 25.2 mo for Gleason 6-7, log-rank p-value = 0.0409). In addition, within each treatment arm, a shorter observed median PSA PFS was detected for patients with Gleason ≥ 9 prostate cancer. Serum PSA and PSADT at study entry, time from prior radical prostatectomy, and prior radiation were not associated with PSA PFS in the overall study cohort or in individual study arms. Conclusions: Gleason sum ≥ 9 prostate cancer at diagnosis was associated with shorter time to PSA progression following subsequent intensified ADT administered for a finite treatment interval in BRPC. Follow-up is ongoing to integrate genomic profiling of primary prostate cancer tissue with these results and validate with longer term endpoints including metastasis-free survival. Clinical trial information: NCT03009981 .

201 Background: Previous studies have evaluated peripheral whole blood mRNA to identify prognostic biomarkers in metastatic prostate cancer, with no consistent genes of prognostic significance between studies and sample collection done at various points of therapy. We aim to identify the prognostic value of 20 previously identified genes in patients mCRPC from a prospective clinical trial. Methods: Between June 2013 and August 2015, whole blood was prospectively collected in PAXgene RNA tubes from 92 men with mCRPC (NCT01953640). Gene expression from samples with RIN > 4.0 were quantified using a customized NanoString CodeSet of 20 candidate genes (C1QA, MCM2, STOM, GABARAPL2, R10K3, HMBS, TFDP1, CDKN1A, ITGAL, TMCC2, TERF2IP, MMP9, SNCA, TIMP1, SLC4A1, SELENBP1, TMEM66, SEMA4D, PROS1, CD22). The raw data from the nCounter Analysis system were normalized to the positive controls and log2 transformed. Univariable Cox proportional hazards models were performed on each target gene sufficiently above negative control (5 times the maximum value of the negative control) to evaluate associations with overall survival (OS). For each gene we considered a linear, quadratic, or categorical model with quantile cutpoints. Categorical models with cutpoints at the 25th percentile for the genes CD22, GABARAPL2, R10K3, and STOM were used as there was a nonlinear relationship between gene expression and death hazard. The remaining genes were modeled with a linear model. Findings were considered statistically significant based on p-values adjusted using the Holm-Bonferroni correction. Results: 18/20 genes were identified and passed quality control (QC) measures, which excluded C1QA and MCM2. 72/92 men had an evaluable pretreatment specimen that passed QC. The median age was 72 years. The study cohort was evenly balanced in terms of Gleason score ( < = 7 v. > 7) and 60% had high volume disease. The median follow-up time was 5.73 years (IQR: 5.39, 6.49) and 58 patients had died. Of the 18 genes evaluated, STOM (Stomatin) [hazard ratio (HR) 3.00, adjusted p = 0.007] and GABARAPL2 (GABA Type A Receptor Associated Protein Like 2) [HR 2.62, adjusted p = 0.033] were significantly associated with overall survival in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for volume of metastatic disease and Gleason score, STOM [HR 2.89, adjusted p = 0.014] was significantly associated with overall survival. Conclusions: Elevated whole blood mRNA expression of STOM is adversely associated with OS in mCRPC. Further studies investigating elucidating the molecular significance of STOM in mCRPC are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT01953640 .

The n_TOF neutron time-of-flight facility at CERN is used for nuclear data measurements. The n_TOF Collaboration works closely with the Nuclear Reaction Data Centres (NRDC) network to disseminate the experimental data through the international EXFOR library. In addition, the Collaboration helps integrate the results in the evaluated library projects. The present contribution describes the dissemination status of n_TOF results, their impact on evaluated libraries and ongoing efforts to provide n_TOF resonance parameters in ENDF-6 format for further use by evaluation projects.

TPS610 Background: Several studies demonstrated worsening disease-free survival in patients who failed to achieve complete pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), particularly in HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. Despite the recent approval of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with residual disease after NAC approximately 12% of patients still develop recurrent and metastatic disease. TPIV100 is a multi-epitope vaccine that includes a pool of 4 degenerate HER2-derived HLA-DR epitopes, which activate CD4 helper T cells, admixed with GM-CSF. In our previous phase I trial this vaccine was shown to be safe in combination with trastuzumab in stage II-III HER2+ breast cancer after completion of standard of care chemotherapy. Furthermore, this vaccine also generated robust long-lasting T-cell immune responses and antibody immunity against HER2. Methods: This trial is a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of TPIV100 in combination with T-DM1 in stage II-III HER2+ breast cancer patients with residual disease after NAC. This trial is currently opened through the ACCRU consortium. Eligible patients include those with stage II-III HER2+ with residual disease, in the breast and/or lymph nodes, after trastuzumab ± pertuzumab-based NAC, with ECOG PS ≤ 2 and adequate organ function. Patients with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%, history of trastuzumab-related cardiac toxicity, myocardial infarction or stroke < 6 months, history of congestive heart failure, autoimmune disease, immunocompromised patients with known HIV or those on chronic steroid, hypersensitivity to GM-CSF, and other active malignancy < 3 years are excluded. TPIV100 or placebo, in combination with GM-CSF, will be given concurrently with T-DM1. To ensure that TPIV100 in combination with T-DM1 is safe, there is a run-in phase with 20 patients treated with the combination. If there is no significant dose-limiting toxicity observed in the run-in phase, the trial will be expanded to the randomized phase II portion, which will include 240 patients. Eligible patients will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion with ER/PR as a stratification factor. The primary endpoint is invasive disease-free survival, and the secondary endpoint includes immunogenicity of TPIV100 as assessed by IFN-g ELIspot analysis. Correlative studies include assessment of helper T-cell response distribution (including Th1, Th2, Th17, Tfh), HER2-specific antibody immunity, and HLA genotype. Currently, 20 patients in the run-in phase have been enrolled. Enrollment to the randomized phase II portion is expected to begin in March 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04197687.