Search

Objective This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of sustained uterine compression versus uterine massage in reducing blood loos after a vaginal delivery. Study Design This was a prospective randomized trial conducted at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC) between October 2015 and October 2017. Inclusion criteria were women with a singleton pregnancy at ≥36 weeks of gestation, with less than three previous deliveries, who were candidates for vaginal delivery. Participants were randomized into two groups, a sustained uterine compression group (group 1) and a uterine massage group (group 2). Incidence of postpartum hemorrhage (blood loss of ≥500 mL) was the primary outcome. We assumed that the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage at our institution is similar to previously published studies. A total of 545 women were required in each arm to detect a reduction from 9.6 to 4.8% in the primary outcome (50% reduction) with a one-sided α of 0.05 and a power of 80%. Factoring in a 10% dropout rate. Secondary outcomes were admission to intensive care unit (ICU), postpartum complications, drop in hemoglobin, duration of hospital stay, maternal pain, use of uterotonics, or of surgical procedure for postpartum hemorrhage. Results A total of 550 pregnant women were recruited, 273 in group 1 and 277 in group 2. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Type of anesthesia, rate of episiotomy, lacerations, and mean birth weight were also equal between the groups. Incidence of the primary outcome was not different between the two groups (group 1: 15.5%, group 2: 15.4%; p = 0.98). There was no statistically significant difference in any of the secondary outcomes between the two groups, including drop in hemoglobin (p = 0.79). Conclusion There was no difference in blood loss between sustained uterine compression and uterine massage after vaginal delivery. Key Points Transabdominal uterine compression and uterine massage are appropriate to prevent postpartum hemorrhage. No significant difference in blood loss or maternal discomfort observed between the two techniques. Both methods are equally effective and either one can be used based on provider preference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the practice patterns among Lebanese obstetricians regarding obstetric care of twins and to compare selected practice patterns between general obstetricians and maternal fetal medicine physicians. Questionnaires distributed during the annual meeting of the Lebanese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Questionnaires were returned by 69.2% of the 296 physicians approached. Ten percent had fellowship training in Maternal Fetal Medicine (MFM). Thirty-nine percent perform cervical length measurement at 20–24 weeks of gestation and 34% recommend vaginal progesterone in case of a short cervix. When comparing selected practice patterns between MFM & general obstetricians, MFM specialists were less likely to perform cervical cerclage in the first trimester (5.9% versus 49%, p =.001), more likely to offer prenatal screening for aneuploidy (66.6% vs 46.4%, p =.03), less likely to use vaginal progesterone in the second trimester in the case of a short cervix (42.1% vs 61.8%, p =.04), less likely to perform serial ultrasound exam in the third trimester to assess fetal growth (50% vs 78%, p =.005) and more likely to deliver monoamniotic twins at 32–34 weeks of gestation (55% vs 37%, p =.05). Because of the different background of the Lebanese physicians, MFM specialists are more likely to follow obstetric care guidelines in twin gestation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]