Search

Background: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) Profile Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) consists of seven CATs and one single item measuring most relevant aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of our study was to determine construct validity and floor and ceiling effects of the PROMIS Profile CAT in Dutch people with stroke., Methods: People with stroke receiving rehabilitation completed the PROMIS Profile CAT and the EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ5D). Construct validity was evaluated with hypotheses testing based on expected correlations between the profile domains and the domains of the EQ5D. The proportion of participants with the lowest and highest scores were calculated for each profile domain to assess floor and ceiling effects., Results: 160 participants were included (median age 61 years, 41.9% female). For the PROMIS Profile domains Physical Function, Anxiety, Depression, Sleep Disturbance, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity > 75% of the results met our hypotheses. For Fatigue and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities only 60% of hypotheses were met. No floor or ceiling effects were found, with the exception of a floor effect for Pain Intensity which probably indicates that many participants had no pain., Conclusion: Most domains of the PROMIS Profile CAT showed sufficient construct validity and no problematic floor or ceiling effects in people with stroke. These CATs and the single item Pain Intensity can be used to efficiently measure HRQoL in people with stroke.

Objective: The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index is an important outcome measure reflecting functional disability, but knowledge on its course over time in patients with systemic sclerosis is scarce. Therefore, we investigated the long-term course of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index and its association with baseline characteristics in systemic sclerosis patients., Methods: Systemic sclerosis patients, fulfilling the European League Against Rheumatism and the American College of Rheumatology 2013 criteria, were included from the Leiden Combined Care in Systemic Sclerosis cohort with annual assessments including the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (range = 0-3). The course of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index was evaluated over the total follow-up (baseline to last available Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index) and between yearly visits. Based on a minimal clinical important difference of 0.22, courses were categorized into worsening, stable or improvement. The course of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index over time was evaluated with linear mixed models. Baseline characteristics were compared between patients with a worsening or improvement of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index over the total follow-up period with logistic regression analyses., Results: A total of 517 systemic sclerosis patients were included, with a median follow-up of 7 years (interquartile range = 4-9; 2649 visits) and a baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index of 0.625 (interquartile range = 0.125-1.25). On group level, the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index is stable with an annual increase of 0.019 (95% confidence interval = 0.011 to 0.027). Looking at subgroups, patients >65 years or who died/were physically unable to come during follow-up had a worse mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index. In individual courses from baseline to the last follow-up, the proportions of patients with a clinically meaningful worsening, stable or improved Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index were 35%, 42% and 23%, respectively. Patients with immunosuppressants (odds ratio = 0.5, 95% confidence interval = 0.3 to 0.9) or gastrointestinal involvement (odds ratio = 0.6, 95% confidence interval = 0.4 to 0.9) at baseline showed a reduced chance of worsening of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index over the total follow-up period., Conclusion: Over time, the average course of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index was stable in systemic sclerosis patients. However, individual courses vary, with worsening occurring in one-third. Worsening occurred less often in individuals using immunosuppressants or with gastrointestinal involvement at baseline., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s) 2023.)

Introduction: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) developed a standard set of patient-centered outcome measures for use in stroke patients. In addition to the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health, it is comprised of 25 questions that are not part of a specific questionnaire. This study aimed to translate these 25 single questions into Dutch., Methods: Two native Dutch-speaking translators independently translated the original ICHOM questions into Dutch. A consensus translation was made by these translators and a third person. This translation was subsequently translated back to English independently by two native English-speaking translators. Afterwards a pre-final version was made by consensus of a committee. After field-testing among 30 stroke patients, a final version was made., Results: The forward and backward translations led to eight cross-cultural adaptations. Based on the interviews with stroke patients, 12 questions were changed to enhance comprehensibility leading to a final Dutch translation of the 25 single questions., Conclusions: A Dutch translation of the 25 single questions of the ICHOM Standard Set for Stroke was developed. Now a complete ICHOM Standard Set for Stroke can be used in Dutch populations allowing comparison and improvement of stroke care., (© 2023. International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL).)

Question: In people with knee osteoarthritis, how much more effective is stratified exercise therapy that distinguishes three subgroups (high muscle strength subgroup, low muscle strength subgroup, obesity subgroup) in reducing knee pain and improving physical function than usual exercise therapy?, Design: Pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial in a primary care setting., Participants: A total of 335 people with knee osteoarthritis: 153 in an experimental arm and 182 in a control arm., Intervention: Physiotherapy practices were randomised into an experimental arm providing stratified exercise therapy (supplemented by a dietary intervention from a dietician for the obesity subgroup) or a control arm providing usual, non-stratified exercise therapy., Outcome Measures: Primary outcomes were knee pain severity (numerical rating scale for pain, 0 to 10) and physical function (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscale activities of daily living, 0 to 100). Measurements were performed at baseline, 3 months (primary endpoint) and 6 and 12 months (follow-up). Intention-to-treat, multilevel, regression analysis was performed., Results: Negligible differences were found between the experimental and control groups in knee pain (mean adjusted difference 0.2, 95% CI -0.4 to 0.7) and physical function (-0.8, 95% CI -4.3 to 2.6) at 3 months. Similar effects between groups were also found for each subgroup separately, as well as at other time points and for nearly all secondary outcome measures., Conclusion: This pragmatic trial demonstrated no added value regarding clinical outcomes of the model of stratified exercise therapy compared with usual exercise therapy. This could be attributed to the experimental arm therapists facing difficulty in effectively applying the model (especially in the obesity subgroup) and to elements of stratified exercise therapy possibly being applied in the control arm., Registration: Netherlands National Trial Register NL7463., (Copyright © 2022 Australian Physiotherapy Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Persons with disabilities are at risk for unemployment with negative long-term consequences., Objective: This study aimed to explore the process and outcomes of a novel vocational rehabilitation (VR) program based on the concept of mentorship., Methods: Observational, retrospective study including unemployed young adults with acquired brain injury (ABI) taking part in a VR program including assessment, training, individual counselling and mentor support from volunteering professionals. Adherence to the program and work status were registered and at follow-up all patients were invited to complete a general questionnaire and EuroQol 5D., Results: 49 patients started the program, with 41 completing the follow-up. Median age was 31 years and 19 were male. Median duration of the program was 8 months. At follow-up, 9 patients had acquired paid employment, 7 with the support of a mentor; 6 of whom were bothered by health problems at work. Nine patients left the program prematurely, with insufficient financial support for continuation being the primary reason for withdrawal (n = 6)., Conclusions: A VR program including a mentor may be a promising program for patients who are unemployed at onset of ABI. Lack of financial support to complete the program and concurrent health problems were found to hamper the process and outcomes of the program, respectively.